Cited by 214Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

MNB/DYRK1A as a multiple regulator of neuronal development

Tejedor, Francisco J., Hämmerle, Barbara·2011·The FEBS Journal

Abstract

MNB/DYRK1A is a member of the dual‐specificity tyrosine phosphorylation‐regulated kinase (DYRK) family that has been strongly conserved across evolution. There are substantial data implicating MNB/DYRK1A in brain development and adult brain function, as well as in neurodegeneration and Down syndrome pathologies. Here we review our current understanding of the neurodevelopmental activity of MNB/DYRK1A. We discuss how MNB/DYRK1A fulfils several sequential roles in neuronal development and the molecular mechanisms possibly underlying these functions. We also summarize the evidence behind the hypotheses to explain how the imbalance in MNB/DYRK1A gene dosage might be implicated in the neurodevelopmental alterations associated with Down syndrome. Finally, we highlight some research directions that may help to clarify the mechanisms and functions of MNB/DYRK1A signalling in the developing brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07954.x

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tejedor, F. J., & Hämmerle, B.
Affiliations
Instituto de Neurociencias (ES)
Venue
The FEBS Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-13
Volume
278
Issue
2
Pages
223-235
ISSN
  • 1742-464X (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-4658
OpenAlex
W1504060840
Cited by
214
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEBS Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
DYRK kinases, neuronal development, brain development, Down syndrome, gene dosage imbalance, neurodevelopmental disorders, neurodegeneration, kinase signaling
MeSH terms
Dyrk Kinases, Animals, Down Syndrome, Humans, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review