The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can computer personalities be human personalities?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Cited by
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
Self-citationTrust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
Advances in natural language processing
Hirschberg, J., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8685 · Cited by 1,712
Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do
Fogg, B. J. (2002) · Ubiquity · doi:10.1145/764008.763957 · Cited by 1,554
Self-citationWho Sees Human?: The Stability and Importance of Individual Differences in Anthropomorphism
Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610369336 · Cited by 1,228
On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model
Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00041-7 · Cited by 1,200
Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2007) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.018 · Cited by 986
Pelau, C., Dabija, D.-C., & Ene, I. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855 · Cited by 889
Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers
Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209566 · Cited by 842
Self-citation(2002) · Cited by 770
An Emerging Theory of Avatar Marketing
Miao, F., Kozlenkova, I. V., Wang, H., Xie, T., & Palmatier, R. W. (2022) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242921996646 · Cited by 688
Can a Retail Web Site Be Social?
Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.3.143 · Cited by 672
Interactivity: a concept explication
Kiousis, S. (2002) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/146144480200400303 · Cited by 666
Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
de Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A. B., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000092 · Cited by 614
Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020240 · Cited by 587
Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review
Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220500337708 · Cited by 577
Almost human? A comparative case study on the social media presence of virtual influencers
Arsenyan, J., & Mirowska, A. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694 · Cited by 566
Nass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.7.3.171 · Cited by 522
Self-citationAnthropomorphism of computers: Is it mindful or mindless?
Kim, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.006 · Cited by 462
Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice
Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2005) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.001 · Cited by 388
Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer‐Based Interviewing Systems1
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x · Cited by 363
Self-citationMusic, Search, and IoT: How People (Really) Use Voice Assistants
Ammari, T., Kaye, J., Tsai, J. Y., & Bentley, F. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3311956 · Cited by 356
Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems
Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C. A. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/975817.975844 · Cited by 311
Designing social presence of social actors in human computer interaction
Lee, K. M., & Nass, C. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642662 · Cited by 257
Self-citationDoes computer-generated speech manifest personality? an experimental test of similarity-attraction
Nass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/332040.332452 · Cited by 242
Self-citationKim, K. J., Park, E., & Shyam Sundar, S. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.009 · Cited by 234
Washington State University, Hess, T., Fuller, M., University of Massachusetts, A., Campbell, D., & Millsaps College (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00216 · Cited by 233
Lee, J.-G., Kim, K. J., Lee, S., & Shin, D.-H. (2015) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1070547 · Cited by 220
Antecedents and consequences of trust in a social media brand: A cross-cultural study of Twitter
Pentina, I., Zhang, L., & Basmanova, O. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.045 · Cited by 198
Artificial Intelligence and Declined Guilt: Retailing Morality Comparison Between Human and AI
Giroux, M., Kim, J., Lee, J. C., & Park, J. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05056-7 · Cited by 194
Pizzi, G., Vannucci, V., Mazzoli, V., & Donvito, R. (2023) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21813 · Cited by 194
No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot
Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., & Scassellati, B. (2010) · 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2010.5453193 · Cited by 193
Kim, T., & Song, H. (2021) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2021.101595 · Cited by 101
Voice as a Design Material: Sociophonetic Inspired Design Strategies in Human-Computer Interaction
Sutton, S. J., Foulkes, P., Kirk, D., & Lawson, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300833 · Cited by 92
Anthropomorphizing information to enhance trust in autonomous vehicles
Niu, D., Terken, J., & Eggen, B. (2018) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20745 · Cited by 90
New Information Technology and Implicit Bias
Elsbach, K. D., & Stigliani, I. (2019) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2017.0079 · Cited by 74
Koç, F. Ş., & Savaş, P. (2025) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344024000168 · Cited by 69
How affordances of chatbots cross the chasm between social and traditional enterprise systems
Stoeckli, E., Dremel, C., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2020) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-019-00359-6 · Cited by 55
My teammate is AI: understanding students’ perceptions of student-AI collaboration in drawing tasks
Kim, J., & Cho, Y. H. (2025) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2023.2286206 · Cited by 50
Social reactions toward people vs. computers: How mere lables shape interactions
Aharoni, E., & Fridlund, A. J. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.019 · Cited by 35
Kalinyak-Fliszar, M., Martin, N., Keshner, E., Rudnicky, A., Shi, J., & Teodoro, G. (2015) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0160 · Cited by 16
If Asimo Thinks, Does Roomba Feel? The Legal Implications of Attributing Agency to Technology
Jaeger, C. B., & Levin, D. T. (2016) · Journal of Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.5898/jhri.5.3.jaeger · Cited by 15
L’italiano delle intelligenze artificiali generative
Cicero, F. (2023) · Italiano LinguaDue · doi:10.54103/2037-3597/21990 · Cited by 5
On the Need to Rethink Trust in AI Assistants for Software Development: A Critical Review
Baltes, S., Speith, T., Chiteri, B., Mohsenimofidi, S., Chakraborty, S., & Buschek, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2026.3659804 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, D. C.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 223-239
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048396937
- Cited by
- 615
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
