The DOI matches its Crossref record; 330 of the 333 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 13 of the 249 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex pathobiology. The presence of extracellular β-amyloid deposition as neuritic plaques and intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles remains the primary neuropathologic criteria for AD diagnosis. However, a number of recent fundamental discoveries highlight important pathological roles for other critical cellular and molecular processes. Despite this, no disease-modifying treatment currently exists, and numerous phase 3 clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefits. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of AD pathobiology and discuss current treatment strategies, highlighting recent clinical trials and opportunities for developing future disease-modifying therapies.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes Alzheimer disease pathobiology and treatment strategies, covering amyloid, tau, ApoE, neuroimmune activation, infection, and sleep. It concludes that no disease-modifying therapy exists and argues for earlier/preclinical anti-amyloid trials plus tau-, ApoE-, immune-modulating, and combination approaches.
Key findings
- AD is biologically defined by extracellular Aβ plaques and intracellular hyperphosphorylated tau tangles; preclinical pathology begins roughly 10–20 years before symptoms, and death generally occurs within 5–12 years of symptom onset.
- APOE ε4 is the strongest late-onset AD genetic risk factor: one copy raises risk about 3–4-fold and two copies about 12-fold, while ε2 is protective. Amyloid accumulation appears required but not sufficient; tau burden tracks cognitive decline more closely than amyloid.
- Four FDA-approved symptomatic drugs exist (three cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine), with modest effects; more than 20 compounds completed phase 3 trials without slowing decline, and many Aβ antibodies, BACE1 inhibitors, and γ-secretase inhibitors failed or caused adverse effects.
- Emerging areas include context-dependent microglial/innate immune roles, ApoE effects on amyloid seeding/clearance, tau-mediated neurodegeneration, blood-brain barrier integrity, and neuronal activity; sleep loss raises Aβ and tau, and infectious/microbiome hypotheses remain under study.
Methods
- Narrative review: the authors synthesize recent advances in AD pathobiology and treatment rather than conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis.
- Evidence base includes human neuropathology, CSF/plasma biomarkers, PET/MRI, genetic studies, animal and cell models, and clinical trial reports.
- Main analysis is qualitative integration; no primary data collection or formal statistical analysis is described.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: no disease-modifying therapy is available; many phase 3 trials failed; some negative amyloid trials were not designed to definitively test the amyloid hypothesis; herpesvirus–dementia associations need replication in large prospective cohorts; human relevance of microglial mechanisms remains unclear.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it lacks systematic search/quality appraisal and reports no new experimental data; many mechanistic conclusions rely on preclinical models, and several cited findings are described as conflicting or unreplicated.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
180 Not checked yet · 43 No basis given · 36 Own interpretation · 18 Sources not found · 6 Partly supported · 3 Supported · 2 Own result · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several lines of evidence suggest Aβ deposition may be required for progression of tau pathology in AD”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Pontecorvo et al., 2019 source
The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) reports no measurable change in flortaucipir signal in amyloid-β− subjects, in contrast to a significant change in amyloid-β+ subjects. It explicitly suggests that amyloid deposition may be a necessary antecedent for tau spread beyond the temporal lobe in Alzheimer’s disease, supporting the claim’s hedged wording. (LLM, conf=0.95)
- Not checked yetcites Price and Morris, 1999
- Partly supportedcites Hanseeuw et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not provided) describes a hypothesis that Aβ precedes and accelerates neocortical tau pathology. The Discussion reports that Aβ increases were associated with later tau changes, but also observes tau increases in people with low Aβ. The paper supports a role for Aβ in tau progression, not the stronger suggestion that Aβ deposition is required for it. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A recent detailed morphological analysis of microglial activation state in brain specimens from two cohorts of cognitive aging found that the proportion of activated microglia (PAM) strongly correlated with presence of pathologic AD (Felsky et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Felsky et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (“Active microglia discriminate pathological AD”) reports a strong association between PAM and pathological AD in the midfrontal and inferior temporal cortices. The Discussion specifies that activation was elevated in cortical but not subcortical structures, a regional limit omitted from the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In a recent study assessing the effect of ApoE-TR in the PS19 (tauP301S) tauopathy mouse model, ApoE4 dramatically exacerbated tau-mediated neurodegeneration”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Shi et al., 2017 source
The study’s description of its P301S tauopathy mouse model reports significantly more brain atrophy and neuronal loss in mice expressing human ApoE4 than in those expressing ApoE2 or ApoE3. It concludes that ApoE4 caused more severe tau-mediated neurodegeneration. (LLM, conf=0.95)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Areas of brain parenchyma containing deposits of HSV-1 infection also demonstrated increased Aβ deposition (Eimer et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Eimer et al., 2018 source
The Results section reports Aβ deposition in the brains of HSV1-infected young 5XFAD mice and says HSV1 and Aβ signals co-localized. This supports the claim for the mouse model studied; it does not establish the same finding in human brain tissue. (LLM, conf=0.91)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A single night of sleep deprivation leads to elevated CSF Aβ42 levels in healthy middle-aged men (Ooms et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ooms et al., 2014 source
The Conclusions state that one night of total sleep deprivation increased CSF Aβ42 relative to normal sleep in healthy middle-aged men. The Discussion clarifies that deprivation abolished the morning decrease seen after sleep, so the elevation is relative to the normal-sleep group. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In mice overexpressing Aβ, acute sleep deprivation caused a significant increase in amyloid plaque deposition.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Kang et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage describing the plaque experiment (section labelled Abstract, p. not provided) reports greater plaque deposition in transgenic mice after 21 days of chronic sleep restriction. The passage on acute sleep deprivation reports increased interstitial-fluid Aβ levels, not plaque deposition. The claim substitutes an acute intervention for the chronic intervention used in the plaque experiment. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Any putative benefit attributed to methylene blue has been thought to be secondary to reduced tau fibrillization and aggregation and induction of autophagy, which leads to reduced tau pathology and neuron death in mouse models of tauopathy (Congdon et al., 2012; Crowe et al., 2013; Wischik et al., 1996).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Congdon et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and discussion report that methylene blue induces autophagy and reduces total and phosphorylated tau in tauopathy mice; the Results also show reduced aggregated tau in mouse-derived slice cultures. The paper says aggregated tau did not significantly decrease in live mice, and it does not establish that these mechanisms reduced neuronal death in its mouse experiment. The discussion cites an earlier study for attenuated neurodegeneration in a tau-transgenic line. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites Crowe et al., 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Tau Fibrillization Inhibitors Promote Disulfide Formation” (page unavailable), Crowe et al. report that methylene blue inhibits 4-R tau fibrillization in vitro and note studies suggesting it enhances autophagic degradation of tau. They also say autophagy may reduce tau inclusions independently of fibrillization inhibition. Our copy does not establish that these mechanisms together reduce tau pathology or neuronal death in mouse tauopathy models. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Wischik et al., 1996 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that methylene blue inhibits tau–tau binding and reverses the proteolytic stability of paired helical filaments in vitro. The paper does not report induction of autophagy or reduced tau pathology and neuronal death in mouse tauopathy models, so it supports only the aggregation-related part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This is especially critical after a recent study in the preclinical literature demonstrated APOE2 expression via viral delivery exacerbated pathology in tauopathy mice (Zhao et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Zhao et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Results report more severe tau pathology in apoE2 mice than in apoE3 or apoE4 mice. But the Results specify that the virus delivered mutant human tau into mice already carrying the human apoE2 allele; APOE2 itself was not delivered virally. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Longitudinal studies of cognitive function and CSF and neuroimaging biomarker changes in ADAD and LOAD have identified a significant preclinical phase of disease preceding onset of clinical symptoms by at least 10-20 years”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vermunt et al., 2019 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent studies demonstrate the ability to detect CNS Aβ deposition via the use of plasma assessment of Aβ species”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 116
- Probably not a substantial claim. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Soluble oligomers isolated from AD brain have been shown to potently inhibit long-term potentiation (LTP), enhance long-term depression (LTD) and reduce dendritic spine density in rodent hippocampal slice cultures”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kamenetz et al., 2003 source
- Partly supportedcites Shankar et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and the section ‘Aβ oligomers trigger spine and synapse loss’ report reduced dendritic spine density in rat hippocampal slice cultures. The paper says its oligomers were isolated from cell-conditioned medium, not AD brain. In ‘Mechanisms of Aβ-induced spine loss,’ it cites earlier work showing LTP inhibition but proposes a shift toward LTD-inducing signaling rather than reporting enhanced LTD as an observed result. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites Wei et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introductory passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says that Aβ oligomers reduce spine density in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures and that soluble Aβ oligomers impair LTP. The Results report reduced spine plasticity in rat slice cultures, but the paper does not report enhanced LTD or establish that the oligomers producing these effects were isolated from AD brains; its experiments used locally produced or synthetic Aβ. (LLM, conf=0.89)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The presence of extracellular amyloid-β deposition as neuritic plaques and intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles remain the primary neuropathologic criteria for AD diagnosis.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“AD as a distinct entity is now defined biologically by the presence of a specific neuropathological profile (Jack et al., 2018a): extracellular deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the form of diffuse and neuritic plaques and the presence of intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads within dystrophic neurites consisting of aggregated hyperphosphorylated tau protein (Duyckaerts et al.,”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jack et al., 2018a
- Not checked yetcites Duyckaerts et al., 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Tau protein is subject to numerous post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, acetylation, glycation, O-GlcNAcylation, nitration, SUMOylation, ubiquitination and truncation”
- Also stated in: § Tau · plain
“In many cases, aberrant phosphorylation results in decreased binding affinity for microtubules”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marcelli et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Biernat et al., 1993
- Not checked yetcites Mandelkow et al., 2007
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Tau · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, the available data still strongly supports the central role of pathologic Aβ accumulation in mediating AD pathogenesis as outlined in the original description of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, although its mechanism may be less direct than originally anticipated”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The γ-secretase complex consists of four protein subunits: presenilin (PSEN), presenilin enhancer (PEN), APH and Nicastrin.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This extension proposes that accumulation of cerebral amyloid and tau pathology (the “biochemical phase”) is a slow, gradual process that is tolerated by CNS cells early in the course of disease, serving as a risk factor for development of clinical disease, but that the disease is only manifest clinically when cellular homeostatic mechanisms fail, leading to impaired clearance of aggregated”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Strooper and Karran, 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hypoxia can induce increased Aβ production, possibly via increased BACE1 expression (Sun et al., 2006), suggesting the possibility of a pathological feedforward loop.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sun et al., 2006 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it seems clear that Aβ is necessary but not sufficient and that there are other downstream factors that play a key role.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Longitudinal assessment of amyloid and tau PET imaging suggests that rate of amyloid accumulation predicts onset of tau accumulation whereas rate of tau accumulation predicts onset of cognitive impairment”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hanseeuw et al., 2019 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings have led to the hypothesis that cognitive decline and neurodegeneration in AD is primarily driven by onset and spread of tau pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
In the paper
“Tau acetylation has been shown to reduce degradation of phosphorylated tau and increase tau pathology”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Min et al., 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A 3D in vitro culture system consisting of human neurons differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells overexpressing human APP containing FAD mutations generates robust Aβ42 production and amyloid deposition. Importantly, this model also develops elevated phospho-tau levels and fibrillary tau aggregates, suggesting that elevated Aβ levels alone are sufficient to drive tau pathology in human”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Choi et al., 2014 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Clinico-neuropathologic correlation analyses have demonstrated that tau pathology propagates throughout the AD brain in a stereotyped fashion across neuroanatomically connected networks (Figure 2C) forming the basis of Braak staging”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Braak and Braak, 1991 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The hypothesis is supported by the discovery that exclusively genetic forms of AD, such as in autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), Down syndrome (trisomy 21), or APP locus duplications, cause an increase in the Aβ42/40 ratio, increased total Aβ production, or increased Aβ fibrillinogenic properties and are sufficient to induce typical AD pathology”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tcw and Goate, 2017
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Exogenously supplied fibrils will seed aggregation of transgenic human and endogenous mouse tau fibrils in mouse tauopathy models by enhancing nucleation of new fibrils. These aggregates then spread transsynaptically to remote anatomically connected brain regions inducing further seeding and aggregation”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that while amyloid accumulation may be key in beginning the pathological process, other downstream events such as neuroinflammation and tau accumulation may be the main drivers of neurodegeneration.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Based on a number of lines of evidence, Hardy and Higgins proposed the amyloid cascade hypothesis in 1992, positing that deposition of Aβ in the brain is the initiating step of AD pathogenesis, leading to subsequent tau deposition, neuron and synaptic loss and cognitive decline”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hardy and Higgins, 1992 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In these studies, tau pathology and neurodegeneration is enhanced in mice with both pathologies, whereas amyloid pathology is generally unaffected”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bolmont et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Götz et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Hurtado et al., 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“Hyperphosphorylated tau is also redirected from the axonal compartment to the somatodendritic compartment where it can impair synaptic function by inhibiting glutamate receptor trafficking or synaptic anchoring”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hoover et al., 2010 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“GABAergic inhibitory networks are impaired in AD and may contribute to cognitive impairment”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“ApoE4-TR mice have decreased numbers of GABAergic interneurons in the hippocampus and this correlates with learning deficits.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Najm et al., 2019 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
In the paper
“Detailed in vivo microdialysis and stable isotope labeling kinetics experiments have demonstrated that ApoE regulates clearance of Aβ in the brain in an isoform-dependent manner (ApoE4-TR mice have diminished Aβ clearance relative to other TR mice), whereas Aβ production was not influenced by ApoE isoform”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Castellano et al., 2011 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“A single inherited copy of the APOE ε4 allele increases risk of developing LOAD by approximately 3-4 fold, while two inherited copies increases risk by ~12-fold”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“Inheritance of the APOE ε2 allele is protective.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roses, 1996
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
In the paper
“Importantly, there was also a reduction in plaque-associated microglia with associated impairments in plaque compaction and increased levels of dystrophic neurites around plaques (Leyns et al., 2017; Song et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leyns et al., 2017; Song et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Single nuclear transcriptomic techniques have recently been applied to human AD brain specimens and have identified microglial subtypes with increased Apoe expression but have failed to identify DAM or MGnD subpopulations similar to what has been seen in the mouse brain (Mathys et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathys et al., 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“ApoE expression in microglia is required for the phenotypic expression of disease-associated microglia”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“ApoE also promotes microglial clustering around Aβ plaques”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ulrich et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may be because of disease stage specific effects with activation being protective in the setting of amyloid deposition and damaging in the setting of tau accumulation (Figure 4B).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Termed microglial neurodegenerative phenotype (MGnD) or disease-associated microglia (DAM), these cells are defined by a unique expression profile consisting of upregulation of certain inflammatory transcripts (e.g. Apoe, Trem2, Clec7a) and downregulation of homeostatic transcripts (e.g. P2ry12, Tmeml19).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In TREM2 deletion and haploinsufficiency studies using mouse models of Aβ deposition (APPPS1-21 and 5xFAD), levels of Aβ were decreased at 2 months of age (before plaque deposition) but increased at 8.5 months of age (after plaque deposition), suggesting an age or amyloid burden effect (Ulrich et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ulrich et al., 2014 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Longitudinal CSF, MRI and PET imaging studies of the preclinical phase of AD have established that APOE ε4 allele carriers develop enhanced cerebral amyloid deposition with age, do so at an earlier age and accumulate amyloid at a more rapid rate relative to non-carriers”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bussy et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Grimmer et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Mishra et al., 2018
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PAM was also strongly associated with total Aβ load and number of neuritic plaques and less strongly associated with amount of PHF tau.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Felsky et al., 2019 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ApoE4 may also mediate neuropathological effects by directly modulating BBB integrity”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · boosted
“Studies in the Zlokovic lab have demonstrated that ApoE4 does not efficiently engage LRP1 on pericytes.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bell et al., 2012 source
- Not checked yetcites Zlokovic, 2013
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · boosted
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TREM2 protein is expressed on microglia, promotes microglial phagocytosis, modulates inflammatory signaling and promotes microglial survival.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that ApoE4 may cause neuronal dysfunction via direct neurotoxic effects and by promoting hyperactivity in hippocampal neuronal networks.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In APP transgenic-ApoE targeted replacement (ApoE-TR) mice, where human apoE isoforms are expressed under the influence of endogenous murine ApoE regulatory sequences, ApoE isoforms have differential effects on amyloid pathology. ApoE4-TR mice have enhanced amyloid deposition and higher Aβ levels”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bales et al., 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“Either TREM2 KO or TREM2 R47H transgene expression in mice that develop amyloid deposition results in enhanced amyloid seeding as well as enhanced tau seeding and spreading near neuritic plaques (Leyns et al., 2019; Parhizkar et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leyns et al., 2019; Parhizkar et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“ApoE4-TR mice have enhanced neural activity in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, as evidenced by hypermetabolism on fMRI, increased high frequency oscillations measured by in vivo electrophysiology, and reduced inhibitory input to neurons of entorhinal cortex”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nuriel et al., 2017
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“A recent study failed to replicate the neurotoxic effect of ApoE4 in tauopathy mice.”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“They found that ApoE2 mice, rather than ApoE4, had enhanced tau pathology, astrogliosis and behavioral impairment”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhao et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ApoE directly binds to Aβ present in plaques”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · hedged
“APP transgenic animal models demonstrate markedly reduced fibrillar Aβ deposition and Aβ levels in the setting of ApoE KO, suggesting ApoE inhibits clearance and/or promotes Aβ seeding”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Namba et al., 1991
- Not checked yetcites Bales et al., 1997, 1999
- Not checked yetcites Huynh et al., 2017b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · hedged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TREM2 also binds to soluble oligomers of Aβ and promotes phagocytosis of Aβ.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In one study, MGnD could be induced in WT mouse brain by injection of apoptotic neurons, and required ApoE expression for induction (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“NLRP3 and caspase-1 genetic deletion results in decreased Aβ deposition, reduced IL-1β release from microglia and improved cognitive performance in APPPS1 mice (Heneka et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Heneka et al., 2013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) brains and in APPPS1 mice.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These experiments have led to the antimicrobial protection hypothesis of AD that suggests intracerebral infection by certain pathogens may induce Aβ fibrillization as an antimicrobial defense mechanism, leading to amyloid seeding and deposition, thereby initiating the amyloid cascade. (Moir et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moir et al., 2018
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This can be reversed by genetic deletion of ASC or use of an anti-ASC neutralizing antibody (Venegas et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Venegas et al., 2017 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests a role of Trem2 function in suppressing amyloid-induced local toxicity that also inhibits tau seeding/spreading.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“C1q binds to synapses and, in the presence of soluble Aβ oligomers, promotes microglia phagocytosis of synaptic contents (Hong et al., 2016)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hong et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Depletion of microglia or pharmacological inhibition of exosome secretion led to reduced tau spreading in this model.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Asai et al., 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Extracellular ASC specks have been found to bind to Aβ and can cross-seed Aβ oligomerization and plaque formation in APPPS1 mice (Figure 4C).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Venegas et al., 2017 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Dating back to 1991, studies have demonstrated the presence of herpesvirus in brains of patients with AD, as well as within amyloid plaques (Carbone et al., 2014; Jamieson et al., 1991, 1992; Wozniak et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carbone et al., 2014; Jamieson et al., 1991, 1992; Wozniak et al., 2009
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Follow-up analyses in AD brain specimens found detectable human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 DNA in 3 separate cohorts, and identified many putative viral-host interactions that regulate gene networks pertinent to AD biology, including innate immunity and APP processing (Readhead et al., 2018)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Readhead et al., 2018 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, one study demonstrated that APP/PS1ΔE9 mice chronically administered a cocktail of high dose antibiotics to modulate microbiome composition had significantly reduced Aβ plaque load, reduced plaque size, increased soluble Aβ42 levels and reduced plaque-associated microglia and reactive astrocytes (Minter et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Minter et al., 2016 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the J20 amyloid mouse model, CD33 expression resulted in reduced microglial-mediated phagocytosis of Aβ, and increased amyloid pathology (Bradshaw et al., 2013; Griciuc et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bradshaw et al., 2013; Griciuc et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Germ-free mice develop microglia with an immature phenotype, blunted response to inflammatory stimuli and defective immune response to infection (Erny et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Erny et al., 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data in models of Aβ deposition would suggest that dysfunctional microglia are less able to sequester Aβ pathology within compact plaques and less able to inhibit amyloid and tau seeding near plaques, resulting in neuronal damage.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“5xFAD mice survived longer with less severe disease than WT mice, while APP KO mice had slightly increased mortality compared to WT mice.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kumar et al., 2016 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CD33 KO results in decreased amyloid pathology and improved cognition in 5xFAD mice.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Griciuc et al., 2019 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Synthetic and AD-brain derived Aβ peptide fibrils significantly inhibit the growth of gram positive and gram negative bacteria, fungus (Soscia et al., 2010) and herpesvirus, and inhibits the entry of herpesvirus into cells (Bourgade et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Soscia et al., 2010; Bourgade et al., 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Activated microglia can directly secrete toxic proinflammatory cytokines (Colonna and Butovsky, 2017; Kinney et al., 2018) or secrete indirect mediators that stimulate astrocytes to secrete a neurotoxic substance (Liddelow et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Colonna and Butovsky, 2017; Kinney et al., 2018; Liddelow et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The current AD clinical pipeline has over 100 different compounds currently being tested in various phases of clinical trials (Hara et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hara et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, after Aβ plaque formation, there is an impaired sleep-wake cycle and loss of diurnal fluctuation in ISF/CSF Aβ levels (Roh et al., 2012).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roh et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Oral infection of WT mice with Porphyromsonas gingivalis resulted in elevated intraparenchymal Aβ levels, and inhibition of gingipain activity led to reduced intracerebral bacterial burden, decreased Aβ levels and reduced neuroinflammation (Dominy et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dominy et al., 2019 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Memantine is a uncompetitive NMDA receptor modulator that may act to inhibit glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity that develops as neurons die during AD progression, although the precise mechanism of its effect is unclear (Greenamyre et al., 1988; Livingston et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Anti-NMDA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Greenamyre et al., 1988; Livingston et al., 2017
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, as with ChEI, the effect size is quite small and the medication has no effect on long-term disease progression.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Anti-NMDA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, these studies provide compelling evidence that sleep deprivation stimulates increased levels of Aβ and tau in human CSF and animal model brains and enhances intracerebral pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the overall effect size is modest (mean difference in MiniMental State Examination (MMSE) of 1.37 points after 6 months treatment), and there is no effect on long-term disease progression.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effects in mild-to-moderate stage disease were marginal and therefore, it is not recommended that this medication be prescribed to patients with mild AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Anti-NMDA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At this stage of disease pathogenesis, significant and irreversible synaptic and neuronal loss has occurred and the pathological cascade would likely be very difficult to reverse (Gómez-Isla et al., 1996).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gómez-Isla et al., 1996 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Available data does not support the use of ChEI in very mild AD (i.e. mild cognitive impairment), and in fact ChEI may worsen cognition at this early clinical stage (Han et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Han et al., 2019
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the underlying evidence for the amyloid cascade hypothesis remains solid, new discoveries should continually inform and update our understanding of disease pathobiology, eventually leading to the development of novel treatment approaches.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a recent study of amyloid kinetics in human CSF using stable isotope labeling, there was an increase in Aβ levels following sleep deprivation but no change in rate of Aβ clearance.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lucey et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In animal microdialysis experiments, interstitial fluid (ISF) Aβ levels correlate with wakefulness and significantly increase following acute sleep deprivation or orexin infusion.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kang et al., 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, in a recent study of partial sleep deprivation lasting 5-8 days, no changes in AD CSF biomarkers were noted although that study did not alter the quantity of slow-wave sleep (Olsson et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Olsson et al., 2018
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They differ primarily in their pharmacokinetic profiles (donepezil has a much longer half-life than the others and is dosed once daily) and formulation (rivastigmine is available as a continuous release transdermal patch) but not in overall efficacy.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“More than 20 compounds have completed large phase 3 double-blind randomized control trials in cohorts of patients at various stages of AD and none has demonstrated any efficacy in slowing cognitive decline or improving global functioning (Table 1).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aducanumab is a fully human IgG1 antibody that binds a specific conformational epitope of Aβ. There was initial excitement for this antibody, as it was demonstrated to actively engage and clear amyloid plaques both in transgenic APP models and in human participants with prodromal or mild AD based on florbetapir-PET imaging.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sevigny et al., 2016 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ideally, BACE1 inhibition would be the preferred target for primary prevention studies, as blocking Aβ production prior to onset of pathology would be sufficient to prevent the development of pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“In mouse amyloidosis model, BACE1 inhibition limits initiation of new plaque formation but does not prevent growth of established plaques (Peters et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peters et al., 2018
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gantenerumab is a fully human IgG1 antibody that binds to a conformational epitope on aggregated Aβ fibrils within plaques and triggers Fc-mediated microglial phagocytosis of Aβ.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, many clinical trials have been inadequately designed to robustly test the amyloid hypothesis, such that negative trial results cannot be necessarily interpreted as a rejection of the amyloid hypothesis (Karran and Hardy, 2014; Karran et al., 2011).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Karran and Hardy, 2014; Karran et al., 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Two phase 3 trials of solanezumab in mild-to-moderate AD failed to demonstrate a marked benefit on cognition or ADL and did not reduce cerebral amyloid deposition (Doody et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Doody et al., 2014 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only one BACE1 inhibitor is now left standing in clinical trials. Elenbecestat is currently engaged in phase 3 clinical trials in biomarker positive MCI/prodromal AD and has not had issues with safety, tolerability or outcome futility to-date.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The first successful demonstration of antibody-mediated clearance of Aβ was in 1999, when active immunization of PDAPP mice using full length human Aβ42 peptide resulted in a significant decrease in existing amyloid deposits in animals vaccinated at an older age and almost completely prevented the development of amyloid deposition in animals vaccinated at a younger age (Schenk et al., 1999).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schenk et al., 1999 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It was hypothesized that the antibody might alter the equilibrium between plasma and CNS Aβ, the so-called “peripheral sink” hypothesis (DeMattos et al., 2001) as well as directly binding soluble Aβ in the CNS.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DeMattos et al., 2001
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Verubecestat failed to slow cognitive decline in a phase 3 trial of mild to moderate AD and resulted in worse cognition on some measures. (Egan et al., 2018, 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Egan et al., 2018, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though the data for Aβ-directed monoclonal antibodies in symptomatic AD have been discouraging, several antibodies are currently being used in primary and secondary prevention studies, where dose administration at an earlier disease stage might provide a better opportunity for disease modification.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since no integrated AD animal model exists in which to definitively test the validity of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, clinical trials using Aβ-directed therapies in humans have been considered one of the most direct ways to test this.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: No integrated animal model exists that can definitively test the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Donanemab is a monoclonal antibody developed by Lilly that uniquely targets Aβ(p3-42), a pyroglutamate form of Aβ exclusively found in plaques, in which the goal is to directly engage plaque-based Aβ for clearance and is currently in a phase 2 trial.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“BAN2401 is a humanized version of murine antibody mAb158 that binds large soluble Aβ protofibrils in vitro. Phase 2 trials demonstrated significant engagement and clearance of cerebral amyloid deposits and possible reduction in cognitive decline. It has now entered a phase 3 clinical trial in very mild to mild AD patients (Logovinsky et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Logovinsky et al., 2016
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a humanized version of mouse 3D6 antibody that targets N-terminal Aβ peptide and binds to soluble and fibrillar Aβ, triggering microglial phagocytosis of Aβ deposits.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Preclinical studies demonstrated that peripheral administration sequestered peripheral Aβ and led to a dramatic and rapid rise in peripheral Aβ levels.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gantenerumab entered a phase 3 clinical trial for mild AD in 2014 that ultimately stopped enrolling early due to futility. The study was continued as an open label extension at high dose for two years.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Post-mortem evaluation determined that there was significant variability in degree of amyloid clearance but that some vaccinated patients had long-lasting nearly complete clearance of Aβ deposits. However, they still had prominent tau pathology with advanced Braak staging and most had severe dementia at time of death, even despite plaque clearance (Nicoll et al., 2019; Vellas et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nicoll et al., 2019; Vellas et al., 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aβ-directed immunotherapy has been explored as a disease-modifying therapy in AD for the last 20 years (Gallardo and Holtzman, 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gallardo and Holtzman, 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lilly inhibitors LY2886721 and LY3202626 failed in phase 2 trials due to hepatotoxicity and impaired cognitive performance, respectively.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Follow-up analyses demonstrated a dramatic decline in Aβ deposition in participants in the open extension, such that some became amyloid negative on imaging.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ostrowitzki et al., 2017 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Active vaccination strategies using Aβ peptides as immunogens are still being pursued, with CAD106 in a phase 3 trial (Table 2) and ABVac40 currently in phase 2 trials (Lacosta et al., 2018; Vandenberghe et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lacosta et al., 2018; Vandenberghe et al., 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The amyloid cascade hypothesis suggests that Aβ accumulation triggers disease pathogenesis, so therapies that lower parenchymal Aβ might be expected to slow disease progression.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aβ accumulation triggers Alzheimer disease pathogenesis, as proposed by the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a phase 2a trial, four patients developed aseptic meningoencephalitis leading to the discontinuation of the trial, although ongoing neuroimaging and neuropathologic follow-up allowed for assessment of long-term treatment response.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirectn = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both claim to avoid the risk of meningoencephalitis by excluding portions of the Aβ peptide responsible for inducing Th1 immune responses.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately study sponsors announced discontinuation of this arm in July 2019 when interim analysis demonstrated worse cognition, increased brain atrophy and more weight loss in the treatment group relative to placebo.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With infusions of a monoclonal antibody, there is less variability in efficacy from patient to patient, and since titer levels can be more tightly controlled, there is less risk of adverse events.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crenezumab is a fully human IgG4 antibody that binds oligomeric, fibrillar and plaque-based Aβ. Two phase 3 trials were terminated early in January 2019 for futility after interim analysis failed to demonstrate any benefit.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The humanized version of HJ8.5 (ABBV-8E12) has been tested in a phase 1 trial and found to be safe and has now advanced to two phase 2 trials including patients with early AD and PSP (West et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites West et al., 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Use of anti-ApoE ASO delivered via intracerebroventricular injection in ApoE-TR/APPPS1-21 mice demonstrated dramatically reduced Aβ plaque deposition if administered prior to plaque seeding but not after.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huynh et al., 2017b
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another proposed strategy is to utilize gene therapy methods to overexpress ApoE2 in APOE ε4/ε4 carriers as means to overcome loss of function associated with ApoE4 (Rosenberg et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rosenberg et al., 2018
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This strategy would only be effective if ApoE4-mediated disease mechanisms are truly due to loss of function or, if secondary to ApoE4 toxic gain of function, that ApoE2 is able to act in dominant protective fashion to inhibit ApoE4 toxic effects.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Conditional BACE1 KO in adulthood mitigates many of these side effects but there remains impaired axon guidance defects (Ou-Yang et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ou-Yang et al., 2018 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“AADvac-1 recently completed phase 1 testing and is currently undergoing phase 2 trials (Novak et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Novak et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, there are other promising GSMs now in development that may enter human trials in the near future (Wagner et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wagner et al., 2017
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In preclinical studies, mouse anti-human tau monoclonal antibody HJ8.5 demonstrated reduced tau seeding, hyperphosphorylation and thioflavin S staining, reduced levels of detergent insoluble tau, and reduced brain atrophy and cognitive deficits in PS19 (P301S) mice, whether administered via intraventricular infusion (Yanamandra et al., 2013) or peripherally (Yanamandra et al., 2015) when administ”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yanamandra et al., 2013 source
- Not checked yetcites Yanamandra et al., 2015
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Avagacestat phase 2 trials in mild to moderate and prodromal AD were terminated after it failed to demonstrate any reduction in cognitive decline and caused adverse effects at higher doses, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rash, pruritis and increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (Coric et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coric et al., 2015 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A GSK-3 inhibitor, tideglusib, was shown in a preclinical study using double transgenic mice expressing human tau and APP to reduce tau phosphorylation, decrease amyloid deposition, lead to less neuronal loss and improved cognition (Serenó et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Serenó et al., 2009 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Semagacestat was the first GSI to enter a phase 3 trial for AD. However, the trial was halted early due to concerns of worsening cognition, increased incidence of skin cancers and infection, and weight loss relative to placebo (Doody et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Doody et al., 2013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ASO-based clinical treatments have demonstrated dramatic success in cases of spinal motor atrophy (Finkel et al., 2017) and are being tested in Huntington’s disease (Tabrizi et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finkel et al., 2017
- Not checked yetcites Tabrizi et al., 2019
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Delivery of this antibody centrally or peripherally reduced fibrillary amyloid plaque load and soluble and insoluble Aβ levels without reducing cerebral or plasma ApoE levels.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Liao et al., 2018
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is likely that if a peripherally administered anti-tau antibody is to be efficacious in a disease such as AD, such a mechanism would need to occur and an antibody would need to inhibit this process.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tau- and ApoE-directed therapeutics remain at an early stage of development and both hold great potential going foward.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In one study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept, TNFα decoy receptor, had lower incidence of AD, but no effect was noted with use of other anti-rheumatic medications (prednisone, sulfasalazine, rituximab) or anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab) (Chou et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chou et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, a phase 3 trial of IVIg did not demonstrate any cognitive benefits in mild AD despite a favorable safety profile (Relkin et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Relkin et al., 2017
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent heterochronic parabiosis experiments demonstrated that introduction of young blood in old mice led to increased neurogenesis and dendritic spine density, and improved age-related cognitive impairment, (Katsimpardi et al., 2014; Villeda et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Heterochronic parabiosis and direct injection of young mouse plasma in APP amyloidosis mice resulted in increased levels of synaptic protein and improvement in cognitive performance on standard tests of spatial working memory and hippocampal-dependent associative learning (Middeldorp et al., 2016)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Middeldorp et al., 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interest in anti-inflammatory treatments for AD were initially stoked by findings from multiple epidemiologic studies suggesting that chronic use of NSAIDs was associated with lower incidence of AD, with the most pronounced effect seen in patients taking chronic ibuprofen (in t’ Veld et al., 2001; Vlad et al., 2008).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites in t’ Veld et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Vlad et al., 2008 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, AD pathobiology is complex and the older one is, the greater likelihood that other age-related diseases contribute to cognitive decline together with AD pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This study found that intracisternal viral injection led to the widest area of cerebral transduction with only minimal surgery (Rosenberg et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rosenberg et al., 2018
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“This approach demonstrated reduced amyloid burden and improvement in recognition memory in preclinical studies using APP/PS1 mice (Chang et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chang et al., 2017
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The AMBAR trial, a current phase 2b/3 trial, is testing this hypothesis by assessing the effect of monthly plasma exchange with albumin replacement on mild to moderate AD (Boada et al., 2019)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boada et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is also huge potential for therapies that modulate the neuroimmune or microglial response in AD, and this class of drug development is significantly underrepresented.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A phase 2 trial of etanercept in mild to moderate AD established safety but saw no significant reduction in cognitive decline on analysis of secondary clinical outcomes (Butchart et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Butchart et al., 2015
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
“In these studies, tau pathology and neurodegeneration is enhanced in mice with both pathologies, whereas amyloid pathology is generally unaffected”
The paper relies on this without support.
No integrated animal model exists that can definitively test the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
“Since no integrated AD animal model exists in which to definitively test the validity of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, clinical trials using Aβ-directed therapies in humans have been considered one of the most direct ways to test this.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Aβ accumulation triggers Alzheimer disease pathogenesis, as proposed by the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
“The amyloid cascade hypothesis suggests that Aβ accumulation triggers disease pathogenesis, so therapies that lower parenchymal Aβ might be expected to slow disease progression.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Tau is a critical target for developing disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease.
“Tau is considered a critical target for developing disease modifying therapies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Alzheimer disease pathobiology is multifactorial and complex.
“Given the multifactorial nature and underlying complexity of AD pathobiology”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, it can also affect about 5% of those under 65, termed early-onset Alzheimer’s disease [2,3].”
From Cholinesterase Inhibitors from Plants and Their Potential in Alzheimer’s Treatment: Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, all existing methods of AD treatment are used lifelong, since the disease has a chronic progressive course with a preclinical phase starting 10–20 years before the onset of symptoms, and an inevitable fatal outcome within 5–12 years after their onset [90].”
From Theranostic Nanoplatforms for Alzheimer's Disease: A Critical Analysis of Conceptual Contradictions (2026) · cites this paper as [90]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“More than 20 compounds which are mainly based on amyloid and tau hypothesis have completed large phase 3, double‐blind, randomized control trials in cohorts of patients at various stages of AD. None of them has demonstrated satisfying efficacy in slowing cognitive decline or improving global brain function.[ 2 ]”
From Multifunctional Nanostructure RAP‐RL Rescues Alzheimer's Cognitive Deficits through Remodeling the Neurovascular Unit (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Synaptic failure is one of the major pathophysiological changes observed in patients with AD and several transgenic mouse models of AD. It is considered an early time point molecular change that is followed by neuronal loss and cognitive deficits (1, 34).”
From Deletion of Abi3 gene locus exacerbates neuropathological features of Alzheimer’s disease in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“APOE*4 is also associated with AD-related proteinopathies, including amyloid-β, tau, α-synuclein, and TDP-43 [11, 12].”
From Genome-wide analysis identifies novel loci influencing plasma apolipoprotein E concentration and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“P-tau is highly susceptible to aggregation, forming insoluble oligomers and NFTs”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Due to the apoE4 allele being the greatest risk factor associated with development of AD”
From The Sigma-2 Receptor/TMEM97, PGRMC1, and LDL Receptor Complex Are Responsible for the Cellular Uptake of Aβ42 and Its Protein Aggregates (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Mechanismly, various factors, including genetics, amyloid protein, tau, ApoE, and neuroimmune activation, are involved in the pathogenesis of AD.”
From Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets (2023) · cites this paper as [123]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Synaptic failure is one of the major pathophysiological changes observed in patients with AD and several transgenic mouse models of AD. It is considered an early time point molecular change that is followed by neuronal loss and cognitive deficits (1, 34).”
From Deletion of Abi3 gene locus exacerbates neuropathological features of Alzheimer’s disease in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“since it is known that the Aβ plaques act as a driver of AD pathology63 and the accumulation Aβ plaques in the brain initiates a complex multicellular neurodegenerative process.”
From Interferon signaling modulates Down syndrome-associated Alzheimer’s disease pathology in a mouse model (2025) · cites this paper as [65]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with dysfunctional neurons and activated astrocytes seen in both ApoE4 mice (Zhu et al., 2012) and AD brains (Long and Holtzman, 2019).”
From ApoE4 Impairs Neuron-Astrocyte Coupling of Fatty Acid Metabolism (2021) · cites this paper as Long and Holtzman, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“tau pathology in AD is suggested to be dependent on Aβ pathology, being correlated with cognitive impairment and clinical progression [5].”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“intraneuronal tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation ensue, causing neuronal and synaptic dysfunction and cell death1.”
From Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides produced by neurons form extracellular aggregates that initiate disease”
From Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“In addition, BACE1 KO mice exhibit a variety of neurological defects [641–643]”
From Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [641]
In the citing paper
“Large clinical trials of Aβ-targeting therapies have repeatedly failed, suggesting that amyloid-centric therapy is insufficient to quell disease [11].”
From Systems-based proteomics to resolve the biology of Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid and tau (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“However, the repeated failures of Aβ-targeting drug trials have recently bolstered critics of this hypothesis and broadened investigations of AD pathophysiology.”
From Systems-based proteomics to resolve the biology of Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid and tau (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123 · cited 2×
“stereotyped fashion across neuroanatomically connected networks (Figure 2C) forming the basis of Braak staging (Braak and Braak, 1991), although recent cross-sectional and longitudinal tau-PET imaging studies in cognitively normal amyloid positive individuals demonstrate widely distributed and continuous accumulation…”
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537
Self-citationAmyloid oligomers exacerbate tau pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy
Selenica, M.-L. B., Brownlow, M., Jimenez, J. P., Lee, D. C., Pena, G., Dickey, C. A., Gordon, M. N., & Morgan, D. (2013) · Neurodegenerative Diseases · doi:10.1159/000337230 · Cited by 10,359
Corder, E. H., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D. E., Gaskell, P. C., Small, G. W., Roses, A. D., Haines, J. L., & Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8346443 · Cited by 9,429
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system
Choi, D. W. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6 · Cited by 8,188
Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia
Liddelow, S. A., Guttenplan, K. A., Clarke, L. E., Bennett, F. C., Bohlen, C. J., Schirmer, L., Bennett, M. L., Münch, A. E., Chung, W.-S., Peterson, T. C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21029 · Cited by 7,971 · cited 1×
“, 2018) or secrete indirect mediators that stimulate astrocytes to secrete a neurotoxic substance (Liddelow et al., 2017).”
Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis
Hardy, J. A., & Higgins, G. A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1566067 · Cited by 7,484
The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years
Selkoe, D. J., & Hardy, J. (2016) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201606210 · Cited by 6,164
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care
Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6 · Cited by 6,072
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,023
Inhibition of miR-331-3p and miR-9-5p ameliorates Alzheimer's disease by enhancing autophagy
Chen, M., Hong, C., Yue, T., Li, H., Duan, R., Hu, W., Cao, J., Wang, Z., Chen, C., Hu, X., et al. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.47408 · Cited by 168
Zha, X., Liu, X., Wei, M., Huang, H., Cao, J., Liu, S., Bian, X., Zhang, Y., Xiao, F., Xie, Y., et al. (2024) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2024.10.006 · Cited by 177
Molecular Mechanisms of Neuroinflammation in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Progression
Andronie-Cioară, F. L., Ardelean, A. I., Nistor-Cseppento, C. D., Jurcău, A., Jurcău, M. C., Pașcalău, N., & Marcu, F. M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24031869 · Cited by 170
Wang, P., Yu, L., Gong, J., Xiong, J., Zi, S., Xie, H., Zhang, F., Mao, Z., Liu, Z., & Kim, J. S. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202206894 · Cited by 163
Pires, M., & Rego, A. C. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24010778 · Cited by 157
Zheng, J., Li, H., Tian, N., Liu, F., Wang, L., Yin, Y., Yue, L., Ma, L., Wan, Y., & Wang, J. (2020) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.12.015 · Cited by 160
Ueda, A., Shinkai, S., Shiroma, H., Taniguchi, Y., Tsuchida, S., Kariya, T., Kawahara, T., Kobayashi, Y., Kohda, N., Ushida, K., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100398 · Cited by 155
Inflammatory pathways in Alzheimer’s disease mediated by gut microbiota
Qian, X.-H., Song, X.-X., Liu, X.-L., Chen, S.-D., & Tang, H.-D. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101317 · Cited by 153
Implications of Gut Microbiota in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Xie, G., Liu, M., Yuan, B., Chai, H., Wang, W., & Cheng, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.785644 · Cited by 161
Gut microbiome-targeted therapies for Alzheimer’s disease
Zhang, T., Gao, G., Kwok, L., & Sun, Z. (2023) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2023.2271613 · Cited by 162
Chronic TREM2 activation exacerbates Aβ-associated tau seeding and spreading
Jain, N., Lewis, C. A., Ulrich, J. D., & Holtzman, D. M. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20220654 · Cited by 146
Self-citationTranslating genetic risk of Alzheimer’s disease into mechanistic insight and drug targets
Sierksma, A. S. R., Escott‐Price, V., & Strooper, B. D. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb8575 · Cited by 153
Recent update on the heterogeneity of the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum
Jellinger, K. A. (2021) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-021-02449-2 · Cited by 155
New developments in the biology of fibroblast growth factors
Ornitz, D. M., & Itoh, N. (2022) · WIREs Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1549 · Cited by 147
Laurindo, L. F., Dias, J. A., Araújo, A. C., Pomini, K. T., Galhardi, C. M., Detregiachi, C. R. P., Haber, L. S. D. A., Roque, D. D., Bechara, M. D., de Castro, M. V. M., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1305933 · Cited by 156
Omics sciences for systems biology in Alzheimer’s disease: State-of-the-art of the evidence
Hampel, H. J., Nisticò, R., Seyfried, N. T., Levey, A. I., Modeste, E. S., Lemercier, P., Baldacci, F., Toschi, N., Garaci, F., Perry, G. L., et al. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101346 · Cited by 147
Physiology and pharmacology of amyloid precursor protein
Cho, Y., Bae, H., Okun, E., Arumugam, T. V., & Jo, D. (2022) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108122 · Cited by 150
Ellwanger, D. C., Wang, S., Brioschi, S., Shao, Z., Green, L. B., Case, R. B., Yoo, D., Weishuhn, D., Rathanaswami, P., Bradley, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2017742118 · Cited by 144
Lithium and Therapeutic Targeting of GSK-3
Snitow, M. E., Bhansali, R. S., & Klein, P. S. (2021) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells10020255 · Cited by 152
Pang, K., Jiang, R., Zhang, W., Yang, Z., Li, L., Shimozawa, M., Tambaro, S., Mayer, J., Zhang, B., Li, M., et al. (2021) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00582-x · Cited by 147
Signal pathways in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease with traditional Chinese medicine
Ding, M.-R., Qu, Y.-J., Hu, B., & An, H. (2022) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113208 · Cited by 145
An exhausted-like microglial population accumulates in aged and APOE4 genotype Alzheimer’s brains
Millet, A., Ledo, J. H., & Tavazoie, S. F. (2024) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2023.12.001 · Cited by 132
The Immunopathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease Is Related to the Composition of Gut Microbiota
Leblhuber, F., Ehrlich, D., Steiner, K., Geisler, S., Fuchs, D., Lanser, L., & Kurz, K. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13020361 · Cited by 149
Zhao, P., Xu, Y., Jiang, L., Fan, X., Li, L., Li, X., Arase, H., Zhao, Y., Cao, W., Zheng, H., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abq0095 · Cited by 141
Buchholz, S., & Zempel, H. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13784 · Cited by 154
Fang, J., Zhang, P., Wang, Q., Chiang, C.-W., Zhou, Y., Hou, Y., Xu, J., Chen, R., Zhang, B., Lewis, S. J., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00951-z · Cited by 140
Mahan, T. E., Wang, C., Bao, X., Choudhury, A., Ulrich, J. D., & Holtzman, D. M. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00516-0 · Cited by 134
Self-citationLin, Y., Jin, J., Lv, R., Luo, Y. M., Dai, W.-P., Li, W., Tang, Y., Wang, Y., Ye, X., & Lin, W. (2021) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-021-01198-3 · Cited by 149
Neurovascular coupling mechanisms in health and neurovascular uncoupling in Alzheimer’s disease
Zhu, W. M., Neuhaus, A. A., Beard, D. J., Sutherland, B. A., & DeLuca, G. C. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac174 · Cited by 144
An epoxide hydrolase inhibitor reduces neuroinflammation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease
Ghosh, A., Comerota, M. M., Wan, D., Chen, F., Propson, N. E., Hwang, S. H., Hammock, B. D., & Zheng, H. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abb1206 · Cited by 139
Iron and Ferroptosis as Therapeutic Targets in Alzheimer's Disease
Gleason, A. J., & Bush, A. I. (2020) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-020-00954-y · Cited by 134
Long, H., Simmons, A., Mayorga, A. J., Burgess, B., Nguyen, T., Budda, B., Rychkova, A., Rhinn, H., Tassi, I., Ward, M. E., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-024-01599-1 · Cited by 153
Cai, L., Yang, C., Jia, W., Liu, Y., Xie, R., Lei, T., Yang, Z., He, X., Tong, R., & Gao, H. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201909999 · Cited by 133
Parhizkar, S., Gent, G., Chen, Y., Rensing, N. R., Gratuze, M., Strout, G. W., Sviben, S., Tycksen, E., Zhang, Q., Erdmann-Gilmore, P., et al. (2023) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.ade6285 · Cited by 141
Self-citationHuang, D., Cao, Y., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Chen, G., & Wang, Q. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202006357 · Cited by 131
Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Target for Therapeutic Intervention
Zhang, G., Wang, Z., Hu, H., Zhao, M., & Sun, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2021.749587 · Cited by 137
APOE-amyloid interaction: Therapeutic targets
Wisniewski, T., & Drummond, E. (2020) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104784 · Cited by 131
Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Inhibitors: Preclinical and Clinical Focus on CNS-A Decade Onward
Ruiz, S. M. A., & Eldar-Finkelman, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2021.792364 · Cited by 133
Jafar-nejad, P., Powers, B., Soriano, A., Zhao, H., Norris, D. A., Matson, J., DeBrosse-Serra, B., Watson, J., Narayanan, P., Chun, S. J., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1235 · Cited by 128
Zhao, L., Li, Z., Vong, J. S. L., Chen, X., Lai, H. M., Yan, L. Y. C., Huang, J., Sy, S. K. H., Tian, X. Y., Huang, Y., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18249-3 · Cited by 125
Wang, H., Yang, F., Zhang, S., Xin, R., & Sun, Y. (2021) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-021-00213-7 · Cited by 135
The Kappa Opioid Receptor: A Promising Therapeutic Target for Multiple Pathologies
Dalefield, M. L., Scouller, B., Bibi, R., & Kivell, B. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.837671 · Cited by 130
Hu, Y., Kirmess, K. M., Meyer, M. R., Rabinovici, G. D., Gatsonis, C., Siegel, B. A., Whitmer, R. A., Apgar, C., Hanna, L., Kanekiyo, M., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8392 · Cited by 120
Self-citationPredicting future rates of tau accumulation on PET
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Therneau, T. M., Lowe, V. J., Knopman, D. S., Botha, H., Graff-Radford, J., Jones, D. T., Ferman, T. J., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa248 · Cited by 117
Potential Bidirectional Relationship Between Periodontitis and Alzheimer’s Disease
Liccardo, D., Marzano, F., Carraturo, F., Guida, M., Femminella, G. D., Bencivenga, L., Agrimi, J., Addonizio, A., Melino, I., Valletta, A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00683 · Cited by 148
Protective actions of exercise-related FNDC5/irisin in memory and Alzheimer's disease
de Freitas, G. B., Lourenco, M. V., & De Felice, F. G. (2020) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.15039 · Cited by 120
Systems-based proteomics to resolve the biology of Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid and tau
Rayaprolu, S., Higginbotham, L., Bagchi, P., Watson, C. M., Zhang, T., Levey, A. I., Rangaraju, S., & Seyfried, N. T. (2021) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-020-00840-3 · Cited by 118
APOE3ch alters microglial response and suppresses Aβ-induced tau seeding and spread
Chen, Y., Song, S., Parhizkar, S., Lord, J., Zhu, Y., Strickland, M. R., Wang, C., Park, J., Tabor, G. T., Jiang, H., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.029 · Cited by 120
Self-citationNoncanonical function of an autophagy protein prevents spontaneous Alzheimer’s disease
Heckmann, B. L., Teubner, B. J. W., Boada-Romero, E., Tummers, B., Guy, C., Fitzgerald, P., Mayer, U., Carding, S., Zakharenko, S. S., Wileman, T., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb9036 · Cited by 114
Dong, Y., Yu, H., Li, X., Bian, K., Zheng, Y., Dai, M., Feng, X., Sun, Y., He, Y. T., Yu, B., et al. (2022) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02567-y · Cited by 127
Bassil, R., Shields, K., Granger, K., Zein, I., Ng, S., & Chih, B. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25344-6 · Cited by 106
Dendritic Spines in Alzheimer’s Disease: How the Actin Cytoskeleton Contributes to Synaptic Failure
Pelucchi, S., Stringhi, R., & Marcello, E. E. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21030908 · Cited by 117
Castro, B. D., Bernstein, A. M., Coppola, G., Sofroniew, M. V., & Khakh, B. S. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109508 · Cited by 121
Ganesan, D., & Cai, Q. (2021) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bcj20200917 · Cited by 123
Amyloid-β oligomers in cellular models of Alzheimer’s disease
Fontana, I. C., Zimmer, A. R., Rocha, A. S., Gosmann, G., Souza, D. O., Lourenco, M. V., Ferreira, S. T., & Zimmer, E. R. (2020) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.15030 · Cited by 115
MicroRNAs: pioneering regulators in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy
Li, Y.-B., Fu, Q., Guo, M., Du, Y., Chen, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2024) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-024-03075-8 · Cited by 134
Penke, B., Szűcs, M., & Bogár, F. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25071659 · Cited by 119
The role of the immune system in Alzheimer’s disease
Wu, K., Zhang, Y.-R., Huang, Y., Dong, Q., Tan, L., & Yu, J. (2021) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101409 · Cited by 119
CryoET of β-amyloid and tau within postmortem Alzheimer’s disease brain
Gilbert, M. A. G., Fatima, N., Jenkins, J., O’Sullivan, T. J., Schertel, A., Halfon, Y., Wilkinson, M., Morrema, T. H. J., Geibel, M., Read, R. J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07680-x · Cited by 123
Huang, D., Wang, Q., Cao, Y., Yang, H., Li, M., Wu, F., Zhang, Y., Chen, G., & Wang, Q. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c12840 · Cited by 110
An, J., Kim, K., Lim, H. J., Kim, H. Y., Shin, J. W., Park, I., Cho, I., Kim, H. Y., Kim, S., McLean, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44818-x · Cited by 116
Dubois, B., López‐Arrieta, J., Lipschitz, S., Doskas, T. K., Spiru, L., Moroz, S., Venger, O., Vermersch, P., Moussy, A., Mansfield, C. D., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-023-01169-x · Cited by 123
Gong, J., Ye, C., Ran, J., Xiong, X., Fang, X., Zhou, X., Yi, Y., Lu, X., Wang, J., Xie, C., et al. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c02407 · Cited by 116
Spurrier, J., Nicholson, L., Fang, X. T., Stoner, A. J., Toyonaga, T., Holden, D., Siegert, T. R., Laird, W., Allnutt, M. A., Chiasseu, M., et al. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abi8593 · Cited by 114
Antisense drugs make sense for neurological diseases
Bennett, C. F., Kordasiewicz, H. B., & Cleveland, D. W. (2021) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010919-023738 · Cited by 108
Wang, H., Shang, Y., Wang, E., Xu, X., Zhang, Q., Qian, C., Yang, Z., Wu, S., & Zhang, T. (2022) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102280 · Cited by 107
Fišar, Z. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12111676 · Cited by 113
Nucleic acid drug vectors for diagnosis and treatment of brain diseases
Lü, Z., Shen, J., Yang, H. J., Wang, J., Zhao, R., Zhang, T.-L., Guo, J. R., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01298-z · Cited by 116
High-frequency terahertz waves disrupt Alzheimer’s β-amyloid fibril formation
Peng, W., Zhu, Z. H., Lou, J., Chen, K., Wu, Y., & Chang, C. (2023) · eLight · doi:10.1186/s43593-023-00048-0 · Cited by 105
A Potential Link Between Visceral Obesity and Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease
Al-Kuraishy, H. M., Al-Gareeb, A. I., Alsayegh, A. A., Hakami, Z. H., Khamjan, N. A., Saad, H. M., Batiha, G. E., & WAARD, M. M. D. (2022) · Neurochemical Research · doi:10.1007/s11064-022-03817-4 · Cited by 106
The Use of Ginkgo Biloba L. as a Neuroprotective Agent in the Alzheimer’s Disease
Nowak, A., Kojder, K., Zielonka-Brzezicka, J., Wróbel, J., Bosiacki, M., Fabiańska, M., Wróbel, M., Sołek-Pastuszka, J., & Klimowicz, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.775034 · Cited by 110
Health Benefits, Food Applications, and Sustainability of Microalgae-Derived N-3 PUFA
Liu, Y., Ren, X., Fan, C., Wu, W., Zhang, W., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11131883 · Cited by 115
PICALM and Alzheimer’s Disease: An Update and Perspectives
Ando, K., Nagaraj, S., Küçükali, F., de Fisenne, M.-A., Kosa, A.-C., Doeraene, E., Lopez Gutierrez, L., Brion, J.-P., & Leroy, K. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11243994 · Cited by 104
Vitamin Supplementation and Dementia: A Systematic Review
Martínez, V. G., Avedillo-Salas, A., & Ballestín, S. S. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14051033 · Cited by 103
Recent Research Trends in Neuroinflammatory and Neurodegenerative Disorders
Cohen, J., Mathew, A., Dourvetakis, K. D., Sanchez-Guerrero, E., Pangeni, R. P., Gurusamy, N., Aenlle, K. K., Ravindran, G., Twahir, A., Isler, D., et al. (2024) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells13060511 · Cited by 103
Safety Landscape of Therapeutic Nanozymes and Future Research Directions
Tagaras, N., Song, H., Sahar, S., Tong, W., Mao, Z., & Buerki‐Thurnherr, T. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202407816 · Cited by 110
The cellular model for Alzheimer's disease research: PC12 cells
Xie, D., Deng, T., Zhai, Z., Sun, T., & Xu, Y. D. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.1016559 · Cited by 107
García-Morales, V., González-Acedo, A., Melguizo-Rodríguez, L., Pardo-Moreno, T., Costela-Ruiz, V. J., Montiel-Troya, M., & Ramos-Rodríguez, J. J. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9121910 · Cited by 104
Song, X., Mao, M., & Qian, X. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2021.3053568 · Cited by 105
A phase II study repurposing atomoxetine for neuroprotection in mild cognitive impairment
Levey, A. I., Qiu, D., Zhao, L., Hu, W. T., Duong, D. M., Higginbotham, L. A., Dammer, E. B., Seyfried, N. T., Wingo, T. S., Hales, C. M., et al. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab452 · Cited by 106
Single-nucleus RNA-sequencing of autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease and risk variant carriers
Brase, L., You, S., Albanus, R. D., Del‐Aguila, J. L., Dai, Y., Novotny, B. C., Soriano‐Tárraga, C., Dykstra, T., Fernández, M. V., Budde, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37437-5 · Cited by 104
Qin, N., Lü, X., Liu, Y., Qiao, Y., Qu, W., Feng, F., & Sun, H. (2020) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112960 · Cited by 98
Porphyromonas gingivalis and Alzheimer disease: Recent findings and potential therapies
Ryder, M. I. (2020) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.20-0104 · Cited by 104
López‐Ortiz, S., Pinto-Fraga, J., Valenzuela, P. L., Martín-Hernández, J., Seisdedos, M. M., García, Ó., Toschi, N., Giuliano, F. D., Garaci, F. G., Mercuri, N. B., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22062897 · Cited by 107
Leinenga, G., Koh, W. K., & Götz, J. (2021) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00809-4 · Cited by 97
Zhi, J., Yuan, X., Wei, J., Guo, X., Gong, Y., Li, J., Zhou, H., Zhang, L., & Liu, J. (2021) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c06687 · Cited by 97
Synaptogenic effect of APP -Swedish mutation in familial Alzheimer’s disease
Zhou, B., Lu, J. G., Siddu, A., Wernig, M., & Südhof, T. C. (2022) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abn9380 · Cited by 99
Lei, T., Yang, Z., Jiang, C., Wang, X., Yang, W., Yang, X., Xie, R., Tong, F., Xia, X., Huang, Q., et al. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c09715 · Cited by 99
Pharmacotherapy Evolution in Alzheimer’s Disease: Current Framework and Relevant Directions
Miculas, D. C., Negru, P. A., Bungau, S. G., Behl, T., Hassan, S. S. U., & Tit, D. M. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells12010131 · Cited by 96
Impact of multisession 40Hz tACS on hippocampal perfusion in patients with Alzheimer’s disease
Sprugnoli, G., Munsch, F., Cappon, D., Paciorek, R., Macone, J., Connor, A., El Fakhri, G., Salvador, R., Ruffini, G., Donohoe, K., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00922-4 · Cited by 99
Plasma IL-12/IFN-γ axis predicts cognitive trajectories in cognitively unimpaired older adults
Yang, H., Zhang, C., Carlyle, B. C., Zhen, S. Y., Trombetta, B. A., Schultz, A. P., Pruzin, J. J., Fitzpatrick, C. D., Yau, W. W., Kirn, D. R., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.12399 · Cited by 90
Singh, N., Das, B., Zhou, J., Hu, X., & Yan, R. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abo3610 · Cited by 95
Modulation of Brain Hyperexcitability: Potential New Therapeutic Approaches in Alzheimer’s Disease
Toniolo, S., Sen, A., & Husain, M. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21239318 · Cited by 97
Shulman, M. B., Kong, J., O'Gorman, J. T., Ratti, E., Rajagovindan, R., Viollet, L., Huang, E., Sharma, S., Racine, A. M., Czerkowicz, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00523-w · Cited by 100
Sun, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, S., Chen, Y., Shen, J., Yao, W., Gao, X., & Chen, S. (2020) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.44370 · Cited by 95
Anti-inflammatory clearance of amyloid-β by a chimeric Gas6 fusion protein
Jung, H., Lee, S. Y., Lim, S., Choi, H. R., Choi, Y., Kim, M., Kim, S., Lee, Y., Han, K. H., Chung, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01926-9 · Cited by 91
Organ‐On‐A‐Chip Models of the Blood–Brain Barrier: Recent Advances and Future Prospects
Kawakita, S., Mandal, K., Mou, L., Mecwan, M. M., Zhu, Y., Li, S., Sharma, S., Hernández, A. L., Nguyen, H. T., Maity, S., et al. (2022) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202201401 · Cited by 103
Multiomics technologies: role in disease biomarker discoveries and therapeutics
Dar, M. A., Arafah, A. M., Bhat, K. A., Khan, A., Khan, M. S., Ali, A., Ahmad, S. M., Rashid, S. M., & Rehman, M. U. (2022) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elac017 · Cited by 102
Kim, O. Y., & Song, J. (2023) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2023.122356 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holtzman, David M.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 312-339
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6778042
- OpenAlex
- W2976163884
- Semantic Scholar
- 9231686941513e88e57650a734b2d4f1fcdbd4cb
- Cited by
- 3,204
- References
- 333
- Citations by year
- 2026: 455 · 2025: 482 · 2024: 565 · 2023: 526 · 2022: 527 · 2021: 426 · 2020: 207 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 34.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 368 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- JPB Foundation
- Cure Alzheimer's Fund
- National Institutes of Health (AG047644, NS074969, NS090934)
- University of Washington (8,232,107, 8,591,894)
- Alzheimer's Association (AACSF-18-564776)
- Tau Consortium
- AbbVie (US2013/049333)
- Genentech
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, pathobiology, amyloid-beta, neuritic plaques, tau hyperphosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangles, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trial failure, neuropathologic diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Alzheimer Vaccines, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review