The DOI matches its DataCite record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Open accessAbstract
Training Deep Neural Networks is complicated by the fact that the distribution of each layer's inputs changes during training, as the parameters of the previous layers change. This slows down the training by requiring lower learning rates and careful parameter initialization, and makes it notoriously hard to train models with saturating nonlinearities. We refer to this phenomenon as internal covariate shift, and address the problem by normalizing layer inputs. Our method draws its strength from making normalization a part of the model architecture and performing the normalization for each training mini-batch. Batch Normalization allows us to use much higher learning rates and be less careful about initialization. It also acts as a regularizer, in some cases eliminating the need for Dropout. Applied to a state-of-the-art image classification model, Batch Normalization achieves the same accuracy with 14 times fewer training steps, and beats the original model by a significant margin. Using an ensemble of batch-normalized networks, we improve upon the best published result on ImageNet classification: reaching 4.9% top-5 validation error (and 4.8% test error), exceeding the accuracy of human raters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“This method ensures the performance of the output activations [81]. This performance follows a unit Gaussian distribution.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [81]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Since the addition of three branches introduces the covariate shift issue (Ioffe and Szegedy 2015)”
From Make RepVGG Greater Again: A Quantization-Aware Approach (2024) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“SGD can be applied naively to the federated optimization problem, where a single batch gradient calculation (say on a randomly selected client) is done per round of communication. This approach is computationally efficient, but requires very large numbers of rounds of training to produce good models (e.g., even using an advanced approach like batch normalization, Ioffe and Szegedy [21] trained MNI”
From Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data (2016) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It mitigates the internal covariate shift that occurs as the distribution of each hidden layer's inputs changes during the training (as the parameters of the preceding layers change) and slows down the learning process.”
From Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: evidence from the European stock market (2021) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy (2015)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Second, we adopt the batch normalization algorithm introduced by Ioffe and Szegedy (2015).”
From Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: evidence from the European stock market (2021) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy (2015)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It occurs throughout training, because the weight updates to deeper layers result in a continuously changing distribution of signal at higher layers, which hinders the convergence of their weights.”
From Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation (2017) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Batch normalization standardizes intermediate outputs of the network to zero mean and unit variance for a batch of training examples [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015].”
From Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization (2017) · cites this paper as Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Batch normalization is a type of supplemental layer which adaptively normalizes the input values of the following layer, mitigating the risk of overfitting, as well as improving gradient flow through the network, allowing higher learning rates, and reducing the dependence on initialization [28].”
From Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology (2018) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Unlike BatchNorm [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015], commonly used in CNNs, LayerNorm cannot be folded into the previous layer due to its dynamic computational property, so we have to quantize it separately.”
From FQ-ViT: Post-Training Quantization for Fully Quantized Vision Transformer (2022) · cites this paper as [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“However, in integer-only quantization, all the operations are performed using low-precision integer arithmetic [113,132,154,193,267], as illustrated in Figure 6 (Right).This permits the entire inference to be carried out with efficient integer arithmetic, without any floating point dequantization of any parameters or activations.”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [113]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“CMSIS-NN [136] is a library from ARM that helps quantizing and deploying NN models onto the ARM Cortex-M cores.Specifically, the library leverages fixed-point quantization [113,154,267] with power-oftwo scaling factors so that quantization and dequantization processes can be carried out efficiently with bit shifting operations.”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [113]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“as neural networks have the capability of learning directly from raw data [49].”
From Investigating Enhancements to Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as [49]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Recent advances in light-weight neural network architectures [15,13,14,9,11,10,12] are mostly based on the metric of FLOPs and do not consider these properties above.”
From ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Following the common practice [15,13,14], all networks in comparison have four levels of computational complexity, i.e. about 40, 140, 300 and 500+ MFLOPs.”
From ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design (2018) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Our reproduced GoogleNet has center crop top-1 error of 26.4%, close to that reported in [32] (25.2%).”
From Object Detection Networks on Convolutional Feature Maps (2017) · cites this paper as [32]
In the citing paper
“To avoid overfitting, both dropout [116] and batch normalization [33] can help to achieve better regularization.”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
(2010) · Cited by 14,134
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications
Hyvärinen, A., & Erkki Oja, A. (2000) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00026-5 · Cited by 8,926
(2010) · Cited by 8,261
On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks
Pascanu, R., Mikolov, T., & Bengio, Y. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1211.5063 · Cited by 4,310
(2013) · Cited by 3,740
Large Scale Distributed Deep Networks
Dean, J. B., Corrado, G. S., Monga, R., Chen, K., Devin, M., Mao, M., Ranzato, M., Senior, A., Tucker, P. A., Yang, K., et al. (2012) · Cited by 3,202
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,101–1,200 of 1,339
FQ-ViT: Post-Training Quantization for Fully Quantized Vision Transformer
Lin, Y., Zhang, T., Sun, P., Li, Z., & Zhou, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2022/164 · Cited by 198
“The above process can be written as: Unlike BatchNorm [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015], commonly used in CNNs, LayerNorm cannot be folded into the previous layer due to its dynamic computational property, so we have to quantize it separately.”
MethodMART: Memory-Augmented Recurrent Transformer for Coherent Video Paragraph Captioning
Lei, J., Wang, L., Shen, Y., Yu, D., Berg, T., & Bansal, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.233 · Cited by 179
Multimodal Gesture Recognition Based on the ResC3D Network
Miao, Q., Li, Y., Ouyang, W., Ma, Z., Xu, X., Shi, W., & Cao, X. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2017.360 · Cited by 168
Zhang, C., Sun, X., Dang, K., Li, K., Guo, X.-W., Chang, J., Yu, Z.-Q., Huang, F.-Y., Wu, Y.-S., Liang, Z., et al. (2019) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0908 · Cited by 168
Bringing ai to edge: from deep learning’s perspective
Liu, D., Kong, H., Luo, X., Liu, W., & Subramaniam, R. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.04.141 · Cited by 171
Deep semantic segmentation for automated driving: Taxonomy, roadmap and challenges
Siam, M., Elkerdawy, S., Jagersand, M., & Yogamani, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2017.8317714 · Cited by 178
Jung, J.-W., Heo, H.-S., Kim, J.-H., Shim, H.-J., & Yu, H.-J. (2019) · Interspeech 2019 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-1982 · Cited by 166
LocNet: Improving Localization Accuracy for Object Detection
Gidaris, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.92 · Cited by 154
Comparing user-dependent and user-independent training of CNN for SSVEP BCI
Ravi, A., Beni, N. H., Manuel, J., & Jiang, N. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab6a67 · Cited by 165
Exploiting epistemic uncertainty of anatomy segmentation for anomaly detection in retinal OCT
Seebock, P., Orlando, J. I., Schlegl, T., Waldstein, S. M., Bogunovic, H., Klimscha, S., Langs, G., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2919951 · Cited by 164
How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy
Ponomareva, N., Hazimeh, H., Kurakin, A., Xu, Z., Denison, C., McMahan, H. B., Vassilvitskii, S., Chien, S., & Thakurta, A. G. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14649 · Cited by 166
Ando, K., Ueyoshi, K., Orimo, K., Yonekawa, H., Sato, S., Nakahara, H., Takamaeda-Yamazaki, S., Ikebe, M., Asai, T., Kuroda, T., et al. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2017.2778702 · Cited by 160
Deep learning in the automotive industry: Applications and tools
Luckow, A., Cook, M., Ashcraft, N., Weill, E., Djerekarov, E., & Vorster, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2016.7841045 · Cited by 164
Single-cell transcriptomic evidence for dense intracortical neuropeptide networks
Smith, S. J., Sümbül, U., Graybuck, L. T., Collman, F., Seshamani, S., Gala, R., Gliko, O., Elabbady, L., Miller, J. A., Bakken, T. E., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.47889 · Cited by 156
Learnable PINs: cross-modal embeddings for person identity
Nagrani, A., Albanie, S., & Zisserman, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_5 · Cited by 151
Facial Sentiment Analysis Using AI Techniques: State-of-the-Art, Taxonomies, and Challenges
Patel, K., Mehta, D., Mistry, C., Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2993803 · Cited by 157
Binary Ensemble Neural Network: More Bits per Network or More Networks per Bit?
Zhu, S., Dong, X., & Su, H. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00506 · Cited by 153
PipeDream: Fast and Efficient Pipeline Parallel DNN Training
Harlap, A., Narayanan, D., Phanishayee, A., Seshadri, V., Devanur, N., Ganger, G., & Gibbons, P. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.03377 · Cited by 153
“When training Inception-v3 [19], VGG16 [36], Resnet-50 [16], and AlexNet [26] on the ILSVRC12 [32] dataset, PipeDream speeds up training by up to 1.”
BackgroundMethodWang, X., Girshick, R., Gupta, A., & He, K. (2017) · arXiv · Cited by 11,689
Sha, Y., Gagne II, D. J., West, G., & Stull, R. (2020) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/jamc-d-20-0057.1 · Cited by 141
Deep Transfer Learning Based Intrusion Detection System for Electric Vehicular Networks
Mehedi, S. T., Anwar, A., Rahman, Z., & Ahmed, K. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21144736 · Cited by 150
Variational autoencoders for cancer data integration: design principles and computational practice
Simidjievski, N., Bodnar, C., Tariq, I., Scherer, P., Andres Terre, H., Shams, Z., Jamnik, M., & Liò, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.01205 · Cited by 145
Eadro: An End-to-End Troubleshooting Framework for Microservices on Multi-source Data
Lee, C., Yang, T., Chen, Z., Su, Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) · doi:10.1109/icse48619.2023.00150 · Cited by 149
Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition
Haresamudram, H., Essa, I., & Plötz, T. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3463506 · Cited by 150
Unsupervised Deep Video Hashing via Balanced Code for Large-Scale Video Retrieval
Wu, G., Han, J., Guo, Y., Liu, L., Ding, G., Ni, Q., & Shao, L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2018.2882155 · Cited by 148
FEANet: Feature-Enhanced Attention Network for RGB-Thermal Real-time Semantic Segmentation
Deng, F., Feng, H., Liang, M., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Gao, Y., Chen, J., Hu, J., Guo, X., & Lam, T. L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros51168.2021.9636084 · Cited by 170
Sensing Fine-Grained Hand Activity with Smartwatches
Laput, G., & Harrison, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300568 · Cited by 147
A Practical Survey on Faster and Lighter Transformers
Fournier, Q., Caron, G. M., & Aloise, D. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3586074 · Cited by 145
An Investigation into Neural Net Optimization via Hessian Eigenvalue Density
Ghorbani, B., Krishnan, S., & Xiao, Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.10159 · Cited by 144
“The original batch normalization paper [14] observed that the normalization parameters of BN, σ B and µ B , have to be computed (and back-propagated through) using the mini-batch.”
MethodAnalysis of the Human Protein Atlas Image Classification competition
Ouyang, W., Winsnes, C. F., Hjelmare, M., Cesnik, A. J., Åkesson, L., Xu, H., Sullivan, D. P., Dai, S., Lan, J., Jinmo, P., et al. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0658-6 · Cited by 131
A Lightweight YOLOv2: A Binarized CNN with A Parallel Support Vector Regression for an FPGA
Nakahara, H., Yonekawa, H., Fujii, T., & Sato, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays · doi:10.1145/3174243.3174266 · Cited by 139
Crafting GBD-Net for Object Detection
Zeng, X., Ouyang, W., Yan, J., Li, H., Xiao, T., Wang, K., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Yang, B., Wang, Z., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2017.2745563 · Cited by 142
PAN++: Towards Efficient and Accurate End-to-End Spotting of Arbitrarily-Shaped Text
Wang, W., Xie, E., Li, X., Liu, X., Liang, D., Zhibo, Y., Lu, T., & Shen, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3077555 · Cited by 140
OpenEI: An Open Framework for Edge Intelligence
Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Lu, S., Liu, L., xu, L., & Shi, W. (2019) · 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2019.00182 · Cited by 139
“MobileNets are generated mainly from depthwise separable convolutions, which were first introduced in the work of [33] and subsequently employed in Inception models [34].”
MethodA Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Deep Learning in Software Engineering Research
Watson, C., Cooper, N., Palacio, D. N., Moran, K., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3485275 · Cited by 137
ResNet-Based Vehicle Classification and Localization in Traffic Surveillance Systems
Jung, H., Choi, M.-K., Jung, J., Lee, J.-H., Kwon, S., & Jung, W. Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2017.129 · Cited by 137
Recognizing Emotions in Video Using Multimodal DNN Feature Fusion
Williams, J., Kleinegesse, S., Comanescu, R., & Radu, O. (2018) · Proceedings of Grand Challenge and Workshop on Human Multimodal Language (Challenge-HML) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-3302 · Cited by 132
Deep learning allows genome-scale prediction of Michaelis constants from structural features
Kroll, A., Engqvist, M. K. M., Heckmann, D., & Lercher, M. J. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001402 · Cited by 132
Sha, L., Osinski, B. L., Ho, I. Y., Tan, T. L., Willis, C., Weiss, H., Beaubier, N., Mahon, B. M., Taxter, T. J., & Yip, S. S. F. (2019) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_24_19 · Cited by 130
Revealing the Importance of Semantic Retrieval for Machine Reading at Scale
Nie, Y., Wang, S., & Bansal, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1258 · Cited by 132
Facial Expression Recognition with Identity and Emotion Joint Learning
Li, M., Xu, H., Huang, X., Song, Z., Liu, X., & Li, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2018.2880201 · Cited by 128
Evaluation of Speech-to-Gesture Generation Using Bi-Directional LSTM Network
Hasegawa, D., Kaneko, N., Shirakawa, S., Sakuta, H., & Sumi, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents · doi:10.1145/3267851.3267878 · Cited by 131
Hao, Z., Liu, Y., Qin, H., Yan, J., Li, X., & Hu, X. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.207 · Cited by 134
On Network Design Spaces for Visual Recognition
Radosavovic, I., Johnson, J., Xie, S., Lo, W.-Y., & Dollar, P. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00197 · Cited by 127
CosmoGAN: creating high-fidelity weak lensing convergence maps using Generative Adversarial Networks
Mustafa, M., Bard, D., Bhimji, W., Lukić, Z., Al-Rfou, R., & Kratochvil, J. M. (2019) · Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology · doi:10.1186/s40668-019-0029-9 · Cited by 127
“The outputs of all layers, except the output one, are batch-normalized [34] (by subtracting the mean activation and dividing by its standard deviation and learning a linear scaling) which was found to stabilize the training.”
MethodNigam, P., Song, Y., Mohan, V., Lakshman, V., Ding, W. (., Shingavi, A., Teo, C. H., Gu, H., & Yin, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330759 · Cited by 127
Nasr, K., Viswanathan, P., & Nieder, A. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav7903 · Cited by 110
Robust multi-task learning and online refinement for spacecraft pose estimation across domain gap
Park, T. H., & D’Amico, S. (2024) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2023.03.036 · Cited by 125
“The original implementation of EfficientPose(3) utilizes Group Normalization (GN) layers(50) throughout the entire network, which is a batch-agnostic alternative to the commonly employed Batch Normalization (BN) layers.(16) As shown in Figure 2, BN normalizes the features across N images with the approximate mean and…”
MethodUniversum Autoencoder-Based Domain Adaptation for Speech Emotion Recognition
Deng, J., Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Fruhholz, S., & Schuller, B. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2017.2672753 · Cited by 125
A Robust GAN-Generated Face Detection Method Based on Dual-Color Spaces and an Improved Xception
Chen, B., Liu, X., Zheng, Y., Zhao, G., & Shi, Y.-Q. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2021.3116679 · Cited by 125
Towards a predictor for CO2 plume migration using deep neural networks
Wen, G., Tang, M., & Benson, S. M. (2021) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103223 · Cited by 124
Watch this: Scalable cost-function learning for path planning in urban environments
Wulfmeier, M., Wang, D. Z., & Posner, I. (2016) · 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2016.7759328 · Cited by 116
Xu, J., Pan, S., Sun, P. Z. H., Hyeong Park, S., & Guo, K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2022.3225782 · Cited by 120
Merkle, N., Luo, W., Auer, S., Müller, R., & Urtasun, R. (2017) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs9060586 · Cited by 120
Anchor Box Optimization for Object Detection
Zhong, Y., Wang, J., Peng, J., & Zhang, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093498 · Cited by 118
Adversarial Attacks on Time Series
Karim, F., Majumdar, S., & Darabi, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.2986319 · Cited by 118
Self-Supervised Feature Learning by Learning to Spot Artifacts
Jenni, S., & Favaro, P. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00289 · Cited by 115
Li, Y., Han, Z., Xu, H., Liu, L., Li, X., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9183781 · Cited by 115
Qiu, S., Chang, G. H., Panagia, M., Gopal, D. M., Au, R., & Kolachalama, V. B. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2018.08.013 · Cited by 110
RTSeg: Real-Time Semantic Segmentation Comparative Study
Siam, M., Gamal, M., Abdel-Razek, M., Yogamani, S., & Jagersand, M. (2018) · 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) · doi:10.1109/icip.2018.8451495 · Cited by 112
A novel monitoring system for fall detection in older people
Taramasco, C., Rodenas, T., Martinez, F., Fuentes, P., Munoz, R., Olivares, R., De Albuquerque, V. H. C., & Demongeot, J. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2861331 · Cited by 113
CNN based semantic segmentation for urban traffic scenes using fisheye camera
Deng, L., Yang, M., Qian, Y., Wang, C., & Wang, B. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2017.7995725 · Cited by 111
Extracting biological age from biomedical data via deep learning: too much of a good thing?
Pyrkov, T. V., Slipensky, K., Barg, M., Kondrashin, A., Zhurov, B., Zenin, A., Pyatnitskiy, M., Menshikov, L., Markov, S., & Fedichev, P. O. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23534-9 · Cited by 111
BodyCompass: Monitoring Sleep Posture with Wireless Signals
Yue, S., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Rahul, H., & Katabi, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3397311 · Cited by 112
Clustering and Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with l2 Normalized Deep Auto-Encoder Representations
Aytekin, C., Ni, X., Cricri, F., & Aksu, E. (2018) · 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489068 · Cited by 107
Cross-Iteration Batch Normalization
Yao, Z., Cao, Y., Zheng, S., Huang, G., & Lin, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01215 · Cited by 112
Coppock, H., Gaskell, A., Tzirakis, P., Baird, A., Jones, L., & Schuller, B. (2021) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000668 · Cited by 108
Morpheus: A Deep Learning Framework for the Pixel-level Analysis of Astronomical Image Data
Hausen, R., & Robertson, B. E. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8868 · Cited by 110
“Ioffe & Szegedy (2015) addressed this issue by providing an alternative normalization operation that introduces additional parameters to be learned during training.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMachine Learning on Mainstream Microcontrollers
Sakr, F., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., & De Gloria, A. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20092638 · Cited by 109
Handling Vanishing Gradient Problem Using Artificial Derivative
Hu, Z., Zhang, J., & Ge, Y. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3054915 · Cited by 109
Yu, Z., Tan, E.-L., Ni, D., Qin, J., Chen, S., Li, S., Lei, B., & Wang, T. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2705031 · Cited by 109
End-to-End Image Super-Resolution via Deep and Shallow Convolutional Networks
Wang, Y., Wang, L., Wang, H., & Li, P. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2903582 · Cited by 143
Deep learning-based spacecraft relative navigation methods: A survey
Song, J., Rondao, D., & Aouf, N. (2022) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.10.025 · Cited by 106
“task, and batch normalisation layers [39] are utilised in all Convolutional Layer (CL) and Fully Connected Layer (FCL) for convergence in training.”
MethodAssessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables
Haresamudram, H., Essa, I., & Plötz, T. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3550299 · Cited by 107
Fault diagnosis of high-speed train bogie by residual-squeeze net
Su, L., Ma, L., Qin, N., Huang, D., & Kemp, A. H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2907373 · Cited by 102
Gao, Y., Zhai, P., & Mosalam, K. M. (2021) · Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · doi:10.1111/mice.12741 · Cited by 105
“According to Radford et al. (2015), leaky ReLU (Maas et al., 2013) is used as the activation function with a negative slope coefficient 𝛼 = .2, and batch normalization (BatchNorm) (Ioffe & Szegedy, 2015) layers are inserted after the intermediate Conv layers with momentum 0.8.”
MethodInfluentialPham, T.-C., Luong, C.-M., Hoang, V.-D., & Doucet, A. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96707-8 · Cited by 101
Skip-GANomaly: Skip Connected and Adversarially Trained Encoder-Decoder Anomaly Detection
Akcay, S., Atapour-Abarghouei, A., & Breckon, T. P. (2019) · 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2019.8851808 · Cited by 103
“An innovative and seminal work of Radford and Chintala [23] pioneered a new approach to stabilize GAN training by using fullyconvolutional layers and batch normalization [24] throughout the network.”
BackgroundRocket Launching: A Universal and Efficient Framework for Training Well-Performing Light Net
Zhou, G., Fan, Y., Cui, R., Bian, W., Zhu, X., & Gai, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11601 · Cited by 121
Generalization in Reinforcement Learning by Soft Data Augmentation
Hansen, N., & Wang, X. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561103 · Cited by 111
A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery State of Charge Estimation Methods Based on Machine Learning
Zhao, F., Guo, Y., & Chen, B. (2024) · World Electric Vehicle Journal · doi:10.3390/wevj15040131 · Cited by 98
Short-Term Load Forecasting based on ResNet and LSTM
Choi, H., Ryu, S., & Kim, H. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm) · doi:10.1109/smartgridcomm.2018.8587554 · Cited by 103
Towards Real-Time Object Detection on Embedded Systems
Mao, H., Yao, S., Tang, T., Li, B., Yao, J., & Wang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2016.2593643 · Cited by 94
Adaptive deep learning model selection on embedded systems
Taylor, B., Marco, V. S., Wolff, W., Elkhatib, Y., & Wang, Z. (2018) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems · doi:10.1145/3211332.3211336 · Cited by 90
Khunte, A., Sangha, V., Oikonomou, E. K., Dhingra, L. S., Aminorroaya, A., Mortazavi, B. J., Coppi, A., Brandt, C. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Khera, R. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00869-w · Cited by 95
Representation Learning of Histopathology Images using Graph Neural Networks
Adnan, M., Kalra, S., & Tizhoosh, H. R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00502 · Cited by 109
Toward Communication-Efficient Federated Learning in the Internet of Things With Edge Computing
Sun, H., Li, S., Yu, F. R., Qi, Q., Wang, J., & Liao, J. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2994596 · Cited by 95
An Animal Detection Pipeline for Identification
Parham, J., Stewart, C., Crall, J., Rubenstein, D., Holmberg, J., & Berger-Wolf, T. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2018.00123 · Cited by 103
Hirtzlin, T., Bocquet, M., Penkovsky, B., Klein, J.-O., Nowak, E., Vianello, E., Portal, J.-M., & Querlioz, D. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01383 · Cited by 93
DeepCPI: A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Large-Scale in Silico Drug Screening
Wan, F., Zhu, Y., Hu, H., Dai, A., Cai, X., Chen, L., Gong, H., Xia, T., Yang, D., Wang, M.-W., et al. (2019) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.04.003 · Cited by 92
Deep Learning-Based Extreme Heatwave Forecast
Jacques-Dumas, V., Ragone, F., Borgnat, P., Abry, P., & Bouchet, F. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.789641 · Cited by 92
Noise Based Deepfake Detection via Multi-Head Relative-Interaction
Wang, T., & Chow, K. P. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26701 · Cited by 93
Human-Like Playtesting with Deep Learning
Gudmundsson, S. F., Eisen, P., Poromaa, E., Nodet, A., Purmonen, S., Kozakowski, B., Meurling, R., & Cao, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) · doi:10.1109/cig.2018.8490442 · Cited by 90
Farahat, A., Reichert, C., Sweeney-Reed, C. M., & Hinrichs, H. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab3bb4 · Cited by 92
Online Fall Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks on Smart Wearable Devices
Musci, M., De Martini, D., Blago, N., Facchinetti, T., & Piastra, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2020.3027454 · Cited by 128
Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Sun, K., Yang, X., Dai, C., & Guo, Y. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm47256.2019.8983228 · Cited by 93
Biology and medicine in the landscape of quantum advantages
Cordier, B. A., Sawaya, N. P. D., Guerreschi, G. G., & McWeeney, S. K. (2022) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0541 · Cited by 87
LEARN Codes: Inventing Low-Latency Codes via Recurrent Neural Networks
Jiang, Y., Kim, H., Asnani, H., Kannan, S., Oh, S., & Viswanath, P. (2020) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory · doi:10.1109/jsait.2020.2988577 · Cited by 87
Deep-learning-based risk stratification for mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction
Kwon, J.-M., Jeon, K.-H., Kim, H. M., Kim, M. J., Lim, S., Kim, K.-H., Song, P. S., Park, J., Choi, R. K., & Oh, B.-H. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224502 · Cited by 86
Contrastive Self-supervised Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition
Khaertdinov, B., Ghaleb, E., & Asteriadis, S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) · doi:10.1109/ijcb52358.2021.9484410 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Szegedy, Christian
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1502.03167
- OpenAlex
- W1836465849
- Cited by
- 27,818
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 152 · 2025: 1317 · 2024: 2504 · 2023: 3465 · 2022: 3990 · 2021: 4698 · 2020: 4028 · 2019: 3832 · 2018: 2356 · 2017: 1153 · 2016: 273 · 2015: 43
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- batch normalization, internal covariate shift, deep neural network training, training speed, learning rate, parameter initialization, regularization, dropout, image classification, ensemble learning, ImageNet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
