Cited by 47Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesEmotions and Moral Behavior

Who is to blame? Oxytocin promotes nonpersonalistic attributions in response to a trust betrayal

Klackl, Johannes, Pfundmair, Michaela, Agroskin, Dmitrij, Jonas, Eva·2013·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Recent research revealed that the neuropeptide Oxytocin (OT) increases and maintains trustful behavior, even towards interaction partners that have proven to be untrustworthy. However, the cognitive mechanisms behind this effect are unclear. In the present paper, we propose that OT might boost trust through the link between angry rumination and the use of nonpersonalistic and personalistic attributions. Nonpersonalistic attributions put the blame for the betrayal on the perpetrator's situation, whereas personalistic attributions blame his dispositions for the event. We predict that OT changes attribution processes in favor of nonpersonalistic ones and thereby boosts subsequent trust. Participants played a classic trust game in which the opponent systematically betrayed their trust. As predicted, OT strengthened the relationship between angry rumination about the event and nonpersonalistic attribution of the opponents' behavior and weakened the link between angry rumination and personalistic attribution. Critically, nonpersonalistic attribution also mediated the interactive effect of OT and angry rumination on how strongly investments were reduced in the remaining rounds of the trust game. In summary, the present findings suggest that one underlying cognitive mechanism behind OT-induced trust might relate to how negative emotions evoked by a breach of trust influence the subsequent attributional analysis: OT seems to augment trust by fostering the interpretation of untrustworthy behavior as caused by non-personal factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.010

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kosfeld's seminal finding on oxytocin and trust has not always been replicated; Baumgartner et al. found no significant effect of oxytocin on the pre-betrayal trust game, and two independent studies also failed to replicate Kosfeld's findings.

    “We noticed that Kosfeld’s [1] seminal finding was not always replicated either. Indeed, Baumgartner et al. [7] found no significant effect of OT on the pre-betrayal trust game. More recently, two independent studies also failed to replicate Kosfeld’s findings [20] [21].”
  • The items used in the antisocial peer pressure task have been validated.

    “the items have been validated in (46)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klackl, J., Pfundmair, M., Agroskin, D., & Jonas, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Salzburg (AT)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Klackl, Johannes
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
92
Issue
2
Pages
387-394
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014201598
Cited by
47
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin, trust, angry rumination, attribution theory, trust game, negative emotions, social cognition
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Games, Experimental, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Personality, Social Perception, Time Factors, Trust, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review