Cited by 43Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersPain Management and Treatment

Closed-Loop Efficient Searching of Optimal Electrical Stimulation Parameters for Preferential Excitation of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Open access
Guo, Tianruo, Yang, Chih Yu, Tsai, David, Muralidharan, Madhuvanthi, Suaning, Gregg J., Morley, John W., Dokos, Socrates, Lovell, Nigel H.·2018·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

The ability for visual prostheses to preferentially activate functionally-distinct retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is important for improving visual perception. This study investigates the use of high frequency stimulation (HFS) to elicit retinal ganglion cell activation, using a closed-loop algorithm to search for optimal stimulation parameters for preferential ON and OFF RGC activation, resembling natural physiological neural encoding in response to visual stimuli. We evaluated the performance of a wide range of electrical stimulation amplitudes and frequencies on RGC responses in vitro using murine retinal preparations. It was possible to preferentially excite either ON or OFF RGCs by adjusting amplitudes and frequencies in HFS. ON RGCs can be preferentially activated at relatively higher stimulation amplitudes (>150 µA) and frequencies (2 to 6.25 kHz) while OFF RGCs are activated by lower stimulation amplitudes (40 to 90 µA) across all tested frequencies (1 to 6.25 kHz). These stimuli also showed great promise in eliciting RGC responses that parallel natural RGC encoding: ON RGCs exhibited an increase in spiking activity during electrical stimulation while OFF RGCs exhibited decreased spiking activity, given the same stimulation amplitude. In conjunction with the in vitro studies, in silico simulations indicated that optimal HFS parameters could be rapidly identified in practice, whilst sampling spiking activity of relevant neuronal subtypes. This closed-loop approach represents a step forward in modulating stimulation parameters to achieve appropriate neural encoding in retinal prostheses, advancing control over RGC subtypes activated by electrical stimulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2018.00168

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In retinal prosthesis, research on closed-loop stimulation has been done to optimize the stimulation parameters to obtain the desired retinal ganglion cells output in response to a given visual input.

    “In retinal prosthesis, research on closed-loop stimulation have been done to optimize the stimulation parameters to obtain the desired retinal ganglion cells output in response to a given visual input (Guo et al., 2018; Spencer et al., 2019; Shah and Chichilnisky, 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, T., Yang, C. Y., Tsai, D., Muralidharan, M., Suaning, G. J., Morley, J. W., Dokos, S., & Lovell, N. H.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lovell, Nigel H.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2018-03-19
Volume
12
Pages
168-168
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790114632
Cited by
43
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (RG1087224)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, retinal ganglion cells, high-frequency electrical stimulation, computer simulation, neural coding, spiking activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review