Cited by 103Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design

A Low-Power Programmable Neural Spike Detection Channel With Embedded Calibration and Data Compression

Open access
Rodriguez-Perez, Alberto, Ruiz-Amaya, Jesús, Delgado-Restituto, Manuel, Rodriguez-Vazquez, Ángel·2012·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems

Abstract

This paper reports a programmable 400 μm pitch neural spike recording channel, fabricated in a 130 nm standard CMOS technology, which implements amplification, filtering, digitization, analog spike detection plus feature extraction, and self-calibration functionalities. It can operate in two different output modes: 1) signal tracking, in which the neural signal is sampled and transmitted as raw data; and 2) feature extraction, in which the spikes of the neural signal are detected and encoded by piece-wise linear curves. Additionally, the channel offers a foreground calibration procedure in which the amplification gain and the passband of the embedded filter can be self-adjusted. The amplification stage obtains a noise efficiency factor of 2.16 and an input referred noise of 2.84 μVrms over a nominal bandwidth of 167 Hz-6.9 kHz. The channel includes a reconfigurable 8-bit analog-to-digital converter combined with a 3-bit controlled programmable gain amplifier for adjusting the input signal to the full scale range of the converter. This combined block achieves an overall energy consumption per conversion of 102 fJ at 90 kS/s. The energy consumed by the circuit elements which are strictly related to the digitization process is 14.12 fJ at the same conversion rate. The complete channel consumes 2.8 μW at 1.2 V voltage supply when operated in the signal tracking mode, and 3.1 μW when the feature extraction mode is enabled.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbcas.2012.2187352

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On-chip signal processing, including spike detection and other data compression, is an emerging trend aimed at reducing transmitted data.

    “Another emerging trend includes on-chip signal processing, such as spike detection [16, 54] or other forms of data compression [108, 132, 155] to reduce the amount of transmitted data.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29][29] S. Rai, J. Holleman, J. N. Pandey, F. Zhang, and B. Otis, 'A 500 uw neural tag with 2 uvrms afe and frequency-multiplying mics/ism fsk transmitter,' in Proc. IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conference-Dig. Tech. Papers , 2009, pp. 212-213, 213a. -
  2. [34][34] A. Agnes, E. Bonizzoni, P. Malcovati, and F. Maloberti, 'A 9.4-enob 1 v 3.8 uw 100 ks/s sar adc with time-domain comparator,' in Proc. IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf., Dig. Tech. Papers , 2008, pp. 246-610. -
  3. [39][39] C. Gabriel, S. Gabriel, and E. Corthout, 'The dielectric properties of biological tissues,' Phys. Med. Biol. , vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 2231-2293, 1996. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez-Perez, A., Ruiz-Amaya, J., Delgado-Restituto, M., & Rodriguez-Vazquez, Á.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
Published
2012-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
87-100
ISSN
  • 1932-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9990
OpenAlex
W2146216888
Cited by
103
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • idUS (Universidad de Sevilla) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Universidad de Sevilla
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
  • Junta de Andalucía
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Keywords
neural spike detection, low-power CMOS circuit, programmable gain amplifier, data compression, noise efficiency factor, input-referred noise, signal tracking
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Algorithms, Amplifiers, Electronic, Analog-Digital Conversion, Calibration, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Neurons, Neurophysiology, Electric Power Supplies, Data Compression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review