Cited by 281Regulation of Appetite and ObesityAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Intranasal Insulin Reduces Body Fat in Men but not in Women

Open access
Hallschmid, Manfred, Benedict, Christian, Schultes, Bernd, Fehm, Horst-Lorenz, Born, Jan, Kern, Werner·2004·Diabetes

Abstract

Insulin acts in the central nervous system to reduce food intake and body weight and is considered a major adiposity signal. After intranasal administration, insulin enters the cerebrospinal fluid compartment and alters brain functions in the absence of substantial absorption into the blood stream. Here we report the effects of 8 weeks of intranasal administration of insulin (4 × 40 IU/day) or placebo to two groups of healthy human subjects (12 men and 8 women in each group). The insulin-treated men lost 1.28 kg body wt and 1.38 kg of body fat, and their waist circumference decreased by 1.63 cm. Plasma leptin levels dropped by an average of 27%. In contrast, the insulin-treated women did not lose body fat and gained 1.04 kg body wt due to a rise in extracellular water. Our results provide a strong, first confirmation in humans that insulin acts as a negative feedback signal in the regulation of adiposity and point to a differential sensitivity to the catabolic effects of insulin based on sex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.53.11.3024

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intranasal insulin reduces body fat in men but not in women.

    “Indeed, intranasal insulin—which reaches the brain directly along olfactory perivascular channels—reduces body fat in men but not in women [33].”

    From Sex differences in metabolic homeostasis, diabetes, and obesity (2015) · cites this paper as [33]

    The study summary reports that after eight weeks of intranasal insulin, healthy men lost body fat while healthy women did not. The paper also says intranasal insulin reaches the brain, but our copy does not specify the olfactory perivascular channels named in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Experimental studies suggest considerable sex differences in brain insulin sensitivity.

    “Of note, experimental studies suggest considerable sex differences in brain insulin sensitivity.”
  • Daily nasal insulin administration over 8 weeks reduced body weight and body fat content only in men, whereas women showed no reduction in body adiposity.

    “Nevertheless, daily nasal insulin administration over 8 weeks reduced body weight and body fat content only in men, whereas women showed no reduction in body adiposity26.”
  • Delivery schedules synced to food intake might be necessary for the catabolic impact of IN insulin to emerge.

    “suggesting that delivery schedules synced to food intake 39,42,44,47 might be necessary for the catabolic impact of IN insulin to emerge.”

    From Intranasal insulin (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

  • In healthy, normal-weight humans, IN insulin administration for 8 weeks at 4 × 40 IU per day reduced body weight and body fat content in men, but not women.

    “In healthy, normal-weight humans, IN insulin administration for 8 weeks (4 × 40 IU day -1 ) reduced body weight and body fat content in men, but not women.”

    From Intranasal insulin (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallschmid, M., Benedict, C., Schultes, B., Fehm, H.-L., Born, J., & Kern, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • Institute of Neuroendocrinology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
53
Issue
11
Pages
3024-3029
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2157247104
Cited by
281
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
intranasal insulin, fat loss, sex differences, leptin, waist circumference, plasma leptin, extracellular water, weight loss
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Administration, Intranasal, Body Weight, Extracellular Space, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Placebos, Reference Values, Sex Characteristics, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review