Cited by 3,204Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 330 of the 333 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 249 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies

Open access

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex pathobiology. The presence of extracellular β-amyloid deposition as neuritic plaques and intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles remains the primary neuropathologic criteria for AD diagnosis. However, a number of recent fundamental discoveries highlight important pathological roles for other critical cellular and molecular processes. Despite this, no disease-modifying treatment currently exists, and numerous phase 3 clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefits. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of AD pathobiology and discuss current treatment strategies, highlighting recent clinical trials and opportunities for developing future disease-modifying therapies.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes Alzheimer disease pathobiology and treatment strategies, covering amyloid, tau, ApoE, neuroimmune activation, infection, and sleep. It concludes that no disease-modifying therapy exists and argues for earlier/preclinical anti-amyloid trials plus tau-, ApoE-, immune-modulating, and combination approaches.

Key findings

  • AD is biologically defined by extracellular Aβ plaques and intracellular hyperphosphorylated tau tangles; preclinical pathology begins roughly 10–20 years before symptoms, and death generally occurs within 5–12 years of symptom onset.
  • APOE ε4 is the strongest late-onset AD genetic risk factor: one copy raises risk about 3–4-fold and two copies about 12-fold, while ε2 is protective. Amyloid accumulation appears required but not sufficient; tau burden tracks cognitive decline more closely than amyloid.
  • Four FDA-approved symptomatic drugs exist (three cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine), with modest effects; more than 20 compounds completed phase 3 trials without slowing decline, and many Aβ antibodies, BACE1 inhibitors, and γ-secretase inhibitors failed or caused adverse effects.
  • Emerging areas include context-dependent microglial/innate immune roles, ApoE effects on amyloid seeding/clearance, tau-mediated neurodegeneration, blood-brain barrier integrity, and neuronal activity; sleep loss raises Aβ and tau, and infectious/microbiome hypotheses remain under study.

Methods

  • Narrative review: the authors synthesize recent advances in AD pathobiology and treatment rather than conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis.
  • Evidence base includes human neuropathology, CSF/plasma biomarkers, PET/MRI, genetic studies, animal and cell models, and clinical trial reports.
  • Main analysis is qualitative integration; no primary data collection or formal statistical analysis is described.

Limitations

  • Paper-stated: no disease-modifying therapy is available; many phase 3 trials failed; some negative amyloid trials were not designed to definitively test the amyloid hypothesis; herpesvirus–dementia associations need replication in large prospective cohorts; human relevance of microglial mechanisms remains unclear.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it lacks systematic search/quality appraisal and reports no new experimental data; many mechanistic conclusions rely on preclinical models, and several cited findings are described as conflicting or unreplicated.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001

Cites

330 of 330 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 249 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 160 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 116
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
128 of 128
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.

    “In these studies, tau pathology and neurodegeneration is enhanced in mice with both pathologies, whereas amyloid pathology is generally unaffected”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No integrated animal model exists that can definitively test the amyloid cascade hypothesis.

    “Since no integrated AD animal model exists in which to definitively test the validity of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, clinical trials using Aβ-directed therapies in humans have been considered one of the most direct ways to test this.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Aβ accumulation triggers Alzheimer disease pathogenesis, as proposed by the amyloid cascade hypothesis.

    “The amyloid cascade hypothesis suggests that Aβ accumulation triggers disease pathogenesis, so therapies that lower parenchymal Aβ might be expected to slow disease progression.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tau is a critical target for developing disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease.

    “Tau is considered a critical target for developing disease modifying therapies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Alzheimer disease pathobiology is multifactorial and complex.

    “Given the multifactorial nature and underlying complexity of AD pathobiology”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 333 references

3 of the 333 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Holtzman, David M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
179
Issue
2
Pages
312-339
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976163884
Cited by
3,204
References
333
Citations by year
2026: 455 · 2025: 482 · 2024: 565 · 2023: 526 · 2022: 527 · 2021: 426 · 2020: 207 · 2019: 9
FWCI
34.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • JPB Foundation
  • Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  • National Institutes of Health (AG047644, NS074969, NS090934)
  • University of Washington (8,232,107, 8,591,894)
  • Alzheimer's Association (AACSF-18-564776)
  • Tau Consortium
  • AbbVie (US2013/049333)
  • Genentech
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, pathobiology, amyloid-beta, neuritic plaques, tau hyperphosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangles, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trial failure, neuropathologic diagnosis
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Alzheimer Vaccines, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review