Cited by 255Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Similar roles of substantia nigra and ventral tegmental dopamine neurons in reward and aversion

Open access
Ilango, Anton, Kesner, Andrew J., Keller, Kristine L., Stuber, Garret D., Bonci, Antonello, Ikemoto, Satoshi·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are implicated in affective functions. However, it is unclear to what extent dopamine neurons in substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) play such roles. TH-Cre transgenic mice received adeno-associated viral vectors encoding channelrhodopsin2 (ChR2), halorhodopsin (NpHR), or control vector into the VTA or SNc, resulting in selective expression of these opsins in dopamine neurons. Mice with ChR2 learned instrumental responding to deliver photostimulation into the VTA or SNc and also sought for the compartment where they received photostimulation (i.e., operant place preference). Operant place preference scores were highly correlated with self-stimulation responses. In contrast, mice with NpHR avoided the compartment where they received photostimulation into the VTA, SNc, or dorsal striatum, whereas control mice did not. These observations suggest that the excitation and inhibition of SNc dopamine neurons elicit positive and negative affective effects, respectively, similar to those of VTA dopamine neurons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1703-13.2014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VTA-DA neurons play a central role in modulating the pleasurable and aversive aspects of social interactions.

    “Dopaminergic neurons, arising from both the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra (SN), have attracted significant scientific interest regarding social behaviour, particularly VTA-DA neurons, owing to their central role in modulating the pleasurable and aversive aspects of social interactions (Gunaydin et al., 2014; Ilango et al., 2014; Merrer et al., 2024; Soli ´ e et al., 2022).”

    From Convergence of oxytocin and dopamine signalling in neuronal circuits: Insights into the neurobiology of social interactions across species (2024) · cites this paper as Ilango et al., 2014

    The Introduction and Discussion (pp. 817–822) support a role for VTA dopamine neurons in reward and aversion. They do not establish that these neurons modulate the pleasurable and aversive aspects of social interactions; the Discussion mentions social stress only in connection with a reported effect on later depression-like behavior. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SNc-DA neurons play a pivotal role in motor function, goal-directed behaviour and reward.

    “SNc-DA neurons play a pivotal role in motor function, goal-directed behaviour and reward (Ilango et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilango, A., Kesner, A. J., Keller, K. L., Stuber, G. D., Bonci, A., & Ikemoto, S.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-01-15
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
817-822
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1964812893
Cited by
255
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 15
FWCI
14.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA032750)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
substantia nigra pars compacta, ventral tegmental area, dopaminergic neurons, reward, aversion, self-stimulation, photostimulation, halorhodopsin, emotional behavior, dorsal striatum
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Operant, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Reward, Substantia Nigra, Ventral Tegmental Area, Mice, Gene Knock-In Techniques, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review