Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 610

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Past-Year Use of Outpatient Services for Psychiatric Problems in the National Comorbidity Survey

Kessler, Ronald C., Zhao, Shanyang, Katz, Steven J., Kouzis, Anthony C., Frank, Richard G., Edlund, Mark, Leaf, Philip·1999·American Journal of Psychiatry
DOI 10.1176/ajp.156.1.115
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors present nationally representative descriptive data on 12-month use of outpatient services for psychiatric problems. They focused on the relationship between DSM-III-R disorders and service use in four broadly defined service sectors as well as the distribution of service use in multiple service sectors. METHOD: Data from the National Comorbidity Survey were examined. RESULTS: Summary measures of the seriousness and complexity of illness were significantly related to probability of use, number of sectors used, mean number of visits, and specialty treatment. One-fourth of the people in outpatient treatment were seen in multiple service sectors, but no evidence was found of multisector offset in number of visits. CONCLUSIONS: Use of outpatient services for psychiatric problems appears to have increased over the decade between the early 1980s and early 1990s, especially in the self-help sector. Aggregate allocation of treatment resources was related to need, highlighting the importance of making provisions for specialty care in the triage systems currently evolving as part of managed care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.156.1.115

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK: The de facto US mental and addictive disorders service system: Epidemiologic Catchment Area prospective 1-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50:85–94 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Narrow WE, Regier DA, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW, Locke BZ: Use of services by persons with mental and addictive disorders: findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50:95–107 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ware JE Jr, Manning WG Jr, Duan N, Wells KB, Newhouse JP: Health status and the use of outpatient mental health service. Am Psychologist 1984; 39:1090–1100 · DOI
  4. Wittchen H-U: Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res 1994; 28:57–84 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Warner LA, Kessler RC, Hughes M, Anthony JC, Nelson CB: Prevalence and correlates of drug use and dependence in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52:219–229 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Wittchen H-U, Kessler RC, Zhao S, Abelson J: Reliability and clinical validity of UM-CIDI DSM-III-R generalized anxiety disorder. J Psychiatr Res 1995; 29:95–110 · DOI
  7. Wittchen H-U, Zhao S, Abelson JM, Abelson JL, Kessler RC: Reliability and procedural validity of UM-CIDI DSM-III-R phobic disorders. Psychol Med 1996; 26:1169–1177 · DOI
  8. Kessler RC, Rubinow DR, Holmes C, Abelson JM, Zhao S: The epidemiology of DSM-III-R bipolar I disorder in a general population survey. Psychol Med 1997; 27:1079–1089 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kish L, Frankel MR: Inference from complex samples. J Royal Statistical Society 1974; 36:1–37 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bridges KW, Goldberg DP: Somatic presentation of DSM III psychiatric disorders in primary care. J Psychosom Res 1985; 29:563–569 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kirmayer LJ, Robbins JM: Patients who somatize in primary care: a longitudinal study of cognitive and social characteristics. Psychol Med 1996; 26:937–951 · DOI
  12. Mechanic D: Treating mental illness: generalist versus specialist. Health Aff (Millwood) 1990; 9:61–75 · DOI
  13. Olfson M, Pincus HA: Measuring outpatient mental health care in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 1994; 13:172–180 · DOI
  14. Zinman S: Self-help: the wave of the future. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1986; 37:213 · DOI
  15. Madara EJ: A comprehensive system approach to promoting mutual aid self-help groups: the New Jersey Self-Help Clearinghouse model. J Voluntary Action and Res 1986; 15:57–63 · DOI
  16. Wollert RW, Knight B, Levy LH: Make today count: a collaborative model for professionals and self-help groups. Prof Psychol 1980; 11:130–138 · DOI
  17. Kessler RC, Mickelson KD, Zhao S: Patterns and correlates of self-help group membership in the United States. Social Policy 1997; 27:27–46
  18. Regier DA, Kaelber CT, Rae DS, Farmer ME, Kn�uper B, Kessler RC, Norquist GS: Limitations of diagnostic criteria and assessment instruments for mental disorders: implications for research and policy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55:109–115 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Spitzer RL: Diagnosis and need for treatment are not the same. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55:120 · DOI
  20. Olfson M, Pincus HA: Outpatient mental health care in nonhospital settings: distribution of patients across provider groups. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153:1353–1356 · DOI
  21. Knesper DJ, Pagnucco DJ, Wheeler RC: Similarities and differences across mental health services providers and practice settings in the United States. Am Psychol 1985; 40:1352–1369 · DOI
  22. Dew MA, Dunn LO, Bromet EJ, Schulberg HC: Factors affecting help-seeking during depression in a community sample. J Affect Disord 1988; 14:223–234 · DOI
  23. Wells KB, Burnam MA, Camp P: Severity of depression in prepaid and fee-for-service general medical and mental health specialty practices. Med Care 1995; 33:350–364 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kessler, R. C., Zhao, S., Katz, S. J., Kouzis, A. C., Frank, R. G., Edlund, M., & Leaf, P.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher
American Psychiatric Association Publishing
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
156
Issue
1
Pages
115-123
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
DOI
10.1176/ajp.156.1.115
OpenAlex
W2147472478
Cited by
610
References
7
FWCI
50.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.