Cited by 42Cognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Functions and Memory

Is Computerized Working Memory Training Effective in Healthy Older Adults? Evidence from a Multi-Site, Randomized Controlled Trial

Simon, Sharon S., Tusch, Erich S., Feng, Nicole C., Håkansson, Krister, Mohammed, Abdul H., Daffner, Kirk R.·2018·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Background: Developing effective interventions to attenuate age-related cognitive decline and prevent or delay the onset of dementia are major public health goals. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) has been marketed increasingly to older adults, but its efficacy remains unclear. Working memory (WM), a key determinant of higher order cognitive abilities, is susceptible to age-related decline and a relevant target for CCT in elders. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of CCT focused on WM compared to an active control condition in healthy older adults. Methods: Eighty-two cognitively normal adults from two sites (USA and Sweden) were randomly assigned to Cogmed Adaptive or Non-Adaptive (active control) CCT groups. Training was performed in participants’ homes, five days per week over five weeks. Changes in the performance of the Cogmed trained tasks, and in five neuropsychological tests (Trail Making Test Part A and Part B, Digit Symbol, Controlled Oral Word Association Test and Semantic Fluency) were used as outcome measures. Results: The groups were comparable at baseline. The Adaptive group showed robust gains in the trained tasks, and there was a time-by-group interaction for the Digit Symbol test, with significant improvement only after Adaptive training. In addition, the magnitude of the intervention effect was similar at both sites. Conclusion: Home-based CCT Adaptive WM training appears more effective than Non-Adaptive training in older adults from different cultural backgrounds. We present evidence of improvement in trained tasks and on a demanding untrained task dependent upon WM and processing speed. The benefits over the active control group suggest that the Adaptive CCT gains were linked to providing a continuously challenging level of WM difficulty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-180455

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Near and far transfer effects were reported only by Brehmer et al. for the PASAT task and by Simon et al. for the Digit Symbol task.

    “Near and far transfer effects were reported only by Brehmer et al. [77] for the PASAT task requiring sustained attention and by Simon et al. [78] for the Digit Symbol task requiring psychomotor ability, sustained attention, processing speed and, to a lesser degree, WM.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simon, S. S., Tusch, E. S., Feng, N. C., Håkansson, K., Mohammed, A. H., & Daffner, K. R.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Linnaeus University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2018-08-02
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
931-949
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2885631459
Cited by
42
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG017935)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
computerized cognitive training, working memory training
MeSH terms
Cognitive Aging, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Self Care, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review