Cited by 145Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Synaptic Loss and the Pathophysiology of PTSD: Implications for Ketamine as a Prototype Novel Therapeutic

Open access
Krystal, John H., Abdallah, Chadi G., Averill, Lynette A., Kelmendi, Benjamin, Harpaz-Rotem, Ilan, Sanacora, Gerard, Southwick, Steven M., Duman, Ronald S.·2017·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Studies of the neurobiology and treatment of PTSD have highlighted many aspects of the pathophysiology of this disorder that might be relevant to treatment. The purpose of this review is to highlight the potential clinical importance of an often-neglected consequence of stress models in animals that may be relevant to PTSD: the stress-related loss of synaptic connectivity.Recent findings Here, we will briefly review evidence that PTSD might be a "synaptic disconnection syndrome" and highlight the importance of this perspective for the emerging therapeutic application of ketamine as a potential rapid-acting treatment for this disorder that may work, in part, by restoring synaptic connectivity. Synaptic disconnection may contribute to the profile of PTSD symptoms that may be targeted by novel pharmacotherapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-017-0829-z

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of synaptic connections in mood-related circuitry is a central pathophysiological process underlying depression and other stress-related disorders, such as PTSD.

    “This discovery fits with convergent evidence implicating a loss of synaptic connections in mood-related circuitry as a central pathophysiological process underlying depression and other stress-related disorders, such as PTSD 15,16 .”

    From Imaging the effect of ketamine on synaptic density (SV2A) in the living brain (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    In “Toward a Synaptic Deficit Hypothesis” (page unavailable), the paper says chronic stress reduces synapses in circuits regulating mood and that synaptic loss may be an important feature of PTSD neuropathology. It presents the PTSD link as a hypothesis supported by early clinical correlates, rather than establishing synaptic loss as a central underlying process; it also does not make that broader claim for depression and other stress-related disorders. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Postmortem findings from animal models consistently demonstrate that stress induces synaptic dysfunction, including reductions in synaptic density, as measured by quantification of synaptic structure and assessments of synaptic protein expression.

    “Postmortem findings from these animal models consistently demostrate that stress induces synaptic dysfunction [5,6,135], including reductions in synaptic density, as measured by both quantification of synaptic structure and assessments of synaptic protein expression”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [95]Popoli M Yan Z McEwen BS Sanacora G The stressed synapse: the impact of stress and glucocorticoids on glutamate transmission Nat Rev Neurosci 2011 13 1 22 37 22127301 PMC3645314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krystal, J. H., Abdallah, C. G., Averill, L. A., Kelmendi, B., Harpaz-Rotem, I., Sanacora, G., Southwick, S. M., & Duman, R. S.
Affiliations
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Krystal, John H.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2017-08-26
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
74-74
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2746761609
Cited by
145
References
134
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P50AA012870)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH093897)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024139)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • Yale Center for Clinical Investigation, Yale School of Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, synaptic loss, ketamine, rapid-acting antidepressants, animal models of stress, PTSD pathophysiology, pharmacotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Ketamine, Synaptic Transmission, Neurobiology, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review