The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Security of Big Data in Fog-Enabled IoT Applications Including Blockchain: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
The proliferation of inter-connected devices in critical industries, such as healthcare and power grid, is changing the perception of what constitutes critical infrastructure. The rising interconnectedness of new critical industries is driven by the growing demand for seamless access to information as the world becomes more mobile and connected and as the Internet of Things (IoT) grows. Critical industries are essential to the foundation of today’s society, and interruption of service in any of these sectors can reverberate through other sectors and even around the globe. In today’s hyper-connected world, the critical infrastructure is more vulnerable than ever to cyber threats, whether state sponsored, criminal groups or individuals. As the number of interconnected devices increases, the number of potential access points for hackers to disrupt critical infrastructure grows. This new attack surface emerges from fundamental changes in the critical infrastructure of organizations technology systems. This paper aims to improve understanding the challenges to secure future digital infrastructure while it is still evolving. After introducing the infrastructure generating big data, the functionality-based fog architecture is defined. In addition, a comprehensive review of security requirements in fog-enabled IoT systems is presented. Then, an in-depth analysis of the fog computing security challenges and big data privacy and trust concerns in relation to fog-enabled IoT are given. We also discuss blockchain as a key enabler to address many security related issues in IoT and consider closely the complementary interrelationships between blockchain and fog computing. In this context, this work formalizes the task of securing big data and its scope, provides a taxonomy to categories threats to fog-based IoT systems, presents a comprehensive comparison of state-of-the-art contributions in the field according to their security service and recommends promising research directions for future investigations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250
Dwork, C. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11787006_1 · Cited by 5,291
Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data
Goyal, V., Pandey, O., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2006) · Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1180405.1180418 · Cited by 5,009
Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2566339 · Cited by 4,552
Fuzzy Identity-Based Encryption
Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11426639_27 · Cited by 4,440
Public Key Encryption with Keyword Search
Boneh, D., Di Crescenzo, G., Ostrovsky, R., & Persiano, G. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_30 · Cited by 3,134
IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges
Khan, M. A., & Salah, K. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022 · Cited by 2,488
Fog and IoT: An Overview of Research Opportunities
Chiang, M., & Zhang, T. (2016) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2016.2584538 · Cited by 2,362
On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities
Reyna, A., Martín, C., Chen, J., Soler, E., & Díaz, M. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.05.046 · Cited by 1,908
Fully Homomorphic Encryption over the Integers
van Dijk, M., Gentry, C., Halevi, S., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_2 · Cited by 1,858
Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomw.2017.7917634 · Cited by 1,843 · cited 2×
“A blockchain-based security and privacy scheme for smart homes [151] • Low packet, time and energy overheads • Ensured availability of devices • Resilient against DDoS and linking attacks”
BackgroundA Survey on the Security of Blockchain Systems
Li, X., Jiang, P., Chen, T., Luo, X., & Wen, Q. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.08.020 · Cited by 1,772
Evaluating 2-DNF Formulas on Ciphertexts
Boneh, D., Goh, E.-J., & Nissim, K. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30576-7_18 · Cited by 1,692
Divertible protocols and atomic proxy cryptography
Blaze, M., Bleumer, G., & Strauss, M. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054122 · Cited by 1,582
A Survey of Fog Computing: Concepts, Applications and Issues
Yi, S., Li, C., & Li, Q. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Workshop on Mobile Big Data · doi:10.1145/2757384.2757397 · Cited by 1,339
Mobile edge computing, Fog et al.: A survey and analysis of security threats and challenges
Roman, R., Lopez, J., & Mambo, M. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.11.009 · Cited by 1,338
Internet of Things security: A survey
Alaba, F. A., Othman, M., Hashem, I. A. T., & Alotaibi, F. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.04.002 · Cited by 1,303
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W. (2016) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0574-6 · Cited by 1,240
Non-interactive Verifiable Computing: Outsourcing Computation to Untrusted Workers
Gennaro, R., Gentry, C., & Parno, B. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_25 · Cited by 1,145
Security for the Internet of Things: A Survey of Existing Protocols and Open Research Issues
Granjal, J., Monteiro, E., & Sa Silva, J. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2388550 · Cited by 1,128
Consortium Blockchain for Secure Energy Trading in Industrial Internet of Things
Li, Z., Kang, J., Yu, R., Ye, D., Deng, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2786307 · Cited by 1,103
The Fog Computing Paradigm: Scenarios and Security Issues
Stojmenovic, I., & Wen, S. (2014) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2014f503 · Cited by 1,037
A survey of intrusion detection in Internet of Things
Zarpelão, B. B., Miani, R. S., Kawakani, C. T., & de Alvarenga, S. C. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.02.009 · Cited by 1,022
Towards fog-driven IoT eHealth: Promises and challenges of IoT in medicine and healthcare
Farahani, B., Firouzi, F., Chang, V., Badaroglu, M., Constant, N., & Mankodiya, K. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.04.036 · Cited by 983
Can blockchain strengthen the internet of things?
Kshetri, N. (2017) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2017.3051335 · Cited by 918
Managing IoT devices using blockchain platform
Huh, S., Cho, S., & Kim, S. (2017) · 2017 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT) · doi:10.23919/icact.2017.7890132 · Cited by 869
Social big data: recent achievements and new challenges
Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005 · Cited by 846
Fully Homomorphic Encryption with Relatively Small Key and Ciphertext Sizes
Smart, N. P., & Vercauteren, F. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13013-7_25 · Cited by 808
EPPA: An Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Aggregation Scheme for Secure Smart Grid Communications
Lu, R., Liang, X., Li, X., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2012.86 · Cited by 772
Blockchain for the Internet of Things: A systematic literature review
Conoscenti, M., Vetro, A., & De Martin, J. C. (2016) · 2016 IEEE/ACS 13th International Conference of Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) · doi:10.1109/aiccsa.2016.7945805 · Cited by 769
Towards an Optimized BlockChain for IoT
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation · doi:10.1145/3054977.3055003 · Cited by 752
Fog Computing for the Internet of Things: Security and Privacy Issues
Alrawais, A., Alhothaily, A., Hu, C., & Cheng, X. (2017) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2017.37 · Cited by 724
Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security
(2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5906-5 · Cited by 697
Bubbles of Trust: A decentralized blockchain-based authentication system for IoT
Hammi, M. T., Hammi, B., Bellot, P., & Serhrouchni, A. (2018) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2018.06.004 · Cited by 691 · cited 2×
“There are many domains such as (but not limited to) eHealth [150], smart home automation [151], authentication and secure communication [152], and data preserving and integrity [153] where blockchain has a remarkable impact, as shown in Table 6.”
BackgroundMethodSecuring Fog Computing for Internet of Things Applications: Challenges and Solutions
Ni, J., Zhang, K., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2762345 · Cited by 659 · cited 10×
“An effective technique is the cooperative authentication mechanism [8], which focuses on the minimization of authentication overhead by removing redundant authentication messages to reduce the delay caused by the authentication process.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSecurity and Privacy for Cloud-Based IoT: Challenges
Zhou, J., Cao, Z., Dong, X., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1600363cm · Cited by 652
Talking to Strangers: Authentication in Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks.
Balfanz, D., Smetters, D. K., Stewart, P. A., & Wong, H. C. (2002) · Cited by 633
An architecture for a secure service discovery service
Czerwinski, S. E., Zhao, B. Y., Hodes, T. D., Joseph, A. D., & Katz, R. H. (1999) · Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/313451.313462 · Cited by 610
Internet of things security: A top-down survey
Kouicem, D. E., Bouabdallah, A., & Lakhlef, H. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.03.012 · Cited by 570
Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Research: A Review of Current Research Topics
Lu, Y., & Xu, L. D. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2869847 · Cited by 567
Chosen-ciphertext secure proxy re-encryption
Canetti, R., & Hohenberger, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/1315245.1315269 · Cited by 540
Security and privacy in fog computing: Challenges
Mukherjee, M., Matam, R., Shu, L., Maglaras, L., Ferrag, M. A., Choudhury, N., & Kumar, V. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2749422 · Cited by 533
Security and Privacy Issues of Fog Computing: A Survey
Yi, S., Qin, Z., & Li, Q. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21837-3_67 · Cited by 517
Trustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things
Nitti, M., Girau, R., & Atzori, L. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.105 · Cited by 508
(2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5 · Cited by 500
A Lightweight Privacy-Preserving Data Aggregation Scheme for Fog Computing-Enhanced IoT
Lu, R., Heung, K., Lashkari, A. H., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2677520 · Cited by 478
Blockchain as a Service for IoT
Samaniego, M., Jamsrandorj, U., & Deters, R. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) · doi:10.1109/ithings-greencom-cpscom-smartdata.2016.102 · Cited by 429
Distblocknet: a distributed blockchains-based secure SDN architecture for IoT networks
Sharma, P. K., Singh, S., Jeong, Y.-S., & Park, J. H. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700041 · Cited by 428
Improved Delegation of Computation Using Fully Homomorphic Encryption
Chung, K.-M., Kalai, Y., & Vadhan, S. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_26 · Cited by 403
Sajid, A., Abbas, H., & Saleem, K. (2016) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2016.2549047 · Cited by 401
Blockchain based hybrid network architecture for the smart city
Sharma, P. K., & Park, J. H. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.04.060 · Cited by 374
Block-VN: A Distributed Blockchain Based Vehicular Network Architecture in Smart City
(2017) · Journal of Information Processing Systems · doi:10.3745/jips.03.0065 · Cited by 365
Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2582841 · Cited by 357
How to Delegate and Verify in Public: Verifiable Computation from Attribute-Based Encryption
Parno, B., Raykova, M., & Vaikuntanathan, V. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28914-9_24 · Cited by 355
Major requirements for building Smart Homes in Smart Cities based on Internet of Things technologies
Hui, T. K. L., Sherratt, R. S., & Sánchez, D. D. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.10.026 · Cited by 349
SecTrust-RPL: A secure trust-aware RPL routing protocol for Internet of Things
Airehrour, D., Gutierrez, J. A., & Ray, S. K. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.03.021 · Cited by 314
Privacy-preserving smart metering
Rial, A., & Danezis, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society · doi:10.1145/2046556.2046564 · Cited by 312
Amin, R., Kumar, N., Biswas, G. P., Iqbal, R., & Chang, V. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.12.028 · Cited by 310
Dynamic Searchable Encryption via Blind Storage
Naveed, M., Prabhakaran, M., & Gunter, C. A. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2014.47 · Cited by 308
Sundaravadivel, P., Kougianos, E., Mohanty, S. P., & Ganapathiraju, M. K. (2018) · IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mce.2017.2755378 · Cited by 305
Intrusion Detection for Grid and Cloud Computing
Vieira, K., Schulter, A., Westphall, C. B., & Westphall, C. M. (2010) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2009.89 · Cited by 293
SMART: A Secure Multilayer Credit-Based Incentive Scheme for Delay-Tolerant Networks
Zhu, H., Lin, X., Lu, R., Fan, Y., & Shen, X. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2009.2020105 · Cited by 284
Future challenges for smart cities: Cyber-security and digital forensics
Baig, Z. A., Szewczyk, P., Valli, C., Rabadia, P., Hannay, P., Chernyshev, M., Johnstone, M., Kerai, P., Ibrahim, A., Sansurooah, K., et al. (2017) · Digital Investigation · doi:10.1016/j.diin.2017.06.015 · Cited by 273
Internet of Things and Edge Cloud Computing Roadmap for Manufacturing
Georgakopoulos, D., Jayaraman, P. P., Fazia, M., Villari, M., & Ranjan, R. (2016) · IEEE Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/mcc.2016.91 · Cited by 256
Protecting consumer privacy from electric load monitoring
McLaughlin, S., McDaniel, P., & Aiello, W. (2011) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/2046707.2046720 · Cited by 237
Critical infrastructures at risk: A need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools
Kröger, W. (2008) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.005 · Cited by 225
A Survey of Standards for Machine-to-Machine and the Internet of Things
Gazis, V. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2592948 · Cited by 223
A Survey of Multi-Agent Trust Management Systems
Yu, H., Shen, Z., Leung, C., Miao, C., & Lesser, V. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2259892 · Cited by 221
IOTSim: A simulator for analysing IoT applications
Zeng, X., Garg, S. K., Strazdins, P., Jayaraman, P. P., Georgakopoulos, D., & Ranjan, R. (2017) · Journal of Systems Architecture · doi:10.1016/j.sysarc.2016.06.008 · Cited by 215
Privacy-Preserving-Outsourced Association Rule Mining on Vertically Partitioned Databases
Li, L., Lu, R., Choo, K. R., Datta, A., & Shao, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2016.2561241 · Cited by 199
Byers, C. C. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1600885 · Cited by 194
Signatures of Correct Computation
Papamanthou, C., Shi, E., & Tamassia, R. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36594-2_13 · Cited by 188
Dynamic Access Control Policy based on Blockchain and Machine Learning for the Internet of Things
Outchakoucht, A., Es-Samaali, H., & Philippe, J. (2017) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080757 · Cited by 188
Defending Connected Vehicles Against Malware: Challenges and a Solution Framework
Zhang, T., Antunes, H., & Aggarwal, S. (2014) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2014.2302386 · Cited by 186
TSVC: timed efficient and secure vehicular communications with privacy preserving
Lin, X., Sun, X., Wang, X., Zhang, C., Ho, P., & Shen, X. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/t-wc.2008.070773 · Cited by 185
Security Enhancements for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks With Trust Management Using Uncertain Reasoning
Wei, Z., Tang, H., Yu, F. R., Wang, M., & Mason, P. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2014.2313865 · Cited by 182
Wu, F., Xu, L., Kumari, S., Li, X., Shen, J., Choo, K.-K. R., Wazid, M., & Das, A. K. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.12.008 · Cited by 182
HiCH: Hierarchical Fog-Assisted Computing Architecture for Healthcare IoT
Azimi, I., Anzanpour, A., Rahmani, A. M., Pahikkala, T., Levorato, M., Liljeberg, P., & Dutt, N. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3126501 · Cited by 170
Belguith, S., Kaaniche, N., Laurent, M., Jemai, A., & Attia, R. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.01.036 · Cited by 167
Achieving Efficient Cooperative Message Authentication in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks
Lin, X., & Li, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2013.2257188 · Cited by 163
Speeding Up Secret Computations with Insecure Auxiliary Devices
Matsumoto, T., Kato, K., & Imai, H. (1990) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/0-387-34799-2_35 · Cited by 161
Securing SDN Infrastructure of IoT–Fog Networks From MitM Attacks
Li, C., Qin, Z., Novak, E., & Li, Q. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2685596 · Cited by 154
Cloud-Based Commissioning of Constrained Devices using Permissioned Blockchains
T, T. H. M. I., & Smith, N. (2016) · doi:10.1145/2899007.2899012 · Cited by 143
Big Data Analytics: Security and privacy challenges
Gahi, Y., Guennoun, M., & Mouftah, H. T. (2016) · IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) · doi:10.1109/iscc.2016.7543859 · Cited by 141
Centralized Fog Computing Security Platform for IoT and Cloud in Healthcare System
Thota, C., Sundarasekar, R., Manogaran, G., Varatharajan, R., & Kumar, P. M. (2017) · Advances in data mining and database management book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2947-7.ch011 · Cited by 131
Walker-Roberts, S., Hammoudeh, M. A. A., & Dehghantanha, A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2817560 · Cited by 129
Self-citationState-Of-The-Art and Prospects for Peer-To-Peer Transaction-Based Energy System
Jogunola, O., Ikpehai, A., Anoh, K., Adebisi, B., Hammoudeh, M. A. A., Son, S.-Y., & Harris, G. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10122106 · Cited by 128
Self-citationCL-PRE: a certificateless proxy re-encryption scheme for secure data sharing with public cloud
Xu, L., Wu, X., & Zhang, X. (2012) · ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (ASIA CCS) · doi:10.1145/2414456.2414507 · Cited by 121
Fog-Empowered Anomaly Detection in IoT Using Hyperellipsoidal Clustering
Lyu, L., Jin, J., Rajasegarar, S., He, X., & Palaniswami, M. S. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2709942 · Cited by 121
A Mechanism for Securing IoT-enabled Applications at the Fog Layer
Abbas, N., Asim, M., Tariq, N., Baker, T., & Abbas, S. (2019) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan8010016 · Cited by 121
Self-citationCloud computing: Challenges and future directions
Choo, K. R. (2010) · Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks · doi:10.52922/ti281703 · Cited by 120
Location privacy in database-driven Cognitive Radio Networks: Attacks and countermeasures
Gao, Z., Zhu, H., Liu, Y., Li, M., & Cao, Z. (2013) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2013.6567084 · Cited by 118
Liang, K. F., Zhao, L., Chu, X., & Chen, H. (2017) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2017.1600027nm · Cited by 103
Hidden-Vector Encryption with Groups of Prime Order
Iovino, V., & Persiano, G. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85538-5_5 · Cited by 97
Securing m-healthcare social networks: challenges, countermeasures and future directions
Zhou, J., Cao, Z., Dong, X., Lin, X., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2013.6590046 · Cited by 96
Analytical Model for Sybil Attack Phases in Internet of Things
Mishra, A. K., Tripathy, A. K., Puthal, D., & Yang, L. T. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2843769 · Cited by 96
A cloud-based intrusion detection and response system for mobile phones
Houmansadr, A., Zonouz, S., & Berthier, R. (2011) · IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops (DSN-W) · doi:10.1109/dsnw.2011.5958860 · Cited by 94
Javaid, U., Aman, M. N., & Sikdar, B. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3282278.3282281 · Cited by 94
MobiShare: Flexible privacy-preserving location sharing in mobile online social networks
Wei, W., Xu, F., & Li, Q. (2012) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2012.6195664 · Cited by 93
Multi-Client Non-interactive Verifiable Computation
Choi, S. G., Katz, J. I., Kumaresan, R., & Cid, C. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36594-2_28 · Cited by 91
Trustworthy Processing of Healthcare Big Data in Hybrid Clouds
Nepal, ., Ranjan, R. K., & Choo, K. R. (2015) · IEEE Cloud Computing · doi:10.1109/mcc.2015.36 · Cited by 91
Sybil Attacks Against Mobile Users: Friends and Foes to the Rescue
Querci, D., & Hailes, S. M. V. (2010) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infcom.2010.5462218 · Cited by 87
Towards a secure service provisioning framework in a Smart city environment
Khan, Z., Pervez, Z., & Abbasi, A. G. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.06.031 · Cited by 87
A secure fog‐based platform for SCADA‐based IoT critical infrastructure
Baker, T., Asim, M., MacDermott, Á., Iqbal, F., Kamoun, F., Shah, B., Alfandi, O., & Hammoudeh, M. A. A. (2019) · Software Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.2688 · Cited by 79
Self-citationBotDet: A System for Real Time Botnet Command and Control Traffic Detection
Ghafir, I., Přenosil, V., Hammoudeh, M. A. A., Baker, T., Jabbar, S., Khalid, S., & Jaf, S. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2846740 · Cited by 77
Self-citationServer-Aided Verification: Theory and Practice
Girault, M., & Lefranc, D. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11593447_33 · Cited by 75
Highlights from Making Sense of Snowden, Part II: What's Significant in the NSA Revelations
Landau, S. M. (2014) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2013.161 · Cited by 70
Critical Infrastructures Vulnerability and Risk Analysis
Zio, E. (2016) · European Journal for Security Research · doi:10.1007/s41125-016-0004-2 · Cited by 69
Diro, A. A., Chilamkurti, N., & Kumar, N. (2017) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-017-0851-8 · Cited by 67
Low Power Data Integrity in IoT Systems
Aman, M. N., Sikdar, B., Chua, K. C., & Ali, A. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2833206 · Cited by 65
Access Control Issues in Utilizing Fog Computing for Transport Infrastructure
Salonikias, S., Mavridis, I. K., & Gritzalis, D. A. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-33331-1_2 · Cited by 61
ETARP: An Energy Efficient Trust-Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Gong, P., Chen, T., & Xu, Q. (2015) · Journal of Sensors · doi:10.1155/2015/469793 · Cited by 59
A Trust-based Resilient Routing Mechanism for the Internet of Things
Khan, Z. A., Ullrich, J., Voyiatzis, A. G., et al. (2017) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3098954.3098963 · Cited by 58
Enabling Trustworthy Service Evaluation in Service-Oriented Mobile Social Networks
Liang, X., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2013.37 · Cited by 56
Secure Location of Things (SLOT): Mitigating Localization Spoofing Attacks in the Internet of Things
Zhang, P., Nagarajan, S. G., & Nevat, I. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2753579 · Cited by 56
Access control for SDN controllers
Klaedtke, F., Karame, G., Bifulco, R., et al. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2620728.2620773 · Cited by 53
Public Key Broadcast Encryption Schemes With Shorter Transmissions
Park, J. H., Kim, H. J., Sung, M. H., & Lee, D. H. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2008.919940 · Cited by 51
Exploiting mobile social behaviors for Sybil detection
Zhang, K., Liang, X., Lu, R., Yang, K., & Shen, X. (2015) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom.2015.7218391 · Cited by 50
A novel countermeasure technique for reactive jamming attack in internet of things
Fadele, A. A., Othman, M., Hashem, M., Yaqoob, I., Imran, M. A., & Shoaib, M. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-6684-z · Cited by 44
The self-organization of the Internet and changing modes of thought
Granic, I., & Lamey, A. V. (2000) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0732-118x(99)00039-2 · Cited by 43
Managing Intrusion Detection as a Service in Cloud Networks
-, H. M. H., & Al-hoby, M. O. M. (2012) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/5508-7533 · Cited by 36
Using Block Chain for Peer-to-Peer Proof-of-Location.Preprint
Brambilla, G., Amoretti, M., & Zanichelli, F. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 33
Reliable and Privacy-Preserving Selective Data Aggregation for Fog-Based IoT
Huang, C., Liu, D., Ni, J., Lu, R., & Shen, X. (2018) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc.2018.8422445 · Cited by 33
Identification of malicious edge devices in fog computing environments
Sandhu, R., Sohal, A. S., & Sood, S. K. (2017) · Information Security Journal A Global Perspective · doi:10.1080/19393555.2017.1334843 · Cited by 32
Preserving secondary users' privacy in cognitive radio networks
Qin, Z., Yi, S., Li, Q., et al. (2014) · doi:10.1109/infocom.2014.6848004 · Cited by 30
Efficient and Secure Delegation of Group Exponentiation to a Single Server
Cavallo, B., Crescenzo, G. D., Kahrobaei, D., & Shpilrain, V. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24837-0_10 · Cited by 30
Malicious SSL Certificate Detection: A Step Towards Advanced Persistent Threat Defence
Ghafir, I., Přenosil, V., Hammoudeh, M. A. A., Han, L., & Raza, U. (2017) · International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (ICFNDS) · doi:10.1145/3102304.3102331 · Cited by 30
Self-citationSecurity of Internet of Things for a Reliable Internet of Services
Arış, A., Oktuğ, S., & Voigt, T. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90415-3_13 · Cited by 29
A Survey on Miscellaneous Attacks and Countermeasures for RPL Routing Protocol in IoT
Jain, A., & Jain, S. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1501-5_54 · Cited by 27
ORAM Based Forward Privacy Preserving Dynamic Searchable Symmetric Encryption Schemes
Rizomiliotis, P., & Gritzalis, S. (2015) · doi:10.1145/2808425.2808429 · Cited by 25
Chandrasekhar, S., & Singhal, M. K. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2015.2500568 · Cited by 24
A Fine-Grained and Privacy-Preserving Query Scheme for Fog Computing-Enhanced Location-Based Service
Yang, X. S., Yin, F., & Tang, X. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17071611 · Cited by 24
A fog-enabled IoT platform for efficient management and data collection
Charalampidis, P., Τράγος, Η., & Fragkiadakis, A. G. (2017) · IEEE International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) · doi:10.1109/camad.2017.8031527 · Cited by 24
Requirements for smart cities: Results from a systematic review of literature
Daneva, M., & Lazarov, B. (2018) · International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) · doi:10.1109/rcis.2018.8406655 · Cited by 23
Su, Z., Biennier, F., Lv, Z., Peng, Y., Song, H. H., & Miao, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2017.2705418 · Cited by 21
Resource optimization in fog enabled IoT deployments
Mushunuri, V., Kattepur, A., Rath, H. K., & Simha, A. (2017) · International Conference on Fog and Mobile Edge Computing (FMEC) · doi:10.1109/fmec.2017.7946400 · Cited by 20
Leveraging Blockchain to Enhance Data Privacy in IoT-Based Applications
Nguyen, T. D. T., Pham, H.-A., & Thai, M. T. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04648-4_18 · Cited by 19
An Abstract Model for Integrated Intrusion Detection and Severity Analysis for Clouds
Arshad, J., Townend, P., & Xu, J. (2011) · International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing · doi:10.4018/ijcac.2011010101 · Cited by 18
SMOC: A secure mobile cloud computing platform
Hao, Z., Tang, Y., Zhang, Y., Novak, E., Carter, N., & Li, Q. (2015) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom.2015.7218658 · Cited by 17
A Denial of Service Attack Method for IoT System in Photovoltaic Energy System
Liang, L., Zheng, K. W., Sheng, Q., Wang, W., Fu, R., & Huang, X. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64701-2_48 · Cited by 17
Blockchain-Based Whitelisting for Consumer IoT Devices and Home Networks
Mena, D. M. M., & Yang, B. (2018) · Conference on Information Technology Education · doi:10.1145/3241815.3241853 · Cited by 16
Smart grid security evaluation with a big data use case
Terzi, D. S., Arslan, B., & Sağıroğlu, Ş. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering · doi:10.1109/cpe.2018.8372536 · Cited by 14
Hussain, R., & Abdullah, I. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE) · doi:10.1109/sege.2018.8499430 · Cited by 13
A privacy-aware query authentication index for database outsourcing
Jang, M., Yoon, M., & Chang, J. (2014) · International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing · doi:10.1109/bigcomp.2014.6741410 · Cited by 11
Device-invisible two-factor authenticated key agreement protocol for BYOD
Ni, J., Lin, X., Zhang, K., Yu, Y. H., & Shen, X. (2016) · IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) · doi:10.1109/iccchina.2016.7636868 · Cited by 7
Lifelogging Protection Scheme for Internet-Based Personal Assistants
Pàmies-Estrems, D., Kaaniche, N., Laurent, M., Castellà‐Roca, J., & Joaquin Garcia-alfaro, B. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00305-0_31 · Cited by 7
Cited by
Blockchain for Edge of Things: Applications, Opportunities, and Challenges
Gadekallu, T. R., Pham, Q.-V., Nguyen, D. C., Maddikunta, P. K. R., Deepa, N., Prabadevi, B., Pathirana, P. N., Zhao, J., & Hwang, W.-J. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3119639 · Cited by 217
Ahmad, S., Shakeel, I., Mehfuz, S., & Ahmad, J. (2023) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100568 · Cited by 197
EdgeMediChain: A Hybrid Edge Blockchain-Based Framework for Health Data Exchange
Akkaoui, R., Hei, X., & Cheng, W. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3003575 · Cited by 175
Moqurrab, S. A., Tariq, N., Anjum, A., Asheralieva, A., Malik, S. U. R., Malik, H., Pervaiz, H., & Gill, S. S. (2022) · Wireless Personal Communications · doi:10.1007/s11277-021-09323-0 · Cited by 65
Self-citationAlzoubi, Y. I., Gill, A., & Mishra, A. (2022) · Journal of Cloud Computing · doi:10.1186/s13677-022-00353-y · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Tariq, N., Asim, M., Al-Obeidat, F., Zubair Farooqi, M., Baker, T., Hammoudeh, M., & Ghafir, I.
- Venue
- Sensors
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-04-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1788
- ISSN
- 1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2937471939
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 146
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
