The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Abstract
We studied the effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on motor cortex excitability in humans. TMS at 0.1 Hz for 1 hour did not change cortical excitability. Stimulation at 0.9 Hz for 15 minutes (810 pulses), similar to the parameters used to induce long-term depression (LTD) in cortical slice preparations and in vivo animal studies, led to a mean decrease in motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of 19.5%. The decrease in cortical excitability lasted for at least 15 minutes after the end of the 0.9 Hz stimulation. The mechanism underlying this decrease in excitability may be similar to LTD. TMS-induced reduction of cortical excitability has potential clinical applications in diseases such as epilepsy and myoclonus. Spread of excitation, which may be a warning sign for seizures, occurred in one subject and was not accompanied by increased MEP amplitude, suggesting that spread of excitation and amplitude changes are different phenomena and also indicating the need for adequate monitoring even with stimulations at low frequencies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These data build upon studies in patients with depression [39,50] and provide a biological mechanism through which DLPFC may be effective at attenuating craving.”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex
Huang, Y.-Z., Edwards, M. J., Rounis, E., Bhatia, K. P., & Rothwell, J. C. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033 · Cited by 4,158
Rossini, P., Burke, D. F., Chen, R., Cohen, L., Daskalakis, Z., Iorio, R. D., di Lazzaro, V., Ferreri, F., Fitzgerald, P., George, M., et al. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · Cited by 2,729
“In the majority of studies, low-frequency stimulation has been applied at 1 Hz, although a smaller number of studies have utilized frequencies between 0.1 and 0.9 Hz (Chen et al., 1997; Fitzgerald et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationWassermann, E. M. (1998) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00096-8 · Cited by 2,337
“When 0.9 Hz rTMS was delivered for 15 min at an intensity of 1.1× the MEP threshold and the excitability of the M1 was measured before and after a conditioning stimulus (15 min of 0.1 Hz stimulation), significant inhibition usually occurred (Chen et al., 1997).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationLefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Cantello, R. M., Cincotta, M., de Carvalho, M., De Ridder, D., et al. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 · Cited by 2,119
“The duration of such after-effects increases with the number of stimuli delivered, and may persist minutes to hours or even days after the end of an rTMS session (Chen et al., 1997; Maeda et al., 2000; Touge et al., 2001; Gangitano et al., 2002).”
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Primer
Hallett, M. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026 · Cited by 2,026
“…strength is called long-term depression (LTD). rTMS at slow rates, approximately between 0.2 and 1 Hz, will cause a decrease in brain excitability (Chen et al., 1997). rTMS at faster rates, approximately 5 Hz or faster, will cause an increase in brain excitability (PascualLeone et al., 1994).”
InfluentialSelf-citationTranscranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain
Hallett, M. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35018000 · Cited by 1,603
“, whereas slow rTMS, at 1 Hz, will transiently depress excitabilit”
BackgroundSelf-citationTranscranial magnetic stimulation in neurology
Kobayashi, M., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00321-1 · Cited by 1,299
Plasticity in the human central nervous system
Cooke, S. F. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl082 · Cited by 1,260
“Further development of this approach seems warranted, given the demonstrations that it can be used to induce an LTD-like phenomenon in the neocortex (Chen et al., 1997; Ziemann et al., 2004).”
Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke
Hummel, F. C. (2005) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awh369 · Cited by 1,141
“…that direct stimulation of a motor cortical representation in rodents elicits cortical reorganization (Nudo et al., 1990), while non-invasive cortical stimulation in humans influences motor cortical excitability (Chen et al., 1997; Pascual-Leone et al., 1998; Nitsche and Paulus, 2000, 2001).”
BackgroundStrafella, A. P., Paus, T., Barrett, J., & Dagher, A. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-15-j0003.2001 · Cited by 1,058
“…of direct stimulation of the corticostriatal axons (Rothwell, 1997), indirect trans-synaptic activation of corticostriatal neurons caused by a reduction in GABA-mediated intracortical inhibition (Chen et al., 1997; Nakamura et al., 1997; Rothwell, 1997; Pascual-Leone et al., 1998), or both.”
BackgroundAction anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players
Aglioti, S. M., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2182 · Cited by 1,093
“An interpulse interval of at least 10 s was always allowed before the next tria”
BackgroundA comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition
Fitzgerald, P. B., FOUNTAIN, S., & Daskalakis, Z. J. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.712 · Cited by 1,026
Fregni, F., & Pascual-Leone, Á. (2007) · Nature Clinical Practice Neurology · doi:10.1038/ncpneuro0530 · Cited by 845
Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex
Muellbacher, W., Ziemann, U., Wissel, J., Dang, N., Kofler, M., Facchini, S., Boroojerdi, B., Poewe, W., & Hallett, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature712 · Cited by 803
“rTMS can depress local cortical function that outlasts the stimulation duratio”
BackgroundSelf-citationStudy and Modulation of Human Cortical Excitability With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Pascual‐Leone, Á., Tormos, J. M., Keenan, J. P., Tarazona, F., Cañete, C., & Catalá, M. D. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005 · Cited by 779
Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity
Siebner, H. R., & Rothwell, J. C. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1234-2 · Cited by 777
“Whatever the explanation, little change in overt movement behaviour is seen after 1 Hz rTMS over the SM1 (finger tapping speed, Chen et al. 1997; kinematics of handwriting movements, Siebner et al. 1999b; maximum pinch force or peak acceleration of brisk finger movements, Muellbacher et al. 2000)…”
InfluentialThe Role of Area 17 in Visual Imagery: Convergent Evidence from PET and rTMS
Kosslyn, S. M., Pascual‐Leone, Á., Félician, O., Camposano, S. E., Keenan, J. P., L., W., Thompson, Ganis, G., Sukel, K. E., & Alpert, N. M. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5411.167 · Cited by 756
Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Maeda, F., Keenan, J. P., Tormos, J. M., Topka, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00323-5 · Cited by 618
“…to minutes following completion of the rTMS application, rTMS at 1 Hz is reported to lead to a transient decrease in corticospinal excitability (Chen et al., 1997) while rTMS at 5 Hz (Berardelli et al., 1998) or 10 Hz (Pascual-Leone et al., 1998) is thought to lead to a transient increase in…”
BackgroundInfluentialSiebner, H. R., Lang, N., Rizzo, V., Nitsche, M. A., Paulus, W., Lemon, R., & Rothwell, J. C. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5316-03.2004 · Cited by 729
“However, the decrease in excitability is seen more prominently and for a longer time if the intensity of the rTMS is above RMT (Chen et al., 1997; Muellbacher et al., 2000) rather than at or below RMT, when the effects are much less consistent (Siebner et al., 1999b; Maeda et al., 2000a; Touge et…”
BackgroundInfluentialPerera, T., George, M. S., Grammer, G., Janicak, P. G., Pascual-Leone, A., & Wirecki, T. S. (2016) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.03.010 · Cited by 674
Maeda, F., Keenan, J. P., Tormos, J. M., Topka, H., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210000432 · Cited by 651
“Findings to date suggest that the modulatory effects of rTMS on cortical excitability may be inhibitory or facilitatory depending on the frequency, intensity, duration and intertrain interval (Chen et al. 1997; Berardelli et al. 1998; Pascual-Leone et al. 1998).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTranscranial magnetic stimulation highlights the sensorimotor side of empathy for pain.
Avenanti, A., Bueti, D., Galati, G., & Aglioti, S. M. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1481 · Cited by 615
“1 Hz frequency did not induce any change of excitabilit”
BackgroundTherapeutic application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review
Wassermann, E. M., & Lisanby, S. H. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00585-5 · Cited by 601
“Early evidence that trains of stimuli delivered to the motor cortex could produce minutes of increased (Pascual-Leone et al., 1994a) or decreased (Wassermann et al., 1996a; Chen et al., 1997) corticospinal hyperexcitability provided the impetus for studies aimed at modulating cortical tone.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationOpposite effects of high and low frequency rTMS on regional brain activity in depressed patients
Speer, A. M., Kimbrell, T. A., Wassermann, E. M., Repella, J. D., Willis, M. W., Herscovitch, P., & Post, R. M. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01065-9 · Cited by 587
“Repeated stimulation at frequencies of about 1 Hz produces inhibition of subsequent cortical responses (Chen et al 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNoninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back
Dayan, E., Censor, N., Buch, E. R., Sandrini, M., & Cohen, L. G. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3422 · Cited by 626
Self-citationHilgetag, C. C., Théoret, H., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn0901-953 · Cited by 583
“We used an repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocol that, when applied to the motor cortex, induces a transient reduction of cortical excitability in most subject”
MethodCausal interactions between fronto-parietal central executive and default-mode networks in humans
Chen, A. C., Oathes, D. J., Chang, C., Bradley, T., Zhou, Z.-W., Williams, L. M., Glover, G. H., Deisseroth, K. A., & Etkin, A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1311772110 · Cited by 580
“Low frequency (∼1 Hz) rTMS, when applied over motor cortex or visual cortex, leads to suppressed local cortical excitability that lasts for approximately the same duration as the rTMS after the end of stimulation, as indexed by decreased motor-evoked potentials (47), increased phosphene threshold (48), or on EEG measu…”
BackgroundNaeser, M. A., Martin, P. I., Nicholas, M. L., Baker, E. H., Seekins, H., Kobayashi, M., Théoret, H., Fregni, F., MARIATORMOS, J., & Kurland, J. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.004 · Cited by 557
“Slow (1 Hz) rTMS has been shown to decrease cortical excitability in humans (Chen et al., 1997; Maeda, Keenan, Tormos, Topka, & Pascual- Leone, 2000).”
BackgroundA sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients
Mansur, C. G., Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Riberto, M., Neto, J. G., dos Santos, C. M., Wagner, T., Rigonatti, S. P., Marcolin, M. A., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000161839.38079.92 · Cited by 544
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Depression
Gershon, A. A., Dannon, P. N., & Grunhaus, L. J. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.835 · Cited by 530
“Conversely, low-frequency rTMS (≤1 Hz) has been shown to decrease both cortical excitability (55, 56) and regional blood flow (9, 54).”
BackgroundApplications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function
Filmer, H. L., Dux, P. E., & Mattingley, J. B. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.003 · Cited by 539
Hoffman, R. E., Hawkins, K. A., Gueorguieva, R. V., Boutros, N. N., Rachid, F., Carroll, K. M., & Krystal, J. H. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.49 · Cited by 520
Neuropsychiatric applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation: a meta analysis
Burt, T., Lisanby, S. H., & Sackeïm, H. A. (2002) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145702002791 · Cited by 510
“Several authors have suggested that the cellular mechanisms involved in long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) subserve the effects that outlast the duration of the stimulation (Chen et al., 1997a ; Wang et al., 1996, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEnhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Luber, B., & Lisanby, S. H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.007 · Cited by 508
“…homeostatic (Jung et al., 2008), resisting changes caused by external disruptions such as TMS, generating reactions such as local habituation or adaptation (Chen et al., 1997) or systemic learning within the TMS context through conditioning (Luber et al., 2007b) or practice (Gagnon et al., 2011).”
BackgroundTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation: Applications in Neuropsychiatry
George, M. S., Lisanby, S. H., & Sackeim, H. A. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.300 · Cited by 496
Zrenner, C., Desideri, D., Belardinelli, P., & Ziemann, U. (2017) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.016 · Cited by 462
Pascual‐Leone, Á. (1999) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0476 · Cited by 472
Valero‐Cabré, A., Amengual, J. L., Stengel, C., Pascual‐Leone, Á., & Coubard, O. A. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.10.006 · Cited by 483
“…areas, either weakening their intrinsic level of activity, reducing the efficacy of their outputs, or silencing their contribution to cognitive processes in which they are involved (Chen et al., 1997; Gangitano et al., 2002; Maeda et al., 2000; Romero et al., 2002; ValeroCabré et al., 2007).”
BackgroundNeurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
Cirillo, G., Di Pino, G., Capone, F., Ranieri, F., Florio, L., Todisco, V., Tedeschi, G., Funke, K., & Di Lazzaro, V. (2017) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.009 · Cited by 446
Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer’s cramp
Siebner, H. R., Tormos, J. M., Baumann, A. O. C., Auer, C., Catala, M. D., Conrad, B., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.52.3.529 · Cited by 426
Lazzaro, V. D., Pilato, F., Saturno, E., Oliviero, A., Dileone, M., Mazzone, P., Insola, A., Tonali, P., Ranieri, F., Huang, Y., et al. (2005) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.087288 · Cited by 424
“…to produce effects on the excitability of the corticospinal system that outlast the period of stimulation for several minutes or even hours (Pascual-Leone et al. 1994, 1998; Chen et al. 1997; Tergau et al. 1997; Berardelli et al. 1998; Peinemann et al. 2000; Maeda et al. 2000; Huang et al. 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialMaeda, F., Kleiner‐Fisman, G., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00773.2000 · Cited by 427
Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity
Bolognini, N., Pascual‐Leone, Á., & Fregni, F. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-8 · Cited by 425
Brain stimulation for epilepsy
Theodore, W. H., & Fisher, R. S. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00664-1 · Cited by 418
Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man
Berardelli, A., Inghilleri, M., Rothwell, J. C., Romeo, S., Currà, A., Gilio, F., Modugno, N., & Manfredi, M. (1998) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210050493 · Cited by 405
“Similar long-lasting effects on clinical symptoms after stimulation of various cortical areas have been reported in Parkinson’s disease (Pascual-Leone et al. 1994b) and in chronic pain syndromes ( Amassian et al. 1997 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialPell, G. S., Roth, Y., & Zangen, A. (2010) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.003 · Cited by 423
“In general terms, high-frequency (HF) rTMS (>5 Hz) of sufficient amplitude increases cortical excitability, whereas low frequency (LF) rTMS ( 1 Hz) decreases cortical excitability (Maeda et al., 2000b; Pascual-Leone et al., 1994; Chen et al., 1997; Siebner et al., 1999; Muellbacher et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMechanisms of Deafferentation-Induced Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex
Ziemann, U., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-17-07000.1998 · Cited by 408
“Low-frequency rTMS at 0.1 Hz does not induce plastic changes in the absence of INB (Chen et al., 1997a; Ziemann et al., 1998).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPlasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: a position paper
Huang, Y.-Z., Lu, M.-K., Antal, A., Classen, J., Nitsche, M., Ziemann, U., Ridding, M., Hamada, M., Ugawa, Y., Jaberzadeh, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.007 · Cited by 401
“In general, low-frequency (1 Hz or less) rTMS decreases cortical excitability (Chen et al., 1997), whereas high-frequency (5 Hz or greater) rTMS”
Self-citationMuellbacher, W., Ziemann, U., Boroojerdi, B., & Hallett, M. (2000) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00284-4 · Cited by 401
Self-citationEffects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper
Buch, E. R., Santarnecchi, E., Antal, A., Jan Born, A., Celnik, P. A., Claßen, J., Gerloff, C. P., Hallett, M., Hummel, F. C., Nitsche, M. A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.004 · Cited by 369
Self-citationPossible mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation
Chervyakov, A. V., Chernyavsky, A. Y., Sinitsyn, D. O., & Piradov, M. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00303 · Cited by 373
“Additionally, a largescale reviewdetermined that a 15-min rTMS session at 0.9Hz (800 pulses)with a stimulation intensity of 115%of themotor threshold causes a 20% decrease in the induced muscle response during the subsequent 15-min period (Chen et al., 1997).”
BackgroundUsing brain imaging to improve spatial targeting of transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression
Cash, R. F. H., Weigand, A., Zalesky, A., Siddiqi, S. H., Downar, J., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Fox, M. D. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.05.033 · Cited by 366
Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., & Gerloff, C. (2003) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02517.x · Cited by 392
Self-citationDecreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex
Gerschlager, W., Siebner, H. R., & Rothwell, J. C. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.3.449 · Cited by 363
Terao, Y., & Ugawa, Y. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/00004691-200208000-00006 · Cited by 364
“With regard to the motor cortex, many studies assume facilitatory effects of highfrequency rTMS and inhibitory effects of low-frequency rTMS (Berardelli et al., 1998; Chen et al., 1997; Pascual–Leone et al., 1998), although some interindividual variability has been noted (Maeda et al.”
BackgroundIyer, M. B., Schleper, N., & Wassermann, E. M. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-34-10867.2003 · Cited by 359
“…threshold for evoked muscle twitches produces a refractory state in which the electromyographic response to stimulation, the motor-evoked potential (MEP), is reduced in size (Wassermann et al., 1996b; Chen et al., 1997a; Touge et al., 2001), and its threshold is elevated (Fitzgerald et al., 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFee, C., Banasr, M., & Sibille, E. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.024 · Cited by 329
“Reflecting findings in MDD (41, 42), repetitive TMS increased cortical inhibition (55) and lengthened CSP (56) in healthy individuals, suggesting enhanced GABA neurotransmission.”
Modulation of Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex after Forearm Ischemic Nerve Block
Ziemann, U., Corwell, B., & Cohen, L. G. (1998) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-03-01115.1998 · Cited by 361
“…ICF suppressed by GABAergic (Z iemann et al., 1995, 1996a,b) and antiglutamatergic (Z iemann et al., 1996b; Liepert et al., 1998) drugs, whereas ion channel-blocking drugs had no effect (Z iemann et al., 1996b; Chen et al., 1997b), supporting f urther the " trans-synaptic nature " of ICI and ICF.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationA proposed regional hierarchy in recovery of post-stroke aphasia
Heiß, W.-D., & Thiel, A. (2006) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.002 · Cited by 362
The Primary Motor and Premotor Areas of the Human Cerebral Cortex
Chouinard, P. A., & Paus, T. (2006) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858405284255 · Cited by 348
Gentner, R., Wankerl, K., Reinsberger, C., Zeller, D., & Claßen, J. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm239 · Cited by 350
“…effects, Siebner et al. (2004) demonstrated that 1-Hz repetitive TMS, when it was conditioned by cathodal direct current transcranial stimulation, induced facilitation rather than the usual depression, which normally follows 1-Hz repetitive TMS application to naive motor cortex (Chen et al. 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLong-term potentiation and long-term depression: a clinical perspective
Bliss, T. V. P., & Cooke, S. F. (2011) · Clinics · doi:10.1590/s1807-59322011001300002 · Cited by 333
Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Robertson, E. M., Théoret, H., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903770007344 · Cited by 358
“In the motor cortex, a 15-min train of rTMS at approximately 1 Hz reduces cortical excitability for at least the subsequent 15 min (Chen et al., 1997).”
BackgroundMethodSandrini, M., Umilta, C., & Rusconi, E. (2011) · Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.005 · Cited by 343
Lang, N., Siebner, H. R., Ernst, D., Nitsche, M. A., Paulus, W., Lemon, R., & Rothwell, J. C. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.017 · Cited by 334
Kimbrell, T. A., Little, J. T., Dunn, R. T., Frye, M. A., Greenberg, B. D., Wassermann, E. M., Repella, J. D., Danielson, A., Willis, M. W., Benson, B. E., et al. (1999) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00195-x · Cited by 329
“Low frequency (1 Hz) stimulation decreases the amplitude of MEPs, indicating decreased excitability (Chen et al 1997; Wassermann et al 1996), whereas treatment with higher frequencies, e.g., 10 Hz (Pascual-Leone et al 1994a) or 5 Hz (Berardelli et al 1998) seems to have the opposite effect,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationNon-invasive transcranial ultrasound stimulation for neuromodulation
Darmani, G., Bergmann, T. O., Pauly, K. B., Caskey, C. F., de Lecea, L., Fomenko, A., Fouragnan, E. F., Legon, W., Murphy, K. R., Nandi, T., et al. (2021) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2021.12.010 · Cited by 335
Self-citationTranscranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: Experimental framework and human models
Thickbroom, G. W. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0991-3 · Cited by 326
“Experimental LTD depends on prolonged weak synaptic activation, and this is achieved with low intensity and frequency TMS given over periods of 10– 15 min or even repeated over consecutive days (Chen et al. 1997; Maeda et al. 2000b; Fitzgerald et al. 2006).”
BackgroundLazzaro, V. D., Profice, P., Ranieri, F., Capone, F., Dileone, M., Oliviero, A., & Pilato, F. (2011) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.008 · Cited by 335
Touge, T., Gerschlager, W., Brown, P., & Rothwell, J. C. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00651-4 · Cited by 325
“…Maeda et al., 2000; Berardelli et al., 1998; Peinemann et al., 2000; Romeo et al., 2000), whereas low-frequency rTMS (i.e. rTMS at a frequency of 1 Hz) causes a short-term decrease in corticomotor excitability (Chen et al., 1997; Siebner et al., 1999a; Muellbacher et al., 2000; Maeda et al., 2000).”
BackgroundSauseng, P., Klimesch, W., Gerloff, C. P., & Hummel, F. C. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.021 · Cited by 315
Self-citationFettes, P., Schulze, L., & Downar, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2017.00025 · Cited by 299
“Inhibitory forms of rTMS, thought to act via long-term depression, include low frequency (1 Hz) stimulation (Chen et al., 1997) and continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; Huang et al., 2009).”
BackgroundPeinemann, A., Reimer, B., Löer, C., Quartarone, A., Münchau, A. M., Conrad, B., & Siebner, H. R. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.02.005 · Cited by 323
“Conversely, low-frequency rTMS (at frequencies of around 1 Hz) causes a short-term decrease in corticospinal excitability (Chen et al., 1997; Muellbacher et al., 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialLow-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves intractable epilepsy
Tergau, F., Naumann, U., Paulus, W., & Steinhoff, B. J. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01301-x · Cited by 317
Chou, Y.-H., Ton That, V., & Sundman, M. (2020) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.020 · Cited by 319
Brief bursts of pulse stimulation terminate afterdischarges caused by cortical stimulation
Lesser, R. P., Kim, S. H., Beyderman, L., et al. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.53.9.2073 · Cited by 309
Di Lazzaro, V., Dileone, M., Pilato, F., Capone, F., Musumeci, G., Ranieri, F., Ricci, V., Bria, P., Di Iorio, R., de Waure, C., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00781.2010 · Cited by 303
“Low-frequency rTMS (stimulus rates of 1 Hz or less) produces a lasting decrease in motor cortex excitability (Chen et al. 1997), whereas high-frequency rTMS (stimulus rates of 5 Hz or higher) (Berardelli et al.”
InfluentialStudies of human motor physiology with transcranial magnetic stimulation
Chen, R. E. (2000) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/1097-4598(2000)999:9 · Cited by 303
Self-citationThe theoretical model of theta burst form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Huang, Y., Rothwell, J. C., Chen, R., Lu, C., & Chuang, W. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.016 · Cited by 300
“For example10 minutes or more 1Hz rTMS conditioning usually leads to LTD-like effects (Chen et al., 1997; Touge et al., 2001) whereas rTMS at 5 Hz leads to LTP-like changes.”
BackgroundSelf-citationLoo, C. K. A., & Mitchell, P. B. (2005) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.08.001 · Cited by 300
“Motor cortex studies suggest that high and low frequency rTMS have opposite effects on the excitability of neurons in brain cortex (Chen et al., 1997; PascualLeone et al., 1994).”
BackgroundNeurochemical Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Stagg, C. J., Wylezinska, M., Matthews, P. M., Johansen‐Berg, H., Jezzard, P., Rothwell, J. C., & Bestmann, S. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.91060.2008 · Cited by 292
Lee, L., Siebner, H. R., Rowe, J. B., Rizzo, V., Rothwell, J. C., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-12-05308.2003 · Cited by 289
“This is in agreement with previous work investigating the effects of rTMS on simple motor behavior (Wassermann et al., 1996; Chen et al., 1997; Pascual Leone et al., 1998; Muellbacher et al., 2000; Rossi et al., 2000).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPadberg, F., Zwanzger, P., Thoma, H., Kathmann, N., Haag, C., Greenberg, B. D., Hampel, H. J., & Möller, H. (1999) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(99)00092-x · Cited by 286
Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Jannati, A., Oberman, L. M., Rotenberg, A., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-022-01453-8 · Cited by 321
“In contrast, low-frequency (≤1 Hz) rTMS often decreases cortical excitability as measured by the post-rTMS decrease in MEP size [38, 39].”
Hoffman, R. E., & Çavuş, I. (2002) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1093 · Cited by 286
“(8) have been replicated by other groups, and suppressive effects on the size of motor evoked potentials have lasted up to 30 minutes after stimulation (12, 14).”
BackgroundLazzaro, V. D., & Rothwell, J. C. (2014) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.274316 · Cited by 283
“The 1 Hz protocol involves applying one thousand or more pulses at a rate of one per second with a suprathreshold stimulus pulse (Chen et al. 1997).”
MethodTerraneo, A., Leggio, L., Saladini, M., Ermani, M., Bonci, A., & Gallimberti, L. (2016) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.11.011 · Cited by 281
“Specifically, repetitive TMS (rTMS) at a low frequency (about 1 Hz) is typically considered to have inhibitory effects, (Chen et al., 1997) while high-frequency rTMS (Z5 Hz) is excitatory (Pascual-Leone et al., 1994).”
BackgroundMantovani, A., Simpson, H. B., Fallon, B. A., Rossi, S., & Lisanby, S. H. (2010) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1017/s1461145709990435 · Cited by 281
“Given the evidence for deficient inhibition in OCD, the use of low-frequency rTMS, which has been reported to be inhibitory on motor cortex excitability (Chen et al. 1997), may be a fruitful avenue to explore as a putative treatment.”
BackgroundUnderstanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation
Borich, M. R., Brodie, S. M., Gray, W. A., Ionta, S., & Boyd, L. A. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.007 · Cited by 302
Non-invasive Human Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience: A Primer
Parkin, B., Ekhtiari, H., & Walsh, V. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.032 · Cited by 283
“Repetitive 1 Hz rTMS is widely used as an inhibitory intervention (Chen et al., 1997) and is classically associated with mimicking the effects of neuropsychological patients (e.g Guse et al., 2010).”
MethodMapping Implied Body Actions in the Human Motor System
Urgesi, C., Moro, V., Candidi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1289-06.2006 · Cited by 273
“The coil was placed tangentially on the scalp, with the handle pointing backward and laterally 45° away from the midline, approximately perpendicular to the line of the central sulcus.”
MethodInfluentialrTMS of the prefrontal cortex in the treatment of chronic migraine: A pilot study
Brighina, F., Piazza, A., Vitello, G., Aloisio, A., Palermo, A., Daniele, O., & Fierro, B. (2004) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2004.08.008 · Cited by 269
“In particular, repetitive stimulation (rTMS) allows to modulate cortical activity: at low frequencies, it has an inhibitory effect [5], whereas at high frequencies, it is able to enhance cortical excitability [6].”
BackgroundHoffman, R. E., Gueorguieva, R., Hawkins, K. A., Varanko, M., Boutros, N. N., Wu, Y.-T., Carroll, K., & Krystal, J. H. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.03.041 · Cited by 272
Fregni, F., Otachi, P. T. M., Valle, A., Boggio, P. S., Thut, G., Rigonatti, S. P., Pascual‐Leone, Á., & Valente, K. D. R. (2006) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20950 · Cited by 272
Motor Representations of Articulators Contribute to Categorical Perception of Speech Sounds
Möttönen, R., & Watkins, K. E. (2009) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6018-08.2009 · Cited by 282
“, to reduce MEP amplitudes) for a further 15 min after the end of rTMS (Chen et al., 1997).”
BackgroundModifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity
Ziemann, U., & Siebner, H. R. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.003 · Cited by 269
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of seizures
Theodore, W. H., Hunter, K., Chen, R. E., Vega‐Bermudez, F., Boroojerdi, B., Reeves‐Tyer, P., Werhahn, K. J., Kelley, K., & Cohen, L. G. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.59.4.560 · Cited by 267
Self-citationContribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke
Werhahn, K. J., Conforto, A. B., Kadom, N., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (2003) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10686 · Cited by 274
“Second, application of 1Hz TMS for 30 minutes at 50% above rMT, as implemented in experiment 3, leads to transient and reversible downregulation of cortical activity in the underlying cortical structures that outlasts the stimulation period for several minutes.(11) We took advantage of this property of the TMS paradig…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationReis, J., Robertson, E. M., Krakauer, J. W., Rothwell, J. C., Marshall, L., Gerloff, C. P., Wassermann, E. M., Pascual‐Leone, Á., Hummel, F. C., Celnik, P. A., et al. (2008) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.08.001 · Cited by 273
Self-citationRepetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements
Kobayashi, M., Hutchinson, S., Théoret, H., Schlaug, G., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.62.1.91 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, R., Classen, J., Gerloff, C., Celnik, P., Wassermann, E. M., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1398-1403
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2034753893
- Cited by
- 2,128
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 95 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 118 · 2012: 104
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
- Keywords
- motor cortex excitability, long-term depression, motor evoked potentials, cortical plasticity, epilepsy, myoclonus, excitation propagation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Electric Stimulation, Female, Fingers, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
