Cited by 105Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 96 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Conditioned Fear Associated Phenotypes as Robust, Translational Indices of Trauma-, Stressor-, and Anxiety-Related Behaviors

Open access
Briscione, Maria Anne, Jovanovic, Tanja, Norrholm, Seth Davin·2014·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a heterogeneous disorder that affects individuals exposed to trauma (e.g., combat, interpersonal violence, and natural disasters). It is characterized by hyperarousal, intrusive reminders of the trauma, avoidance of trauma-related cues, and negative cognition and mood. This heterogeneity indicates the presence of multiple neurobiological mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of PTSD. Fear conditioning is a robust, translational experimental paradigm that can be employed to elucidate these mechanisms by allowing for the study of fear-related dimensions of PTSD (e.g., fear extinction, fear inhibition, and generalization of fear) across multiple units of analysis. Fear conditioning experiments have identified varying trajectories of the dimensions described, highlighting exciting new avenues of targeted, focused study. Additionally, fear conditioning studies provide a translational platform to develop novel interventions. The current review highlights the versatility of fear conditioning paradigms, the implications for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, the robustness of these paradigms to span an array of neuroscientific measures (e.g., genetic studies), and finally the need to understand the boundary conditions under which these paradigms are effective. Further understanding these paradigms will ultimately allow for optimization of fear conditioning paradigms, a necessary step towards the advancement of PTSD treatment methods.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that fear conditioning paradigms provide robust, translational intermediate phenotypes for trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related disorders, especially PTSD. It synthesizes human and animal work on fear extinction, inhibition, generalization, and treatment development while emphasizing the need to define boundary conditions.

Key findings

  • PTSD affects 8% of the general population and approximately 20% of Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom veterans presented with PTSD symptoms upon return; Vietnam veterans can experience persistent symptoms for as long as 40 years.
  • Fear conditioning can index dysregulated fear dimensions including fear extinction, fear inhibition, and stimulus generalization; PTSD patients have shown increased fear responses to cues they subjectively report as safe, impaired fear inhibition, altered stimulus generalization, and reduced extinction recall when tested 24 h after extinction learning.
  • Divergent extinction trajectories are reported: “fear load” (over-expression of fear during early extinction) in traumatized civilians, “persistence of fear” with impaired within-session extinction in combat veterans, and impaired between-session extinction retention.
  • Treatment targets include DCS, propranolol, morphine, antidepressants, endocannabinoid/FAAH agents, oxytocin, losartan, and retrieval + extinction; DCS effectiveness for PTSD is described as unclear due to mixed reports, though some studies show benefit under specific conditions such as virtual reality exposure.

Methods

  • Narrative review of fear conditioning and fear-potentiated startle/skin conductance studies in humans and animal models, framed by RDoC and intermediate phenotypes.
  • Discusses acquisition, extinction, fear inhibition (including AX+/BX−), generalization, and pharmacological/non-pharmacological treatment studies.
  • No primary data collection, systematic search strategy, inclusion criteria, or meta-analysis is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states the need to understand boundary conditions under which fear conditioning paradigms, such as retrieval + extinction, are effective; these include the psychophysiological measure, reinforcement schedule, fear-relevancy of conditioned stimuli, strength of the fear memory, and presence of on-line expectancy or fear ratings.
  • As a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search, risk-of-bias assessment, or quantitative synthesis; this is evident from the text.
  • Many cited treatment findings are mixed or from preclinical/early human studies, and DCS effectiveness for PTSD is explicitly described as unclear due to mixed reports.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00088

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Promising targets for the translational study of trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related fear behaviors: trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related disorders have been shown to have a significant degree of heritability and more recently, it has become increasingly clear that genetic contributions include complex gene × environment interactions. Understanding these complex relationships may allow for early interventions to enhance resiliency in certain individuals with a high risk of trauma. Fear-conditioning paradigms afford the study of intermediate phenotypes, which may enhance our ability to elucidate these complex interactions [see Ref. (36)]. The dysregulated fear learning commonly observed in anxious and traumatized populations can be modeled by fear-conditioning paradigms, which can provide a translational framework. Translational studies have shown that fearful memories are initially labile and are consolidated to a more permanent state, hours to days, after the initial event. Modeling the process of consolidation and reconsolidation with fear-conditioning techniques provides an avenue to study potential pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions [e.g., Ref. (33, 37)]. Clinically, individuals with PTSD have been show to have alterations in stimulus generalization (16), fear inhibition (29), discrimination, and fear extinction (38). In addition to complementary psychophysiological methods (e.g., skin conductance, reaction time), fear-potentiated startle methods have proven to be quite useful for the study and/or manipulation of these targets to better understand and treat stressor-, trauma-, and anxiety-related disorders. Figure adapted from Jovanovic and Ressler (39).
Figure 1 Promising targets for the translational study of trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related fear behaviors: trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related disorders have been shown to have a significant degree of heritability and more recently, it has become increasingly clear that genetic contributions include complex gene × environment interactions. Understanding these complex relationships may allow for early interventions to enhance resiliency in certain individuals with a high risk of trauma. Fear-conditioning paradigms afford the study of intermediate phenotypes, which may enhance our ability to elucidate these complex interactions [see Ref. (36)]. The dysregulated fear learning commonly observed in anxious and traumatized populations can be modeled by fear-conditioning paradigms, which can provide a translational framework. Translational studies have shown that fearful memories are initially labile and are consolidated to a more permanent state, hours to days, after the initial event. Modeling the process of consolidation and reconsolidation with fear-conditioning techniques provides an avenue to study potential pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions [e.g., Ref. (33, 37)]. Clinically, individuals with PTSD have been show to have alterations in stimulus generalization (16), fear inhibition (29), discrimination, and fear extinction (38). In addition to complementary psychophysiological methods (e.g., skin conductance, reaction time), fear-potentiated startle methods have proven to be quite useful for the study and/or manipulation of these targets to better understand and treat stressor-, trauma-, and anxiety-related disorders. Figure adapted from Jovanovic and Ressler (39).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

66 Not checked yet · 19 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given

Verify all 96 references — free account

Show all 56 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 22
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
34 of 34
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Extinction learning is a form of fear inhibition.

    “This is based on the notion that extinction learning is a form of fear inhibition.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Exposure therapy is a form of treatment based on the principles of fear extinction learning.

    “DCS administration before or after exposure therapy, a form of treatment based on the principles of fear extinction learning, was effective in alleviating the symptoms of acrophobia”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Dysregulated fear learning is a central tenant of trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related disorders.

    “Ultimately, potential breakthroughs will increase the utility of fear-conditioning studies as a translational platform for studying the intermediate phenotypes underlying dysregulated fear learning, a central tenant of trauma-, stressor-, and anxiety-related disorders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    PTSD has high comorbidity with other disorders including depression and substance abuse.

    “This is especially useful due to the high comorbidity of PTSD and other disorders including depression and substance abuse.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, DSM-5
  2. Myers, 2009, Measurement of fear inhibition in rats, monkeys, and humans with or without posttraumatic stress disorder, using the AX+, BX– paradigm, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–105 of 105

Metadata

Authors
Briscione, M. A., Jovanovic, T., & Norrholm, S. D.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Norrholm, Seth Davin
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2014-07-21
Volume
5
Pages
88-88
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969678755
Cited by
105
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008605)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025008)
  • Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (W81XWH-08-2-0170)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, fear conditioning, fear extinction, fear inhibition, fear generalization, hyperarousal, trauma exposure, anxiety-like behavior, translational model, PTSD treatment, genetic research, neurobiological mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review