The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250951 · Cited by 4,726
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001 · Cited by 2,284
Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model
Szajna, B. (1996) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85 · Cited by 1,656
Cited by
The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions
Ajzen, I. (2020) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.195 · Cited by 3,347
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
Brave new world: service robots in the frontline
Wirtz, J., Patterson, P. G., Kunz, W. H., Gruber, T., Lu, V. N., Paluch, S., & Martins, A. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0119 · Cited by 2,315
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 · Cited by 1,923
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 · Cited by 986
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., Hu, P. J.-H., & Brown, S. A. (2011) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373.x · Cited by 852
Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005 · Cited by 851
Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM)
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.895855 · Cited by 679
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2009) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910708x373959 · Cited by 538
Zhao, Y., Ni, Q., & Zhou, R. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.006 · Cited by 516
Manis, K. T., & Choi, D. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.021 · Cited by 494
Yang, Q., Pang, C., Liu, L., Yen, D. C., & Michael Tarn, J. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.058 · Cited by 410
Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 · Cited by 413
Lee, J., Kim, J., & Choi, J. Y. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.006 · Cited by 382
A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce
Sarkar, S., Chauhan, S., & Khare, A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.008 · Cited by 375
Why do people play games? A meta-analysis
Hamari, J., & Keronen, L. (2017) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.006 · Cited by 368
A review of technology acceptance by older adults
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2011) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00 · Cited by 353
Mao, Z., & Lyu, J. (2017) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-08-2016-0439 · Cited by 325
User acceptance of smart home services: An extension of the theory of planned behavior
Yang, H., Lee, H., & Zo, H. (2017) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-01-2016-0017 · Cited by 325
Hertzum (2017) · doi:10.1145/3127358 · Cited by 307
UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
Chang, A. (2012) · Journal The Winners · doi:10.21512/tw.v13i2.656 · Cited by 293
Factors affecting adoption of online banking: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study
Montazemi, A. R., & Qahri-Saremi, H. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.11.002 · Cited by 293
Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: An extension of TAM with trust and risk factors
Ortega Egea, J. M., & Román González, M. V. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.010 · Cited by 287
A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later
Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., & Ndjambou, P. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.1381 · Cited by 246
The social influence model of technology adoption
Vannoy, S. A., & Palvia, P. (2010) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1743546.1743585 · Cited by 210
Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016 · Cited by 204
Self-citationSánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002 · Cited by 205
Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification
Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z · Cited by 181
Understanding user perception toward artificial intelligence (AI) enabled e-learning
Kashive, N., Powale, L., & Kashive, K. (2020) · The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-05-2020-0090 · Cited by 181
Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117700144 · Cited by 168
Tandon, U., Kiran, R., & Sah, A. N. (2018) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-017-0341-3 · Cited by 157
Gado, S., Kempen, R., Lingelbach, K., & Bipp, T. (2022) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/14757257211037149 · Cited by 153
(2009) · Cited by 154
Factors influencing adoption of e-payment systems: an empirical study on Iranian customers
Barkhordari, M., Nourollah, Z., Mashayekhi, H., Mashayekhi, Y., & Ahangar, M. S. (2017) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-016-0311-1 · Cited by 143
Humida, T., Al Mamun, M. H., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9 · Cited by 133
E. Koh, C., R. Prybutok, V., D. Ryan, S., & Andy" Wu, Y. (2010) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/1326 · Cited by 120
A systematic literature review of the role of trust and security on FinTech adoption in banking
Jafri, J. A., Mohd Amin, S. I., Abdul Rahman, A., & Mohd Nor, S. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22980 · Cited by 126
Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: towards an integrated and comprehensive overview
Verdegem, P., & De Marez, L. (2011) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.02.004 · Cited by 119
Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., Metri, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10337-7 · Cited by 80
“Subjective norms influence consumers’ attitudes towards sharing experience and knowledge (Schepers & Wetzels, 2007).”
BackgroundMuhaimin, Asrial, Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., & Hadisaputra, P. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04631 · Cited by 77
Cheng, X., Qiao, L., Yang, B., & Li, Z. (2024) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2022-0402 · Cited by 76
Mobile application user behavior in the developing countries: A survey in Iran
Hajiheydari, N., & Ashkani, M. (2018) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2018.05.004 · Cited by 73
Wang, S., Yu, H., Hu, X., & Li, J. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12998 · Cited by 71
Information technology acceptance in health information management
Abdekhoda, M., Dehnad, A., Hosseini, A. F., & Ahmadi, M. (2014) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me13-01-0079 · Cited by 60
Citizens as consumers: Profiling e-government services’ users in Egypt via data mining techniques
Mostafa, M. M., & El-Masry, A. A. (2013) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.03.007 · Cited by 60
Mobile Nursing Information System Utilization: The Task-Technology Fit Perspective
LIN, T.-C. (2014) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000039 · Cited by 32
Testing the performance of online recommendation agents: A meta-analysis
Blut, M., Ghiassaleh, A., & Wang, C. (2023) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2023.08.001 · Cited by 31
A Comprehensive Review of Research in IT Adoption
Liu, Z., Min, Q., & Ji, S. (2008) · 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/wicom.2008.2808 · Cited by 30
Aceptación del e-commerce en Colombia: un estudio para la ciudad de Medellín
Tavera Mesías, J. F., Sánchez Giraldo, J. C., & Ballesteros Díaz, B. (2011) · Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas · doi:10.18359/rfce.2245 · Cited by 29
Factors impacting end-users' usage of ERP in China
Zhang, S., Gao, P., & Ge, Z. (2013) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-11-2012-0099 · Cited by 28
Data Quality as a Critical Success Factor for User Acceptance of Research Information Systems
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2020) · Data · doi:10.3390/data5020035 · Cited by 16
In ChatGPT they trust: a study of students' perceptions and misuse of ChatGPT in higher education
Yeung, L. K. C., Chow, D. P. L., Wong, P. H., & Lau, S. S. S. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00855-w · Cited by 16
Mat Dangi, M. R., & Mohamed Saat, M. (2021) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i1/8288 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-103
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100795105
- Cited by
- 1,656
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.