Cited by 390Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Negative Reward Signals from the Lateral Habenula to Dopamine Neurons Are Mediated by Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus in Primates

Open access
Hong, Simon, Jhou, Thomas C., Smith, Mitchell, Saleem, Kadharbatcha S., Hikosaka, Okihide·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Lateral habenula (LHb) neurons signal negative “reward-prediction errors” and inhibit midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons. Yet LHb neurons are largely glutamatergic, indicating that this inhibition may occur through an intermediate structure. Recent studies in rats have suggested a candidate for this role, the GABAergic rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), but this neural pathway has not yet been tested directly. We now show using electrophysiology and anatomic tracing that (1) the monkey has an inhibitory structure similar to the rat RMTg; (2) RMTg neurons receive excitatory input from the LHb, exhibit negative reward-prediction errors, and send axonal projections near DA soma; and (3) stimulating this structure inhibits DA neurons. Surprisingly, some RMTg neurons responded to reward cues earlier than the LHb, and carry “state-value” signals not found in DA neurons. Thus, our data suggest that the RMTg translates LHb reward-prediction errors (negative) into DA reward-prediction errors (positive), while transmitting additional motivational signals to non-DA networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1384-11.2011

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RMTg activity increases with aversive stimuli and decreases with reward stimuli, showing inversely correlated signaling patterns.

    “Activity in the RMTg increases upon exposure to aversive stimuli and decreases upon exposure to reward stimuli, representing inversely correlated signaling patterns (Hong et al. 2011).”

    From Nicotine Withdrawal (2015) · cites this paper as Hong et al. 2011

    The Results (‘Reward-related properties of primate RMTg neurons’; page not provided) report that reward-negative neurons increased activity when an expected reward was absent and decreased activity when an unexpected reward occurred. The paper also reports reward-positive neurons with the opposite pattern. It supports inverse responses to reward versus non-reward in a subset of RMTg neurons, but does not establish the claimed response to aversive stimuli generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Paxinos G Huang X Toga A The Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 1999 1st edition Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, S., Jhou, T. C., Smith, M., Saleem, K. S., & Hikosaka, O.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • National Eye Institute (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-08-10
Volume
31
Issue
32
Pages
11457-11471
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2083338953
Cited by
390
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 21
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 EY999999)
  • National Eye Institute (ZIAEY000415)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
lateral habenula, rostromedial tegmental nucleus, dopaminergic neurons, GABAergic interneurons, reward processing, primate brain, glutamatergic inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Dopamine, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neural Inhibition, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Signal Transduction, Habenula, Pedunculopontine Tegmental Nucleus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review