Cited by 599Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Use of probiotic Lactobacillus preparation to prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial

Open access
Hickson, Mary, D'Souza, Aloysius L, Muthu, Nirmala, Rogers, Thomas R, Want, Susan, Rajkumar, Chakravarthi, Bulpitt, Christopher J·2007·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of a probiotic drink containing Lactobacillus for the prevention of any diarrhoea associated with antibiotic use and that caused by Clostridium difficile. DESIGN: Randomised double blind placebo controlled study. PARTICIPANTS: 135 hospital patients (mean age 74) taking antibiotics. Exclusions included diarrhoea on admission, bowel pathology that could result in diarrhoea, antibiotic use in the previous four weeks, severe illness, immunosuppression, bowel surgery, artificial heart valves, and history of rheumatic heart disease or infective endocarditis. INTERVENTION: Consumption of a 100 g (97 ml) drink containing Lactobacillus casei, L bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus twice a day during a course of antibiotics and for one week after the course finished. The placebo group received a longlife sterile milkshake. PRIMARY OUTCOME: occurrence of antibiotic associated diarrhoea. Secondary outcome: presence of C difficile toxin and diarrhoea. RESULTS: 7/57 (12%) of the probiotic group developed diarrhoea associated with antibiotic use compared with 19/56 (34%) in the placebo group (P=0.007). Logistic regression to control for other factors gave an odds ratio 0.25 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.85) for use of the probiotic, with low albumin and sodium also increasing the risk of diarrhoea. The absolute risk reduction was 21.6% (6.6% to 36.6%), and the number needed to treat was 5 (3 to 15). No one in the probiotic group and 9/53 (17%) in the placebo group had diarrhoea caused by C difficile (P=0.001). The absolute risk reduction was 17% (7% to 27%), and the number needed to treat was 6 (4 to 14). CONCLUSION: Consumption of a probiotic drink containing L casei, L bulgaricus, and S thermophilus can reduce the incidence of antibiotic associated diarrhoea and C difficile associated diarrhoea. This has the potential to decrease morbidity, healthcare costs, and mortality if used routinely in patients aged over 50. TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Research Register N0016106821.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39231.599815.55

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Leplingard A, Oozeer R, Michelin R, Mogenet A, Seksek I, Diop L, et al. Persistence of living Lactobacillus casei in human stools after regular ingestion of fermented milk. 9th European Nutrition Conference. Rome: Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS), Italian Nutrition Society (SINU), 2003.
  2. Black FT, Anderson PL, Orskov J, Gaarslev K, Lauland S. Prophylactic efficacy of Lactobacilli on traveller's diarrhoea. Travel Medicine 1989;7:333-5.
  3. Guarner F, Schaafsma GJ. Probiotics. Int J Food Microbiol 1998;39:237-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickson, M., D'Souza, A. L., Muthu, N., Rogers, T. R., Want, S., Rajkumar, C., & Bulpitt, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Hillingdon Hospital (GB)
  • Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hickson, Mary
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-06-29
Volume
335
Issue
7610
Pages
80
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2152575922
Cited by
599
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 52
FWCI
96.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
probiotics, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, probiotic beverages, Clostridium difficile toxin, hospitalized older adults, diarrhea prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Toxins, Diarrhea, Double-Blind Method, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Lactobacillus, Male, Treatment Refusal, Clostridioides difficile, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review