Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 995

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-sided platforms

Open access
Hagiu, Andrei, Wright, Julian·2015·International Journal of Industrial Organization
DOI 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.03.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.03.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Alonso, 2008, When does coordination require centralization?, Am. Econ. Rev., 98, 145, 10.1257/aer.98.1.145 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Armstrong, 2006, Competition in two-sided markets, Rand J. Econ., 37, 669, 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Biglaiser, 1993, Middlemen as experts, Rand J. Econ., 24, 212, 10.2307/2555758 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Gawer, 2007, Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: evidence from Intel, J. Econ. Manag. Strateg., 16, 1, 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2007.00130.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Gibbons, 2005, Four formal(izable) theories of the firm?, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 58, 200, 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hagiu, 2006, Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms, Rand J. Econ., 37, 720, 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00039.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hagiu, 2013, First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets, Manag. Sci., 59, 933, 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1577 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hagiu, 2013, Do you really want to be an eBay?, Harv. Bus. Rev., 91, 102
  9. Hagiu, 2015, Marketplace or reseller?, Manag. Sci., 61, 184, 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2042 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hagiu, 2013, The new patent intermediaries: platforms, defensive aggregators and super-aggregators, J. Econ. Perspect., 27, 45, 10.1257/jep.27.1.45 · DOI
  11. Halaburda, 2013, Platform competition under asymmetric information, Am. Econ. J Microecon., 5, 22, 10.1257/mic.5.3.22 · DOI
  12. Morrison, 2004, Partnership firms, reputation, and human capital, Am. Econ. Rev., 94, 1682, 10.1257/0002828043052367 · DOI
  13. Parker, 2005, Two-sided network effects: a theory of information product design, Manag. Sci., 51, 1494, 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rochet, 2006, Two-sided markets: where we stand, Rand J.Econ., 37, 645, 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J.
Venue
International Journal of Industrial Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
43
Pages
162-174
ISSN
0167-7187 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.03.003
OpenAlex
W2152359509
Cited by
995
References
3
FWCI
157.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Ministry of Education - Singapore (R122000215-112)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.