Cited by 120Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

A critical period for nicotine-induced disruption of synaptic development in rat auditory cortex

Open access
Aramakis, V. Bess, Hsieh, Candace Y., Leslie, Frances M., Metherate, Raju·2000·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Cholinergic markers in the middle layers of rat auditory cortex are transiently upregulated during the second postnatal week, at which time alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) selectively regulate NMDA receptor (NMDAR)-mediated EPSPs. To investigate the developmental role of this regulation, we determined whether manipulating nAChR function at specific times during the first 4 weeks after birth could alter subsequent neuronal function. Rat pups were injected twice daily with nicotine (1 or 2 mg/kg) or saline during approximately the first, second, or fourth postnatal week (i. e., before, during, or after the peak upregulation of nAChRs). Glutamate EPSPs and intrinsic membrane properties were measured during whole-cell recordings from visually identified pyramidal neurons in layers II-IV of brain slices prepared at least 15 hr after the last injection. Chronic nicotine exposure (CNE) had little effect on intrinsic membrane properties and during week 1 or 4 did not affect synaptic function. However, CNE during week 2 resulted in EPSPs with long durations, multiple peaks, and enhanced NMDAR components. These changes remained significant even 10 d after CNE. Rapid application of nicotine, which in control neurons selectively enhances NMDAR EPSPs during week 2, produced only weak effects after CNE. Receptor binding studies showed that CNE-induced EPSP alterations occurred in the absence of altered alpha 7 nAChR numbers or agonist binding affinity. Thus, altered stimulation of nAChRs by CNE during week 2, but not before or after, disrupts the development of glutamate synapses in rat auditory cortex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.20-16-06106.2000

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manipulation of these nAChRs with chronic nicotine exposure during the second, but not the first or fourth, postnatal weeks disrupts synaptic development in the auditory cortex by altering NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic signaling.

    “Manipulation of these nAChRs with chronic nicotine exposure during the second, but not the first or fourth, postnatal weeks disrupts synaptic development in the auditory cortex by altering NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic signaling [96].”

    From Nicotine on the developing brain. (2023) · cites this paper as [96]

  • Nicotine exposure in rats during the second postnatal week disrupted auditory cortex glutamate synapses, linked to long-term auditory processing and learning deficits.

    “Exposure of rats to nicotine in the second postnatal week, corresponding to the third trimester of human fetal brain development,(147) disrupted the development of glutamate synapses in the auditory cortex, which has been associated with long-term deficits in auditory processing and learning.”
  • Animal research supports that nicotine harms auditory processing.

    “Animal research supports that nicotine adversely affects auditory processing.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aramakis, V. B., Hsieh, C. Y., Leslie, F. M., & Metherate, R.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2000-08-15
Volume
20
Issue
16
Pages
6106-6116
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1785827736
Cited by
120
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program
  • University of California, Irvine
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R29DC002967, DC 02967, R01DC002967)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
nicotine, alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, auditory cortex, synaptic development, NMDA receptor, cholinergic markers, postnatal development, pyramidal neurons, intrinsic membrane properties, chronic nicotine exposure, receptor binding affinity
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Auditory Cortex, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Membrane Potentials, Microinjections, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Receptors, Nicotinic, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review