Cited by 7,155Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease

Open access

Abstract

The pathophysiological process of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is thought to begin many years before the diagnosis of AD dementia. This long “preclinical” phase of AD would provide a critical opportunity for therapeutic intervention; however, we need to further elucidate the link between the pathological cascade of AD and the emergence of clinical symptoms. The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association convened an international workgroup to review the biomarker, epidemiological, and neuropsychological evidence, and to develop recommendations to determine the factors which best predict the risk of progression from “normal” cognition to mild cognitive impairment and AD dementia. We propose a conceptual framework and operational research criteria, based on the prevailing scientific evidence to date, to test and refine these models with longitudinal clinical research studies. These recommendations are solely intended for research purposes and do not have any clinical implications at this time. It is hoped that these recommendations will provide a common rubric to advance the study of preclinical AD, and ultimately, aid the field in moving toward earlier intervention at a stage of AD when some disease‐modifying therapies may be most efficacious.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. JABecker DRentz JSCarmasin THedden IHamdi RLBuckner et al.Amyloid deposition and brain volume across the continuum of aging and AD.Ann Neurol2011(in press)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,158

Metadata

Authors
Sperling, R. A., Aisen, P. S., Beckett, L. A., Bennett, D. A., Craft, S., Fagan, A. M., Iwatsubo, T., Jack, C. R., Kaye, J., Montine, T. J., Park, D. C., Reiman, E. M., Rowe, C. C., Siemers, E., Stern, Y., Yaffe, K., Carrillo, M. C., Thies, B., Morrison‐Bogorad, M., Wagster, M. V., & Phelps, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Alzheimer's Association Chicago IL USA
  • Alzheimer's Association (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Sperling, Reisa A.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-22
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
280-292
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2129497119
Cited by
7,155
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 375 · 2025: 467 · 2024: 485 · 2023: 445 · 2022: 534 · 2021: 575 · 2020: 550 · 2019: 533 · 2018: 513 · 2017: 471 · 2016: 468 · 2015: 461 · 2014: 417 · 2013: 418 · 2012: 302
FWCI
277.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging
  • Pfizer
  • Baxter International
  • Johnson and Johnson
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Bayer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, preclinical Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Humans, United States, Biomarkers, Practice Guidelines as Topic, National Institute on Aging (U.S.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review