Cited by 60Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Personalized dietary management of overweight and obesity based on measures of insulin and glucose

Open access
Hjorth, Mads F., Zohar, Yishai, Hill, James O., Astrup, Arne·2018·Annual Review of Nutrition

Abstract

During the past several decades, numerous trials have compared various diets for the management of overweight and obesity, assuming that a single dietary strategy would be appropriate for all individuals. These studies have failed to provide strong evidence for the efficacy of any particular diet, and it is likely that different people will have different levels of success on different diets. We identified studies investigating pretreatment glycemia or insulinemia status, or both, of the individual as prognostic markers of weight loss during periods in which the composition of a participant's diet was known. Overall, research suggests that providing specific diets for weight management based on pretreatment glycemia and insulinemia statuses holds great promise for advancing personalized nutrition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082117-051606

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with high insulin secretion or other abnormalities of glucose homeostasis appear especially susceptible to adverse metabolic responses and weight gain when consuming a high-GL diet.

    “Furthermore, studies suggest a unique diet–phenotype interaction, in that individuals with high insulin secretion or other abnormalities of glucose homeostasis appear especially susceptible to adverse metabolic responses and weight gain when consuming a high-GL diet (96, 105–110).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hjorth, M. F., Zohar, Y., Hill, J. O., & Astrup, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Gelesis, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Nutrition
Published
2018-08-21
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
245-272
ISSN
  • 0199-9885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4312
OpenAlex
W2807614902
Cited by
60
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Annual Review of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK056336, P30DK079626)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
personalized nutrition, obesity, overweight, weight loss, insulin levels, glycemia, dietary intervention, diet selection, prognostic factors, diet composition
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Weight Loss, Overweight, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review