Cited by 90Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenetic diversity and population structure

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental conditions improving in‐solution target enrichment for ancient DNA

Abstract

High‐throughput sequencing has dramatically fostered ancient DNA research in recent years. Shotgun sequencing, however, does not necessarily appear as the best‐suited approach due to the extensive contamination of samples with exogenous environmental microbial DNA . DNA capture‐enrichment methods represent cost‐effective alternatives that increase the sequencing focus on the endogenous fraction, whether it is from mitochondrial or nuclear genomes, or parts thereof. Here, we explored experimental parameters that could impact the efficacy of MY baits in‐solution capture assays of ~5000 nuclear loci or the whole genome. We found that varying quantities of the starting probes had only moderate effect on capture outcomes. Starting DNA , probe tiling, the hybridization temperature and the proportion of endogenous DNA all affected the assay, however. Additionally, probe features such as their GC content, number of CpG dinucleotides, sequence complexity and entropy and self‐annealing properties need to be carefully addressed during the design stage of the capture assay. The experimental conditions and probe molecular features identified in this study will improve the recovery of genetic information extracted from degraded and ancient remains.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1755-0998.12595

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probe design must attend to base compositional and structural considerations to avoid biasing recovery of sequence variants.

    “However, probe design must attend to base compositional and structural considerations 159 to avoid biasing the recovery of sequence variants.”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [159]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1038/srep00074 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/2041-210X.12353 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/gb-2003-4-2-r9 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.1188046 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.002 · DOI
  7. 10.2144/000113809 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nmeth.2375 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/srep11184 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/mec.12690 · DOI
  11. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0387 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.032 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030377 · DOI
  14. 10.2144/000114114 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/molbev/msu074 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.015 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2990-0_13 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/1755-0998.12470 · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.1159750 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-177 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/342485a0 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/bies.201400160 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/ng.3475 · DOI
  24. 10.2144/000114320 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1093/sysbio/syw059 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1513696112 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.027 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1101/gr.120196.111 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/1755-0998.12466 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002451 · DOI
  32. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nature12323 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1038/nrg3935 · DOI
  35. 10.1098/rspb.2009.2019 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/1755-0998.12420 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1111/1755-0998.12249 · DOI
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129102 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1126/science.281.5375.402 · DOI
  41. R Core Team, 2016, R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  42. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043808 · DOI
  43. 10.1038/nprot.2014.063 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1073/pnas.1416991111 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/srep11826 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1179/2054892315Y.0000000005 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1371/journal.pone.0125344 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1093/nar/24.22.4501 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109101 · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.1141758 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1038/nature12921 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90713-7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cruz‐Dávalos, D. I., Llamas, B., Gaunitz, C., Fages, A., Gamba, C., Soubrier, J., Librado, P., Seguin‐Orlando, A., Pruvost, M., Alfarhan, A. H., Alquraishi, S. A., Al‐Rasheid, K. A. S., Scheu, A., Beneke, N., Ludwig, A., Cooper, A., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L.
Affiliations
  • Centre for GeoGenetics Natural History Museum of Denmark University of Copenhagen Øster Voldgade 5‐7 1350K Copenhagen Denmark
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Naturwissenschaftliches Referat an der Zentrale Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Im Dol 2‐6 14195 Berlin Germany
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Orlando, Ludovic
Venue
Molecular Ecology Resources
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09-18
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
508-522
ISSN
  • 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-0998
OpenAlex
W2517291540
Cited by
90
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Ecology Resources (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natur og Univers, Det Frie Forskningsråd (4002‐00152B)
  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (DNRF94)
  • King Saud University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
Keywords
ancient DNA, DNA capture, probe design, hybridization temperature, GC content, CpG, self-annealing, degraded DNA
MeSH terms
DNA, Ancient, Base Composition, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, DNA Probes, Sequence Analysis, DNA, CpG Islands, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review