Cited by 196Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Hunger neurons drive feeding through a sustained, positive reinforcement signal.

Open access
Chen, Yiming, Lin, Yen-Chu, Zimmerman, Christopher A, Essner, Rachel A, Knight, Zachary A·2016·eLife

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying hunger are poorly understood. AgRP neurons are activated by energy deficit and promote voracious food consumption, suggesting these cells may supply the fundamental hunger drive that motivates feeding. However recent in vivo recording experiments revealed that AgRP neurons are inhibited within seconds by the sensory detection of food, raising the question of how these cells can promote feeding at all. Here we resolve this paradox by showing that brief optogenetic stimulation of AgRP neurons before food availability promotes intense appetitive and consummatory behaviors that persist for tens of minutes in the absence of continued AgRP neuron activation. We show that these sustained behavioral responses are mediated by a long-lasting potentiation of the rewarding properties of food and that AgRP neuron activity is positively reinforcing. These findings reveal that hunger neurons drive feeding by transmitting a positive valence signal that triggers a stable transition between behavioral states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7554/elife.18640

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brief optical stimulation, as little as 1 min, prior to food availability was sufficient to promote robust, sustained feeding in well-fed mice once food was made available.

    “This paradox is potentially reconciled by the observation that brief optical stimulation, as little as 1 min, prior to food availability was sufficient to promote robust, sustained feeding in well-fed mice once food was made available231.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [231]

  • Prestimulation was insufficient to drive drinking behavior when water was subsequently made available for SFO NOS1 neurons.

    “Intriguingly, this is not a feature of SFO NOS1 neurons, as prestimulation was insufficient to drive drinking behavior when water was subsequently made available231.”

    From Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis (2019) · cites this paper as [231]

  • Mice will actually work to turn on their hypothalamic AgRP neurons that previously made them eat, indicating that the increased appetite can be dissociated from negative valence, and even take on a positive valence in the right conditions.

    “However, other neuroscientists have found that mice will actually work to turn on their hypothalamic AgRP neurons that previously made them eat, indicating that the increased appetite can be dissociated from negative valence, and even take on a positive valence in the right conditions (Chen et al., 2016).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Lin, Y.-C., Zimmerman, C. A., Essner, R. A., & Knight, Z. A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Knight, Zachary A
Venue
eLife
Published
2016-08-24
Volume
5
ISSN
2050-084X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2513909731
Cited by
196
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK106399, P30DK098722, P30DK063720, DP2DK019342)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS094781)
  • New York Stem Cell Foundation (Robertson Investigator Award)
  • American Diabetes Association (Pathway Accelerator Award)
  • Rita Allen Foundation (Rita Allen Scholar)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • McKnight Endowment Fund for Neuroscience
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • UCSF Program for Breakthrough Biological Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
AgRP neurons, feeding behavior, positive reinforcement, food reward, negative energy balance, optogenetic stimulation, appetitive behavior, consummatory behavior, behavioral state transitions
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Feeding Behavior, Hunger, Neurons, Mice, Agouti-Related Protein, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review