The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments
Abstract
Three investigations are reported that examined the relation between self-appraisals and appraisals of others. In Experiment 1, subjects rated a series of valenced trait adjectives according to how well the traits described the self and others. Individuals displayed a pronounced “self-other bias,” such that positive attributes were rated as more descriptive of self than of others, whereas negative attributes were rated as less descriptive of self than of others. Furthermore, in contrast to C. R. Rogers's (1951) assertion that high self-esteem is associated with a comparable regard for others, the tendency for individuals to evaluate the self in more favorable terms than they evaluated people in general was particularly pronounced among those with high self-esteem. These findings were replicated and extended in Experiment 2, where it also was found that self-evaluations were more favorable than were evaluations of a friend and that individuals with high self-esteem were most likely to appraise their friends more positively than they appraised the average person. The findings of Experiment 3 revealed that the tendency for those with high self-esteem to judge themselves and their friends more favorably than they assessed most other people was not restricted to only those individuals showing a high need for social approval. The findings are discussed in terms of a motivation to enhance self-worth and are integrated with recent evidence that the use of self-enhancing strategies promotes psychological well-being.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Self-citationKruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121 · Cited by 7,731
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431 · Cited by 3,893
Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.608 · Cited by 3,426
Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes
Wood, J. V. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231 · Cited by 1,957
Baumeister, R. F. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.1.90 · Cited by 1,919
Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806
The Costly Pursuit of Self-Esteem
Crocker, J., & Park, L. E. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.392 · Cited by 1,402
Chou, H.-T. G., & Edge, N. (2012) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0324 · Cited by 1,166
For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations
Collins, R. L. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.51 · Cited by 1,166
Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.79 · Cited by 1,134
Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena
Zheng, L., Chiang, W.-L., Sheng, Y., Zhuang, S., Wu, Z., Zhuang, Y., Lin, Z., Li, Z., Li, D., Xing, E. P., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.05685 · Cited by 1,888
“We adopt the term “self-enhancement bias” from social cognition literature [4] to describe the effect that LLM judges may favor the answers generated by themselves.”
MethodThe Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases
Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3 · Cited by 838
Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process.
Sedikides, C. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.317 · Cited by 710
Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent
Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002 · Cited by 707
Social comparison in everyday life
Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.760 · Cited by 699
Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit
Yaniv, I. (2004) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002 · Cited by 652
Self‐image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources
Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.885 · Cited by 600
Chambers, J. R., & Windschitl, P. D. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813 · Cited by 547
McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09990975 · Cited by 474
Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification.
Swann, W. B., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.782 · Cited by 584
Forming beliefs: Why valence matters
Sharot, T., & Garrett, N. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.11.002 · Cited by 345
Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. K. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203029006003 · Cited by 336
Self-esteem and direct versus indirect forms of self-enhancement.
Brown, J. D., Collins, R. L., & Schmidt, G. W. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.445 · Cited by 336
Self-citationThe Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns
Grossmann, I., Weststrate, N. M., Ardelt, M., Brienza, J. P., Dong, M., Ferrari, M., Fournier, M. A., Hu, C. S., Nusbaum, H. C., & Vervaeke, J. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1750917 · Cited by 330
“Social desirability is particularly pronounced for moral aspirations central to wisdom because most people wish to perceive themselves, and to be perceived as, better than they actually are (e.g., Brown, 1986; Kruger & Dunning, 1999).”
BackgroundSelf‐knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves?
Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2010) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00280.x · Cited by 265
The representation of self and person knowledge in the medial prefrontal cortex
Wagner, D. D., Haxby, J. V., & Heatherton, T. F. (2012) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1183 · Cited by 201
Self-esteem modulates medial prefrontal cortical responses to evaluative social feedback
Somerville, L. H., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq049 · Cited by 189
Mirror, Mirror on the wall: enhancement in self-recognition
Epley, N., & Whitchurch, E. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208318601 · Cited by 174
McComb, C. A., Vanman, E. J., & Tobin, S. J. (2023) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2023.2180647 · Cited by 167
“They point to the better-thanaverage effect: a general tendency for individuals to perceive themselves as superior compared to the average person (Brown, 1986).”
BackgroundThe Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
Bortolotti, L. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198863984.001.0001 · Cited by 127
Self-Esteem and Self-Enhancement in Japan and America
Kobayashi, C., & Brown, J. D. (2003) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022103256479 · Cited by 113
Self-citationProtecting the self: The effect of social-evaluative threat on neural representations of self
Hughes, B. L., & Beer, J. S. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00343 · Cited by 101
Recovering from negative events by boosting implicit positive affect
Quirin, M., Bode, R. C., & Kuhl, J. (2011) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.536418 · Cited by 72
Negativity-bias in forming beliefs about own abilities
Müller-Pinzler, L., Czekalla, N., Mayer, A. V., Stolz, D. S., Gazzola, V., Keysers, C., Paulus, F. M., & Krach, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50821-w · Cited by 68
“Positive Illusions in Parenting: Every Child is Above Average”
Wenger, A., & Fowers, B. J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00319.x · Cited by 54
Kong, D. T. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.015 · Cited by 42
LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods
Li, H., Dong, Q., Chen, J., Su, H., Zhou, Y., Ai, Q., Ye, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.05579 · Cited by 40
Self-Esteem Modulates the Time Course of Self-Positivity Bias in Explicit Self-Evaluation
Zhang, H., Guan, L., Qi, M., & Yang, J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081169 · Cited by 39
Understanding empathy and its disorders through a focus on the neural mechanism.
Preston, S. D., Ermler, M., Lei, Y., & Bickel, L. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.001 · Cited by 23
Autistic People Do Enhance Their Selves
Gernsbacher, M. A., Stevenson, J. L., & Dern, S. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619865057 · Cited by 21
Performance and Metacognition Disconnect when Reasoning in Human-AI Interaction
Fernandes, D., Villa, S., Nicholls, S., Haavisto, O., Buschek, D., Schmidt, A., Kosch, T., Shen, C., & Welsch, R. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.16708 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. D.
- Venue
- Social Cognition
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-376
- ISSN
- 0278-016X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2164438751
- Cited by
- 855
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
