CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Neural Systems Underlying Emotional and Non-emotional Interference Processing: An ALE Meta-Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Studies

Open access
Xu, Min, Xu, Guiping, Yang, Yang·2016·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00220PMC PMC5109402
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Understanding how the nature of interference might influence the recruitments of the neural systems is considered as the key to understanding cognitive control. Although, interference processing in the emotional domain has recently attracted great interest, the question of whether there are separable neural patterns for emotional and non-emotional interference processing remains open. Here, we performed an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of 78 neuroimaging experiments, and examined common and distinct neural systems for emotional and non-emotional interference processing. We examined brain activation in three domains of interference processing: emotional verbal interference in the face-word conflict task, non-emotional verbal interference in the color-word Stroop task, and non-emotional spatial interference in the Simon, SRC and Flanker tasks. Our results show that the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was recruited for both emotional and non-emotional interference. In addition, the right anterior insula, presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), and right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) were activated by interference processing across both emotional and non-emotional domains. In light of these results, we propose that the anterior insular cortex may serve to integrate information from different dimensions and work together with the dorsal ACC to detect and monitor conflicts, whereas pre-SMA and right IFG may be recruited to inhibit inappropriate responses. In contrast, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) showed different degrees of activation and distinct lateralization patterns for different processing domains, which suggests that these regions may implement cognitive control based on the specific task requirements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00220

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many prefrontal cortex areas are particularly associated with control over emotionally relevant information (hot cognitive control).

    “Many PFC areas are particularly associated with control over emotionally relevant information (hot CC) [60–64, 66], which, as discussed earlier, show some dissociations from cool CC.”

    From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Results (Conjunction and subtraction analyses; page unavailable) identify prefrontal regions active during emotional verbal interference, supporting their involvement in control of emotionally relevant information. But these regions also showed activation during non-emotional interference: the emotional-versus-non-emotional verbal contrast found no greater activation for emotional interference, so the paper does not support describing many PFC areas as particularly associated with hot control. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Hot cognitive control shows some dissociations from cool cognitive control.

    “Many PFC areas are particularly associated with control over emotionally relevant information (hot CC) [60–64, 66], which, as discussed earlier, show some dissociations from cool CC.”

    From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [66]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Algom D. Chajut E. Lev S. (2004). A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. J. Exp. Psychol. 133, 323– 338. 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323 15355142 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aron A. R. (2011). From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses. Biol. Psychiatry 69, e55– e68. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.024 20932513 PMC3039712 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aron A. R. Fletcher P. C. Bullmore E. T. Sahakian B. J. Robbins T. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 115– 116. 10.1038/nn1003 12536210 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Aron A. R. Robbins T. W. Poldrack R. A. (2014). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 177– 185. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003 24440116 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Barch D. M. Braver T. S. Akbudak E. Conturo T. Ollinger J. Snyder A. (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. Cereb. Cortex 11, 837– 848. 10.1093/cercor/11.9.837 11532889 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bitan T. Burman D. D. Chou T. L. Lu D. Cone N. E. Cao F.. (2007). The interaction between orthographic and phonological information in children: an fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 880– 891. 10.1002/hbm.20313 17133384 PMC2692515 · DOI
  7. Botvinick M. M. Braver T. S. Barch D. M. Carter C. S. Cohen J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624– 652. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 11488380 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bremner J. D. Vermetten E. Vythilingam M. Afzal N. Schmahl C. Elzinga B.. (2004). Neural correlates of the classic color and emotional stroop in women with abuse-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 55, 612– 620. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.001 15013830 · DOI
  9. Bush G. Luu P. Posner M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 215– 222. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2 10827444 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Carter C. S. Van Veen V. (2007). Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: an update of theory and data. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 367– 379. 10.3758/CABN.7.4.367 18189010 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cauda F. D'Agata F. Sacco K. Duca S. Geminiani G. Vercelli A. (2011). Functional connectivity of the insula in the resting brain. Neuroimage 55, 8– 23. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.049 21111053 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chechko N. Augustin M. Zvyagintsev M. Schneider F. Habel U. Kellermann T. (2013). Brain circuitries involved in emotional interference task in major depression disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 149, 136– 145. 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.013 23394712 · DOI
  13. Cieslik E. C. Mueller V. I. Eickhoff C. R. Langner R. Eickhoff S. B. (2015). Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 48, 22– 34. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.003 25446951 PMC4272620 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Coulthard E. J. Nachev P. Husain M. (2008). Control over conflict during movement preparation: role of posterior parietal cortex. Neuron 58, 144– 157. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.009 18400170 PMC2292819 · DOI
  15. Cromheeke S. Mueller S. C. (2014). Probing emotional influences on cognitive control: an ALE meta-analysis of cognition emotion interactions. Brain Struct. Funct. 219, 995– 1008. 10.1007/s00429-013-0549-z 23563751 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Desimone R. Duncan J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193– 222. 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 7605061 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Devinsky O. Morrell M. J. Vogt B. A. (1995). Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 118, 279– 306. 10.1093/brain/118.1.279 7895011 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Diener C. Kuehner C. Brusniak W. Ubl B. Wessa M. Flor H. (2012). A meta-analysis of neurofunctional imaging studies of emotion and cognition in major depression. Neuroimage 61, 677– 685. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.005 22521254 · DOI
  19. Dosenbach N. U. Fair D. A. Miezin F. M. Cohen A. L. Wenger K. K. Dosenbach R. A.. (2007). Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 11073– 11078. 10.1073/pnas.0704320104 17576922 PMC1904171 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Dosenbach N. U. Visscher K. M. Palmer E. D. Miezin F. M. Wenger K. K. Kang H. C.. (2006). A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron 50, 799– 812. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.031 16731517 PMC3621133 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Egner T. Etkin A. Gale S. Hirsch J. (2008). Dissociable neural systems resolve conflict from emotional versus nonemotional distracters. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1475– 1484. 10.1093/cercor/bhm179 17940084 · DOI
  22. Egner T. Hirsch J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1784– 1790. 10.1038/nn1594 16286928 · DOI
  23. Eickhoff S. B. Bzdok D. Laird A. R. Kurth F. Fox P. T. (2012). Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage 59, 2349– 2361. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017 21963913 PMC3254820 · DOI
  24. Eickhoff S. B. Laird A. R. Grefkes C. Wang L. E. Zilles K. Fox P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2907– 2926. 10.1002/hbm.20718 19172646 PMC2872071 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Eriksen B. A. Eriksen C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 143– 149. 10.3758/BF03203267 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Etkin A. Egner T. Peraza D. M. Kandel E. R. Hirsch J. (2006). Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron 51, 871– 882. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029 16982430 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Etkin A. Schatzberg A. (2011). Common abnormalities and disorder-specific compensation during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety and major depressive disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 968– 978. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10091290 21632648 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Fan J. Flombaum J. I. McCandliss B. D. Thomas K. M. Posner M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage 18, 42– 57. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1319 12507442 · DOI
  29. Farrell M. J. Laird A. R. Egan G. F. (2005). Brain activity associated with painfully hot stimuli applied to the upper limb: a meta-analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25, 129– 139. 10.1002/hbm.20125 15846813 PMC6871740 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Fitts P. M. Seeger C. M. (1953). SR compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. J. Exp. Psychol. 46, 199– 210. 10.1037/h0062827 13084867 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Garavan H. Ross T. Stein E. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 8301– 8306. 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8301 10393989 PMC22229 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Jiang J. Egner T. (2014). Using neural pattern classifiers to quantify the modularity of conflict–control mechanisms in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 24, 1793– 1805. 10.1093/cercor/bht029 23402762 PMC4051892 · DOI
  33. Kanwisher N. McDermott J. Chun M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17, 4302– 4311. 9151747 PMC6573547
  34. Kennerley S. W. Sakai K. Rushworth M. (2004). Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre-SMA. J. Neurophysiol. 91, 978– 993. 10.1152/jn.00651.2003 14573560 · DOI
  35. Kronhaus D. M. Lawrence N. S. Williams A. M. Frangou S. Brammer M. J. Williams S. C.. (2006). Stroop performance in bipolar disorder: further evidence for abnormalities in the ventral prefrontal cortex. Bipolar Disord. 8, 28– 39. 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00282.x 16411978 · DOI
  36. Kurth F. Zilles K. Fox P. T. Laird A. R. Eickhoff S. B. (2010). A link between the systems: functional differentiation and integration within the human insula revealed by meta-analysis. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 519– 534. 10.1007/s00429-010-0255-z 20512376 PMC4801482 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Laird A. R. Fox P. M. Price C. J. Glahn D. C. Uecker A. M. Lancaster J. L.. (2005a). ALE meta-analysis: controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25, 155– 164. 10.1002/hbm.20136 15846811 PMC6871747 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Laird A. R. McMillan K. M. Lancaster J. L. Kochunov P. Turkeltaub P. E. Pardo J. V.. (2005b). A comparison of label-based review and ALE meta-analysis in the Stroop task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25, 6– 21. 10.1002/hbm.20129 15846823 PMC6871676 · DOI
  39. Laird A. R. Robinson J. L. McMillan K. M. Tordesillas-Gutiérrez D. Moran S. T. Gonzales S. M.. (2010). Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: validation of the Lancaster transform. Neuroimage 51, 677– 683. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.048 20197097 PMC2856713 · DOI
  40. Lancaster J. L. Tordesillas-Gutiérrez D. Martinez M. Salinas F. Evans A. Zilles K.. (2007). Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM-152 brain template. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28, 1194– 1205. 10.1002/hbm.20345 17266101 PMC6871323 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lau H. Rogers R. D. Passingham R. E. (2006). Dissociating response selection and conflict in the medial frontal surface. Neuroimage 29, 446– 451. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.050 16150611 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Levy B. J. Wagner A. D. (2011). Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1224, 40– 62. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x 21486295 PMC3079823 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Liston C. Matalon S. Hare T. A. Davidson M. C. Casey B. J. (2006). Anterior cingulate and posterior parietal cortices are sensitive to dissociable forms of conflict in a task-switching paradigm. Neuron 50, 643– 653. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.015 16701213 · DOI
  44. MacDonald A. W. Cohen J. D. Stenger V. A. Carter C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science 288, 1835– 1838. 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 10846167 · DOI · Paper page
  45. MacLeod C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol. Bull. 109, 163– 203. 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 2034749 · DOI · Paper page
  46. MacLeod C. M. MacDonald P. A. (2000). Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 383– 391. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01530-8 11025281 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Mansouri F. A. Tanaka K. Buckley M. J. (2009). Conflict-induced behavioural adjustment: a clue to the executive functions of the prefrontal cortex. Nat. Rev. 10, 141– 152. 10.1038/nrn2538 19153577 · DOI · Paper page
  48. McKenna F. P. (1986). Effects of unattended emotional stimuli on color-naming performance. Curr. Psychol. Res. Rev. 5, 3– 9. 10.1007/BF02686591 · DOI
  49. Medford N. Critchley H. D. (2010). Conjoint activity of anterior insular and anterior cingulate cortex: awareness and response. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 535– 549. 10.1007/s00429-010-0265-x 20512367 PMC2886906 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Mostofsky S. H. Simmonds D. J. (2008). Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 751– 761. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20500 18201122 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Nachev P. Wydell H. O'neill K. Husain M. Kennard C. (2007). The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action. Neuroimage 36, T155– T163. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.034 17499162 PMC2648723 · DOI
  52. Nee D. E. Wager T. D. Jonides J. (2007). Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 1– 17. 10.3758/CABN.7.1.1 17598730 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Nichols T. Brett M. Andersson J. Wager T. Poline J.-B. (2005). Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 25, 653– 660. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.005 15808966 · DOI
  54. Posner M. I. DiGirolamo G. J. (1998). Executive attention: conflict, target detection and cognitive control, in The Attentive Brain, ed Parasuraman R. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 401– 423.
  55. Proctor R. W. Vu K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  56. Raemaekers M. Vink M. Zandbelt B. Van Wezel R. Kahn R. Ramsey N. (2007). Test–retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades. Neuroimage 36, 532– 542. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.061 17499525 · DOI
  57. Rey G. Desseilles M. Favre S. Dayer A. Piguet C. Aubry J.-M.. (2014). Modulation of brain response to emotional conflict as a function of current mood in bipolar disorder: preliminary findings from a follow-up state-based fMRI study. Psychiatry Res. 223, 84– 93. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.04.016 24862389 · DOI
  58. Ridderinkhof K. R. Ullsperger M. Crone E. A. Nieuwenhuis S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306, 443– 447. 10.1126/science.1100301 15486290 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Roberts K. L. Hall D. A. (2008). Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: a systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 1063– 1078. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20074 18211237 · DOI
  60. Roelofs A. van Turennout M. Coles M. G. H. (2006). Anterior cingulate cortex activity can be independent of response conflict in Stroop-like tasks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 13884– 13889. 10.1073/pnas.0606265103 16954195 PMC1564252 · DOI
  61. Shackman A. J. Salomons T. V. Slagter H. A. Fox A. S. Winter J. J. Davidson R. J. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 154– 167. 10.1038/nrn2994 21331082 PMC3044650 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Sharp D. Bonnelle V. De Boissezon X. Beckmann C. James S. Patel M.. (2010). Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 6106– 6111. 10.1073/pnas.1000175107 20220100 PMC2851908 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Shin L. M. Bush G. Whalen P. J. Handwerger K. Cannistraro P. A. Wright C. I.. (2007). Dorsal anterior cingulate function in posttraumatic stress disorder. J. Trauma. Stress 20, 701– 712. 10.1002/jts.20231 17955522 · DOI
  64. Simon J. R. Berbaum K. (1990). Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the ‘Stroop effect’vs. the ‘Simon effect’. Acta Psychol. 73, 159– 170. 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90077-S 2343770 · DOI
  65. Smith E. E. Jonides J. Koeppe R. A. (1996). Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. Cereb. Cortex 6, 11– 20. 10.1093/cercor/6.1.11 8670634 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Stevens F. L. Hurley R. A. Hayman L. A. Taber K. H. (2011). Anterior cingulate cortex: unique role in cognition and emotion. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 23, 121– 125. 10.1176/jnp.23.2.jnp121 21677237 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Stroop J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643– 662. 10.1037/h0054651 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Tanji J. (2001). Sequential organization of multiple movements: involvement of cortical motor areas. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 631– 651. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.631 11520914 · DOI
  69. Taylor K. S. Seminowicz D. A. Davis K. D. (2009). Two systems of resting state connectivity between the insula and cingulate cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2731– 2745. 10.1002/hbm.20705 19072897 PMC6871122 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Thomason M. E. Race E. Burrows B. Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Glover G. H. Gabrieli J. D. E. (2009). Development of spatial and verbal working memory capacity in the human brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21, 316– 332. 10.1162/jocn.2008.21028 18510448 PMC2746557 · DOI
  71. Tops M. Boksem M. A. (2011). A potential role of the inferior frontal gyrus and anterior insula in cognitive control, brain rhythms, and event-related potentials. Front. Psychol. 2: 330. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00330 22084637 PMC3212750 · DOI
  72. Turkeltaub P. E. Eden G. F. Jones K. M. Zeffiro T. A. (2002). Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage 16, 765– 780. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1131 12169260 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Turkeltaub P. E. Eickhoff S. B. Laird A. R. Fox M. Wiener M. Fox P. (2012). Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1– 13. 10.1002/hbm.21186 21305667 PMC4791073 · DOI
  74. Ullsperger M. Harsay H. A. Wessel J. R. Ridderinkhof K. R. (2010). Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 629– 643. 10.1007/s00429-010-0261-1 20512371 PMC2886909 · DOI · Paper page
  75. van Gaal S. Scholte H. S. Lamme V. A. Fahrenfort J. J. Ridderinkhof K. R. (2011). Pre-SMA gray-matter density predicts individual differences in action selection in the face of conscious and unconscious response conflict. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 382– 390. 10.1162/jocn.2010.21444 20175674 · DOI
  76. Vogt B. A. (2005). Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 533– 544. 10.1038/nrn1704 15995724 PMC2659949 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Vogt B. A. Finch D. M. Olson C. R. (1992). Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. Cereb. Cortex 2, 435– 443. 10.1093/cercor/2.6.435-a 1477524 · DOI
  78. Wager T. D. Lindquist M. Kaplan L. (2007). Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 150– 158. 10.1093/scan/nsm015 18985131 PMC2555451 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Wager T. D. Sylvester C.-Y. C. Lacey S. C. Nee D. E. Franklin M. Jonides J. (2005). Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 27, 323– 340. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.054 16019232 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Williams J. M. G. Mathews A. MacLeod C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol. Bull. 120, 3– 24. 10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3 8711015 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Wittfoth M. Buck D. Fahle M. Herrmann M. (2006). Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception. Neuroimage 32, 921– 929. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.034 16677831 · DOI
  82. Wittfoth M. Schardt D. M. Fahle M. Herrmann M. (2009). How the brain resolves high conflict situations: double conflict involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage 44, 1201– 1209. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.026 18951983 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, M., Xu, G., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Guangdong University of Education (CN)
  • Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Min
ORCID
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2016-11-15
Volume
10
Pages
220-220
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00220
PMC
PMC5109402
OpenAlex
W2539497453
Cited by
71
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
emotional interference, cognitive control, Stroop task, Simon task, flanker task, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, pre-supplementary motor area, inferior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, hemispheric lateralization, conflict monitoring, response inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review