Cited by 1,869

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeting DNA Double-Strand Breaks with TAL Effector Nucleases

Christian, Michelle, Cermak, Tomas, Doyle, Erin L, Schmidt, Clarice, Zhang, Feng, Hummel, Aaron, Bogdanove, Adam J, Voytas, Daniel F·2010·Genetics

Abstract

Engineered nucleases that cleave specific DNA sequences in vivo are valuable reagents for targeted mutagenesis. Here we report a new class of sequence-specific nucleases created by fusing transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) to the catalytic domain of the FokI endonuclease. Both native and custom TALE-nuclease fusions direct DNA double-strand breaks to specific, targeted sites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1534/genetics.110.120717

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 10570, 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10570 · DOI
  2. 2009, Science, 326, 1509, 10.1126/science.1178811 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2010, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol, 13, 394, 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.010 · DOI
  4. 1989, Mol. Gen. Genet., 218, 127, 10.1007/BF00330575 · DOI
  5. 2008, Gene Ther., 15, 1463, 10.1038/gt.2008.145 · DOI
  6. 2008, Mol. Ther., 16, 1200, 10.1038/mt.2008.114 · DOI
  7. 1996, Structure, 4, 1171, 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00125-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2008, Nucleic Acids Res., 36, 2163, 10.1093/nar/gkn059 · DOI
  9. 2009, PLoS One, 4, e4348, 10.1371/journal.pone.0004348 · DOI
  10. 2009, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., 9, 1289, 10.1517/14712590903213669 · DOI
  11. 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 5617, 10.1073/pnas.94.11.5617 · DOI
  12. 2009, Genome Res., 19, 1279, 10.1101/gr.089417.108 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2008, Mol. Cell, 31, 294, 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.06.016 · DOI
  14. 2009, Science, 326, 1501, 10.1126/science.1178817 · DOI
  15. 2010, New Phytol
  16. 2009, Nature, 459, 442, 10.1038/nature07845 · DOI
  17. 2005, Nature, 435, 646, 10.1038/nature03556 · DOI
  18. 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 10503, 10.1073/pnas.0604088103 · DOI
  19. 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 12028, 10.1073/pnas.0914991107 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Christian, M., Cermak, T., Doyle, E. L., Schmidt, C., Zhang, F., Hummel, A., Bogdanove, A. J., & Voytas, D. F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Genetics , Cell Biology and Development and Center for Genome Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 and
  • Department of Plant Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames , Iowa 50011
Venue
Genetics
Published
2010-10-01
Volume
186
Issue
2
Pages
757-761
ISSN
1943-2631
Cited by
1,869
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review