The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models
Abstract
The Technology Acceptance Model and two variations of the Theory of Planned Behavior were compared to assess which model best helps to understand usage of information technology. The models were compared using student data collected from 786 potential users of a computer resource center. Behavior data was based on monitoring 3,780 visits to the resource center over a 12-week period. Weighted least squares estimation revealed that all three models performed well in terms of fit and were roughly equivalent in terms of their ability to explain behavior. Decomposing the belief structures in the Theory of Planned Behavior provided a moderate increase in the explanation of behavioral intention. Overall, the results indicate that the decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior provides a fuller understanding of behavioral intention by focusing on the factors that are likely to influence systems use through the application of both design and implementation strategies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prior research has suggested that employees' perceptions regarding organizational support-that is, facilitating conditions or perceptions of external control (Taylor & Todd, 1995;Venkatesh, 2000;Venkatesh et al., 2003)-will lead to greater user acceptance of new systems.”
From Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008) · cites this paper as Taylor & Todd, 1995
In the citing paper
“The fundamental assumption of the theory is that users’ beliefs influence their behavioral intentions, and these intentions, in turn, determine their actual behavior toward using a given technology (Taylor and Todd, 1995).”
From A two-step structural equation modeling and explainable machine learning framework for understanding university students’ adoption of generative AI: balancing intrinsic motivations and perceived risks (2026) · cites this paper as Taylor and Todd, 1995
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Structural Equations with Latent Variables.
Clogg, C. C., & Bollen, K. A. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2072165 · Cited by 17,475
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250921 · Cited by 8,767
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250981 · Cited by 2,780
Bock, Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y., & Lee, J.-N. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148669 · Cited by 4,474
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1
van der Heijden, H. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148660 · Cited by 3,850
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x · Cited by 4,068
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204 · Cited by 3,575
Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior
Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00056-2 · Cited by 3,219
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249633 · Cited by 2,891
Self-citationValidation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · Cited by 2,797
The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 · Cited by 2,669
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions
Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080 · Cited by 2,640
The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01250 · Cited by 2,572
Consumer trust in an Internet store
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1023/a:1019104520776 · Cited by 2,577
Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study1
Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249749 · Cited by 2,631
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success
Seddon, P. B. (1997) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.240 · Cited by 2,574
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y · Cited by 2,137
Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x · Cited by 2,174
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0165 · Cited by 2,060
E-satisfaction: an initial examination
Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00035-x · Cited by 2,069
Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience
Hsu, C., & Lu, H. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014 · Cited by 2,099
Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951
Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking
Luarn, P., & Lin, H. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003 · Cited by 2,070
A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042 · Cited by 2,835
Self-citationScherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923
Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships
Petter, S., DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2008) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.15 · Cited by 2,029
The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption
Drexel University, Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Georgia State University (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00008 · Cited by 1,833
Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.00407 · Cited by 6,416
Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148720 · Cited by 2,685
Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00101-3 · Cited by 1,772
Meuter, M. L., Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Brown, S. W., III (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.61.60759 · Cited by 1,799
AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE
MORRIS, M. G., & VENKATESH, V. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x · Cited by 1,723
Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking
National University of Singapore, Tan, M., Teo, T., & National University of Singapore (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00005 · Cited by 1,716
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x · Cited by 1,669
Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. B., & Cavaye, A. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249498 · Cited by 1,711
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,808
Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148690 · Cited by 1,615
Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003 · Cited by 1,560
An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(01)00111-7 · Cited by 1,441
Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands
van der Heijden, H. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00079-4 · Cited by 1,465
Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2001) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2001.tb00978.x · Cited by 1,409
Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?
Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736 · Cited by 1,407
Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,399
Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250959 · Cited by 1,440
Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation1
Venkatesh, V. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249753 · Cited by 1,428
Bock, G., & Kim, Y. (2002) · Information Resources Management Journal · doi:10.4018/irmj.2002040102 · Cited by 1,374
Determinants of user acceptance of Internet banking: an empirical study
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, H., & Tang, T. (2003) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564230310500192 · Cited by 1,440
Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions
Lin, H. (2007) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551506068174 · Cited by 1,360
Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S., & Tam, K. Y. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001 · Cited by 1,368
Word-of-Mouth Processes within a Services Purchase Decision Context
Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050032005 · Cited by 1,334
Yi, M. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00114-9 · Cited by 1,362
Intentions to Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and Cross-Service Comparisons
Nysveen, H. (2005) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305276149 · Cited by 1,294
Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis
Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O. S., & Wirtz, B. W. (2009) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2009.07.005 · Cited by 1,376
Lee, M.-C. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002 · Cited by 1,385
Protection motivation and deterrence: a framework for security policy compliance in organisations
Herath, T. C., & Rao, H. R. (2009) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.6 · Cited by 1,251
The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies
Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., & Roundtree, R. (2003) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00276-4 · Cited by 1,247
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2896 · Cited by 1,237
Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning
Wang, Y., Wu, M., & Wang, H. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x · Cited by 1,308
Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.011 · Cited by 1,218
Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle
Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549 · Cited by 1,266
Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148634 · Cited by 1,764
Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007 · Cited by 1,184
The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance1
Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148745 · Cited by 1,169
Yi, M. Y., Jackson, J. D., Park, J. S., & Probst, J. C. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006 · Cited by 1,139
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective1
Kim, H.-W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650309 · Cited by 1,135
Bolton, R. N., & Lemon, K. N. (1999) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379903600203 · Cited by 1,274
Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance1
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249403 · Cited by 1,120
Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources
Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/506724.506730 · Cited by 1,099
Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00098-2 · Cited by 1,145
Lewis, Agarwal, & Sambamurthy, V. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036552 · Cited by 1,121
Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model1
Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148755 · Cited by 1,398
Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003 · Cited by 1,066
The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology
Lai, P. C. (2017) · Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management · doi:10.4301/s1807-17752017000100002 · Cited by 1,312
Chao, C.-M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652 · Cited by 1,041
Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017264.2017272 · Cited by 1,035
Determining Uses and Gratifications for the Internet
Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524.x · Cited by 1,010
Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments – A qualitative study
Mallat, N. (2007) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.08.001 · Cited by 1,079
Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet
Lu, J., Yu, C., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240310478222 · Cited by 1,038
Kim, S. S., & Malhotra, N. K. (2005) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0326 · Cited by 1,047
The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013 · Cited by 1,070
"Migrating" to New Service Providers: Toward a Unifying Framework of Consumers' Switching Behaviors
Bansal, H. S. (2005) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304267928 · Cited by 975
Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002 · Cited by 965
Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2003.817277 · Cited by 965
Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Arha, H. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518610 · Cited by 1,040
Hong, S., Thong, J. Y. L., & Tam, K. Y. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.03.009 · Cited by 955
Jasperson, J., Carter, & Zmud, R. W. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148694 · Cited by 1,433
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132321 · Cited by 945
A Three-Component Model of Customer to Service Providers
Bansal, H. S., Irving, P. G., & Taylor, S. F. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263332 · Cited by 934
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Venue
- Information Systems Research
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-176
- ISSN
- 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5536
- OpenAlex
- W1987198869
- Cited by
- 8,815
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 226 · 2025: 285 · 2024: 376 · 2023: 421 · 2022: 485 · 2021: 558 · 2020: 448 · 2019: 422 · 2018: 428 · 2017: 357 · 2016: 384 · 2015: 481 · 2014: 453 · 2013: 487 · 2012: 410
- FWCI
- 53.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Keywords
- information technology use, technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, behavioral intention, student users, belief structures, model comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review