The DOI matches its Crossref record; 330 of the 333 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 19 of the 249 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex pathobiology. The presence of extracellular β-amyloid deposition as neuritic plaques and intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles remains the primary neuropathologic criteria for AD diagnosis. However, a number of recent fundamental discoveries highlight important pathological roles for other critical cellular and molecular processes. Despite this, no disease-modifying treatment currently exists, and numerous phase 3 clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefits. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of AD pathobiology and discuss current treatment strategies, highlighting recent clinical trials and opportunities for developing future disease-modifying therapies.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes Alzheimer disease pathobiology and treatment strategies, covering amyloid, tau, ApoE, neuroimmune activation, infection, and sleep. It concludes that no disease-modifying therapy exists and argues for earlier/preclinical anti-amyloid trials plus tau-, ApoE-, immune-modulating, and combination approaches.
Key findings
- AD is biologically defined by extracellular Aβ plaques and intracellular hyperphosphorylated tau tangles; preclinical pathology begins roughly 10–20 years before symptoms, and death generally occurs within 5–12 years of symptom onset.
- APOE ε4 is the strongest late-onset AD genetic risk factor: one copy raises risk about 3–4-fold and two copies about 12-fold, while ε2 is protective. Amyloid accumulation appears required but not sufficient; tau burden tracks cognitive decline more closely than amyloid.
- Four FDA-approved symptomatic drugs exist (three cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine), with modest effects; more than 20 compounds completed phase 3 trials without slowing decline, and many Aβ antibodies, BACE1 inhibitors, and γ-secretase inhibitors failed or caused adverse effects.
- Emerging areas include context-dependent microglial/innate immune roles, ApoE effects on amyloid seeding/clearance, tau-mediated neurodegeneration, blood-brain barrier integrity, and neuronal activity; sleep loss raises Aβ and tau, and infectious/microbiome hypotheses remain under study.
Methods
- Narrative review: the authors synthesize recent advances in AD pathobiology and treatment rather than conducting a systematic review or meta-analysis.
- Evidence base includes human neuropathology, CSF/plasma biomarkers, PET/MRI, genetic studies, animal and cell models, and clinical trial reports.
- Main analysis is qualitative integration; no primary data collection or formal statistical analysis is described.
Limitations
- Paper-stated: no disease-modifying therapy is available; many phase 3 trials failed; some negative amyloid trials were not designed to definitively test the amyloid hypothesis; herpesvirus–dementia associations need replication in large prospective cohorts; human relevance of microglial mechanisms remains unclear.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it lacks systematic search/quality appraisal and reports no new experimental data; many mechanistic conclusions rely on preclinical models, and several cited findings are described as conflicting or unreplicated.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
174 Not checked yet · 43 No basis given · 36 Own interpretation · 18 Sources not found · 9 Partly supported · 6 Supported · 2 Own result · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Aβ is produced by sequential cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-secretase and γ-secretase”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Haass et al., 2012 source
The Abstract states that Aβ is produced in the amyloidogenic pathway by the consecutive action of β-secretase and γ-secretase. It specifies that β-secretase first generates an APP fragment, which γ-secretase then cleaves. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several lines of evidence suggest Aβ deposition may be required for progression of tau pathology in AD”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Pontecorvo et al., 2019 source
The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) reports no measurable change in flortaucipir signal in amyloid-β− subjects, in contrast to a significant change in amyloid-β+ subjects. It explicitly suggests that amyloid deposition may be a necessary antecedent for tau spread beyond the temporal lobe in Alzheimer’s disease, supporting the claim’s hedged wording. (LLM, conf=0.95)
- Not checked yetcites Price and Morris, 1999
- Partly supportedcites Hanseeuw et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not provided) describes a hypothesis that Aβ precedes and accelerates neocortical tau pathology. The Discussion reports that Aβ increases were associated with later tau changes, but also observes tau increases in people with low Aβ. The paper supports a role for Aβ in tau progression, not the stronger suggestion that Aβ deposition is required for it. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A recent detailed morphological analysis of microglial activation state in brain specimens from two cohorts of cognitive aging found that the proportion of activated microglia (PAM) strongly correlated with presence of pathologic AD (Felsky et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Felsky et al., 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (“Active microglia discriminate pathological AD”) reports a strong association between PAM and pathological AD in the midfrontal and inferior temporal cortices. The Discussion specifies that activation was elevated in cortical but not subcortical structures, a regional limit omitted from the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A non-synonymous coding variant in PCLG2, a gene with suspected immune function, has been associated with decreased risk of AD (van der Lee et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Supportedcites van der Lee et al., 2019 source
The Discussion states that the authors replicated an association between a nonsynonymous PLCG2 variant and reduced Alzheimer’s disease risk. The Introduction also describes PLCG2’s role in immune signaling. The citing sentence spells the gene “PCLG2,” apparently a transposition of PLCG2. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In a recent study assessing the effect of ApoE-TR in the PS19 (tauP301S) tauopathy mouse model, ApoE4 dramatically exacerbated tau-mediated neurodegeneration”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Shi et al., 2017 source
The study’s description of its P301S tauopathy mouse model reports significantly more brain atrophy and neuronal loss in mice expressing human ApoE4 than in those expressing ApoE2 or ApoE3. It concludes that ApoE4 caused more severe tau-mediated neurodegeneration. (LLM, conf=0.95)
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Areas of brain parenchyma containing deposits of HSV-1 infection also demonstrated increased Aβ deposition (Eimer et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Eimer et al., 2018 source
The Results section reports Aβ deposition in the brains of HSV1-infected young 5XFAD mice and says HSV1 and Aβ signals co-localized. This supports the claim for the mouse model studied; it does not establish the same finding in human brain tissue. (LLM, conf=0.91)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A single night of sleep deprivation leads to elevated CSF Aβ42 levels in healthy middle-aged men (Ooms et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ooms et al., 2014 source
The Conclusions state that one night of total sleep deprivation increased CSF Aβ42 relative to normal sleep in healthy middle-aged men. The Discussion clarifies that deprivation abolished the morning decrease seen after sleep, so the elevation is relative to the normal-sleep group. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In mice overexpressing Aβ, acute sleep deprivation caused a significant increase in amyloid plaque deposition.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Kang et al., 2009 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage describing the plaque experiment (section labelled Abstract, p. not provided) reports greater plaque deposition in transgenic mice after 21 days of chronic sleep restriction. The passage on acute sleep deprivation reports increased interstitial-fluid Aβ levels, not plaque deposition. The claim substitutes an acute intervention for the chronic intervention used in the plaque experiment. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Two γ-secretase inhibitors (GSI) have been tested clinically as disease modifying therapies for AD and each have failed due to lack of efficacy or worsening of cognition combined with dose-limiting adverse side effects.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Coric et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not available in our copy) reports that avagacestat showed no signal of efficacy and had dose-limiting safety and tolerability effects. It mentions similar adverse-event trends with semagacestat, but does not establish that the second inhibitor failed because of lack of efficacy or worsening cognition combined with dose-limiting adverse effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked yetcites Doody et al., 2013 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Any putative benefit attributed to methylene blue has been thought to be secondary to reduced tau fibrillization and aggregation and induction of autophagy, which leads to reduced tau pathology and neuron death in mouse models of tauopathy (Congdon et al., 2012; Crowe et al., 2013; Wischik et al., 1996).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Congdon et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and discussion report that methylene blue induces autophagy and reduces total and phosphorylated tau in tauopathy mice; the Results also show reduced aggregated tau in mouse-derived slice cultures. The paper says aggregated tau did not significantly decrease in live mice, and it does not establish that these mechanisms reduced neuronal death in its mouse experiment. The discussion cites an earlier study for attenuated neurodegeneration in a tau-transgenic line. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites Crowe et al., 2013 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Tau Fibrillization Inhibitors Promote Disulfide Formation” (page unavailable), Crowe et al. report that methylene blue inhibits 4-R tau fibrillization in vitro and note studies suggesting it enhances autophagic degradation of tau. They also say autophagy may reduce tau inclusions independently of fibrillization inhibition. Our copy does not establish that these mechanisms together reduce tau pathology or neuronal death in mouse tauopathy models. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites Wischik et al., 1996 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that methylene blue inhibits tau–tau binding and reverses the proteolytic stability of paired helical filaments in vitro. The paper does not report induction of autophagy or reduced tau pathology and neuronal death in mouse tauopathy models, so it supports only the aggregation-related part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“An alternative means of inhibiting amyloidogenic processing of Aβ by γ-secretase is to use γ-secretase modulators (GSM) that alter processing of APP (lower Aβ42 and higher Aβ40 levels) without influencing processing of other substrates (Xia, 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Xia, 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Modulating γ-secretase and neuroinflammation” (page unavailable) says GSMs can alter APP cleavage and lower Aβ42 while sparing Notch processing. But its example reports increased Aβ38 with no change in Aβ40—not higher Aβ40—and describes reduced effects on other substrates, not an absence of effects on all of them. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This is especially critical after a recent study in the preclinical literature demonstrated APOE2 expression via viral delivery exacerbated pathology in tauopathy mice (Zhao et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Zhao et al., 2018 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Results report more severe tau pathology in apoE2 mice than in apoE3 or apoE4 mice. But the Results specify that the virus delivered mutant human tau into mice already carrying the human apoE2 allele; APOE2 itself was not delivered virally. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Longitudinal studies of cognitive function and CSF and neuroimaging biomarker changes in ADAD and LOAD have identified a significant preclinical phase of disease preceding onset of clinical symptoms by at least 10-20 years”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vermunt et al., 2019 source
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent studies demonstrate the ability to detect CNS Aβ deposition via the use of plasma assessment of Aβ species”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite this, no disease modifying treatment currently exists and numerous phase 3 clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefit.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“There is a dire need for disease modifying therapies that may prevent or slow rate of disease progression, but unfortunately none are currently available.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
In the paper
“Synaptic and neuronal loss in the entorhinal cortex generally correlates well with onset of cognitive impairment”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gómez-Isla et al., 1996 source
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Antemortem AD neuropathologic diagnoses can now be made with reasonable validity using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET) imaging biomarkers as surrogate markers for cerebral Aβ and tau deposition”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Brier et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Fagan et al., 2006, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites Lowe et al., 2019 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“characterized by early deposition of Aβ in the precuneus and other cortical regions comprising the default mode network, followed sequentially by regional cortical hypometabolism, accumulation of tau pathology, hippocampal volume loss, and onset of symptomatic cognitive impairment”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies of both ADAD and LOAD have demonstrated that rate of change in CSF and plasma NfL levels correlate with cortical thickness on structural MRI and cognitive performance”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > INTRODUCTION > Clinical and Preclinical Disease
What the sources say
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“numerous phase 3 clinical trials have failed to demonstrate benefit”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · boosted
“The history of pharmaceutical development for AD has been plagued by a seemingly endless parade of mid-to-late-stage clinical trial failures.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Abstract
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · boosted
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Unlike Aβ, the stage of tau pathology correlates well with progression of cognitive impairment”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Neuropathological studies in humanshave demonstrated that tau pathology generally does not progress from the entorhinal cortex into the neocortex in the absence of co-occurring amyloid pathology”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, there is minimal correlation between phases of amyloid deposition and degree of cognitive decline”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nelson et al., 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Owing to increased hydrophobicity of its expanded C-terminus, Aβ42 has a greater propensity for aggregation.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is strong evidence that human-to-human transmission of amyloid pathology is possible.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multiple lines of evidence suggest that aggregated, hyperphosphorylated forms of tau may be a primary driver of neurodegeneration in AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Aβ fibrillization can be “seeded” in a prion-like manner by the presence of small assemblies of misfolded beta-sheet-containing Aβ seeds that template the formation of larger amyloid aggregates”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walker and Jucker, 2015 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Numerous studies over the last decade have demonstrated the “prion-like” ability of aggregated human tau fibrils to self-propagate, for both synthetically-prepared fibrils and those derived from human AD brain.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, the strongest genetic risk factor for LOAD, apolipoprotein E, APOE, in large part appears to increase risk via influencing Aβ seeding and clearance”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Thus, prion-like seeding and spreading may represent a mechanism whereby tau pathology propagates from the entorhinal cortex to the neocortex in AD”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DeVos et al., 2018 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A recent study shows that the presence of Aβ also causes capillary constriction in human cortical slices by acting on pericytes to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to endothelin-1 release”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nortley et al., 2019 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, despite decades of investment by the pharmaceutical industry in anti-amyloid therapies and numerous phase 3 clinical trials, no amyloid-targeting therapy has been successful in limiting progression of cognitive impairment in symptomatic AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aβ may also lead to cognitive impairment in ways independent from its effects on tau.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cognitive impairment in AD is only noted when tau spreads from the entorhinal cortex into the neocortex in neuropathological studies”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Price and Morris, 1999
- Not checked yetcites Price et al., 2009 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“APOE is the strongest genetic risk factor for LOAD”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ApoE4 may have direct pathologic effects on neurons and neuronal networks independent of effects on amyloid and tau pathology”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Najm et al., 2019 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ApoE4 may mediate risk for AD though modulation of immune and microglial responses.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Causal mediation modeling generated a model consistent with a proposed pathologic sequence of increased PAM triggering increased PHF tau accumulation, leading to cognitive decline.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Felsky et al., 2019 source
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In both studies, these microglia were found to be in close association with neuritic plaques.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Instead, ApoE regulates clearance of Aβ by competitively binding to Aβ receptors, such as LDLR-related protein 1 (LRP1) on the surface of astrocytes, and blocking Aβ uptake.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Verghese et al., 2013 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ApoE likely regulates AD risk in large part via effects on amyloid pathology”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huynh et al., 2017a
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As an example, TREM2 is an AD risk gene with a rare variant allele R47H associated with significantly increased risk of AD (Gratuze et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gratuze et al., 2018 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Of note, many of these immune-related AD risk factor SNPs or coding variants (Apoe, Trem2, Cd33, Ms4a6d) have been identified as genes differentially expressed in models of Aβ deposition as compared to tauopathy, suggesting they may represent amyloid response genes (Matarin et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matarin et al., 2015 source
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“R47H is thought to be a loss of function variant (Gratuze et al., 2018; Shi and Holtzman, 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Gratuze et al., 2018; Shi and Holtzman, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Numerous SNPs and rare coding variants in immune-related genes thought to be implicated in microglial function have been identified as risk factors for AD in whole genome sequencing and GWAS analyses (see for review (Efthymiou and Goate, 2017; Karch and Goate, 2015), including TREM2, CR1, SHIP1, BIN1, CD33, PICALM, CLU, and theMS4A gene cluster.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Efthymiou and Goate, 2017; Karch and Goate, 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“ApoE also has modulatory effects on tau pathology and tau-related neurodegeneration”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shi and Holtzman, 2018 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Single cell transcriptomic methods have been employed to identify unique microglial phenotypes associated with Aβ plaque deposition in animal models of amyloidosis (APP/PS1 and 5XFAD) (Figure 4A).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“APOE ε4 carriers have a stronger systemic inflammatory response to an intravenous LPS challenge, including more intense hyperthermia and higher levels of TNF secretion in whole blood”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gale et al., 2014 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Systems-level analyses of gene regulatory networks in post-mortem human LOAD brain specimens have identified the immune/microglial molecular network as most highly associated with pathophysiology in LOAD (Zhang et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhang et al., 2013 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multiple lines of evidence suggest that activation of immune mediators is a critical regulator of AD pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gut microbiota may also modulate the microglial response to pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The presence of Aβ in brain parenchyma is linked with protection against infectious bacterial encephalomyelitis experimentally induced by intracerebral inoculation with Salmonella enterica typhimurium bacteria in 4-week old 5xFAD mice.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kumar et al., 2016 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This risk was nearly eliminated in patients that received antiherpetic treatment (Tzeng et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tzeng et al., 2018 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data would suggest that microglia contribute to neuron death in models of tau-mediated neurodegeneration.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Alternatively, phagocytosis of Aβ by microglia can lead to microglial activation.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plainstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In support of this theory, HSV-1 viral particles have recently been shown to directly catalyze the fibrillization of Aβ42 in vitro by nucleating aggregation via contact with the viral surface (Ezzat et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ezzat et al., 2019 source
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At sites of bacterial deposition in the brain, significant Aβ deposition was also noted. (Kumar et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kumar et al., 2016 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A recent systems-level molecular network analysis of preclinical AD brain identified a set of network driver genes noted to be enriched for viral susceptibility genes.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Readhead et al., 2018 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This is abrogated by additional TREM2 KO, however CD33 KO does not reciprocally abrogate effects of TREM2 KO, suggesting that CD33 acts upstream of TREM2 (Griciuc et al.,2019 .”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Griciuc et al., 2019 source
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, data regarding role of activated microglia in animal models suggest possibly divergent effects depending on disease context.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased surface CD33 expression results in decreased microglial activation.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the PS19 tauopathy mouse, TREM2 deletion significantly reduced tau-mediated neurodegeneration and astrogliosis (Leyns et al., 2017; Sayed et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leyns et al., 2017; Sayed et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Various aspects of CNS physiology are regulated by the microbiome, including microglial maturation and function (Abdel-Haq et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abdel-Haq et al., 2019 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Complement binding (C1q) and microglial phagocytosis leads to early synapse loss in a mouse model with Aβ plaque deposition (J20 model).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hong et al., 2016 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There is increasing evidence that interactions between the gut microbiome and the CNS innate immune system (gut-brain axis) may modulate AD pathogenesis.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abdel-Haq et al., 2019 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, phagocytosis of Aβ by microglia may be a double-edged sword: it may serve to limit spread of amyloid pathology in certain contexts or alternatively may promote spread of amyloid pathology via the mechanisms described above.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of developing all-cause dementia (~3-fold increase) in patients greater than 50 years of age following a new HSV infection.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tzeng et al., 2018 source
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Microglial-derived exosomes appear necessary for tau propagation in a model of tau spreading using AAV viral transduced expression of P301Ltau to induce rapid tau spreading from the entorhinal cortex to the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus (Asai et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Asai et al., 2015 source
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Several studies have profiled the composition of the gut microbiota in both mouse models of amyloidosis (APP/PS1) and in human participants with dementia due to AD and have found significant differences in the overall abundance and diversity of microbial species relative to WT animals or non-demented control participants, respectively (Bäuerl et al., 2018; Saji et al., 2019; Vogt et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bäuerl et al., 2018; Saji et al., 2019; Vogt et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Aβ exhibits characteristics of an antimicrobial peptide.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Aβ also forms fibrils that entrap bacteria and fungal cells, leading to agglutination in vitro (Kumar et al., 2016; Spitzer et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kumar et al., 2016; Spitzer et al., 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Similarly, presence of parenchymal Aβ in 5xFAD mice results in decreased mortality following direct intracerebral HSV inoculation.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Eimer et al., 2018 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, activation of the innate immune system undoubtedly plays a role in AD pathophysiology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Following phagocytosis by microglia, Aβ activates the NLRP3 inflammasome leading to caspase-1 activation and IL-1β maturation and release (Halle et al., 2008).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Halle et al., 2008 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Their symptomatic benefit in AD has been confirmed via meta-analyses assessing both cognitive performance and global functioning (Birks, 2006).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Birks, 2006
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Studies from the lab of Maiken Nedergaard suggest that glymphatic clearance is slower during wakefulness vs. sleep (Iliff et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Iliff et al., 2012; Xie et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“During the course of AD pathogenesis, cholinergic neurons in the nucleus basalis of Meynert and other septal nuclei that project widely throughout the cortex are lost, causing a general cholinergic deficit (Bartus et al., 1982).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bartus et al., 1982 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“When seeded with recombinant synthetic tau fibrils, sleep deprived animals had more significant tau spreading relative to non-sleep deprived animals.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holth et al., 2019
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Sleep impairment can lead to impaired attention, concentration, and working memory but may also influence development of underlying AD pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Meta-analysis confirms the efficacy of memantine in moderate-to-severe AD on measures of cognition, activities of daily living (ADL) and neuropsychiatric symptoms (McShane et al., 2006).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Anti-NMDA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McShane et al., 2006
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three ChEI are currently approved for use in mild-to-moderate AD: donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite enormous efforts by the pharmaceutical industry, there remains no effective disease modifying therapy available today.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Again, a significant decrease in dementia risk was observed in patients that received antiherpetic treatment (HR 0.47) (Chen et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2018 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Increased synaptic and network activity has been previously shown to stimulate release of extracellular Aβ and tau from neurons (Bero et al., 2011; Brody et al., 2008; Cirrito et al., 2005; Yamada et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bero et al., 2011; Brody et al., 2008; Cirrito et al., 2005; Yamada et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Several recent large scale clinical trials have adopted a secondary or primary prevention paradigm: the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN-TU) drawing from the large DIAN cohort of ADAD patients (Bateman et al., 2017), the A4 trial enrolling participants with confirmed preclinical AD by biomarker assessment (Sperling et al., 2014), and the Alzheimer Prevention initiative (API”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bateman et al., 2017; Sperling et al., 2014; Reiman et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) work to reverse this deficiency by increasing synaptic levels of acetylcholine.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A second study demonstrated a very slight increased risk of developing all-cause dementia after zoster infection (HR 1.12).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chen et al., 2018 source
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In mice overexpressing Aβ, sleep-wake cycle and diurnal fluctuations in ISF and CSF Aβ levels are normal before an age when animals develop amyloid plaque formation.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roh et al., 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this study, periodontal bacterial proteins (gingipains) and DNA were identified in human AD brain.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dominy et al., 2019 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Though this represents an intermediate phase of clinical disease, this is actually an advanced stage of the biological disease when considering that pathology accumulates in the AD brain 15-20 years prior to onset of clinical symptoms (Vermunt et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Vermunt et al., 2019 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This suggests the mechanism for increased Aβ is increased production (Lucey et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lucey et al., 2018 source
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The goal of many Aβ-directed therapies is to lower levels of parenchymal Aβ and amyloid deposits in the AD brain.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are currently four FDA approved medications for the management of cognitive impairment and dysfunction in global activities in symptomatic AD. These include three cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs; donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) and memantine, an uncompetitive NMDA receptor modulator.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A study exploring the effect of selective reduction of overnight slow-wave sleep via an automated detection-intervention method in healthy volunteers also demonstrated increased CSF Aβ levels in participants receiving the study intervention (Ju et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ju et al., 2017
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A decrease in amyloid plaque deposition was observed after chronic orexin receptor blockade resulting in increased sleep (Kang et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kang et al., 2009 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Reduced slow-wave sleep in cognitively normal elderly participants is also associated with increased CSF Aβ42 (Varga et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Varga et al., 2016 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, most of the failed phase 3 trials intervened on patients with mild-to-moderate symptomatic AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Women with sleep disordered breathing have a higher risk of developing MCI or dementia relative to non-sleep disordered breathing patients (Yaffe et al., 2011).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yaffe et al., 2011
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, disease modifying clinical interventions applied as early in the preclinical phase of disease as possible in a preventative study design might have a better chance of changing disease trajectory before the onset of frank neurodegeneration.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Sleep deprivation in tauopathy mice and healthy human participants resulted in increased ISF/CSF tau levels (Holth et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holth et al., 2019
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This loss of cholinergic input is thought to contribute to early attention and memory dysfunction in AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, each study is testing anti-amyloid therapies in cognitively normal patients who are at high risk for developing the disease.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Atabecestat was discontinued after a trial in preclinical AD demonstrated frequent hepatotoxicity and worse cognitive outcomes than placebo (Henley et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henley et al., 2019 source
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Solanezumab is a humanized version of mouse antibody m226 whose epitope lies within the Aβ mid-domain and binds only to soluble Aβ, not fibrillar or plaque-based Aβ.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This antibody was tested in two parallel phase 3 trials in mild-to-moderate AD patients and had no effect on cognition or ADL at the doses tested (Salloway et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Salloway et al., 2014 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“25 of 129 patients were deemed to be antibody responders.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainn = 129- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, two phase 3 trials in mild AD were stopped early for futility in March 2019 after interim analysis suggested no change in cognitive decline (Selkoe, 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Selkoe, 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Four additional BACE1 inhibitors failed phase 3 clinical trials due to lack of efficacy and associated side effects (Table 1).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In fact, it has been chosen by the Alzheimer’s Clinical Trials Consortium for use in upcoming primary and secondary prevention studies (along with BAN2401) (Panza et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Panza et al., 2018 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Crenezumab is being used in the API ADAD Colombia trial of known mutation carriers (Tariot et al., 2018), whereas active immunization with CAD106 is being used in the API Generation trial of APOE ε4 homozygotes (Lopez Lopez et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tariot et al., 2018 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though the data for Aβ-directed monoclonal antibodies in symptomatic AD have been discouraging, several antibodies are currently being used in primary and secondary prevention studies, where dose administration at an earlier disease stage might provide a better opportunity for disease modification.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, BACE1 inhibition might be expected to work synergistically in combination with Aβ-directed monoclonal antibodies to reduce Aβ deposition by addressing both clearance and production of Aβ.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lanabacestat was discontinued after interim analysis in biomarker-confirmed very mild to mild AD failed to detect any reduction in cognitive decline, despite evidence of target engagement (Clinicaltrials.gov ).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clinicaltrials.gov
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Active and passive immunization strategies and use of secretase inhibitors have been the primary modes of targeting Aβ in clinical trials.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Further, after one year of monthly infusions, participants receiving aducanumab had slower decline in CDR-sum of boxes and MMSE in a phase 1b trial (Sevigny et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sevigny et al., 2016 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At this point, it appears that worsening cognitive function and weight loss are possible class effects for BACE1 inhibitors, as they were observed as adverse effects across multiple trials.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“DIAN-TU is using solanezumab and gantenerumab in a phase 2/3 adaptive design clinical trial in ADAD mutation carriers known to inevitably develop disease (Bateman et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bateman et al., 2017 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Based on this, a new high dose phase 3 trial has been initiated in very mild to mild AD (Ostrowitzki et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ostrowitzki et al., 2017 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Six different monoclonal antibodies directed against Aβ have advanced to phase 3 clinical trials.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A third phase 3 trial in mild AD also failed to demonstrate a significant benefit on the primary endpoint (Honig et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Honig et al., 2018 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Crenezumab is being used in the API ADAD Colombia trial of known mutation carriers (Tariot et al., 2018), whereas active immunization with CAD106 is being used in the API Generation trial of APOE ε4 homozygotes (Lopez Lopez et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lopez Lopez et al., 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CNP520 (umibecestat) was initially found to be safe and well-tolerated in early phase 1 and 2a studies.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In high concentrations it was associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) edema and microhemorrhages.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These may not be simply off-target effects.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This inhibitor was then incorporated into one arm of the phase 2/3 API Generation study (along with CAD106; see above) for secondary prevention of AD in older APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes (Lopez Lopez et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lopez Lopez et al., 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The rate-limiting step for Aβ production is enzymatic cleavage by BACE1, so this would seem to be a particularly attractive target.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Neuritic dystrophy was also significantly attenuated, independent of an effect on amyloid deposition even when administered after amyloid deposition (Huynh et al., 2017b).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huynh et al., 2017b
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In PS19 mice, plasma tau was found to inversely correlate with brain soluble tau levels, suggesting that peripheral tau levels reflect changes occurring in the CNS (Yanamandra et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yanamandra et al., 2017 source
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Preclinical studies using tau-overexpressing mice suggest this approach may be viable in tauopathies (DeVos et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DeVos et al., 2017 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The mechanism appears to be related to slowed dissociation of epsilon-cleaved C99 fragment thereby increasing enzyme processivity, leading to generation of shorter Aβ fragments (Okochi et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Okochi et al., 2013 source
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“therefore more efficacious GSMs may still be a viable conceptual approach.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“therapeutically reducing ApoE levels may also have unexpected effects on the innate immune response to established plaques.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Instead, data suggests the antibody mediates its effect by binding apoE in plaques followed by antibody mediated plaque opsonization by microglia, likely promoting peri-plaque Aβ phagocytosis (Liao et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Liao et al., 2018 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Since ApoE promotes plaque-associated microgliosis resulting in plaque compaction and reduced neuritic dystrophy (Ulrich et al., 2018), therapeutically reducing ApoE levels may also have unexpected effects on the innate immune response to established plaques.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ulrich et al., 2018 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“BACE1 has substrates other than APP that are likely important in neurodevelopment as evidenced by the fact that BACE1 KO mice develop seizures (Hitt et al., 2010), myelination deficits (Willem et al., 2006), cognitive impairment (Laird et al., 2005) and axon guidance defects (Rajapaksha et al., 2011).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Hitt et al., 2010; Willem et al., 2006; Laird et al., 2005; Rajapaksha et al., 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The first GSMs were discovered by recognizing that ibuprofen, indomethacin and sulindac reduce Abeta42 levels (Weggen et al., 2001) through modulation of gamma-secretase activity (Eriksen et al., 2003).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Multiple studies employing ApoE genetic deletion (Bales et al., 1999; Verghese et al., 2013), conditional expression of ApoE isoforms (Liu et al., 2017) or ASO-mediated knockdown of ApoE expression (Huynh et al., 2017b) suggest that lowering ApoE levels reduces relevant pathology in both amyloidosis and tauopathy mouse models (Shi et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, in two different phase 3 trials testing LMTM in all-cause dementia and mild-to-moderate AD, there was no reduction in rate of decline of cognition or ADL compared to placebo (Gauthier et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gauthier et al., 2016 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Whether LMTM at the doses administered prevented accumulation of aggregated tau or decreased existing deposits was not tested.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gauthier et al., 2016 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Based on these data, it may be difficult to develop a BACE1 inhibitor without some expected on-target side effects.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, a phase 2 trial in mild to moderate AD did not demonstrate any reduction in rate of cognitive or functional decline as compared to placebo (Lovestone et al., 2015)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lovestone et al., 2015 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“While there is data to support the concept that ApoE2 expression may be protective using a gene transfer approach (Hu et al., 2015; Hudry et al., 2013), it would be useful to validate protective effects and lack of toxicity in a number of different models.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hu et al., 2015
- Not checked yetcites Hudry et al., 2013 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, targeting ApoE3 or ApoE4 expression via ASO delivery in AD may be beneficial, especially if administered in early preclinical phases.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Despite promising preclinical data, unfortunately a phase 3 clinical trial did not demonstrate any benefits on cognition or ADLs over the course of 18 months (Green et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Green et al., 2009 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, significant CNS Aβ42 lowering was not likely achieved (Karran and Hardy, 2014), therefore more efficacious GSMs may still be a viable conceptual approach.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Karran and Hardy, 2014
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Likely the broad-spectrum nature of these GSI contributed to their side effect profile, as Notch signaling and downstream pathways from other substrates would be inhibited (De Strooper, 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Strooper, 2014 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This effect was also seen after injection of human umbilical cord blood (Castellano et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Castellano et al., 2017 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A separate treatment approach is to boost microglial activation or phagocytic function, since several AD gene risk variants in TREM2 and CD33 act to decrease microglial activation and phagocytosis (see above).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While biochemical analyses, in vitro and in vivo studies, genetic analyses and longitudinal imaging studies lend strong support to the role of Aβ aggregation in initiating disease pathogenesis, the clinical trials as conducted have not panned out.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, a generic anti-inflammatory treatment approach for AD does not appear viable for secondary prevention or treatment of symptomatic patients.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Using the example of treatment paradigms for other chronic diseases, such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, epilepsy, HIV and others, a combinatorial treatment strategy for AD seems more likely to yield clinical successes than monotherapy (Gauthier et al., 2019; Morris, 2019; Stephenson et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Combination Therapies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gauthier et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Morris, 2019
- Not checked yetcites Stephenson et al., 2015 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Alzheimer disease pathobiology is multifactorial and complex.
In the paper
“Proteomic and functional validation experiments suggest that the effect is at least partly mediated by SPARC1L and thrombospondin-4 (Gan and Südhof, 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gan and Südhof, 2019 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A concentrated plasma fraction derived from young donor plasma is now being tested in a phase 2 trial (Kheifets and Braithwaite, 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kheifets and Braithwaite, 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite significant advances in our understanding of AD pathobiology, we have not yet identified a disease modifying therapy that has proven effective in humans.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Preclinical models have demonstrated protection from synaptic deficits in rodent amyloidosis models following treatment with inflammasome inhibitors before onset of amyloid plaques (Qi et al., 2018)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Qi et al., 2018
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the multifactorial nature and underlying complexity of AD pathobiology, the expectation that a single agent targeting a single pathological pathway would be highly effective in slowing disease progression seems irrational once different pathologies of different types are present.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Combination Therapies
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Alzheimer disease pathobiology is multifactorial and complex.
In the paper
“A completed phase 1 trial of weekly infusions of 1 unit of young fresh frozen plasma from male donors (age 18-30) vs saline in patients with mild to moderate AD for total of 4 weeks demonstrated the intervention was mostly well tolerated (Sha et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sha et al., 2019 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Prevention studies of naproxen and celecoxib in patients at risk for preclinical AD also failed to demonstrate any protective benefit (ADAPT-FS Research Group, 2015; Meyer et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites ADAPT-FS Research Group, 2015
- Not checked yetcites Meyer et al., 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, follow-up clinical trials testing the effect of low-dose prednisone (Aisen et al., 2000), low dose aspirin (AD2000 Collaborative Group et al., 2008), NSAIDS (Aisen et al., 2003; de Jong et al., 2008), and selective COX-2 inhibitors (Aisen et al., 2003; Thal et al., 2005) failed to show any reduction in rate of cognitive decline in mild to moderate AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So far, amyloid-based therapeutics appear to be ineffective in modifying the disease course for symptomatic AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 116
- Probably not a substantial claim. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Soluble oligomers isolated from AD brain have been shown to potently inhibit long-term potentiation (LTP), enhance long-term depression (LTD) and reduce dendritic spine density in rodent hippocampal slice cultures”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kamenetz et al., 2003 source
- Partly supportedcites Shankar et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and the section ‘Aβ oligomers trigger spine and synapse loss’ report reduced dendritic spine density in rat hippocampal slice cultures. The paper says its oligomers were isolated from cell-conditioned medium, not AD brain. In ‘Mechanisms of Aβ-induced spine loss,’ it cites earlier work showing LTP inhibition but proposes a shift toward LTD-inducing signaling rather than reporting enhanced LTD as an observed result. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites Wei et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introductory passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable) says that Aβ oligomers reduce spine density in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures and that soluble Aβ oligomers impair LTP. The Results report reduced spine plasticity in rat slice cultures, but the paper does not report enhanced LTD or establish that the oligomers producing these effects were isolated from AD brains; its experiments used locally produced or synthetic Aβ. (LLM, conf=0.89)
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Follow-up analyses demonstrated a dramatic decline in Aβ deposition in participants in the open extension, such that some became amyloid negative on imaging.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ostrowitzki et al., 2017 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Exploratory biomarker analysis; page not provided) report a dose-dependent PET amyloid reduction in the randomized trial, averaging 4.8% at week 100 in the 225-mg group. The Discussion says higher-dose regimens were being examined in open-label extensions, but reports no extension PET results or participants becoming amyloid negative. It therefore does not support the claim's dramatic decline in the extension. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Conditional BACE1 KO in adulthood mitigates many of these side effects but there remains impaired axon guidance defects (Ou-Yang et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Ou-Yang et al., 2018 source
The Introduction states that neurological phenotypes associated with germline BACE1 deficiency were greatly reduced or eliminated after adult conditional knockout, but hippocampal mossy fiber axonal disorganization was not reduced. The Discussion describes the remaining defect as possibly resulting from impaired axon guidance. The finding concerns adult knockout mice, not demonstrated side effects of BACE1-inhibitor treatment. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The presence of extracellular amyloid-β deposition as neuritic plaques and intracellular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau as neurofibrillary tangles remain the primary neuropathologic criteria for AD diagnosis.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“AD as a distinct entity is now defined biologically by the presence of a specific neuropathological profile (Jack et al., 2018a): extracellular deposition of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the form of diffuse and neuritic plaques and the presence of intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles and neuropil threads within dystrophic neurites consisting of aggregated hyperphosphorylated tau protein (Duyckaerts et al.,”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jack et al., 2018a
- Not checked yetcites Duyckaerts et al., 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Tau protein is subject to numerous post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, acetylation, glycation, O-GlcNAcylation, nitration, SUMOylation, ubiquitination and truncation”
- Also stated in: § Tau · plain
“In many cases, aberrant phosphorylation results in decreased binding affinity for microtubules”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marcelli et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Biernat et al., 1993
- Not checked yetcites Mandelkow et al., 2007
plainstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Tau · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, the available data still strongly supports the central role of pathologic Aβ accumulation in mediating AD pathogenesis as outlined in the original description of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, although its mechanism may be less direct than originally anticipated”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The γ-secretase complex consists of four protein subunits: presenilin (PSEN), presenilin enhancer (PEN), APH and Nicastrin.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This extension proposes that accumulation of cerebral amyloid and tau pathology (the “biochemical phase”) is a slow, gradual process that is tolerated by CNS cells early in the course of disease, serving as a risk factor for development of clinical disease, but that the disease is only manifest clinically when cellular homeostatic mechanisms fail, leading to impaired clearance of aggregated”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Strooper and Karran, 2016 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hypoxia can induce increased Aβ production, possibly via increased BACE1 expression (Sun et al., 2006), suggesting the possibility of a pathological feedforward loop.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sun et al., 2006 source
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it seems clear that Aβ is necessary but not sufficient and that there are other downstream factors that play a key role.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Longitudinal assessment of amyloid and tau PET imaging suggests that rate of amyloid accumulation predicts onset of tau accumulation whereas rate of tau accumulation predicts onset of cognitive impairment”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hanseeuw et al., 2019 source
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings have led to the hypothesis that cognitive decline and neurodegeneration in AD is primarily driven by onset and spread of tau pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
In the paper
“Tau acetylation has been shown to reduce degradation of phosphorylated tau and increase tau pathology”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Min et al., 2010 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A 3D in vitro culture system consisting of human neurons differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells overexpressing human APP containing FAD mutations generates robust Aβ42 production and amyloid deposition. Importantly, this model also develops elevated phospho-tau levels and fibrillary tau aggregates, suggesting that elevated Aβ levels alone are sufficient to drive tau pathology in human”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Choi et al., 2014 source
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Clinico-neuropathologic correlation analyses have demonstrated that tau pathology propagates throughout the AD brain in a stereotyped fashion across neuroanatomically connected networks (Figure 2C) forming the basis of Braak staging”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Braak and Braak, 1991 source
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The hypothesis is supported by the discovery that exclusively genetic forms of AD, such as in autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), Down syndrome (trisomy 21), or APP locus duplications, cause an increase in the Aβ42/40 ratio, increased total Aβ production, or increased Aβ fibrillinogenic properties and are sufficient to induce typical AD pathology”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tcw and Goate, 2017
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Exogenously supplied fibrils will seed aggregation of transgenic human and endogenous mouse tau fibrils in mouse tauopathy models by enhancing nucleation of new fibrils. These aggregates then spread transsynaptically to remote anatomically connected brain regions inducing further seeding and aggregation”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that while amyloid accumulation may be key in beginning the pathological process, other downstream events such as neuroinflammation and tau accumulation may be the main drivers of neurodegeneration.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Based on a number of lines of evidence, Hardy and Higgins proposed the amyloid cascade hypothesis in 1992, positing that deposition of Aβ in the brain is the initiating step of AD pathogenesis, leading to subsequent tau deposition, neuron and synaptic loss and cognitive decline”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hardy and Higgins, 1992 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In these studies, tau pathology and neurodegeneration is enhanced in mice with both pathologies, whereas amyloid pathology is generally unaffected”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Amyloid
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bolmont et al., 2007
- Not checked yetcites Götz et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Hurtado et al., 2010
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“Hyperphosphorylated tau is also redirected from the axonal compartment to the somatodendritic compartment where it can impair synaptic function by inhibiting glutamate receptor trafficking or synaptic anchoring”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Tau
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hoover et al., 2010 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“GABAergic inhibitory networks are impaired in AD and may contribute to cognitive impairment”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“ApoE4-TR mice have decreased numbers of GABAergic interneurons in the hippocampus and this correlates with learning deficits.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Najm et al., 2019 source
plainstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
In the paper
“Detailed in vivo microdialysis and stable isotope labeling kinetics experiments have demonstrated that ApoE regulates clearance of Aβ in the brain in an isoform-dependent manner (ApoE4-TR mice have diminished Aβ clearance relative to other TR mice), whereas Aβ production was not influenced by ApoE isoform”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Castellano et al., 2011 source
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“A single inherited copy of the APOE ε4 allele increases risk of developing LOAD by approximately 3-4 fold, while two inherited copies increases risk by ~12-fold”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“Inheritance of the APOE ε2 allele is protective.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roses, 1996
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
In the paper
“Importantly, there was also a reduction in plaque-associated microglia with associated impairments in plaque compaction and increased levels of dystrophic neurites around plaques (Leyns et al., 2017; Song et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leyns et al., 2017; Song et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Single nuclear transcriptomic techniques have recently been applied to human AD brain specimens and have identified microglial subtypes with increased Apoe expression but have failed to identify DAM or MGnD subpopulations similar to what has been seen in the mouse brain (Mathys et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathys et al., 2019 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“ApoE expression in microglia is required for the phenotypic expression of disease-associated microglia”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“ApoE also promotes microglial clustering around Aβ plaques”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ulrich et al., 2018 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This may be because of disease stage specific effects with activation being protective in the setting of amyloid deposition and damaging in the setting of tau accumulation (Figure 4B).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Termed microglial neurodegenerative phenotype (MGnD) or disease-associated microglia (DAM), these cells are defined by a unique expression profile consisting of upregulation of certain inflammatory transcripts (e.g. Apoe, Trem2, Clec7a) and downregulation of homeostatic transcripts (e.g. P2ry12, Tmeml19).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In TREM2 deletion and haploinsufficiency studies using mouse models of Aβ deposition (APPPS1-21 and 5xFAD), levels of Aβ were decreased at 2 months of age (before plaque deposition) but increased at 8.5 months of age (after plaque deposition), suggesting an age or amyloid burden effect (Ulrich et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ulrich et al., 2014 source
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Longitudinal CSF, MRI and PET imaging studies of the preclinical phase of AD have established that APOE ε4 allele carriers develop enhanced cerebral amyloid deposition with age, do so at an earlier age and accumulate amyloid at a more rapid rate relative to non-carriers”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bussy et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Grimmer et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Mishra et al., 2018
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“PAM was also strongly associated with total Aβ load and number of neuritic plaques and less strongly associated with amount of PHF tau.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Felsky et al., 2019 source
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ApoE4 may also mediate neuropathological effects by directly modulating BBB integrity”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · boosted
“Studies in the Zlokovic lab have demonstrated that ApoE4 does not efficiently engage LRP1 on pericytes.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bell et al., 2012 source
- Not checked yetcites Zlokovic, 2013
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · boosted
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TREM2 protein is expressed on microglia, promotes microglial phagocytosis, modulates inflammatory signaling and promotes microglial survival.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that ApoE4 may cause neuronal dysfunction via direct neurotoxic effects and by promoting hyperactivity in hippocampal neuronal networks.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In APP transgenic-ApoE targeted replacement (ApoE-TR) mice, where human apoE isoforms are expressed under the influence of endogenous murine ApoE regulatory sequences, ApoE isoforms have differential effects on amyloid pathology. ApoE4-TR mice have enhanced amyloid deposition and higher Aβ levels”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bales et al., 2009
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“Either TREM2 KO or TREM2 R47H transgene expression in mice that develop amyloid deposition results in enhanced amyloid seeding as well as enhanced tau seeding and spreading near neuritic plaques (Leyns et al., 2019; Parhizkar et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Leyns et al., 2019; Parhizkar et al., 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“ApoE4-TR mice have enhanced neural activity in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, as evidenced by hypermetabolism on fMRI, increased high frequency oscillations measured by in vivo electrophysiology, and reduced inhibitory input to neurons of entorhinal cortex”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nuriel et al., 2017
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
In the paper
“A recent study failed to replicate the neurotoxic effect of ApoE4 in tauopathy mice.”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
“They found that ApoE2 mice, rather than ApoE4, had enhanced tau pathology, astrogliosis and behavioral impairment”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Zhao et al., 2018 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ApoE directly binds to Aβ present in plaques”
- Also stated in: § ApoE · hedged
“APP transgenic animal models demonstrate markedly reduced fibrillar Aβ deposition and Aβ levels in the setting of ApoE KO, suggesting ApoE inhibits clearance and/or promotes Aβ seeding”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > ApoE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Namba et al., 1991
- Not checked yetcites Bales et al., 1997, 1999
- Not checked yetcites Huynh et al., 2017b
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
- Also stated in: § ApoE · hedged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TREM2 also binds to soluble oligomers of Aβ and promotes phagocytosis of Aβ.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In one study, MGnD could be induced in WT mouse brain by injection of apoptotic neurons, and required ApoE expression for induction (Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Keren-Shaul et al., 2017; Krasemann et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“NLRP3 and caspase-1 genetic deletion results in decreased Aβ deposition, reduced IL-1β release from microglia and improved cognitive performance in APPPS1 mice (Heneka et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Heneka et al., 2013 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NLRP3 inflammasome is activated in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) brains and in APPPS1 mice.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These experiments have led to the antimicrobial protection hypothesis of AD that suggests intracerebral infection by certain pathogens may induce Aβ fibrillization as an antimicrobial defense mechanism, leading to amyloid seeding and deposition, thereby initiating the amyloid cascade. (Moir et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moir et al., 2018
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This can be reversed by genetic deletion of ASC or use of an anti-ASC neutralizing antibody (Venegas et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Venegas et al., 2017 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests a role of Trem2 function in suppressing amyloid-induced local toxicity that also inhibits tau seeding/spreading.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“C1q binds to synapses and, in the presence of soluble Aβ oligomers, promotes microglia phagocytosis of synaptic contents (Hong et al., 2016)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hong et al., 2016 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Depletion of microglia or pharmacological inhibition of exosome secretion led to reduced tau spreading in this model.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Asai et al., 2015 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Extracellular ASC specks have been found to bind to Aβ and can cross-seed Aβ oligomerization and plaque formation in APPPS1 mice (Figure 4C).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Venegas et al., 2017 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Dating back to 1991, studies have demonstrated the presence of herpesvirus in brains of patients with AD, as well as within amyloid plaques (Carbone et al., 2014; Jamieson et al., 1991, 1992; Wozniak et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carbone et al., 2014; Jamieson et al., 1991, 1992; Wozniak et al., 2009
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Follow-up analyses in AD brain specimens found detectable human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 DNA in 3 separate cohorts, and identified many putative viral-host interactions that regulate gene networks pertinent to AD biology, including innate immunity and APP processing (Readhead et al., 2018)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Readhead et al., 2018 source
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, one study demonstrated that APP/PS1ΔE9 mice chronically administered a cocktail of high dose antibiotics to modulate microbiome composition had significantly reduced Aβ plaque load, reduced plaque size, increased soluble Aβ42 levels and reduced plaque-associated microglia and reactive astrocytes (Minter et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Minter et al., 2016 source
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In the J20 amyloid mouse model, CD33 expression resulted in reduced microglial-mediated phagocytosis of Aβ, and increased amyloid pathology (Bradshaw et al., 2013; Griciuc et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bradshaw et al., 2013; Griciuc et al., 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Germ-free mice develop microglia with an immature phenotype, blunted response to inflammatory stimuli and defective immune response to infection (Erny et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Erny et al., 2015 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data in models of Aβ deposition would suggest that dysfunctional microglia are less able to sequester Aβ pathology within compact plaques and less able to inhibit amyloid and tau seeding near plaques, resulting in neuronal damage.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“5xFAD mice survived longer with less severe disease than WT mice, while APP KO mice had slightly increased mortality compared to WT mice.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kumar et al., 2016 source
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CD33 KO results in decreased amyloid pathology and improved cognition in 5xFAD mice.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Griciuc et al., 2019 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Synthetic and AD-brain derived Aβ peptide fibrils significantly inhibit the growth of gram positive and gram negative bacteria, fungus (Soscia et al., 2010) and herpesvirus, and inhibits the entry of herpesvirus into cells (Bourgade et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Soscia et al., 2010; Bourgade et al., 2015
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Activated microglia can directly secrete toxic proinflammatory cytokines (Colonna and Butovsky, 2017; Kinney et al., 2018) or secrete indirect mediators that stimulate astrocytes to secrete a neurotoxic substance (Liddelow et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Neuroimmune activation
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Colonna and Butovsky, 2017; Kinney et al., 2018; Liddelow et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The current AD clinical pipeline has over 100 different compounds currently being tested in various phases of clinical trials (Hara et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hara et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, after Aβ plaque formation, there is an impaired sleep-wake cycle and loss of diurnal fluctuation in ISF/CSF Aβ levels (Roh et al., 2012).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roh et al., 2012 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Oral infection of WT mice with Porphyromsonas gingivalis resulted in elevated intraparenchymal Aβ levels, and inhibition of gingipain activity led to reduced intracerebral bacterial burden, decreased Aβ levels and reduced neuroinflammation (Dominy et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Infectious Hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dominy et al., 2019 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Memantine is a uncompetitive NMDA receptor modulator that may act to inhibit glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity that develops as neurons die during AD progression, although the precise mechanism of its effect is unclear (Greenamyre et al., 1988; Livingston et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Anti-NMDA
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Greenamyre et al., 1988; Livingston et al., 2017
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, as with ChEI, the effect size is quite small and the medication has no effect on long-term disease progression.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Anti-NMDA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In summary, these studies provide compelling evidence that sleep deprivation stimulates increased levels of Aβ and tau in human CSF and animal model brains and enhances intracerebral pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the overall effect size is modest (mean difference in MiniMental State Examination (MMSE) of 1.37 points after 6 months treatment), and there is no effect on long-term disease progression.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effects in mild-to-moderate stage disease were marginal and therefore, it is not recommended that this medication be prescribed to patients with mild AD.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Anti-NMDA
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At this stage of disease pathogenesis, significant and irreversible synaptic and neuronal loss has occurred and the pathological cascade would likely be very difficult to reverse (Gómez-Isla et al., 1996).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gómez-Isla et al., 1996 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Available data does not support the use of ChEI in very mild AD (i.e. mild cognitive impairment), and in fact ChEI may worsen cognition at this early clinical stage (Han et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Han et al., 2019
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the underlying evidence for the amyloid cascade hypothesis remains solid, new discoveries should continually inform and update our understanding of disease pathobiology, eventually leading to the development of novel treatment approaches.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a recent study of amyloid kinetics in human CSF using stable isotope labeling, there was an increase in Aβ levels following sleep deprivation but no change in rate of Aβ clearance.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lucey et al., 2018 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In animal microdialysis experiments, interstitial fluid (ISF) Aβ levels correlate with wakefulness and significantly increase following acute sleep deprivation or orexin infusion.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kang et al., 2009 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, in a recent study of partial sleep deprivation lasting 5-8 days, no changes in AD CSF biomarkers were noted although that study did not alter the quantity of slow-wave sleep (Olsson et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF AD > Sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Olsson et al., 2018
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They differ primarily in their pharmacokinetic profiles (donepezil has a much longer half-life than the others and is dosed once daily) and formulation (rivastigmine is available as a continuous release transdermal patch) but not in overall efficacy.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Cholinesterase inhibitors
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“More than 20 compounds have completed large phase 3 double-blind randomized control trials in cohorts of patients at various stages of AD and none has demonstrated any efficacy in slowing cognitive decline or improving global functioning (Table 1).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR ALZHEIMER DISEASE
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Table 1
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aducanumab is a fully human IgG1 antibody that binds a specific conformational epitope of Aβ. There was initial excitement for this antibody, as it was demonstrated to actively engage and clear amyloid plaques both in transgenic APP models and in human participants with prodromal or mild AD based on florbetapir-PET imaging.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sevigny et al., 2016 source
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ideally, BACE1 inhibition would be the preferred target for primary prevention studies, as blocking Aβ production prior to onset of pathology would be sufficient to prevent the development of pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“In mouse amyloidosis model, BACE1 inhibition limits initiation of new plaque formation but does not prevent growth of established plaques (Peters et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peters et al., 2018
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gantenerumab is a fully human IgG1 antibody that binds to a conformational epitope on aggregated Aβ fibrils within plaques and triggers Fc-mediated microglial phagocytosis of Aβ.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, many clinical trials have been inadequately designed to robustly test the amyloid hypothesis, such that negative trial results cannot be necessarily interpreted as a rejection of the amyloid hypothesis (Karran and Hardy, 2014; Karran et al., 2011).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Karran and Hardy, 2014; Karran et al., 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Two phase 3 trials of solanezumab in mild-to-moderate AD failed to demonstrate a marked benefit on cognition or ADL and did not reduce cerebral amyloid deposition (Doody et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Doody et al., 2014 source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only one BACE1 inhibitor is now left standing in clinical trials. Elenbecestat is currently engaged in phase 3 clinical trials in biomarker positive MCI/prodromal AD and has not had issues with safety, tolerability or outcome futility to-date.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The first successful demonstration of antibody-mediated clearance of Aβ was in 1999, when active immunization of PDAPP mice using full length human Aβ42 peptide resulted in a significant decrease in existing amyloid deposits in animals vaccinated at an older age and almost completely prevented the development of amyloid deposition in animals vaccinated at a younger age (Schenk et al., 1999).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schenk et al., 1999 source
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It was hypothesized that the antibody might alter the equilibrium between plasma and CNS Aβ, the so-called “peripheral sink” hypothesis (DeMattos et al., 2001) as well as directly binding soluble Aβ in the CNS.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DeMattos et al., 2001
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Verubecestat failed to slow cognitive decline in a phase 3 trial of mild to moderate AD and resulted in worse cognition on some measures. (Egan et al., 2018, 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Egan et al., 2018, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though the data for Aβ-directed monoclonal antibodies in symptomatic AD have been discouraging, several antibodies are currently being used in primary and secondary prevention studies, where dose administration at an earlier disease stage might provide a better opportunity for disease modification.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since no integrated AD animal model exists in which to definitively test the validity of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, clinical trials using Aβ-directed therapies in humans have been considered one of the most direct ways to test this.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: No integrated animal model exists that can definitively test the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Donanemab is a monoclonal antibody developed by Lilly that uniquely targets Aβ(p3-42), a pyroglutamate form of Aβ exclusively found in plaques, in which the goal is to directly engage plaque-based Aβ for clearance and is currently in a phase 2 trial.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“BAN2401 is a humanized version of murine antibody mAb158 that binds large soluble Aβ protofibrils in vitro. Phase 2 trials demonstrated significant engagement and clearance of cerebral amyloid deposits and possible reduction in cognitive decline. It has now entered a phase 3 clinical trial in very mild to mild AD patients (Logovinsky et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Logovinsky et al., 2016
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is a humanized version of mouse 3D6 antibody that targets N-terminal Aβ peptide and binds to soluble and fibrillar Aβ, triggering microglial phagocytosis of Aβ deposits.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Preclinical studies demonstrated that peripheral administration sequestered peripheral Aβ and led to a dramatic and rapid rise in peripheral Aβ levels.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gantenerumab entered a phase 3 clinical trial for mild AD in 2014 that ultimately stopped enrolling early due to futility. The study was continued as an open label extension at high dose for two years.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Post-mortem evaluation determined that there was significant variability in degree of amyloid clearance but that some vaccinated patients had long-lasting nearly complete clearance of Aβ deposits. However, they still had prominent tau pathology with advanced Braak staging and most had severe dementia at time of death, even despite plaque clearance (Nicoll et al., 2019; Vellas et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nicoll et al., 2019; Vellas et al., 2009
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aβ-directed immunotherapy has been explored as a disease-modifying therapy in AD for the last 20 years (Gallardo and Holtzman, 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gallardo and Holtzman, 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lilly inhibitors LY2886721 and LY3202626 failed in phase 2 trials due to hepatotoxicity and impaired cognitive performance, respectively.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Active vaccination strategies using Aβ peptides as immunogens are still being pursued, with CAD106 in a phase 3 trial (Table 2) and ABVac40 currently in phase 2 trials (Lacosta et al., 2018; Vandenberghe et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lacosta et al., 2018; Vandenberghe et al., 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The amyloid cascade hypothesis suggests that Aβ accumulation triggers disease pathogenesis, so therapies that lower parenchymal Aβ might be expected to slow disease progression.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Aβ accumulation triggers Alzheimer disease pathogenesis, as proposed by the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a phase 2a trial, four patients developed aseptic meningoencephalitis leading to the discontinuation of the trial, although ongoing neuroimaging and neuropathologic follow-up allowed for assessment of long-term treatment response.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a causen = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both claim to avoid the risk of meningoencephalitis by excluding portions of the Aβ peptide responsible for inducing Th1 immune responses.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately study sponsors announced discontinuation of this arm in July 2019 when interim analysis demonstrated worse cognition, increased brain atrophy and more weight loss in the treatment group relative to placebo.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With infusions of a monoclonal antibody, there is less variability in efficacy from patient to patient, and since titer levels can be more tightly controlled, there is less risk of adverse events.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Crenezumab is a fully human IgG4 antibody that binds oligomeric, fibrillar and plaque-based Aβ. Two phase 3 trials were terminated early in January 2019 for futility after interim analysis failed to demonstrate any benefit.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The humanized version of HJ8.5 (ABBV-8E12) has been tested in a phase 1 trial and found to be safe and has now advanced to two phase 2 trials including patients with early AD and PSP (West et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites West et al., 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Use of anti-ApoE ASO delivered via intracerebroventricular injection in ApoE-TR/APPPS1-21 mice demonstrated dramatically reduced Aβ plaque deposition if administered prior to plaque seeding but not after.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Huynh et al., 2017b
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another proposed strategy is to utilize gene therapy methods to overexpress ApoE2 in APOE ε4/ε4 carriers as means to overcome loss of function associated with ApoE4 (Rosenberg et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rosenberg et al., 2018
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This strategy would only be effective if ApoE4-mediated disease mechanisms are truly due to loss of function or, if secondary to ApoE4 toxic gain of function, that ApoE2 is able to act in dominant protective fashion to inhibit ApoE4 toxic effects.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“AADvac-1 recently completed phase 1 testing and is currently undergoing phase 2 trials (Novak et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Novak et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Indeed, there are other promising GSMs now in development that may enter human trials in the near future (Wagner et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wagner et al., 2017
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In preclinical studies, mouse anti-human tau monoclonal antibody HJ8.5 demonstrated reduced tau seeding, hyperphosphorylation and thioflavin S staining, reduced levels of detergent insoluble tau, and reduced brain atrophy and cognitive deficits in PS19 (P301S) mice, whether administered via intraventricular infusion (Yanamandra et al., 2013) or peripherally (Yanamandra et al., 2015) when administ”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yanamandra et al., 2013 source
- Not checked yetcites Yanamandra et al., 2015
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Avagacestat phase 2 trials in mild to moderate and prodromal AD were terminated after it failed to demonstrate any reduction in cognitive decline and caused adverse effects at higher doses, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rash, pruritis and increased incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (Coric et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Coric et al., 2015 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A GSK-3 inhibitor, tideglusib, was shown in a preclinical study using double transgenic mice expressing human tau and APP to reduce tau phosphorylation, decrease amyloid deposition, lead to less neuronal loss and improved cognition (Serenó et al., 2009).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Serenó et al., 2009 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Semagacestat was the first GSI to enter a phase 3 trial for AD. However, the trial was halted early due to concerns of worsening cognition, increased incidence of skin cancers and infection, and weight loss relative to placebo (Doody et al., 2013).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Disease Modifying Treatments
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Doody et al., 2013 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“ASO-based clinical treatments have demonstrated dramatic success in cases of spinal motor atrophy (Finkel et al., 2017) and are being tested in Huntington’s disease (Tabrizi et al., 2019).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Finkel et al., 2017
- Not checked yetcites Tabrizi et al., 2019
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Delivery of this antibody centrally or peripherally reduced fibrillary amyloid plaque load and soluble and insoluble Aβ levels without reducing cerebral or plasma ApoE levels.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Liao et al., 2018
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is likely that if a peripherally administered anti-tau antibody is to be efficacious in a disease such as AD, such a mechanism would need to occur and an antibody would need to inhibit this process.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Tau-directed therapeutics
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tau- and ApoE-directed therapeutics remain at an early stage of development and both hold great potential going foward.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In one study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with etanercept, TNFα decoy receptor, had lower incidence of AD, but no effect was noted with use of other anti-rheumatic medications (prednisone, sulfasalazine, rituximab) or anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab) (Chou et al., 2016).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chou et al., 2016 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, a phase 3 trial of IVIg did not demonstrate any cognitive benefits in mild AD despite a favorable safety profile (Relkin et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Relkin et al., 2017
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent heterochronic parabiosis experiments demonstrated that introduction of young blood in old mice led to increased neurogenesis and dendritic spine density, and improved age-related cognitive impairment, (Katsimpardi et al., 2014; Villeda et al., 2014).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Heterochronic parabiosis and direct injection of young mouse plasma in APP amyloidosis mice resulted in increased levels of synaptic protein and improvement in cognitive performance on standard tests of spatial working memory and hippocampal-dependent associative learning (Middeldorp et al., 2016)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Middeldorp et al., 2016 source
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interest in anti-inflammatory treatments for AD were initially stoked by findings from multiple epidemiologic studies suggesting that chronic use of NSAIDs was associated with lower incidence of AD, with the most pronounced effect seen in patients taking chronic ibuprofen (in t’ Veld et al., 2001; Vlad et al., 2008).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites in t’ Veld et al., 2001
- Not checked yetcites Vlad et al., 2008 source
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, AD pathobiology is complex and the older one is, the greater likelihood that other age-related diseases contribute to cognitive decline together with AD pathology.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This study found that intracisternal viral injection led to the widest area of cerebral transduction with only minimal surgery (Rosenberg et al., 2018).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > ApoE-directed therapeutics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rosenberg et al., 2018
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“This approach demonstrated reduced amyloid burden and improvement in recognition memory in preclinical studies using APP/PS1 mice (Chang et al., 2017).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chang et al., 2017
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The AMBAR trial, a current phase 2b/3 trial, is testing this hypothesis by assessing the effect of monthly plasma exchange with albumin replacement on mild to moderate AD (Boada et al., 2019)”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Young Blood
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boada et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is also huge potential for therapies that modulate the neuroimmune or microglial response in AD, and this class of drug development is significantly underrepresented.”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > CONCLUSIONS
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A phase 2 trial of etanercept in mild to moderate AD established safety but saw no significant reduction in cognitive decline on analysis of secondary clinical outcomes (Butchart et al., 2015).”
§ Alzheimer Disease: An Update on Pathobiology and Treatment Strategies > Symptomatic Treatment > Immune Modulation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Butchart et al., 2015
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Findings from transgenic mouse and cell-culture models of AD can be extrapolated to human AD pathobiology.
“In these studies, tau pathology and neurodegeneration is enhanced in mice with both pathologies, whereas amyloid pathology is generally unaffected”
The paper relies on this without support.
No integrated animal model exists that can definitively test the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
“Since no integrated AD animal model exists in which to definitively test the validity of the amyloid cascade hypothesis, clinical trials using Aβ-directed therapies in humans have been considered one of the most direct ways to test this.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Aβ accumulation triggers Alzheimer disease pathogenesis, as proposed by the amyloid cascade hypothesis.
“The amyloid cascade hypothesis suggests that Aβ accumulation triggers disease pathogenesis, so therapies that lower parenchymal Aβ might be expected to slow disease progression.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Tau is a critical target for developing disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease.
“Tau is considered a critical target for developing disease modifying therapies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Alzheimer disease pathobiology is multifactorial and complex.
“Given the multifactorial nature and underlying complexity of AD pathobiology”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“intraneuronal tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation ensue, causing neuronal and synaptic dysfunction and cell death1.”
From Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, it can also affect about 5% of those under 65, termed early-onset Alzheimer’s disease [2,3].”
From Cholinesterase Inhibitors from Plants and Their Potential in Alzheimer’s Treatment: Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, all existing methods of AD treatment are used lifelong, since the disease has a chronic progressive course with a preclinical phase starting 10–20 years before the onset of symptoms, and an inevitable fatal outcome within 5–12 years after their onset [90].”
From Theranostic Nanoplatforms for Alzheimer's Disease: A Critical Analysis of Conceptual Contradictions (2026) · cites this paper as [90]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“More than 20 compounds which are mainly based on amyloid and tau hypothesis have completed large phase 3, double‐blind, randomized control trials in cohorts of patients at various stages of AD. None of them has demonstrated satisfying efficacy in slowing cognitive decline or improving global brain function.[ 2 ]”
From Multifunctional Nanostructure RAP‐RL Rescues Alzheimer's Cognitive Deficits through Remodeling the Neurovascular Unit (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Synaptic failure is one of the major pathophysiological changes observed in patients with AD and several transgenic mouse models of AD. It is considered an early time point molecular change that is followed by neuronal loss and cognitive deficits (1, 34).”
From Deletion of Abi3 gene locus exacerbates neuropathological features of Alzheimer’s disease in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“APOE*4 is also associated with AD-related proteinopathies, including amyloid-β, tau, α-synuclein, and TDP-43 [11, 12].”
From Genome-wide analysis identifies novel loci influencing plasma apolipoprotein E concentration and Alzheimer’s disease risk (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“P-tau is highly susceptible to aggregation, forming insoluble oligomers and NFTs”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Due to the apoE4 allele being the greatest risk factor associated with development of AD”
From The Sigma-2 Receptor/TMEM97, PGRMC1, and LDL Receptor Complex Are Responsible for the Cellular Uptake of Aβ42 and Its Protein Aggregates (2020) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Mechanismly, various factors, including genetics, amyloid protein, tau, ApoE, and neuroimmune activation, are involved in the pathogenesis of AD.”
From Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets (2023) · cites this paper as [123]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Synaptic failure is one of the major pathophysiological changes observed in patients with AD and several transgenic mouse models of AD. It is considered an early time point molecular change that is followed by neuronal loss and cognitive deficits (1, 34).”
From Deletion of Abi3 gene locus exacerbates neuropathological features of Alzheimer’s disease in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“since it is known that the Aβ plaques act as a driver of AD pathology63 and the accumulation Aβ plaques in the brain initiates a complex multicellular neurodegenerative process.”
From Interferon signaling modulates Down syndrome-associated Alzheimer’s disease pathology in a mouse model (2025) · cites this paper as [65]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with dysfunctional neurons and activated astrocytes seen in both ApoE4 mice (Zhu et al., 2012) and AD brains (Long and Holtzman, 2019).”
From ApoE4 Impairs Neuron-Astrocyte Coupling of Fatty Acid Metabolism (2021) · cites this paper as Long and Holtzman, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“tau pathology in AD is suggested to be dependent on Aβ pathology, being correlated with cognitive impairment and clinical progression [5].”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides produced by neurons form extracellular aggregates that initiate disease”
From Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“In addition, BACE1 KO mice exhibit a variety of neurological defects [641–643]”
From Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [641]
In the citing paper
“Large clinical trials of Aβ-targeting therapies have repeatedly failed, suggesting that amyloid-centric therapy is insufficient to quell disease [11].”
From Systems-based proteomics to resolve the biology of Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid and tau (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“However, the repeated failures of Aβ-targeting drug trials have recently bolstered critics of this hypothesis and broadened investigations of AD pathophysiology.”
From Systems-based proteomics to resolve the biology of Alzheimer’s disease beyond amyloid and tau (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123 · cited 2×
“stereotyped fashion across neuroanatomically connected networks (Figure 2C) forming the basis of Braak staging (Braak and Braak, 1991), although recent cross-sectional and longitudinal tau-PET imaging studies in cognitively normal amyloid positive individuals demonstrate widely distributed and continuous accumulation…”
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537
Self-citationAmyloid oligomers exacerbate tau pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy
Selenica, M.-L. B., Brownlow, M., Jimenez, J. P., Lee, D. C., Pena, G., Dickey, C. A., Gordon, M. N., & Morgan, D. (2013) · Neurodegenerative Diseases · doi:10.1159/000337230 · Cited by 10,359
Corder, E. H., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D. E., Gaskell, P. C., Small, G. W., Roses, A. D., Haines, J. L., & Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8346443 · Cited by 9,429
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system
Choi, D. W. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6 · Cited by 8,188
Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia
Liddelow, S. A., Guttenplan, K. A., Clarke, L. E., Bennett, F. C., Bohlen, C. J., Schirmer, L., Bennett, M. L., Münch, A. E., Chung, W.-S., Peterson, T. C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21029 · Cited by 7,971 · cited 1×
“, 2018) or secrete indirect mediators that stimulate astrocytes to secrete a neurotoxic substance (Liddelow et al., 2017).”
Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis
Hardy, J. A., & Higgins, G. A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1566067 · Cited by 7,484
The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years
Selkoe, D. J., & Hardy, J. (2016) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201606210 · Cited by 6,164
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care
Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6 · Cited by 6,072
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lecanemab in early Alzheimer's disease
van Dyck, C. H., Swanson, C. J., Aisen, P., Bateman, R. J., Chen, C., Gee, M., Kanekiyo, M., Li, D., Reyderman, L., Cohen, S., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2212948 · Cited by 5,678
Scheltens, P., De Strooper, B., Kivipelto, M., Holstege, H., Chételat, G., Teunissen, C. E., Cummings, J., & van der Flier, W. M. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32205-4 · Cited by 5,465
Hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases
Wilson, D. M., Cookson, M. R., Van Den Bosch, L., Zetterberg, H., Holtzman, D. M., & Dewachter, I. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.12.032 · Cited by 1,789
Self-citationLocal and systemic mechanisms linking periodontal disease and inflammatory comorbidities
Hajishengallis, G., & Chavakis, T. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00488-6 · Cited by 1,871
Microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: mechanism and potential therapeutic targets
Gao, C., Jiang, J., Tan, Y., & Chen, S. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01588-0 · Cited by 1,616
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, J. M., & Holtzman, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holtzman, David M.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 312-339
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6778042
- OpenAlex
- W2976163884
- Semantic Scholar
- 9231686941513e88e57650a734b2d4f1fcdbd4cb
- Cited by
- 3,204
- References
- 333
- Citations by year
- 2026: 455 · 2025: 482 · 2024: 565 · 2023: 526 · 2022: 527 · 2021: 426 · 2020: 207 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 34.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 368 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- JPB Foundation
- Cure Alzheimer's Fund
- National Institutes of Health (AG047644, NS074969, NS090934)
- University of Washington (8,232,107, 8,591,894)
- Alzheimer's Association (AACSF-18-564776)
- Tau Consortium
- AbbVie (US2013/049333)
- Genentech
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, pathobiology, amyloid-beta, neuritic plaques, tau hyperphosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangles, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trial failure, neuropathologic diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Alzheimer Vaccines, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review