Cited by 543Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsImmune Response and Inflammation

Role of the Toll-Like Receptor 4 in Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease

Walter, Silke, Letiembre, Maryse, Liu, Yang, Heine, Holger, Penke, Botond, Hao, Wenlin, Bode, Barbara, Manietta, Nicole +3 more·2007·Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Microglial activation is a key feature in Alzheimer's disease and is considered to contribute to progressive neuronal injury by release of neurotoxic products. The innate immune receptor Toll-like-receptor 4 (TLR4), localized on the surface of microglia, is a first-line host defense receptor against invading microorganisms. Here, we show that a spontaneous loss-of-function mutation in the Tlr4 gene strongly inhibits microglial and monocytic activation by aggregated Alzheimer amyloid peptide resulting in a significantly lower release of the inflammatory products IL-6, TNFalpha and nitric oxide. Treatment of primary murine neuronal cells with supernatant of amyloid peptide-stimulated microglia demonstrates that Tlr4 contributes to amyloid peptide-induced microglial neurotoxicity. In addition, stimulation experiments in transfected HEK293 cells allowed to define a tri-molecular receptor complex consisting of TLR4, MD-2 and CD14 necessary for full cellular activation by aggregated amyloid peptide. A clinical relevance of these findings is supported by a marked upregulation of Tlr4 mRNA in APP transgenic mice and by an increased expression of TLR4 in Alzheimer's disease brain tissue associated with amyloid plaque deposition. Together, these observations provide the first evidence for a role of the key innate immune receptor, TLR4, in neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000110455

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walter, S., Letiembre, M., Liu, Y., Heine, H., Penke, B., Hao, W., Bode, B., Manietta, N., Walter, J., Schulz-Schüffer, W., & Fassbender, K.
Affiliations
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • Research Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center (DE)
  • University of Szeged (HU)
  • Klinikum Ludwigshafen (DE)
Venue
Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2007
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
947-956
ISSN
  • 1015-8987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9778
OpenAlex
W2076260194
Cited by
543
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 31
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Washington
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
TLR4, Alzheimer's disease, neuroinflammation, microglial activation, innate immunity, MD-2, CD14, neurotoxicity, interleukin-6, TNF-α, nitric oxide, APP transgenic mice, amyloid plaques
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Cell Line, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Inflammation, Mice, Transgenic, Monocytes, Neurons, RNA, Messenger, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microglia, Lipopolysaccharide Receptors, Toll-Like Receptor 4, Lymphocyte Antigen 96, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review