Cited by 2,304Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatiguePlant Molecular Biology Research

A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: Implications for biology and medicine

Open access
Zhang, Ray, Lahens, Nicholas F., Ballance, Heather I., Hughes, Michael E., Hogenesch, John B.·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: We generated high-resolution multiorgan expression data showing that nearly half of all genes in the mouse genome oscillate with circadian rhythm somewhere in the body. Such widespread transcriptional oscillations have not been previously reported in mammals. Applying pathway analysis, we observed new clock-mediated spatiotemporal relationships. Moreover, we found a majority of best-selling drugs in the United States target circadian gene products. Many of these drugs have relatively short half-lives, and our data predict which may benefit from timed dosing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1408886111

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, R., Lahens, N. F., Ballance, H. I., Hughes, M. E., & Hogenesch, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-10-27
Volume
111
Issue
45
Pages
16219-16224
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2133918896
Cited by
2,304
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 168 · 2025: 209 · 2024: 225 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 224 · 2021: 258 · 2020: 266 · 2019: 201 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 120 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
60.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pennsylvania Department of Health
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 097800, R01HL097800, T32 5T32HL007953-13, T32HL007953)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG000046)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS054794)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES013508)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
circadian clock, circadian gene expression, clock genes, drug timing, chronotherapy, elimination half-life, mouse transcriptome
MeSH terms
Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Chronotherapy, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Mice, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review