The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study†
Open accessAbstract
There are conflicting opinions in the literature as to whether it is more beneficial to use a large number of gradient sampling orientations in diffusion tensor MRI (DT‐MRI) experiments than to use a smaller number of carefully chosen orientations. In this study, Monte Carlo simulations were used to study the effect of using different gradient sampling schemes on estimates of tensor‐derived quantities assuming a b‐value of 1000 smm–2. The study focused in particular on the effect that the number of unique gradient orientations has on uncertainty in estimates of tensor‐orientation, and on estimates of the trace and anisotropy of the diffusion tensor. The results challenge the recently proposed notion that a set of six icosahedrally‐arranged orientations is optimal for DT‐MRI. It is shown that at least 20 unique sampling orientations are necessary for a robust estimation of anisotropy, whereas at least 30 unique sampling orientations are required for a robust estimation of tensor‐orientation and mean diffusivity. Finally, the performance of sampling schemes that use low numbers of sampling orientations, but make efficient use of available gradient power, are compared to less efficient schemes with larger numbers of sampling orientations, and the relevant scenarios in which each type of scheme should be used are discussed. Magn Reson Med 51:807–815, 2004. Published 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain
Pierpaoli, C., Jezzard, P., Basser, P. J., Barnett, A., & Di Chiro, G. (1996) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939209 · Cited by 2,664
Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging
Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Woolrich, M. W., Smith, S. M., Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M., Boulby, P. A., Barker, G. J., Sillery, E. L., Sheehan, K., Ciccarelli, O., et al. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1075 · Cited by 2,330
Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke
Warach, S., Chien, D., Li, W., Ronthal, M., & Edelman, R. R. (1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.9.1717 · Cited by 881
Cited by
Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain
Alexander, A. L., Lee, J. E., Lazar, M., & Field, A. S. (2007) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.011 · Cited by 2,747
White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI
Jones, D. K., Knösche, T. R., & Turner, R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081 · Cited by 2,402
Self-citationRich-club organization of the human connectome
van den Heuvel, M. P., & Sporns, O. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3539-11.2011 · Cited by 2,354
Resting-State Functional Connectivity Reflects Structural Connectivity in the Default Mode Network
Greicius, M. D., Supekar, K., Menon, V., & Dougherty, R. F. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn059 · Cited by 2,175
MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions
Tournier, J., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2012) · International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · doi:10.1002/ima.22005 · Cited by 1,370
Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data
Fortin, J.-P., Parker, D., Tunç, B., Watanabe, T., Elliott, M. A., Ruparel, K., Roalf, D. R., Satterthwaite, T. D., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., et al. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.047 · Cited by 1,261
Jeurissen, B., Leemans, A., Tournier, J., Jones, D. K., & Sijbers, J. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22099 · Cited by 1,088
Self-citationvan den Heuvel, M. P., Mandl, R. C. W., Kahn, R. S., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20737 · Cited by 987
Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond
Tournier, J., Mori, S., & Leemans, A. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22924 · Cited by 921
A hitchhiker's guide to diffusion tensor imaging
Soares, J. M., Marques, P., Alves, V., & Sousa, N. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00031 · Cited by 893
Twenty‐five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data
Jones, D. K., & Cercignani, M. (2010) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1543 · Cited by 827
Self-citationSpurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study
Yendiki, A., Koldewyn, K., Kakunoori, S., Kanwisher, N., & Fischl, B. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.027 · Cited by 508
Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K. S., Ryali, S., & Menon, V. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4465-11.2011 · Cited by 520
Tournier, J. ‐., Calamante, F., & Connelly, A. (2013) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.3017 · Cited by 403
Thakkar, K. N., Polli, F. E., Joseph, R. M., Tuch, D. S., Hadjikhani, N., Barton, J. J. S., & Manoach, D. S. (2008) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awn099 · Cited by 367
van den Heuvel, M., Mandl, R., Luigjes, J., & Hulshoff Pol, H. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2964-08.2008 · Cited by 349
Cubon, V. A., Putukian, M., Boyer, C., & Dettwiler, A. (2011) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1430 · Cited by 297
Roalf, D. R., Quarmley, M., Elliott, M. A., Satterthwaite, T. D., Vandekar, S. N., Ruparel, K., Gennatas, E. D., Calkins, M. E., Moore, T. M., Hopson, R., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.068 · Cited by 199
Is diffusion anisotropy an accurate monitor of myelination?
Mädler, B., Drabycz, S. A., Kolind, S. H., Whittall, K. P., & MacKay, A. L. (2008) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.047 · Cited by 227
Age-related regional variations of the corpus callosum identified by diffusion tensor tractography
Lebel, C., Caverhill-Godkewitsch, S., & Beaulieu, C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.072 · Cited by 209
Reduced white matter integrity in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
Hamilton, L. S., Levitt, J. G., O'Neill, J., Alger, J. R., Luders, E., Phillips, O. R., Caplan, R., Toga, A. W., McCracken, J., & Narr, K. L. (2008) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e3283174415 · Cited by 167
Fox, R. J., Sakaie, K., Lee, J.-C., Debbins, J. P., Liu, Y., Arnold, D. L., Melhem, E. R., Smith, C. H., Philips, M. D., Lowe, M., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a2844 · Cited by 137
The sensitivity of diffusion MRI to microstructural properties and experimental factors
Afzali, M., Pieciak, T., Newman, S., Garyfallidis, E., Özarslan, E., Cheng, H., & Jones, D. K. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108951 · Cited by 117
Self-citationLiu, X., Lai, Y., Wang, X., Hao, C., Chen, L., Zhou, Z., Yu, X., & Hong, N. (2013) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.061 · Cited by 101
Dalby, R. B., Frandsen, J., Chakravarty, M. M., Ahdidan, J., Sørensen, L., Rosenberg, R., Videbech, P., & Østergaard, L. (2010) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.06.008 · Cited by 96
Three-dimensional diffusion tensor microimaging for anatomical characterization of the mouse brain
Aggarwal, M., Mori, S., Shimogori, T., Blackshaw, S., & Zhang, J. (2010) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22426 · Cited by 90
Zhang, F., Wu, Y., Norton, I., Rathi, Y., Golby, A. J., & O'Donnell, L. J. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24579 · Cited by 89
Panigrahy, A., Schmithorst, V. J., Wisnowski, J. L., Watson, C. G., Bellinger, D. C., Newburger, J. W., & Rivkin, M. J. (2015) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.01.013 · Cited by 86
Pohl, K. M., Sullivan, E. V., Rohlfing, T., Chu, W., Kwon, D., Nichols, B. N., Zhang, Y., Brown, S. A., Tapert, S. F., Cummins, K., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.061 · Cited by 85
Yang, J. Y.-M., Yeh, C.-H., Poupon, C., & Calamante, F. (2021) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac0d90 · Cited by 80
How does angular resolution affect diffusion imaging measures?
Zhan, L., Leow, A. D., Jahanshad, N., Chiang, M.-C., Barysheva, M., Lee, A. D., Toga, A. W., McMahon, K. L., de Zubicaray, G. I., Wright, M. J., et al. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.057 · Cited by 79
Lawrence, K. E., Levitt, J. G., Loo, S. K., Ly, R., Yee, V., O’Neill, J., Alger, J., & Narr, K. L. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.01.010 · Cited by 77
Coelho, S., Pozo, J. M., Jespersen, S. N., Jones, D. K., & Frangi, A. F. (2019) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.27714 · Cited by 76
Self-citationAn Introduction to Computational Diffusion MRI: the Diffusion Tensor and Beyond
Alexander, D. C. (2006) · Mathematics and Visualization · doi:10.1007/3-540-31272-2_5 · Cited by 70
Wilkes, B. J., & Lewis, M. H. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.022 · Cited by 64
MacQueen, G. M., Hassel, S., Arnott, S. R., Addington, J., Bowie, C. R., Bray, S. L., Davis, A. D., Downar, J., Foster, J. A., Frey, B. N., et al. (2019) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.180036 · Cited by 57
Lee, S. J., Steiner, R. J., Yu, Y., Short, S. J., Neale, M. C., Styner, M. A., Zhu, H., & Gilmore, J. H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1604658114 · Cited by 51
Angular versus spatial resolution trade-offs for diffusion imaging under time constraints
Zhan, L., Jahanshad, N., Ennis, D. B., Jin, Y., Bernstein, M. A., Borowski, B. J., Jack, C. R., Toga, A. W., Leow, A. D., & Thompson, P. M. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22094 · Cited by 52
Na, K.-S., Won, E., Kang, J., Kim, A., Choi, S., Tae, W.-S., Kim, Y.-K., Lee, M.-S., Joe, S.-H., & Ham, B.-J. (2018) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.04.030 · Cited by 50
Schmithorst, V. J., Panigrahy, A., Gaynor, J. W., Watson, C. G., Lee, V., Bellinger, D. C., Rivkin, M. J., & Newburger, J. W. (2016) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.504 · Cited by 46
Cavedo, E., Lista, S., Rojkova, K., Chiesa, P. A., Houot, M., Brueggen, K., Blautzik, J., Bokde, A. L. W., Dubois, B., Barkhof, F., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.05.048 · Cited by 40
Agger, P., Ilkjær, C., Laustsen, C., Smerup, M., Frandsen, J. R., Ringgaard, S., Pedersen, M., Partridge, J. B., Anderson, R. H., & Hjortdal, V. (2016) · Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1186/s12968-017-0404-0 · Cited by 28
Reproducibility of the structural connectome reconstruction across diffusion methods
Prčkovska, V., Rodrigues, P., Puigdellivol Sanchez, A., Ramos, M., Andorra, M., Martinez‐Heras, E., Falcon, C., Prats‐Galino, A., & Villoslada, P. (2016) · Journal of Neuroimaging · doi:10.1111/jon.12298 · Cited by 24
Hashempour, N., Tuulari, J. J., Merisaari, H., Acosta, H., Lewis, J. D., Pelto, J., Scheinin, N. M., Fonov, V. S., Collins, D. L., Lehtola, S. J., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15989 · Cited by 20
Kennis, M., van Rooij, S. J. H., Kahn, R. S., Geuze, E., & Leemans, A. (2016) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2016.03.022 · Cited by 18
Crombé, A., Nicolas, R., Richard, N., Tourdias, T., & Hiba, B. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15511-0 · Cited by 13
Müller, H.-P., Roselli, F., Rasche, V., & Kassubek, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00734 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, D. K.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-03-26
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 807-815
- ISSN
- 0740-3194 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-2594
- OpenAlex
- W2124525546
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
