CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 314Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthGestational Diabetes Research and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 394 of the 394 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physical Activity and Pregnancy: Cardiovascular Adaptations, Recommendations and Pregnancy Outcomes

Open access
Melzer, Katarina, Schutz, Yves, Boulvain, Michel, Kayser, Bengt·2010·Sports Medicine
DOI 10.2165/11532290-000000000-00000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Regular physical activity is associated with improved physiological, metabolic and psychological parameters, and with reduced risk of morbidity and mortality. Current recommendations aimed at improving the health and well-being of nonpregnant subjects advise that an accumulation of > or =30 minutes of moderate physical activity should occur on most, if not all, days of the week. Regardless of the specific physiological changes induced by pregnancy, which are primarily developed to meet the increased metabolic demands of mother and fetus, pregnant women benefit from regular physical activity the same way as nonpregnant subjects. Changes in submaximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)) during pregnancy depend on the type of exercise performed. During maternal rest or submaximal weight-bearing exercise (e.g. walking, stepping, treadmill exercise), absolute maternal VO(2) is significantly increased compared with the nonpregnant state. The magnitude of change is approximately proportional to maternal weight gain. When pregnant women perform submaximal weight-supported exercise on land (e.g. level cycling), the findings are contradictory. Some studies reported significantly increased absolute VO(2), while many others reported unchanged or only slightly increased absolute VO(2) compared with the nonpregnant state. The latter findings may be explained by the fact that the metabolic demand of cycle exercise is largely independent of the maternal body mass, resulting in no absolute VO(2) alteration. Few studies that directly measured changes in maternal maximal VO(2) (VO(2max)) showed no difference in the absolute VO(2max) between pregnant and nonpregnant subjects in cycling, swimming or weight-bearing exercise. Efficiency of work during exercise appears to be unchanged during pregnancy in non-weight-bearing exercise. During weight-bearing exercise, the work efficiency was shown to be improved in athletic women who continue exercising and those who stop exercising during pregnancy. When adjusted for weight gain, the increased efficiency is maintained throughout the pregnancy, with the improvement being greater in exercising women. Regular physical activity has been proven to result in marked benefits for mother and fetus. Maternal benefits include improved cardiovascular function, limited pregnancy weight gain, decreased musculoskeletal discomfort, reduced incidence of muscle cramps and lower limb oedema, mood stability, attenuation of gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational hypertension. Fetal benefits include decreased fat mass, improved stress tolerance, and advanced neurobehavioural maturation. In addition, few studies that have directly examined the effects of physical activity on labour and delivery indicate that, for women with normal pregnancies, physical activity is accompanied with shorter labour and decreased incidence of operative delivery. However, a substantial proportion of women stop exercising after they discover they are pregnant, and only few begin participating in exercise activities during pregnancy. The adoption or continuation of a sedentary lifestyle during pregnancy may contribute to the development of certain disorders such as hypertension, maternal and childhood obesity, gestational diabetes, dyspnoea, and pre-eclampsia. In view of the global epidemic of sedentary behaviour and obesity-related pathology, prenatal physical activity was shown to be useful for the prevention and treatment of these conditions. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm the association between physical activity and outcomes of labour and delivery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11532290-000000000-00000

Cites

394 of 394 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Blair, 2009, Br J Sports Med, 43, 1
  2. Katz, 1990, Isr J Med Sci, 26, 254
  3. Pivarnik, 1993, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 25, 993
  4. Heenan, 2001, Obstet Gynecol, 97, 127
  5. Spaaij, 1994, Eur J Clin Nutr, 48, 513
  6. McMurray, 1993, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 25, 1305
  7. Jones, 1985, Obstet Gynecol, 65, 340
  8. Lawrence, 1988, Eur J Clin Nutr, 42, 145
  9. Heini, 1991, Am J Physiol, 261, E9
  10. Gawade, 2009, J Reprod Med, 54, 429
  11. DiNallo, 2008, Res Q Exerc Sport, 79, 28
  12. Jarrett, 1983, Obstet Gynecol, 61, 705
  13. Clapp, 1991, J Dev Physiol, 15, 9
  14. Erdelyi, 1962, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2, 174
  15. Beckmann, 1990, J Reprod Med, 35, 704
  16. Rice, 1991, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 31, 95
  17. Magann, 2002, Obstet Gynecol, 99, 466

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 314

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Melzer, K., Schutz, Y., Boulvain, M., & Kayser, B.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Kayser, Bengt
ORCID
Venue
Sports Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-06
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
493-507
ISSN
0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2165/11532290-000000000-00000
OpenAlex
W1566969346
Cited by
314
References
394
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 27
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
exercise during pregnancy, maternal physical activity, submaximal oxygen uptake, VO2max, weight-bearing exercise, cycling, work efficiency, gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, labour duration, sedentary lifestyle, maternal cardiovascular function, musculoskeletal discomfort, maternal and fetal health
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Oxygen Consumption, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Exercise, Guidelines as Topic, Delivery, Obstetric, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review