Cited by 294Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionComplex Systems and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring information integration

Open access
Tononi, Giulio, Sporns, Olaf·2003·BMC Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To understand the functioning of distributed networks such as the brain, it is important to characterize their ability to integrate information. The paper considers a measure based on effective information, a quantity capturing all causal interactions that can occur between two parts of a system. RESULTS: The capacity to integrate information, or Phi, is given by the minimum amount of effective information that can be exchanged between two complementary parts of a subset. It is shown that this measure can be used to identify the subsets of a system that can integrate information, or complexes. The analysis is applied to idealized neural systems that differ in the organization of their connections. The results indicate that Phi is maximized by having each element develop a different connection pattern with the rest of the complex (functional specialization) while ensuring that a large amount of information can be exchanged across any bipartition of the network (functional integration). CONCLUSION: Based on this analysis, the connectional organization of certain neural architectures, such as the thalamocortical system, are well suited to information integration, while that of others, such as the cerebellum, are not, with significant functional consequences. The proposed analysis of information integration should be applicable to other systems and networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2202-4-31

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Zeki S: A vision of the brain. 1993, Oxford ; Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tononi, G., & Sporns, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Tononi, Giulio
Venue
BMC Neuroscience
Published
2003-12-02
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
31-31
ISSN
1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1832461346
Cited by
294
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
Keywords
information integration, effective information, phi, distributed networks, brain connectivity, functional specialization, functional integration, thalamocortical system, cerebellum, network organization, causal interaction
MeSH terms
Brain, Information Theory, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Stochastic Processes, Normal Distribution, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review