Cited by 295Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Autism Prevalence Following Prenatal Exposure to Hurricanes and Tropical Storms in Louisiana

Kinney, Dennis K., Miller, Andrea M., Crowley, David J., Huang, Emerald, Gerber, Erika·2008·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Hurricanes and tropical storms served as natural experiments for investigating whether autism is associated with exposure to stressful events during sensitive periods of gestation. Weather service data identified severe storms in Louisiana from 1980 to 1995 and parishes hit by storm centers during this period. Autism prevalences in different cohorts were calculated using anonymous data on birth dates and parishes of children diagnosed with autism in the state mental health system, together with corresponding census data on all live births in Louisiana. Prevalence increased in dose-response fashion with severity of prenatal storm exposure, especially for cohorts exposed near the middle or end of gestation (p < 0.001). Results complement other evidence that factors disrupting development during sensitive gestational periods may contribute to autism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-007-0414-0

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a Louisiana tropical storm model, a dose-response relationship for ASD emerged across cohorts, particularly strong for exposures during the middle and end stages of gestation.

    “While a dose–response relationship for ASD emerged across cohorts, in contrast to the findings of Project Ice Storm, this was particularly strong for exposures occurring during the middle and end stages of gestation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kinney, D. K., Miller, A. M., Crowley, D. J., Huang, E., & Gerber, E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Kinney, Dennis K.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2007-07-06
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
481-488
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2114436773
Cited by
295
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
autism prevalence, prenatal exposure, hurricanes, tropical storms, prenatal stress, dose-response relationship, storm intensity, pregnancy timing, Louisiana
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Disasters, Female, Humans, Louisiana, Mothers, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Severity of Illness Index, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review