Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 549

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Resistance Training on Blood Pressure and Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

Cornelissen, Véronique A., Fagard, Robert H., Coeckelberghs, Ellen, Vanhees, Luc·2011·Hypertension
DOI 10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.177071
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We reviewed the effect of resistance training on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults. Randomized, controlled trials lasting ≥4 weeks investigating the effects of resistance training on blood pressure in healthy adults (age ≥18 years) and published in a peer-reviewed journal up to June 2010 were included. Random- and fixed-effects models were used for analyses, with data reported as weighted means and 95% confidence limits. We included 28 randomized, controlled trials, involving 33 study groups and 1012 participants. Overall, resistance training induced a significant blood pressure reduction in 28 normotensive or prehypertensive study groups [−3.9 (−6.4; −1.2)/−3.9 (−5.6; −2.2) mm Hg], whereas the reduction [−4.1 (−0.63; +1.4)/−1.5 (−3.4; +0.40) mm Hg] was not significant for the 5 hypertensive study groups. When study groups were divided according to the mode of training, isometric handgrip training in 3 groups resulted in a larger decrease in blood pressure [−13.5 (−16.5; −10.5)/−6.1(−8.3; −3.9) mm Hg] than dynamic resistance training in 30 groups [−2.8 (−4.3; −1.3)/−2.7 (−3.8; −1.7) mm Hg]. After dynamic resistance training, V o 2 peak increased by 10.6% ( P =0.01), whereas body fat and plasma triglycerides decreased by 0.6% ( P <0.01) and 0.11 mmol/L ( P <0.05), respectively. No significant effect could be observed on other blood lipids and fasting blood glucose. This meta-analysis supports the blood pressure–lowering potential of dynamic resistance training and isometric handgrip training. In addition, dynamic resistance training also favorably affects some other cardiovascular risk factors. Our results further suggest that isometric handgrip training may be more effective for reducing blood pressure than dynamic resistance training. However, given the small amount of isometric studies available, additional studies are warranted to confirm this finding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.177071

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn018 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3281fc975a · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.584060 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1097/00004872-200502000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2337/diacare.46.10.1594 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/S0895-7061(97)00327-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1001/jama.1986.03380200061022 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90054-Q · DOI · Paper page
  10. Higgins JPT, Green SLN: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration: 2008;volume 5.0.1.
  11. 10.1249/00005768-198706000-00011 · DOI
  12. Cononie CC, Graves JE, Pollock ML, Phillips MI, Sumners C, Hagberg JA. Effect of exercise training on blood pressure in 70- to 90-yr-old men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:505–511
  13. Katz J, Wilson BRA. The effects of a six-week, low-intensity nautilus circuit training program on resting blood pressure in females. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1992;32:299–302
  14. Vanhoof R, Macor F, Lijnen P, Staessen J, Thijs L, Vanhees L, Fagard R. Effect of strength training on blood pressure measured in various conditions in sedentary men. J Sports Med. 1996;17:415–422
  15. 10.2114/jpa.16.257 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00005768-200110000-00021 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1076-7460.2003.01588.x · DOI
  18. 10.1161/01.cir.0000146380.08401.99 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02398.x · DOI
  20. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00497.2006 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/01.hjh.0000242399.60838.14 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001979 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0269215506070795 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0898264305281102 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803534 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1055/s-2007-964901 · DOI
  27. Cortez-Cooper MY, Anton MM, Devan AE, Neidre DB, Cook JN, Tanaka H. The effects of strength training on central arterial compliance in middle-aged and older adults. EJCPR. 2008;15:149–155
  28. 10.1007/s00421-009-0996-7 · DOI
  29. 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832e0644 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00849.x · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2008.00847.x · DOI
  32. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052126 · DOI
  33. 10.1136/bjsm.36.5.340 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048725.15026.B5 · DOI
  35. 10.1097/01.HCR.0000320073.66223.a7 · DOI
  36. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283357d16 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/jhh.2010.13 · DOI
  38. 10.1161/01.HYP.17.1_Suppl.I16 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1001/jama.288.15.1882 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1590/S1807-59322010000300006 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2006.09.001 · DOI
  42. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Final report 2002. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2002.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cornelissen, V. A., Fagard, R. H., Coeckelberghs, E., & Vanhees, L.
Venue
Hypertension
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2011-11
Volume
58
Issue
5
Pages
950-958
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
DOI
10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.177071
OpenAlex
W2126651813
Cited by
549
References
11
FWCI
90.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.