Cited by 342Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Addiction, compulsive drug seeking, and the role of frontostriatal mechanisms in regulating inhibitory control

Feil, Jodie, Sheppard, Dianne, Fitzgerald, Paul B., Yücel, Murat, Lubman, Dan I., Bradshaw, John L.·2010·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

A principal feature of drug addiction is a reduced ability to regulate control over the desire to procure drugs regardless of the risks involved. Traditional models implicated the neural 'reward' system in providing a neurobiological model of addiction. Newer models however, have expanded on this circuitry to include two separate, but interconnecting systems, the limbic system in the incentive sensitization of drugs, and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in regulating inhibitory control over drug use. Until the recent developments in neuroimaging and brain stimulation techniques, it has been extremely difficult to assess the involvement of the PFC in addiction. In the current review, we explore the involvement of the frontostriatal circuitry in regulating inhibitory control, and suggest how dysregulation of these circuits could be involved in an increased difficulty in ceasing drug use. Following this, we investigate the recent neuropsychological, neuroimaging and brain stimulation studies that explore the presence of these inhibitory deficits, and frontostriatal dysfunctions, across various different substance groups. Further insight into these deficits could contribute to the development of treatment strategies which target these cognitive impairments, and frontostriatal dysfunction, in reducing drug-seeking behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.001

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feil, J., Sheppard, D., Fitzgerald, P. B., Yücel, M., Lubman, D. I., & Bradshaw, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
248-275
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030055333
Cited by
342
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
drug addiction, compulsive drug seeking, frontostriatal circuits, inhibitory control, prefrontal cortex, reward systems, incentive sensitization, limbic system, substance use disorders, brain stimulation, neuroimaging of addiction
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Compulsive Behavior, Corpus Striatum, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Illicit Drugs, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders, Drug-Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review