Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Customer Engagement/Value Interface: An Exploratory Investigation

Hollebeek, Linda D.·2013·Australasian Marketing Journal

Abstract

After generating significant interest among marketing practitioners, the customer engagement (CE) concept is rapidly gaining traction in the academic marketing literature. Although pioneering research has provided foundational insights in this emerging area, little is known regarding the ways in which CE may contribute to generating customer value (CV) and ensuing loyalty for utilitarian and hedonic brands. Addressing this research gap, this paper develops a conceptual model of the CE/CV interface for utilitarian and hedonic brands, which proposes: (i) The existence of a curvilinear relationship between CE/CV for utilitarian and hedonic brands; and (ii) Up to a focal brand-, category-, consumer-, and situation-specific optimum, growing CE generates greater CV increases for hedonic, than for utilitarian brands. By drawing on a sample of 14 consumers, depth-interviewing/focus group findings provided exploratory evidence for contentions (i) and (ii). The paper concludes with an overview of key research limitations and implications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.08.006

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Abdul-Ghani E., 2010, Journal of Business Research, 64, 1060, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.009 · DOI
  2. Batra R., 1991, Marketing Letters, 2, 159, 10.1007/BF00436035 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S1441-3582(02)70141-9 · DOI
  4. Bowden J.H., 2009, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18, 574, 10.1080/19368620903024983 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1177/1094670511415523 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/1094670511411703 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brodie R.J., Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research
  8. Bryant J., 1981, Human Communication Research, 8, 43, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00655.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.intmar.2009.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chen Z., 2003, Psychology & Marketing, 20, 323, 10.1002/mar.10076 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Childers T.L., 2001, Journal of Retailing, 77, 511, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Coffey A.J. Atkinson P.A. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies1999 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks
  13. Cronin J.J., 2000, Journal of Retailing, 76, 193, 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dall'Olmio Riley F., 2000, British Journal of Management, 11, 137, 10.1111/1467-8551.t01-1-00156 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/002224298104500408 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Eisend M., 2009, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 191, 10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/002224378201900101 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gummesson E., 2008, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 15, 10.1007/s11747-007-0065-x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Higgins E.T., 2009, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 100, 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Holbrook M.B., 1994, Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice, 21, 10.4135/9781452229102.n2 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hollebeek L.D., 2011, Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 785, 10.1080/0267257X.2010.500132 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hollebeek L.D., 2011, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19, 555, 10.1080/0965254X.2011.599493 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1177/1094670510375604 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Janis I., 1967, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 166
  26. Jones M.A., 2006, Journal of Business Research, 59, 974, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1509/jmkg.74.5.001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Leeflang P., 2011, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28, 76, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Leeflang P., 2009, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26, 13, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.06.006 · DOI
  30. Lincoln Y.S. Guba E.G. Naturalistic Inquiry1985 Sage Publications Beverly Hills
  31. Lusch R.F. Vargo S.L. S-D logic: Accommodating, Integrating, Transdisciplinary2010 Grand Service Challenge University of Cambridge
  32. 10.1016/S1441-3582(08)70003-X · DOI
  33. Mollen A., 2010, Journal of Business Research, 63, 919, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Myers M.D., 2007, Information and Organization, 17, 2, 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Oh H., 1999, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18, 67, 10.1016/S0278-4319(98)00047-4 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Ouschan R., 2006, European Journal of Marketing, 40, 1068, 10.1108/03090560610681014 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Overby J.W., 2006, Journal of Business Research, 59, 1160, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.02.004 · DOI
  39. Patterson P., 2006, In: Proceedings of ANZMAC 2006 Conference. Advancing Theory, 4
  40. 10.3102/0013189X022002023 · doi:10.3102/0013189x022002023 · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/dir.20015 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Shrivastava S., 2003, Australasian Marketing Journal, 11, 61, 10.1016/S1441-3582(03)70135-9 · DOI
  43. Slater S.F., 1997, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 162, 10.1007/BF02894352 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1177/0092070300281011 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Slater S.F., 1994, Business Horizons, 22, 10.1016/0007-6813(94)90029-9 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Spiggle S., 1994, Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 491, 10.1086/209413 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Strauss A.L. Corbin J.M. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory1998 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks
  48. Sweeney J.C., 2010, Australasian Marketing Journal, 10, 26, 10.1016/S1441-3582(02)70148-1 · DOI
  49. Sweeney J.C., 2001, Journal of Retailing, 77, 203, 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1177/002224299105500304 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Tay R., 2002, Health Marketing Quarterly, 19, 55, 10.1300/J026v19n04_05 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S1441-3582(99)70202-8 · DOI
  53. Varey R., 2006, Australasian Marketing Journal, 14, 5, 10.1016/S1441-3582(06)70048-9 · doi:10.1016/s1441-3582(06)70048-9
  54. Walker R.H., 2006, Journal of Services Marketing, 20, 125, 10.1108/08876040610657057 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Winzar H.F., 1999, Australasian Marketing Journal, 7, 49, 10.1016/S1441-3582(99)70215-6 · DOI
  56. Woodruff R.B., 1997, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25, 139, 10.1007/BF02894350 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Woodruff R.B., 2006, The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, 183
  58. 10.1177/002224298805200302 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Hollebeek, L. D.
Venue
Australasian Marketing Journal
Published
2013-02
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
17-24
ISSN
  • 1441-3582 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-3349
OpenAlex
W2042156737
Cited by
274
References
16
FWCI
27.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Customer Engagement/Value Interface: An Exploratory Investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.08.006
The paper
Hollebeek, L. D. (2013). The Customer Engagement/Value Interface: An Exploratory Investigation. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.08.006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.