Cited by 123Child Abuse and TraumaEpigenetics and DNA MethylationStress Responses and Cortisol

Differential Methylation of Genes in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex of Developing and Adult Rats Following Exposure to Maltreatment or Nurturing Care During Infancy

Open access
Blaze, Jennifer, Scheuing, Lisa, Roth, Tania L.·2013·Developmental Neuroscience

Abstract

Quality of maternal care in infancy is an important contributing factor in the development of behavior and psychopathology. One way maternal care could affect behavioral trajectories is through environmentally induced epigenetic alterations within brain regions known to play prominent roles in cognition, emotion regulation, and stress responsivity. Whereas such research has largely focused on the hippocampus or hypothalamus, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) has only just begun to receive attention. The current study was designed to determine whether exposure to maltreatment or nurturing care is associated with differential methylation of candidate gene loci (bdnf and reelin) within the medial PFC (mPFC) of developing and adult rats. Using a within-litter design, infant male and female rats were exposed to an adverse or nurturing caregiving environment outside their home cage for 30 min per day during the first postnatal week. Additional littermates remained with their biological caregiver within the home cage during the manipulations. We observed that infant rats subjected to caregiver maltreatment emitted more audible and ultrasonic vocalizations than littermates subjected to nurturing care either within or outside of the home cage. While we found no maltreatment-induced changes in bdnf DNA methylation present in infancy, sex-specific alterations were present in the mPFC of adolescents and adults that had been exposed to maltreatment. Furthermore, while maltreated females showed differences in reelin DNA methylation that were transient, males exposed to maltreatment and both males and females exposed to nurturing care outside the home cage showed differences in reelin methylation that emerged by adulthood. Our results demonstrate the ability of infant-caregiver interactions to epigenetically mark genes known to play a prominent role in cognition and psychiatric disorders within the mPFC. Furthermore, our data indicate the remarkable complexity of alterations that can occur, with both transient and later emerging DNA methylation differences that could shape developmental trajectories and underlie gender differences in outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000350716

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the PFC of female rats exposed to neonatal caregiver maltreatment, Bdnf exon IV methylation was reduced at adolescence compared to normal care controls, increased at adulthood, and did not differ at infancy.

    “one study found that in the PFC of female rats exposed to neonatal caregiver maltreatment, there was reduced Bdnf exon IV methylation at adolescence compared to normal care controls, but an increase at adulthood, and no differences at infancy [101].”
  • Epigenetic modifications detected in temporal proximity to environmental factors are not always the same as the ones detected later.

    “Epigenetic modifications detected in temporal proximity to environmental factors are not always the same as the ones detected later.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blaze, J., Scheuing, L., & Roth, T. L.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Venue
Developmental Neuroscience
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
306-316
ISSN
  • 0378-5866 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9859
OpenAlex
W2031067009
Cited by
123
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6
FWCI
16.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • University of Delaware Research Foundation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103653)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
DNA methylation, medial prefrontal cortex, infant maltreatment, nurturing care, maternal care, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, reelin, sex differences, ultrasonic vocalizations, caregiver-infant interaction, epigenetic programming, postnatal development, rats
MeSH terms
Reelin Protein, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Behavior, Animal, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Humans, Male, Maternal Behavior, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuronal Plasticity, Pregnancy, Serine Endopeptidases, Sex Characteristics, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal, Gene Expression, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Prefrontal Cortex, DNA Methylation, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Rats, Long-Evans, Epigenesis, Genetic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review