Cited by 61Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesSleep and Wakefulness Research

The hippocampus and exploration: dynamically evolving behavior and neural representations

Open access
Johnson, Adam, Varberg, Zachary, Benhardus, James, Maahs, Anthony, Schrater, Paul·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

We develop a normative statistical approach to exploratory behavior called information foraging. Information foraging highlights the specific processes that contribute to active, rather than passive, exploration and learning. We hypothesize that the hippocampus plays a critical role in active exploration through directed information foraging by supporting a set of processes that allow an individual to determine where to sample. By examining these processes, we show how information directed information foraging provides a formal theoretical explanation for the common hippocampal substrates of constructive memory, vicarious trial and error behavior, schema-based facilitation of memory performance, and memory consolidation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00216

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Processes of information selection tap into high cognitive functions, including intrinsic curiosity, advance planning, and forming internal models of complex tasks.

    “Recent evidence from computational and behavioral studies makes it clear that processes of information selection tap into some of our highest cognitive functions, involving, among others, intrinsic curiosity and the ability for advance planning and forming internal models of complex tasks (e.g., (Gershman and Niv, 2010; Johnson et al., 2012)).”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2012

  • The need for hierarchical learning is at the heart of attention control.

    “The need for hierarchical learning has been discussed in relation to motor control and cognitive tasks (Braun et al., 2010; Johnson et al., 2012) and, as it is clear from this discussion, is also at the heart of attention control.”

    From Attention, learning, and the value of information (2012) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Easton A. Eacott M. (2008). “A new working definition of episodic memory: replacing ‘when’ with ‘which,’” in Handbook of Episodic Memory, Vol. 18, eds Dere E. Easton A. Nadel L. Huston J. P. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 185– 196

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, A., Varberg, Z., Benhardus, J., Maahs, A., & Schrater, P.
Affiliations
  • Bethel University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Adam
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
216-216
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060761263
Cited by
61
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
hippocampus, exploratory behavior, information foraging, active exploration, constructive memory, memory consolidation, neural representations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review