Cited by 1,790Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

The keystone-pathogen hypothesis

Open access
Hajishengallis, George, Darveau, Richard P., Curtis, Michael A.·2012·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of the human microbiome in health and disease. However, for the most part the mechanisms by which the microbiome mediates disease, or protection from it, remain poorly understood. The keystone-pathogen hypothesis holds that certain low-abundance microbial pathogens can orchestrate inflammatory disease by remodelling a normally benign microbiota into a dysbiotic one. In this Opinion article, we critically assess the available literature that supports this hypothesis, which may provide a novel conceptual basis for the development of targeted diagnostics and treatments for complex dysbiotic diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrmicro2873

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The genus Prevotella, including P. denticola, acts on the early and middle steps of oral biofilm formation with cellular adhesion for later colonizers and supports the biofilm formation of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans.

    “The genus Prevotella, including P. denticola, acts on the early and middle steps of oral biofilm formation with cellular adhesion for later colonizers and, in particular, supports the biofilm formation of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans [22,23].”

    From Analysis of Chemical Structure and Antibiofilm Properties of Exopolysaccharides from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum EIR/IF-1 Postbiotics (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The section “Periodontitis and keystone pathogen-induced dysbiosis” discusses Porphyromonas gingivalis and changes in oral biofilms, not a role for Prevotella denticola in adhesion or early-to-middle biofilm formation. Searches for Prevotella denticola and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans found no passage in our copy supporting the claimed interaction; related species appear only in the References. No page numbers were available for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The keystone-pathogen hypothesis and the α-bug hypothesis both state that certain low abundance microbiota members, such as enterotoxigenic B. fragilis, possess unique virulence traits that are pro-oncogenic and remodel the microbiome, promoting mucosal immune responses and colonic epithelial cell changes.

    “The keystone-pathogen hypothesis88 and the α-bug hypothesis both state that certain, low abundance microbiota members (such as enterotoxigenic B. fragilis) possess unique virulence traits, which are pro-oncogenic and remodel the microbiome and in turn promote mucosal immune responses and colonic epithelial cell changes.89”

    From The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier (2016) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hajishengallis, G., Darveau, R. P., & Curtis, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hajishengallis, George
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2012-09-03
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
717-725
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W2043248182
Cited by
1,790
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 163 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 146 · 2023: 172 · 2022: 146 · 2021: 199 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council (MR/J011118/1)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE018292, DE-015254, R01DE015254, DE012768, DE021580, DE18274, DE021685, R01DE018274, DE018292, RC4DE021580, R01DE021685, R01DE012768)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
human microbiome, dysbiosis, commensal microbiota, inflammatory diseases, targeted therapeutics
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Inflammation, Models, Biological, Periodontitis, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Metagenome, Microbial Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review