Cited by 248Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Development of a New Once-a-Day Formulation of Methylphenidate for the Treatment of Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Proof-of-Concept and Proof-of-Product Studies

Swanson, James, Gupta, Suneel, Lam, Andrew, Shoulson, Ira, Lerner, Marc, Modi, Nishit, Lindemulder, Elizabeth, Wigal, Sharon·2003·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The duration of action of the immediate-release formulation of methylphenidate hydrochloride is short (3 to 4 hours), and 3 times daily dosing is thought to maximize effectiveness across a 12-hour day. The initial sustained-release formulations of methylphenidate had reduced efficacy compared with immediate-release methylphenidate and were not well accepted. Tachyphylaxis was hypothesized to account for the reduced effects, and an ascending drug delivery pattern was proposed to overcome this acute tolerance. Methods Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder were evaluated in a laboratory school to characterize onset and duration of the effect of a variety of methylphenidate regimens. In a proof-of-concept study, an experimental ascending profile was established by an initial bolus followed by small increasing doses of immediate-release methylphenidate in capsules administered every 30 minutes for 8 hours. Two proof-of-product studies of a new oral once-a-day formulation to deliver methylphenidate by an osmotic pump process based on OROS (ALZA Corp, Mountain View, Calif) technology (hereafter referred to "OROS-methylphenidate") were conducted: a pharmacokinetic study and a pharmacodynamic study. Results The experimental ascending profile matched the effect of the standard regimen of methylphenidate, 3 times daily. In the pharmacokinetic study, OROS-methylphenidate treatment produced a rapid rise followed by increasing plasma concentrations that peaked 7…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.204

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, J., Gupta, S., Lam, A., Shoulson, I., Lerner, M., Modi, N., Lindemulder, E., & Wigal, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
204
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986046877
Cited by
248
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, OROS methylphenidate, osmotic pump, sustained-release formulation, acute tolerance, tachyphylaxis, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, children
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Capsules, Child, Clinical Protocols, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Methylphenidate, Placebos, Tachyphylaxis, Cohort Studies, Drug Delivery Systems, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review