Cited by 65Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Animal Learning Development

The neural coding of feedback learning across child and adolescent development

Peters, Sabine, Braams, Barbara R., Raijmakers, Maartje E. J., Koolschijn, P. Cédric M. P., Crone, Eveline A.·2014·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The ability to learn from environmental cues is an important contributor to successful performance in a variety of settings, including school. Despite the progress in unraveling the neural correlates of cognitive control in childhood and adolescence, relatively little is known about how these brain regions contribute to learning. In this study, 268 participants aged 8-25 years performed a rule-learning task with performance feedback in a 3T MRI scanner. We examined the development of the frontoparietal network during feedback learning by exploring contributions of age and pubertal development. The pFC showed more activation following negative compared with positive feedback with increasing age. In contrast, our data suggested that the parietal cortex demonstrated a shift from sensitivity to positive feedback in young children to negative feedback in adolescents and adults. These findings were interpreted in terms of separable contributions of the frontoparietal network in childhood to more integrated functions in adulthood. Puberty (testosterone, estradiol, and self-report) did not explain additional variance in neural activation patterns above age, suggesting that development of the frontoparietal network occurs relatively independently from hormonal development. This study presents novel insights into the development of learning, moving beyond a simple frontoparietal immaturity hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn_a_00594

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance in a feedback learning task increased from age 8-12 before reaching adult levels, but was not explained by pubertal stage, estradiol, or testosterone levels.

    “Additionally, performance in a feedback learning task increased from age 8–12 before reaching adult levels, but was not explained by pubertal stage, estradiol, or testosterone levels”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, S., Braams, B. R., Raijmakers, M. E. J., Koolschijn, P. C. M. P., & Crone, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2014-08-01
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
1705-1720
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2151685326
Cited by
65
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
feedback learning, rule induction, frontoparietal network, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, cognitive development, puberty, pubertal hormones, age differences, positive and negative feedback
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Brain Mapping, Child, Child Development, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Puberty, Prefrontal Cortex, Feedback, Psychological, Adolescent Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review