Cited by 373Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsPhagocytosis and Immune RegulationAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Inhibition of Microglial Phagocytosis Is Sufficient To Prevent Inflammatory Neuronal Death

Open access
Neher, Jonas J, Neniskyte, Urte, Zhao, Jing-Wei, Bal-Price, Anna, Tolkovsky, Aviva M, Brown, Guy C·2011·The Journal of Immunology

Abstract

It is well-known that dead and dying neurons are quickly removed through phagocytosis by the brain’s macrophages, the microglia. Therefore, neuronal loss during brain inflammation has always been assumed to be due to phagocytosis of neurons subsequent to their apoptotic or necrotic death. However, we report in this article that under inflammatory conditions in primary rat cultures of neurons and glia, phagocytosis actively induces neuronal death. Specifically, two inflammatory bacterial ligands, lipoteichoic acid or LPS (agonists of glial TLR2 and TLR4, respectively), stimulated microglial proliferation, phagocytic activity, and engulfment of ∼30% of neurons within 3 d. Phagocytosis of neurons was dependent on the microglial release of soluble mediators (and peroxynitrite in particular), which induced neuronal exposure of the eat-me signal phosphatidylserine (PS). Surprisingly, however, eat-me signaling was reversible, so that blocking any step in a phagocytic pathway consisting of PS exposure, the PS-binding protein milk fat globule epidermal growth factor-8, and its microglial vitronectin receptor was sufficient to rescue up to 90% of neurons without reducing inflammation. Hence, our data indicate a novel form of inflammatory neurodegeneration, where inflammation can cause eat-me signal exposure by otherwise viable neurons, leading to their death through phagocytosis. Thus, blocking phagocytosis may prevent some forms of inflammatory neurodegeneration, and therefore might be beneficial during brain infection, trauma, ischemia, neurodegeneration, and aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4049/jimmunol.1003600

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endotoxin directly and indirectly activates microglia that damage neurons via nitric oxide, oxidants and cytokines, and by phagocytosis of synapses and neurons.

    “Endotoxin directly and indirectly activates microglia that damage neurons via nitric oxide, oxidants and cytokines, and by phagocytosis of synapses and neurons.”

    From The endotoxin hypothesis of neurodegeneration (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

  • Treatment of glial-neuronal cultures with LPS alone results in little or no neuronal apoptosis or necrosis, but rather progressive loss of neurons over several days due to microglial phagocytosis of stressed-but-viable neurons, and blocking the phagocytosis saves the neurons.

    “However, treatment of glial-neuronal cultures with LPS alone results in little or no neuronal apoptosis or necrosis, but rather progressive loss of neurons over several days due to microglial phagocytosis of stressed-but-viable neurons and blocking the phagocytosis saves the neurons [59].”

    From The endotoxin hypothesis of neurodegeneration (2019) · cites this paper as [59]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neher, J. J., Neniskyte, U., Zhao, J.-W., Bal-Price, A., Tolkovsky, A. M., & Brown, G. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 1QW ,
  • Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 OPY ,
  • In Vitro Toxicology Unit, European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods, Institute of Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission Joint Research Centre , 21027 Ispra ,
Venue
The Journal of Immunology
Published
2011-04
Volume
186
Issue
8
Pages
4973-4983
ISSN
  • 0022-1767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6606
OpenAlex
W2120950413
Cited by
373
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (RG50995)
  • Cambridge Trust
  • Gates Cambridge Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
microglial phagocytosis, neuronal cell death, phosphatidylserine exposure, milk fat globule epidermal growth factor 8, integrin αvβ3, peroxynitrite, lipoteichoic acid, lipopolysaccharide, TLR2, TLR4, microglial proliferation, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Surface, Cells, Cultured, Cerebellum, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Milk Proteins, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Phagocytosis, Phosphatidylserines, Teichoic Acids, Time Factors, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Apoptosis, Microglia, Inflammation Mediators, Coculture Techniques, Toll-Like Receptor 2, Toll-Like Receptor 4, Rats, Interleukin-1beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review