The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet; none of the 136 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Growing interest on the effects of home telemonitoring on patients with chronic heart failure (HF) has led to a rise in the number of systematic reviews addressing the same or very similar research questions with a concomitant increase in discordant findings. Differences in the scope, methods of analysis, and methodological quality of systematic reviews can cause great confusion and make it difficult for policy makers and clinicians to access and interpret the available evidence and for researchers to know where knowledge gaps in the extant literature exist. OBJECTIVE: This overview aims to collect, appraise, and synthesize existing evidence from multiple systematic reviews on the effectiveness of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic heart failure (HF) to inform policy makers, practitioners, and researchers. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library to identify all relevant, peer-reviewed systematic reviews published between January 1996 and December 2013. Reviews were searched and screened using explicit keywords and inclusion criteria. Standardized forms were used to extract data and the methodological quality of included reviews was appraised using the AMSTAR (assessing methodological quality of systematic reviews) instrument. Summary of findings tables were constructed for all primary outcomes of interest, and quality of evidence was graded by outcome using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Post-hoc analysis and subgroup meta-analyses were conducted to gain further insights into the various types of home telemonitoring technologies included in the systematic reviews and the impact of these technologies on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 15 reviews published between 2003 and 2013 were selected for meta-level synthesis. Evidence from high-quality reviews with meta-analysis indicated that taken collectively, home telemonitoring interventions reduce the relative risk of all-cause mortality (0.60 to 0.85) and heart failure-related hospitalizations (0.64 to 0.86) compared with usual care. Absolute risk reductions ranged from 1.4%-6.5% and 3.7%-8.2%, respectively. Improvements in HF-related hospitalizations appeared to be more pronounced in patients with stable HF: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% credible interval [Crl] 0.34-1.5]). Risk reductions in mortality and all-cause hospitalizations appeared to be greater in patients who had been recently discharged (≤28 days) from an acute care setting after a recent HF exacerbation: HR 0.62 (95% CrI 0.42-0.89) and HR 0.67 (95% CrI 0.42-0.97), respectively. However, quality of evidence for these outcomes ranged from moderate to low suggesting that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the observed estimates of effect and may change these estimates. The post-hoc analysis identified five main types of non-invasive telemonitoring technologies included in the systematic reviews: (1) video-consultation, with or without transmission of vital signs, (2) mobile telemonitoring, (3) automated device-based telemonitoring, (4) interactive voice response, and (5) Web-based telemonitoring. Of these, only automated device-based telemonitoring and mobile telemonitoring were effective in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalizations. More research data are required for interactive voice response systems, video-consultation, and Web-based telemonitoring to provide robust conclusions about their effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on understanding the process by which home telemonitoring works in terms of improving outcomes, identify optimal strategies and the duration of follow-up for which it confers benefits, and further investigate whether there is differential effectiveness between chronic HF patient groups and types of home telemonitoring technologies.
Checked 2026-10-06 · 2 references not checked yet
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This overview of 15 systematic reviews found that home telemonitoring for chronic heart failure was associated with reduced all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalizations versus usual care, but the quality of evidence was moderate to low. Post-hoc analyses suggested only automated device-based and mobile telemonitoring were effective, while other technologies lacked robust data.
Key findings
- Across high-quality reviews with meta-analysis, home telemonitoring reduced the relative risk of all-cause mortality (0.60 to 0.85) and HF-related hospitalizations (0.64 to 0.86) compared with usual care; absolute risk reductions ranged from 1.4%-6.5% and 3.7%-8.2%, respectively.
- The strongest evidence (moderate quality) came from a Cochrane review: all-cause mortality RR 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.81) in 2710 patients/11 RCTs, ARR 5.2%, number needed to treat 19; HF-related hospitalizations RR 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.94) in 1570 patients/4 RCTs, ARR 6%.
- Recently discharged patients (≤28 days) showed greater reductions in mortality and all-cause hospitalizations: HR 0.62 (95% CrI 0.42-0.89) and HR 0.67 (95% CrI 0.42-0.97), respectively, but quality of evidence was low.
- Post-hoc analyses found automated device-based telemonitoring reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.65 [0.54-0.79]) and HF-related hospitalizations (RR 0.77 [0.64-0.91]); mobile telemonitoring showed beneficial but statistically inconclusive trends; interactive voice response and video-consultation were not associated with benefit.
Methods
- Overview of systematic reviews: searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library through December 2013, updated December 2014; included 15 peer-reviewed systematic reviews published 2003-2013 (18 references), covering 105 primary HT studies.
- Data extraction, AMSTAR quality appraisal, GRADE evidence grading, summary-of-findings tables, citation overlap analysis, and a taxonomy classifying reviews by PICO characteristics.
- Post-hoc subgroup meta-analyses of RCTs by home telemonitoring technology used risk ratios, intention-to-treat analysis, Mantel-Haenszel method, and random-effects models; some included reviews used Bayesian credible intervals.
Limitations
- The paper states overviews are constrained by the quality and reporting of included reviews, publication lag, and overlap between reviews; only 3/15 reviews were high quality (AMSTAR ≥8), 4 were moderate, and 8 were low quality.
- The paper states evidence quality was moderate to low due to risk of bias, imprecision, and heterogeneity; most trials lacked details on randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding, and one third of trials contributing data received commercial funding.
- Evident from the text: the post-hoc technology analyses were exploratory, often based on few RCTs, and should be considered hypothesis-generating; the overview found no high-quality evidence for or against home telemonitoring effectiveness.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 136 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Improvements in HF-related hospitalizations appeared to be more pronounced in patients with stable HF: hazard ratio (HR) 0.70 (95% credible interval [Crl] 0.34-1.5]).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four systematic reviews (27%), in addition to HT investigated the effects of structured telephone support (STS) on patients with HF [33,34,37,41].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence from high-quality reviews with meta-analysis indicated that taken collectively, home telemonitoring interventions reduce the relative risk of all-cause mortality (0.60 to 0.85) and heart failure-related hospitalizations (0.64 to 0.86) compared with usual care.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence from high-quality reviews with meta-analysis indicated that taken collectively, home telemonitoring interventions reduce the relative risk of all-cause mortality (0.60 to 0.85) and heart failure-related hospitalizations (0.64 to 0.86) compared with usual care. Absolute risk reductions ranged from 1.4%-6.5% and 3.7%-8.2%, respectively.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, quality of evidence for these outcomes ranged from moderate to low suggesting that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the observed estimates of effect and may change these estimates.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven reviews (47%) included only RCTs [33,34,36,37,41,43,47].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Risk reductions in mortality and all-cause hospitalizations appeared to be greater in patients who had been recently discharged (≤28 days) from an acute care setting after a recent HF exacerbation: HR 0.62 (95% CrI 0.42-0.89) and HR 0.67 (95% CrI 0.42-0.97), respectively.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence from high-quality reviews with meta-analysis indicated that taken collectively, home telemonitoring interventions reduce the relative risk of all-cause mortality (0.60 to 0.85) and heart failure-related hospitalizations (0.64 to 0.86) compared with usual care. Absolute risk reductions ranged from 1.4%-6.5% and 3.7%-8.2%, respectively.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 15 reviews published between 2003 and 2013 were selected for meta-level synthesis.”
- Also stated in: § Description of the Included Systematic Reviews · plain
“After completion of the screening process, we identified 15 systematic reviews for inclusion (18 references; 3 systematic reviews had duplicate publications) [33-50].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Description of the Included Systematic Reviews · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of these, only automated device-based telemonitoring and mobile telemonitoring were effective in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalizations.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 42
- It may state two separate claims as one. 40
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, findings from these distinctively different interventions were analyzed and reported separately. Therefore, data extracted and presented in Table 2 from these reviews pertain only to the HT studies and not the STS ones.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After screening titles and abstracts, we retrieved 65 reviews in full text for further assessment.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Seven reviews (based on the corresponding author) originated in North America (Canada=5 and United States=2), 6 in Europe (United Kingdom=3, Greece=1, Netherlands=1, Spain=1), and 2 in Australia.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our search (up to December 13, 2013) yielded 4683 citations after removal of 771 duplicate references.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This process yielded 8 more reviews.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The total number of identified studies was 105; 38 (36%) referring to RCTs and 67 (64%) to observational studies.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After further assessment, we excluded 55 articles that did not meet our eligibility criteria.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All reviews were published in peer-reviewed journals.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reviews were published between 2003 and 2013, with more than half (n=9) published in 2009 or later.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 9Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of HT studies identified and included in the reviews ranged from 4 to 42: mean 17.53 (SD 11.4).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, two systematic reviews were initially published as Health Technology Assessment reports and one as a Cochrane review.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The post-hoc analysis identified five main types of non-invasive telemonitoring technologies included in the systematic reviews: (1) video-consultation, with or without transmission of vital signs, (2) mobile telemonitoring, (3) automated device-based telemonitoring, (4) interactive voice response, and (5) Web-based telemonitoring.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Five reviews (33%) contained meta-analysis for at least one primary outcome of interest, while the remaining 10 used narrative synthesis.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Description of the Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The NYHA class of participants in all but one review ranged from I to IV.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Population
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“One review [37] focused primarily on HF patients who had been recently discharged (within 28 days) from an acute care setting after a recent HF exacerbation and conducted additional analyses to assess whether or not the results from these studies differed markedly from the results of studies that included patients with stable HF.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reviews consisted of a family of complex HT interventions, rather than a single type, involving various telehealth devices”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Intervention
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, reporting of the active ingredients of these interventions was often poor in the included reviews and not consistently performed for all primary studies (eg, [36,38-40,46,47]).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Intervention
What the sources say
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The remaining reviews, in addition to usual care, included RCTs that compared HT with other relevant comparators (eg, home visits or telephone support).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Comparison
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The highest reported mean age in a study was 85 years [36] and the lowest was 48 years [39].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Population
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most frequently reported outcomes included all-cause mortality (11/15, 73%), hospital re-admissions (13/15, 87%), costs (12/15, 80%), and length of stay (9/15, 60%).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the majority of systematic reviews reported the mean age (12/15, 80%) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of the participants (10/15, 67%).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Population
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Six reviews made a distinction between all-cause and HF-related hospitalizations, while the remaining reviews did not.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Outcomes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Relative risk reductions in the four reviews that incorporated meta-analysis ranged from 14% (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.61-1.21)] [37] to 36% (HR 0.64 [95% CrI 0.34-1.14]), while the ARR in HF-related hospitalizations extended from 3.7%-8.2%.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ratio of cited to total published observational studies remained the same, as virtually all reviews that included studies with observational designs were classified in the same group (Comparison 6).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Classification of Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the analysis yielded a mean ratio of 0.87 (95% CI 0.29-1.44) for RCTs in Comparison group 1, a mean ratio of 0.66 (95% CI 0.43-0.90) for RCTs in Comparison group 5, and a mean ratio of 0.48 (95% CI 0.28-0.67) for RCTs in Comparison group 6.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Classification of Reviews
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Remote monitoring strategies included STS, HT with clinical support during offices hours, and HT with clinical support provided 24/7.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Classification of Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The remaining six summarized the available evidence narratively using various qualitative or semi-quantitative techniques [38,39,41,43,45].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compliance, acceptability, emergency room visits, and patient satisfaction were reported in less than half of the reviews and thus were excluded from our analysis.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Outcomes
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The methodological quality of the reviews varied considerably, and many of them had important limitations (Table 5).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Methodological Quality of Included Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Of them, five pooled study results into a meta-analysis [33-37].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other reviews had a broader scope of inquiry and examined the effects of HT interventions (with or without home visits) versus a variety of comparison interventions, including usual care, nursing telephone support, and/or home care.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Classification of Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, reviews concluded that HT improved quality of life.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, in one of the high-quality reviews, the authors concluded that HT improves quality of life, but only three of the seven studies that reported data for this outcome found positive and statistically significant improvements.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These included (1) automated device-based telemonitoring (TM and TM+), (2) mobile telemonitoring (MT), (3) automated interactive voice response (IVR), and (4) video-consultation with trans-telephonic vital signs monitoring (VC+).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These interventions were further categorized into three mutually exclusive subgroups, based on the technological characteristics of the intervention, as well as methods of data collection and transmission.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the other two studies, the process of measurement and transmission was not automated.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two used structured telephone support only (denoted in Figure 3 as “STS”), while a third study used a pager to transmit computer-generated reminders to the patient to take medications, weigh themselves, and measure their blood pressure and heart rate.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No significant differences were found for all-cause mortality (RR 0.95 [0.35-2.53], P=.91) owing to the small number of patients and events.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three observational studies cited across 4 systematic reviews involved the use of other communication platforms that could not be classified under any of the above categories.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eleven reviews examined the effects of HT interventions on cost savings, but none of them pooled results into a meta-analysis due to the inconsistency in cost-analysis methods used in the original studies.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown at the bottom of Table 10, when considered collectively, HT interventions without home visits are associated with a statistically significant, relative risk reduction of all-cause mortality (RR 0.73 [0.62-0.85], P<.001) and HF-related hospitalizations (RR 0.79 [0.69-0.91], P=.001) of 27% and 21%, respectively.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the remaining studies (1 RCT and 3 observational), the intervention involved use of stand-alone videoconferencing equipment without transmission of vital signs.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This overview appraised and summarized evidence from 15 systematic reviews assessing the effects of HT interventions on patients with HF.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Discussion > Summary of the Evidence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Eight reviews concurred that the impact of HT interventions on health care costs appeared to be positive in more cases than not, but in general results were statistically inconclusive and varied depending on the context and specific national health system of the study [34,36,38,39,41,43,44,47].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies that involved telemonitoring of vital signs and symptoms through individualized symptom response systems (TM+) yielded slightly smaller effects with respect to all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations than studies involving telemonitoring of vital signs only (TM). However, this difference was not statistically significant.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Evidence about cost-effectiveness remains limited, and there are no reliable data on the long-term benefits and economic implications of HT interventions [51].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Discussion > Summary of the Evidence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in this overview, there exists a considerable body of evidence evaluating the effectiveness of HT interventions for patients with HF.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Discussion > Implications for Research
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results from the principal analysis of this overview suggest that compared with usual care, HT interventions improve survival rates and reduce the risk of HF-related hospitalizations.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Discussion > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Quality of evidence in included systematic reviews was assessed by outcome using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system criteria [17-27].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Quality of Evidence in Included Systematic Reviews
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] source
- Not checked yetcites [18] source
- Not checked yetcites [19] source
- Not checked yetcites [20] source
- Not checked yetcites [21] source
- Not checked yetcites [22] source
- Not checked yetcites [23] source
- Not checked yetcites [24] source
- Not checked yetcites [25] source
- Not checked yetcites [26] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“AMSTAR is a validated instrument that uses 11 items to assess the degree to which review methods are unbiased.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Quality Assessment of Included Reviews
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, quality of evidence for these outcomes ranged from moderate to low suggesting that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the observed estimates of effect and may change these estimates.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Abstract > Results
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In cases where reviews had not performed a risk of bias assessment, we performed this task independently using the six criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration tool [28].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Quality of Evidence in Included Systematic Reviews
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Higgins, Julian PT, 2008, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was independently assessed by the first two authors using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool [16].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Quality Assessment of Included Reviews
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As shown below, the Cochrane Collaboration methodology [11] and available methodological guidelines for overviews of reviews [12,13] were rigorously applied throughout this study.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Overview
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Full-text articles were then retrieved and independently assessed for inclusion by the first 2 authors.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Selection of Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It can be particularly helpful for those living in remote and rural areas, the elderly and frail who are housebound, as well as those at high risk of deterioration [5].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No language restrictions were applied.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Search Methods
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Overviews of systematic reviews are an efficient way to gather and summarize in a single source the best available evidence on the effectiveness of interventions.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To ensure consistency of assessment between the 2 assessors, we developed decision support rules for scoring each criterion (Multimedia Appendix 2).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Quality Assessment of Included Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data were extracted by the first author and were verified for accuracy by the second.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Data Extraction
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the preliminary stage, all titles and abstracts were screened by the first author according to the pre-specified inclusion criteria described in Table 1.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Selection of Systematic Reviews
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A recent critical review indicated that among all chronic conditions, HF has attracted the highest number of primary studies and systematic reviews [7].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Searches were supplemented by manual searching of two relevant scientific journals (ie, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare and Telemedicine and e-Health) and screening of relevant reviews’ bibliographies.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Methods > Search Methods
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As shown in Table 9, the strongest evidence (moderate quality) comes from a high-quality meta-analysis of 4 large RCTs (N=1570 patients), which found statistically significant risk reductions of 21% in HF-related hospitalizations with HT versus usual care, equating to an ARR of 6% (95% CI-1.7 to -9.7) [34].”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“While HT with 24/4 clinical support yielded beneficial but marginally lower relative effects than those observed in recently discharged patients: HR 0.84 (95% CrI 0.54-1.15); ARR 5.7% (-1.8 to 4.8%).”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“In the pooling of all-cause mortality data from 11 RCTs involving 2710 patients with HF, HT resulted in statistically significant risk reduction of 34% (RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.54-0.81]); an ARR of 5.2% (95% CI -2.9 to -7.1), equating to a number needed to treat of 19 to postpone one death.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, results were statistically inconclusive and the overall quality of evidence was found to be low, suggesting that these estimates should be interpreted with caution until more evidence accumulates.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Home Telemonitoring Effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We were able to extract data from all 105 primary studies, with the exception of 8 observational studies that could not be retrieved.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Results > Opening the Black Box of Home Telemonitoring Technologies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these findings should be interpreted with caution and be considered as hypothesis generating rather than hypothesis testing due to the exploratory nature of our investigation.”
§ Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews > Discussion > Conclusions
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Systematic reviews of home telemonitoring for heart failure have produced discordant findings in terms of direction and magnitude of home telemonitoring effects.
“Growing interest on the effects of home telemonitoring on patients with HF has led to a rise in the number of reviews addressing the same or very similar research questions with a concurrent increase in discordant findings in terms of direction and magnitude of HT effects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Differences in scope, methods of analysis, results, and quality of systematic reviews make it difficult for policy makers to access and interpret review-level evidence and for researchers to identify evidence gaps.
“Differences in scope, methods of analysis, results, and quality of systematic reviews can cause great confusion and make it difficult for policy makers to access the review-level evidence, and for researchers to know where gaps in the evidence exist.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Home telemonitoring enables early detection of clinical decompensation in patients with heart failure, allowing timely intervention to prevent mortality events or further deterioration necessitating hospitalization.
“By allowing clinical data to be remotely collected on a regular basis, HT can enable early detection of clinical decompensation in patients with HF, allowing for timely intervention to prevent mortality events or further deterioration of the patient’s condition necessitating hospitalization and use of more resources.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A recent metareview of heart failure telemonitoring interventions showed a reduction in all-cause mortality (relative risk 0.60-0.85) and heart failure hospitalizations (relative risk 0.64-0.86) in an analysis of 15 meta-analyses [74].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conclusion calls mobile telemonitoring effective despite inconclusive results
MajorThe conclusion says mobile telemonitoring is effective at reducing mortality and HF-related hospitalizations, whereas the mobile-telemonitoring results explicitly say both outcomes were statistically inconclusive.
“The results of the post-hoc analyses suggest that only interventions involving automated device-based telemonitoring and mobile telemonitoring are effective in reducing the risk of all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalizations.”
“However, results for both of these outcomes were statistically inconclusive owing to the small number and size of RCTs in this group.”
Conflicting counts of reviews reporting costs
MinorThe outcomes section says 12 reviews reported costs, while the cost-savings section says 11 examined that outcome.
“costs (12/15, 80%)”
“Eleven reviews examined the effects of HT interventions on cost savings”
Conflicting counts of reviews reporting length of stay
MinorThe outcomes section reports nine reviews for length of stay, but the dedicated section reports eight.
“length of stay (9/15, 60%)”
“The impact of HT on hospital length of stay due to exacerbated HF events and/or any cause hospitalization was examined in eight reviews.”
Louis review study-design counts do not total 24
MinorThe listed 6 RCTs and 12 observational studies total 18, not the stated 24 studies. The remaining six studies are not accounted for in this breakdown.
Reported 24 · recomputed 18
“24 studies (6 RCTs, 12 observational)”
All-cause hospitalization confidence-limit percentage is tenfold too small
MinorThe table's lower confidence limit of 181 fewer per 1000 is 18.1% fewer, not the 1.8% given in the prose for the same 5.7% reduction.
“ARR 5.7% (-1.8 to 4.8%).”
“57 fewer per 1000 (from 181 fewer to 48 more)”
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042 · cited 1×
“Finally, given our observation that 80% (12/15) of the systematic reviews assessed in this overview had moderate or major methodological limitations, researchers are strongly encouraged to closely adhere to the available methodological and reporting guidelines for systematic reviews [70-72] and consider the AMSTAR eva…”
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164 · cited 1×
“…limitations, researchers are strongly encouraged to closely adhere to the available methodological and reporting guidelines for systematic reviews [70-72] and consider the AMSTAR evaluation criteria [16] in order to improve the methodological rigor and reporting quality of their work.”
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048 · cited 1×
“Finally, given our observation that 80% (12/15) of the systematic reviews assessed in this overview had moderate or major methodological limitations, researchers are strongly encouraged to closely adhere to the available methodological and reporting guidelines for systematic reviews [70-72] and consider the AMSTAR eva…”
Dermyshi, E., Wang, Y., Yan, C., Hong, W., Qiu, G., Gong, X., & Zhang, T. (2017) · Neonatology · doi:10.1159/000454668 · Cited by 24,586
McDonagh, T. A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., Gardner, R. S., Baumbach, A., Böhm, M., Burri, H., Butler, J., Čelutkienė, J., Chioncel, O. D., et al. (2021) · PubMed · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab670 · Cited by 20,604
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,762
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jadad, A R, 1997, CMAJ, 156, 1411
- ESC Press OfficeIndividualised treatment for heart failure is rarely available outside hospital - New telemonitoring systems could ‘radically’ change the situation200905302014-09-20http://www.escardio.org/about/press/press-releases/pr-09/Pages/Individualised-treatment-HF-hospital.aspxESC Press release Heart Failure Congress 2009http://www.escardio.org/about/press/press-releases/pr-09/Pages/Individualised-treatment-HF-hospital.aspx6WaYcS3L3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2019) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212 · Cited by 1,044
“Patients feel that adopting to telemedicine services will be useful only if it will lead to faster delivery of health care services with the low-cost of medical inspection, improved documentation and reduced service time of health care [49].”
BackgroundHanlon, P., Daines, L., Campbell, C., McKinstry, B., Weller, D., & Pinnock, H. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6688 · Cited by 499
“86) in an analysis of 15 meta-analyses [74].”
Bringing health care to the patient
Hashiguchi, T. C. O. (2020) · OECD health working papers · doi:10.1787/8e56ede7-en · Cited by 588
Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews
Kitsiou, S., Paré, G., Jaana, M., & Gerber, B. S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173160 · Cited by 415
Self-citationRemote Patient Monitoring: A Systematic Review
Farias, F. A. C. D., Dagostini, C. M., Bicca, Y. D. A., Falavigna, V. F., & Falavigna, A. (2020) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0066 · Cited by 338
Kendzerska, T., Zhu, D. T., Gershon, A. S., Edwards, J. D., Peixoto, C., Robillard, R., & Kendall, C. (2021) · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · doi:10.2147/rmhp.s293471 · Cited by 289
“manage chronic illnesses, for example, for patients with heart failure and COPD.(56,57) Suddenly, social distancing,”
BackgroundWang, Y., Min, J., Khuri, J., Xue, H., Xie, B., A Kaminsky, L., & J Cheskin, L. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/15400 · Cited by 250
“A thorough review of the evidence is needed and can help guide future research and interventions [38,39].”
Rouleau, G., Gagnon, M.-P., Côté, J., Payne-Gagnon, J., Hudson, E., & Dubois, C.-A. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6686 · Cited by 244
“For criteria 9, entailing the inappropriateness of methods used to combine findings, we answered “yes,” based on the decision rules developed by Kitsiou et al [45]: “reviews’authors made a statement regarding the inappropriateness of pooling data (eg, highlighted issues about heterogeneity or variability between the s…”
Bienassis, K. D., Kristensen, S., Burtscher, M., Brownwood, I., & Klazinga, N. S. (2020) · OECD health working papers · doi:10.1787/6ee1aeae-en · Cited by 244
Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2018) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2017.1398880 · Cited by 180
Self-citationFrederix, I., Hansen, D., Coninx, K., Vandervoort, P., Vandijck, D., Hens, N., Van Craenenbroeck, E., Van Driessche, N., & Dendale, P. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4799 · Cited by 185
“Recent literature findings confirmed telehealth interventions such as telemonitoring to be feasible and effective for heart failure patients [15-18].”
Bardhan, I. R., Chen, H., & Karahanna, E. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/14644 · Cited by 192
“With the increasing presence of sensors, telemonitoring technologies have the potential to provide continuous feedback of a chronic patient’s condition either to the patient or to their healthcare providers (Kitsiou et al. 2015).”
Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation
McDonagh, S. T. J., Dalal, H. M., Moore, S. F., Clark, C. E., Dean, S. G., Jolly, K. B., Cowie, A., Afzal, J., & Taylor, R. S. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007130.pub5 · Cited by 178
Understanding heart failure; explaining telehealth—a hermeneutic systematic review
Greenhalgh, T., A’Court, C., & Shaw, S. (2017) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0594-2 · Cited by 141
“Meta-analyses of such trials, claim critics, have tended to take too little account of inter-study differences and give too much weight to flawed primary studies [6, 33, 38, 39, 64, 65].”
BackgroundMobile health technology: a novel tool in chronic disease management
Fan, K., & Zhao, Y. (2021) · Intelligent Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.imed.2021.06.003 · Cited by 150
Digital physical therapy in the COVID-19 pandemic
Dantas, L. O., Barreto, R. P. G., & Ferreira, C. H. J. (2020) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.04.006 · Cited by 137
Piette, J. D., Striplin, D., Marinec, N., Chen, J., Trivedi, R. B., Aron, D. C., Fisher, L., & Aikens, J. E. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4550 · Cited by 131
“A number of recently completed clinical trials and evidence syntheses have shown that mobile health (mHealth) interventions can improve self-care behaviors and physiologic risk factors for poor outcomes of cardiovascular disease, including heart failure [12-16].”
Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey
Paré, G., Leaver, C. A., & Bourget, C. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9388 · Cited by 113
“Although the use of connected care technologies could potentially benefit the growing population of patients with chronic conditions [29,30], the question remains as to whether it will diffuse broadly beyond early adopters and across cost inequities.”
BackgroundSelf-citationWare, P., Ross, H. J., Cafazzo, J. A., Laporte, A., Gordon, K., & Seto, E. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/10768 · Cited by 85
“Meta-analyses tend to support claims of the positive impact on heart failure outcomes [1,6-9]; however, important inconsistencies in the evidence persist [10].”
BackgroundHale, T. M., Jethwani, K., Kandola, M. S., Saldaña, F., & Kvedar, J. C. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5256 · Cited by 105
“A recent large scale RCT found no significant reduction in hospitalization and ED visits [16], whereas systematic reviews [15,17] and smaller studies have found positive effects [19,22-26].”
Ware, P., Ross, H. J., Cafazzo, J. A., Boodoo, C., Munnery, M., & Seto, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16538 · Cited by 102
“This is supported by several meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which have concluded that TM reduces the risk of mortality and the number of hospitalizations when compared with the standard of care [10-13].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAthilingam, P. R., Jenkins, B., Johansson, M., & Labrador, M. A. (2017) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/cardio.7848 · Cited by 95
“5), indicating appropriate selection of patients who are not in the refractory or end-stage HF [58].”
BackgroundWare, P., Dorai, M., Ross, H. J., Cafazzo, J. A., Laporte, A., Boodoo, C., & Seto, E. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/13259 · Cited by 100
“According to several meta-analyses, these mechanisms work together to improve quality of life and reduce mortality and health care utilization compared with the standard of care without TM [2,7-10].”
BackgroundSoones, T. N., Federman, A. D., Leff, B. A., Siu, A. L., & Ornstein, K. A. (2016) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.14467 · Cited by 102
“Similarly, home telehealth interventions have resulted in less healthcare use of homebound older adults with depression(39) and lower risks of hospitalization and death in individuals with congestive heart failure.(40,41) Given that telehealth interventions and HBPC can improve individual- and system-level outcomes by…”
BackgroundCost‐Effectiveness of Remote Cardiac Monitoring With the CardioMEMS Heart Failure System
Schmier, J. K., Ong, K. L., & Fonarow, G. C. (2017) · Clinical Cardiology · doi:10.1002/clc.22696 · Cited by 98
“The effectiveness of remote monitoring may also depend on the particular monitoring device/system or patient characteristics.(15,16)”
BackgroundMizukawa, M., Moriyama, M., Yamamoto, H., Rahman, M. M., Naka, M., Kitagawa, T., Kobayashi, S., Oda, N., Yasunobu, Y., Tomiyama, M., et al. (2019) · International Heart Journal · doi:10.1536/ihj.19-313 · Cited by 87
mHealth education interventions in heart failure
Allida, S. M., Du, H., Xu, X., Prichard, R. A., Chang, S., Hickman, L., Davidson, P. M., & Inglis, S. C. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011845.pub2 · Cited by 90
Dickinson, M. G., Allen, L. A., Albert, N. M., DiSalvo, T. G., Ewald, G. A., Vest, A. R., Whellan, D. J., Zile, M. R., & Givertz, M. M. (2018) · Journal of Cardiac Failure · doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.08.011 · Cited by 86
Kitsiou, S., Vatani, H., Paré, G., Gerber, B. S., Buchholz, S. W., Kansal, M. M., Leigh, J. W., & Creber, R. M. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.015 · Cited by 83
Self-citationHome Telemonitoring In Heart Failure: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
Pekmezaris, R., Tortez, L. M., Williams, M. S., Patel, V. H., Makaryus, A. N., Zeltser, R., Sinvani, L., Wolf‐Klein, G. P., Lester, J., Sison, C. P., et al. (2018) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05087 · Cited by 93
Creber, R. M., Dodson, J. A., Bidwell, J. T., Breathett, K. K., Lyles, C. R., Still, C. H., Ooi, S., Yancy, C. W., & Kitsiou, S. (2023) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/hcq.0000000000000123 · Cited by 91
“28,38,50,64 One of the major weaknesses of using noninvasive remote monitoring for predicting or identifying episodes of worsening HF is the high rate of false-positive alerts that eventually leads to warnings being ignored due to mistrust.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationUse of smartphone technology in cardiology
Nguyen, H. H., & Silva, J. N. A. (2015) · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2015.11.002 · Cited by 79
“A recent meta-analysis of all the identified systematic reviews on the subject of the effectiveness of home telemonitoring interventions on patients with chronic heart failure from 2003 to 2103 showed that automated devicebased and mobile tele-monitoring of vital signs and symptoms are effective in reducing all-cause…”
BackgroundAthilingam, P., Labrador, M. A., Remo, E. F. J., Mack, L., San Juan, A. B., & Elliott, A. F. (2016) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2016.07.001 · Cited by 78
The Effect of Telehealth on Hospital Services Use: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Peters, G. M., Kooij, L., Lenferink, A., van Harten, W. H., & Doggen, C. J. M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25195 · Cited by 78
“2% for patients with a condition-related hospitalization [6].”
BackgroundInfluentialPatient Use and Clinical Practice Patterns of Remote Cardiology Clinic Visits in the Era of COVID-19
Yuan, N., Pevnick, J. M., Botting, P. G., Elad, Y., Miller, S. J., Cheng, S. C., & Ebinger, J. E. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.4157 · Cited by 74
O’Connor, M. L., Dempsey, M., Huffenberger, A. M., Jost, S. G., Flynn, D., Norris, A. H., & Asdornwised, U. (2016) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2015-11-soa-0157 · Cited by 73
Middlemass, J., Vos, J., & Siriwardena, A. N. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0486-5 · Cited by 69
“Health status, beliefs and concerns All patients had severe COPD and at least one other heart related condition which for some included confirmed heart failure.”
BackgroundInfluentialOlivari, Z., Giacomelli, S., Gubian, L., Mancin, S., Visentin, E., Francesco, V. D., Iliceto, S., Penzo, M., Zanocco, A., Marcon, C., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.099 · Cited by 76
Lefler, L. L., Rhoads, S., Harris, M., Funderburg, A. E., Lubin, S., Martel, I. D., Faulkner, J. L., Rooker, J. L., Bell, D. K., Marshall, H., et al. (2018) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/12178 · Cited by 63
“Recently, mHealth was supported for reducing hospital readmissions [32,53,54] but not necessarily ED visits [51].”
BackgroundBertoncello, C., Colucci, M., Baldovin, T., Buja, A., & Baldo, V. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207332 · Cited by 68
The role of non-invasive devices for the telemonitoring of heart failure patients
Faragli, A., Abawi, D., Quinn, C., Cvetković, M., Schlabs, T., Tahirović, E., Düngen, H., Pieske, B. M., Kelle, S., Edelmann, F., et al. (2020) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-020-09963-7 · Cited by 66
“The most relevant criteria refer to symptomatic patients (NYHA class 3), with recent hospitalizations, a history of body fluids overload and a lack of appropriate medication adherence [106, 107].”
BackgroundGiordan, L. B., Tong, H. L., Atherton, J. J., Ronto, R., Chau, J. Y., Kaye, D. M., Shaw, T. J., Chow, C. K., & Laranjo, L. (2022) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/33839 · Cited by 55
“Given the demonstrated benefits of self-management interventions more broadly [74] and remote monitoring [18-27], future research should explore the possibility that their combination may result in synergistic effects and higher efficacy in improving heart failure outcomes.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAamodt, I. T., Lycholip, E., Celutkiene, J., Strömberg, A., Atar, D., Falk, R. S., von Lueder, T., Hellesø, R., Jaarsma, T., & Lie, I. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10362 · Cited by 49
“Moreover, the cost of implementing TM in the management of HF is not clearly reported, varying from low-to-high cost depending on how costs are measured, for example, equipment, follow-up, or hospital admission [13,23,42].”
BackgroundResultDesign and Usability of a Heart Failure mHealth System: A Pilot Study
Alnosayan, N., Chatterjee, S., Alluhaidan, A. S., Lee, E., & Houston-Feenstra, L. (2017) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.6481 · Cited by 56
“The various design approaches and inconsistent findings have resulted in the need to understand what features are effective and how users’ interaction with the system impacts adherence to the HF self-care process and, consequently, health outcomes [7,8].”
Kitsiou, S., Thomas, M. M., Marai, G. E., Maglaveras, N., Kondos, G. T., Arena, R. A., & Gerber, B. S. (2017) · IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI ...) · doi:10.1109/bhi.2017.7897223 · Cited by 55
“sabbatical leave from Aristotle University, Lab of Computing and Medical Mobile health technologies (mHealth) such as smartphones, mobile applications (apps), and wearable activity tracking devices that permit real-time collection of “big data” have become ubiquitous [10], offering significant and innovative opportuni…”
BackgroundSelf-citationEffectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review
Lanssens, D., Vandenberk, T., Thijs, I. M. V., Grieten, L., & Gyselaers, W. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7266 · Cited by 52
“A number of systematic reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of telemonitoring interventions for patients diagnosed with chronic cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and diabetes [2,5-8].”
BackgroundNick, J. M., Roberts, L. R., & Petersen, A. B. (2021) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-20-00329 · Cited by 52
“A pivotal question remains: Is the effectiveness of TM due to increased provider interaction in response to alerts or due to patients’ increased ability to adjust self-care behaviors, or both? There is still a need for greater understanding of the mechanism by which TM improves outcomes.(84) Existing theoretical model…”
BackgroundDing, H., Chen, S. H., Edwards, I., Jayasena, R., Doecke, J. D., Layland, J. J., Yang, I. A., & Maiorana, A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20032 · Cited by 49
“Over the past two decades, many enabled care programs have been developed and evaluated, and several reviews have demonstrated the potential of using telemonitoring interventions to reduce mortality [9-11] and hospitalizations [9,11] in CHF care.”
BackgroundWoo, K., & Dowding, D. (2017) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2017.0080 · Cited by 47
“A recent meta-analysis of 15 systematic reviews published between 2003 and 2013 indicates that telehealth reduces HF-related hospital admissions comparedwithusual care.(9) In addition, amore recent study reports a significant reduction, from 19.”
BackgroundEffects of a Tablet Computer on Self-care, Quality of Life, and Knowledge
Melin, M., Hägglund, E., Ullman, B., Persson, H., & Hagerman, I. (2018) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000462 · Cited by 47
Iqbal, F. M., Lam, K., Joshi, M., Khan, S. N., Ashrafian, H., & Darzi, A. W. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00378-0 · Cited by 46
Home Telemonitoring of Community-Dwelling Heart Failure Patients After Home Care Discharge
Nouryan, C. N., Morahan, S., Pecinka, K., Akerman, M. B., LESSER, M. L., Chaikin, D., Castillo, S., Zhang, M., & Pekmezaris, R. (2018) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2018.0099 · Cited by 45
“85) compared with usual care.(14,15) This review also found a great deal of variability in outcomes associated with home telehealth technology, specifically finding that only telemonitoring using mobile or automated devices effectively reduced the risk of HF-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality, as opposed…”
Omboni, S., Campolo, L., & Panzeri, E. (2020) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2020.1782734 · Cited by 45
Li, J., Varnfield, M., Jayasena, R., & Celler, B. G. (2021) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458221997893 · Cited by 50
Guidelines os the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on Telemedicine in Cardiology - 2019
Lopes, M. A. C. Q., de Oliveira, G. M. M., Ribeiro, A. L. P., Pinto, F. J., Rey, H. C. V., o, A. ́. A. ́. B., Zimerman, L. I., Hajjar, L. A., Rochitte, C. E., Bacal, F., et al. (2019) · Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia · doi:10.5935/abc.20190205 · Cited by 50
Drews, T. E. I., Laukkanen, J. A., & Nieminen, T. V. M. (2021) · ESC Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ehf2.13475 · Cited by 51
“reasons.(12,23) Previous meta-analyses and reviews have mostly included various approaches of telehealth interventions among HF patients.”
BackgroundEnablers and barriers in upscaling telemonitoring across geographic boundaries: a scoping review
Gijsbers, H., Feenstra, T. M., Eminovic, N., van Dam, D., Nurmohamed, S. A., van de Belt, T., & Schijven, M. P. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057494 · Cited by 37
Wade, V., & Stocks, N. P. (2016) · Heart Lung and Circulation · doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2016.10.013 · Cited by 41
Remote Surveillance Technologies: Realizing the Aim of Right Patient, Right Data, Right Time
Safavi, K. C., Driscoll, W. D., & Wiener-Kronish, J. P. (2018) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000003948 · Cited by 42
Gómez-García, F. J., Ruano, J., Aguilar-Luque, M., Gay-Mimbrera, J., Maestre-López, B., Sanz-Cabanillas, J. L., Carmona-Fernández, P. J., González-Padilla, M., García-Nieto, A. J. V., & Isla-Tejera, B. (2017) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.15380 · Cited by 39
Savoli, A., Barki, H., & Paré, G. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/15103 · Cited by 43
Self-citationDigital Health Applications in Heart Failure: a Critical Appraisal of Literature
Farwati, M., Riaz, H., & Tang, W. H. W. (2021) · Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11936-020-00885-z · Cited by 37
Evidence and User Considerations of Home Health Monitoring for Older Adults: Scoping Review
Chan, A., Cohen, R., Robinson, K.-M., Bhardwaj, D., Gregson, G., Jutai, J. W., Millar, J., Rincon, A. M. R., & Fekr, A. R. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/40079 · Cited by 41
“First, the evidence remains siloed within disease-specific reviews or secondary prevention, whether in heart failure [22,23], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [24], diabetes [25], or cardiometabolic health [26], making it difficult to compare effective monitoring models, delineate the overall evidence for…”
BackgroundLeigh, J. W., Gerber, B. S., Gans, C. P., Kansal, M. M., & Kitsiou, S. (2021) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/31982 · Cited by 41
“Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of mHealth interventions for self-management of long-term conditions (eg, HF [27,28], diabetes [29,30], and hypertension [31]).”
BackgroundSelf-citationJaana, M., Sherrard, H., & Paré, G. (2018) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458218799458 · Cited by 37
Self-citationEnabling Guidelines for the Adoption of eHealth Solutions: Scoping Review
Støme, L. N., Wilhelmsen, C. R., & Kværner, K. J. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/21357 · Cited by 39
“US Strategic analysis Scaling Multifaceted Cardiovascular disease Kitsiou et al (2015) [37]”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZsilinszka, R., Mentz, R. J., DeVore, A. D., Eapen, Z. J., Pang, P. S., & Hernandez, A. F. (2017) · JACC Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.014 · Cited by 35
From Elements to Structures: An Agenda for Organisational Gamification
Khan, A., Boroomand, F., Webster, J., & Minocher, X. (2020) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2020.1780963 · Cited by 37
“…advantages such as summarizing research teams’ views of the evidence in an area (Aromataris et al., 2015), the review articles making up the umbrella review do not represent independent observations (Kitsiou et al., 2015) and need to be interpreted at a broad level (Aromataris et al., 2015).”
BackgroundPractice Patterns and Patient Outcomes After Widespread Adoption of Remote Heart Failure Care
Yuan, N., Botting, P. G., Elad, Y., Miller, S. J., Cheng, S. C., Ebinger, J. E., & Kittleson, M. M. (2021) · Circulation Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.121.008573 · Cited by 34
Uminski, K., Komenda, P. V. J., Whitlock, R. H., Ferguson, T. W., Nadurak, S., Hochheim, L., Tangri, N., & Rigatto, C. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196114 · Cited by 33
Lesende, I. M., Orruño, E., Mateos, M., Recalde, E., Asua, J., Reviriego, E., & Bayón, J. C. (2017) · European Journal of General Practice · doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1306516 · Cited by 33
“Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses [1–10] have been recently published regarding the utility of telemonitoring in reducing hospital admissions and mortality [1,2,4,8,9] in HF, and in decreasing admissions in COPD patients [7,10].”
BackgroundBrohman, M. K., Addas, S., Dixon, J., & Pinsonneault, A. (2020) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2020/15089 · Cited by 44
Hsiehchen, D., Muquith, M., Haque, W. Z., Espinoza, M., Yopp, A. C., & Beg, M. S. (2021) · JCO Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/op.21.00092 · Cited by 32
“273 Time to therapy initiation, median (IQR), days 17 (12-28) 15 (10-21) 18 (12-28) 15 (10-21) .”
Komenda, P. V. J., Tangri, N., Klajncar, E., Eng, A., Nella, M. D., Hiebert, B. M., Strome, T., de Faria, R. L., Zacharias, J., Verrelli, M., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195323 · Cited by 29
A Systematic Review of the Usability of Telemedicine Interface Design for Older Adults
He, H., Ghazilla, R. A. R., & Abdul‐Rashid, S. H. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15105458 · Cited by 36
A Novel Point-of-Care Smartphone Based System for Monitoring the Cardiac and Respiratory Systems
Sohn, K., Merchant, F. M., Sayadi, O., Puppala, D., Doddamani, R., Sahani, A. K., Singh, J. P., Heist, E. K., Isselbacher, E. M., & Armoundas, A. A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44946 · Cited by 28
Effects of CPOE-based medication ordering on outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews
Abraham, J., Kitsiou, S., Meng, A., Burton, S., Vatani, H., & Kannampallil, T. (2020) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010436 · Cited by 31
“These groups reflect the existence of ‘major’, ‘moderate’ and ‘minor or no methodological limitations’ in a SR. 32 Similar categorisation of methodological quality have been used in other overviews of SRs (eg, studies include Kitsiou et al, Jaspers et al and Sequeira-Byron et al 33–35 ).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationdel Hoyo, J., Millán, M., Garrido‐Marín, A., & Aguas, M. (2023) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v29.i7.1139 · Cited by 26
Or, C. K., Tao, D., & Wang, H. (2016) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x15625540 · Cited by 25
Ware, P., Ross, H. J., Cafazzo, J. A., Laporte, A., Gordon, K., & Seto, E. (2018) · JMIR Cardio · doi:10.2196/11466 · Cited by 25
“Meta-analyses have shown that telemonitoring for patients with heart failure (HF) can improve patients’ health outcomes and reduce health care utilization [1-4].”
BackgroundZhou, W., Woo, S., & Larson, J. L. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.15511 · Cited by 25
Hafkamp, F. J., Tio, R. A., Otterspoor, L., Greef, T. V.-D., van Steenbergen, G. J., van de Ven, A. R. T., Smits, G., Post, H., & van Veghel, D. (2022) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-021-10212-8 · Cited by 24
Kitsiou, S., Gerber, B. S., Buchholz, S. W., Kansal, M. M., Sun, J., & Pressler, S. J. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/55586 · Cited by 34
“These interventions range from structured telephone support and noninvasive home telemonitoring [23,24] to remote patient monitoring (RPM) with implantable devices [25,26] and, more recently, the use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies for patient education [27] and HF self-care support…”
Self-citationCreber, R. M., Daniels, B., Munjal, K. G., Turchioe, M. R., Topaz, L. S., Goytia, C. N., Diaz, I. M., Goyal, P., Weiner, M., Yu, J., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054956 · Cited by 23
How to develop and frame impactful review articles: key recommendations
Paré, G., Wagner, G., & Prester, J. (2023) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2023.2197701 · Cited by 23
“Kitsiou et al.'s (2015) umbrella review of the effects of home telemonitoring on patients with chronic heart failure can be seen as a typical representative of this mode.”
Self-citationHung, C., Yu, J.-Y., Lin, Y., Chen, Y., Huang, C., Lee, J., Chuang, P., Ho, Y., & Chen, M.-F. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5718 · Cited by 23
“Among patients with chronic heart failure, the beneficial effect of telehealth care on all-cause mortality has been repeatedly demonstrated in studies [3,4].”
“Mobile technology to improve heart failure outcomes: A proof of concept paper”
Athilingam, P. R., Jenkins, B. A., Zumpano, H., & Labrador, M. A. (2017) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2017.10.018 · Cited by 32
Gordon, K., Dainty, K. N., Gray, C. S., DeLacy, J., Shah, A., Resnick, M., & Seto, E. (2020) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/22118 · Cited by 32
“Several systematic reviews have shown that the use of telemonitoring (TM) can lead to improved health outcomes [18-23] and reduced hospital readmissions [18,24-26].”
BackgroundChallenges to Systems of Long-Term Care: Mapping of the Central Concepts from an Umbrella Review
Barreira, L. F., Paiva, A., Araújo, B., & Campos, M. J. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20031698 · Cited by 27
“As decreased heart failure-related mortality within 180 days, reduced risk of mortality from all causes of disease, and reduced relative risk of heart failure-related hospitalizations contribute to safety, security and ageing at home [72,73].”
BackgroundJacomet, C., Ologeanu‐Taddei, R., Prouteau, J., Lambert, C., Linard, F., Bastiani, P., & Dellamonica, P. (2020) · Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses · doi:10.1016/j.medmal.2020.04.005 · Cited by 22
Evaluation Criteria of Noninvasive Telemonitoring for Patients With Heart Failure: Systematic Review
Farnia, T., Jaulent, M., & Steichen, O. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7873 · Cited by 21
“Our 52 criteria cover all outcomes reported in previous systematic reviews on the evaluation of telemonitoring in HF [18,25] but also in other chronic diseases, such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases [19,20].”
BackgroundAlami, H., Gagnon, M., & Fortin, J. (2018) · Journal of Participatory Medicine · doi:10.2196/10665 · Cited by 26
“In recent years, many projects and programs have been initiated with the objective to develop new models of service delivery, capitalizing on the potential of telehealth to improve accessibility, quality, continuity, efficiency, and integration of health care and services, especially for populations with chronic disea…”
BackgroundBoodoo, C., Zhang, Q., Ross, H., Alba, A., Laporte, A., & Seto, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18917 · Cited by 20
Mobile Health Self-management Interventions for Patients With Heart Failure
Schmaderer, M. S., Struwe, L. A., Loecker, C. N., Lier, L., Lundgren, S. W., Wichman, C., Pozehl, B., & Zimmerman, L. M. (2021) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000846 · Cited by 20
“There is a need to understand what specific interventions are most beneficial and user-friendly to patients performing self-management of HF.(4,5) Despite positive trends toward improvement of self-care and reduction of health care utilization, the overall impact of mHealth-based interventions on HF outcomes remains u…”
BackgroundAvaliação e intervenção para a reabilitação cardiopulmonar de pacientes recuperados da COVID-19
Cacau, L. D. A. P., Mesquita, R., Furlanetto, K. C., Borges, D. L., Forgiarini, L. A., Maldaner, V., de Souza, Y. R., Cipriano, G., Carvalho, C. R. F., Nogueira, I. C., et al. (2020) · ASSOBRAFIR Ciência · doi:10.47066/2177-9333.ac20.covid19.018 · Cited by 26
Zylstra, B., Netscher, G. M., Jacquemot, J., Schäffer, M. W., Shen, G., Bowhay, A. D., Braley, T. L., Possin, K. L., Miller, B. L., Bayen, A. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.08.034 · Cited by 20
“For example, remote monitoring of medication adherence (Hale et al., 2016) or relevant clinical metrics (e.g., blood pressure, weight; Agboola et al., 2015; Hudson et al., 2005) have improved clinical outcomes for patients with congestive heart failure (review, Kitsiou et al., 2015).”
BackgroundPei, X., & Li, Z. (2025) · BMJ Public Health · doi:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001353 · Cited by 25
“10 Research indicates that individuals with diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring devices achieve significantly better glycaemic control compared with those relying on traditional monitoring methods.”
Impact of COVID-19 on Heart Failure Self-Care
Radhakrishnan, K., Allen, C., Main, A. S. D., & Park, L. (2021) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000794 · Cited by 19
“32 Access to technology for digital temperatures can easily be implemented to assess risk for COVID-19 or other infection.”
BackgroundGrosjean, S., Bonneville, L., & Redpath, C. J. (2019) · Sciences du Design · doi:10.3917/sdd.009.0065 · Cited by 23
Strategies for Patient, Family, and Caregiver Engagement
Bennett, W. L., Pitts, S. I., Aboumatar, H. J., Sharma, R., Smith, B. M., Das, A., Day, J., Holzhauer, K., & Bass, E. B. (2020) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepctb36 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Kitsiou, S., Paré, G., & Jaana, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- HEC Montréal (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kitsiou, Spyros
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Internet Research
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2015-03-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e63
- ISSN
- 1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4376138
- OpenAlex
- W2074454475
- Semantic Scholar
- 498b1218d10c77894f3f577d87d5854f58e95106
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- McMaster University
- Canada Research Chairs
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- home health monitoring, chronic heart failure, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause mortality, methodological quality of systematic reviews, AMSTAR, GRADE quality of evidence, heart failure exacerbation, patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Review Literature as Topic, Telemetry, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review