The DOI matches its Crossref record; 147 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 259 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice
Open accessAbstract
Shank family proteins (Shank1, Shank2, and Shank3) are synaptic scaffolding proteins that organize an extensive protein complex at the postsynaptic density (PSD) of excitatory glutamatergic synapses. Recent human genetic studies indicate that SHANK family genes (SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3) are causative genes for idiopathic autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Neurobiological studies of Shank mutations in mice support a general hypothesis of synaptic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of ASD. However, the molecular diversity of SHANK family gene products, as well as the heterogeneity in human and mouse phenotypes, pose challenges to modeling human SHANK mutations. Here, we review the molecular genetics of SHANK mutations in human ASD and discuss recent findings where such mutations have been modeled in mice. Conserved features of synaptic dysfunction and corresponding behaviors in Shank mouse mutants may help dissect the pathophysiology of ASD, but also highlight divergent phenotypes that arise from different mutations in the same gene.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
138 Not checked yet · 54 Own interpretation · 16 No basis given · 6 Own method · 2 Supported · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“SHANK2 exhibits transcriptional regulation similar to SHANK3 (Leblond et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Molecular Diversity of SHANK Gene Products
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Leblond et al., 2012 source
The Results section, “SHANK2 isoforms are differentially expressed in human tissues” (page unavailable), reports that inter-individual differences in SHANK2 mRNA levels have also been observed for SHANK3. It also describes comparable brain-specific splicing in the two genes, supporting the broad comparison in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, to date none of the various social and communication behaviors have been validated as robustly translatable from rodents to humans (Silverman et al., 2010).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Translation of Shank Mutant Mice to Human ASD
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Silverman et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Assays to be developed’ section says that modelling some human social and language symptoms in mice is challenging, and ‘Ultrasonic vocalizations’ says the relevance of mouse vocalizations to autism-related communication abnormalities is still being evaluated. These passages support caution about translation, but do not establish the blanket claim that no social or communication behaviour has been robustly validated as translatable from rodents to humans. (LLM, conf=0.80)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Interventions that improve cognitive performance, behaviors, or neuropathology in rodents have frequently not led to accelerated therapeutic development, most notably in Alzheimer’s disease where reports abound of cured mouse models despite repeated clinical failures (Cisse et al., 2011; Gandy and DeKosky, 2013; Malenka and Malinow, 2011; Vaillend et al., 2002).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Future Directions
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Cisse et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that increasing EphB2 expression improved learning and memory in Alzheimer-model mice, so this paper provides an example of a successful rodent intervention. It does not address whether such interventions frequently fail to accelerate therapeutic development or whether clinical treatments have repeatedly failed. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked yetcites Gandy and DeKosky, 2013
- Not checked yetcites Malenka and Malinow, 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Using the longest rat cDNA of Shank2 deposited in GenBank (NM_201350) as a reference, one can deduce that exons 6 and 7 in mouse Shank2a isoform correspond to exons 16 and 17 of predicted full length mouse Shank2 deduced from rat cDNA (NM_201350)”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites NM_201350
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The rat Shank2 cDNA reference accurately predicts the exon numbering of full-length mouse Shank2.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the molecular diversity of SHANK family gene products, as well as the heterogeneity in human and mouse phenotypes, pose challenges to modeling human SHANK mutations.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Remarkably little is known about the underlying pathophysiology or neurological basis of ASD (Amaral et al., 2008; Courchesne et al., 2007; Geschwind and Levitt, 2007; Rubenstein, 2010; Zoghbi, 2003).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Introduction
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Shank family proteins (Shank1, Shank2, and Shank3) are synaptic scaffolding proteins that organize an extensive protein complex at the postsynaptic density (PSD) of excitatory glutamatergic synapses.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Abstract
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent human genetic studies indicate that SHANK family genes (SHANK1, SHANK2, and SHANK3) are causative genes for idiopathic autism spectrum disorders (ASD).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Abstract
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neurobiological studies of Shank mutations in mice support a general hypothesis of synaptic dysfunction in the pathophysiology of ASD.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“SHANK/ProSAP family proteins (SHANK1, SHANK2, SHANK3) have emerged as promising candidates for modeling ASD in mice due to strong genetic evidence showing molecular defects of SHANK in patients with ASD (Berkel et al., 2010; Berkel et al., 2012; Durand et al., 2007; Gauthier et al., 2010; Marshall et al., 2008; Pinto et al., 2010; Sato et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Introduction
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- It may state two separate claims as one. 69
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Among the various Shank binding proteins, Homer family members have been shown to regulate diverse synaptic functions (Hayashi et al., 2009; Sala et al., 2001; Tu et al., 1999).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Hayashi et al., 2009 source
The Results section reports that Homer1b tetramerization affects dendritic spine structure and AMPA- and NMDA-receptor-mediated synaptic currents. The Discussion also describes Homer’s roles in intracellular calcium signalling and in positioning endocytic zones, supporting the broad claim that Homer family members regulate diverse synaptic functions. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked yetcites Sala et al., 2001 source
- Not checked yetcites Tu et al., 1999
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For example, mutation of the PDZ domain of Shank3 results in a reduction in dendritic spine formation while mutation of ANK-SH3 domains leads to spines with normal length but reduced spine head area.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Roussignol et al., 2005 source
In “Contribution of Shank3-specific domains to dendritic spine induction and maturation,” the authors report fewer spines with the construct lacking the PDZ domain than with the comparator retaining it, and explicitly conclude that the PDZ domain plays a role in spine formation. The same section reports that the ΔAnk-SH3 mutant produces spines of normal length but reduced head area relative to full-length Shank3. The PDZ finding comes from comparing deletion constructs, rather than an isolated PDZ-only mutation. (LLM, conf=0.89)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Conserved features of synaptic dysfunction and corresponding behaviors in Shank mouse mutants may help dissect the pathophysiology of ASD, but also highlight divergent phenotypes that arise from different mutations in the same gene.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Genetic risk contributes significantly to idiopathic ASD, but the specific genetic alterations remain elusive in the majority of cases (Abrahams and Geschwind, 2008; Folstein and Rosen-Sheidley, 2001; State, 2010b).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Abrahams and Geschwind, 2008 source
- Not checked yetcites Folstein and Rosen-Sheidley, 2001
- Not checked yetcites State, 2010b
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diagnostic evaluations for ASD were not conducted in the majority of cases or were carried out using different evaluation protocols.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these data strongly support a conclusion that molecular defects of SHANK3 can cause ASD but with variable presentations.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many missense mutations have been identified in SHANK3 (Gauthier et al., 2009; Moessner et al., 2007; Schaaf et al., 2011), but their clinical relevance has not been determined.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, genes implicated in metachromatic leukodystrophy (ARSA), congenital disorders of glycosylation (ALG12), and spinocerebellar ataxia type 10 (ATXN10) are mapped within the 22q13.3 region.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, the quality of clinical data varies and is often incomplete in these reports and thus direct comparisons should be made with caution.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“More recently, point mutations of SHANK2 and microdeletions of SHANK1 and SHANK2 have been found in patients with ASD and intellectual disability (Figures 1B and 1C) (Berkel et al., 2010; Leblond et al., 2012; O’Roak et al., 2012b; Pinto et al., 2010; Sato et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The key clinical features associated with PMS are global developmental delay, hypotonia, absent or severely delayed language, autistic behaviors, and intellectual disability (Phelan, 2007).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Phelan, 2007
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This observation is consistent with recent reports that similar copy number variants (CNVs) are found across many genomic loci in both ASD and schizophrenia (Cook and Scherer, 2008; Gejman et al., 2011; Moreno-De-Luca et al., 2010; Sanders et al., 2011).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Compared to SHANK3, the number of cases with SHANK2 mutations is small but convincing.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the number of ASD cases with two genetic hits including SHANK2 is small, the validity of the model remains to be tested in additional patient cohorts or by functional studies.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Mutations of SHANK3 were the first (Durand et al., 2007) and remain the best characterized SHANK mutations in human ASD (Boccuto et al., 2012; Moessner et al., 2007).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Introduction
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“When overexpressed in cultured neurons from mice, Shanks recruit GluA1 AMPA receptors and increases the formation of new synapses (Roussignol et al., 2005).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roussignol et al., 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Shank3 forms multimers via its C terminal SAM domain (Boeckers et al., 2005; Hayashi et al., 2009; Naisbitt et al., 1999) as well as its PDZ domain (Iskenderian-Epps and Imperiali, 2010).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In cultured rat neurons, knock-down of Shank3 selectively reduces synaptic mGluR5 receptor and impairs mGluR5-dependent signaling and plasticity (Verpelli et al., 2011).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Verpelli et al., 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Shank/ProSAP family members including Shank3 have five conserved protein domains – an ankyrin repeat domain (ANK), Src homology 3 (SH3) domain, PSD-95/Discs large/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain, a proline-rich region containing homer- and cortactin-binding sites, and a sterile alpha motif (SAM) domain (Figure 2A).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The SAM domain of Shank3 has a Zn2+ binding site that is important for Shank3 protein folding at the PSD as well as for synaptogenesis and synapse maturation in vitro (Baron et al., 2006; Grabrucker et al., 2011a).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baron et al., 2006 source
- Not checked yetcites Grabrucker et al., 2011a
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Different SHANK mutations may thus act through different mechanisms to alter protein-protein interactions at the PSD and cause synaptic dysfunction that may underlie clinical presentations of disorder.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Shank3 shares very similar protein domain structure to Shank1, suggesting that Shank3 participates in a similar protein network with Homer1.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, mutation in the cortactin binding site results in longer spines with reduced spine head area (Roussignol et al., 2005).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roussignol et al., 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“although excessive mGluR5 signaling has been implicated in fragile X syndrome (Krueger and Bear, 2011), which has clinical overlap with 22q13.3 deletions (Phelan, 2008).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Krueger and Bear, 2011
- Not checked yetcites Phelan, 2008 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Shank3 shares a similar protein domain structure but has a different expression pattern and subcellular localization than Shank1 and Shank2 (Bockers et al., 2004; Peca et al., 2011; Tao-Cheng et al., 2010).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The large protein complex organized by Shanks performs a variety of functions at the postsynaptic membrane including actin-based cytoskeletal remodeling, synapse formation, AMPA receptor endocytosis, and regulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity (Table 2).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Biochemically, Shank family proteins are ubiquitinated in an activity-dependent manner in neurons (Ehlers, 2003).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ehlers, 2003 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The expression of Shank3 isoforms is cell type-specific and developmentally regulated (Lim et al., 1999; Maunakea et al., 2010).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Molecular Diversity of SHANK Gene Products
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Consistent with this notion, many known ASD genes, such as neuroligins and neurexins, display a complex pattern of isoform-specific expression in brain (Boucard et al., 2005; Sudhof, 2008), with different isoforms having very distinct functions (Chih et al., 2006).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Molecular Diversity of SHANK Gene Products
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Homer1 and Shank1 form a mesh-like matrix that is thought to function as an organizing lattice for PSD proteins (Hayashi et al., 2009).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > SHANK Encodes a Multidomain Scaffolding Protein Present at Glutamatergic Synapses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hayashi et al., 2009 source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The intron 19 splicing mutation will disrupt most isoforms but leave SHANK3f and other short isoforms intact.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Molecular Diversity of SHANK Gene Products
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The alternative splicing of exons 19-20 and isoforms of SHANK2E (Jiang, unpublished data), SHANK2A, and SHANK2B (Lim et al., 1999) were conserved in mice but the status of SHANK2C and other spliced exons has not been confirmed.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Molecular Diversity of SHANK Gene Products
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lim et al., 1999 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Smaller dendritic spines were observed, but the ultrastructure of the PSD is unaffected at CA1 synapses of Shank1−/− mice.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hung et al., 2008 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The deletion of exon 7 and exon 6-7 of Shank2a (exons 17 and exons 16-17 of predicted full length Shank2) resulted in a frame shift of the open reading frame immediately after exon 7.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“mEPSCs recorded from CA1 hippocampal neurons were unaltered in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice, but reduced in Shank2 Δex7−/−.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analyses of protein composition, synaptic development and function, and behaviors have revealed similarity but also significant differences between these two lines of Shank2 mutant mice”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Spatial learning and memory was impaired in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− but normal in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the ratio of NMDA/AMPA currents was reduced at CA1 synapses in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice but increased at the same synapses of Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the transcript structure has not been fully worked out, the possibility that this is not a complete Shank1 knockout cannot be ruled out.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In Shank2 Δex7−/− mice, GluN1 and GluN2B NMDA-type glutamate receptors in hippocampus and GluN1, GluN2A, and GluA1 in striatum are increased (Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“NMDA receptor-dependent LTP in hippocampal CA1 synapses was increased and LTD was unaffected in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Whereas baseline synaptic transmission was reduced in Shank2 Δex7−/− mice (Schmeisser et al., 2012), normal synaptic transmission was observed in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice (Won et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To add further complexity, SHANK3 has five CpG islands across the gene and these CpG islands display brain-specific and cell type-specific DNA methylation (Figure 1A) (Beri et al., 2007; Ching et al., 2005; Maunakea et al., 2010).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Molecular Diversity of SHANK Gene Products
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Basal synaptic transmission was reduced but long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) in CA1 hippocampus were unaffected (Hung et al., 2008).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hung et al., 2008 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, a recent report indicates that SHANK2E is also expressed in brain tissues in humans (Leblond et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Molecular Diversity of SHANK Gene Products
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leblond et al., 2012 source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Interestingly, treatment with D-cycloserine, a NMDA receptor agonist, restored the NMDA/AMPA ratio and improved social interaction in the three-chamber social interaction assay in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice (Won et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Won et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Behaviorally, hyperactivity, impaired social interaction, altered ultrasonic vocalizations, and increased self-grooming were observed in both Shank2 Δex6-7−/− and Shank2 Δex7−/− mice.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Behavioral analyses revealed subtle impairments in social interaction and communication as well as increased repetitive behaviors (Silverman et al., 2011; Wohr et al., 2011).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast, both NMDA receptor-dependent LTP and LTD at CA1 synapses were reduced in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Won et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Shank1 mutant mice with a deletion of exons 14-15 encoding the PDZ domain were first reported in 2007 (Hung et al., 2008) (Figure 3C) and more extensive behavioral analyses were conducted subsequently (Silverman et al., 2011; Wohr et al., 2011).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, treatment with CDPPB, an mGluR5-selective positive allosteric modulator, not only rescued the reduced NMDA/AMPA ratio but also recovered the defective LTP and LTD in hippocampus as well as biochemical changes in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice.”
- Also stated in: § Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice · plain
“CDPPB also reversed the impaired social interaction impairment in Shank2 Δex6-7−/− mice without affecting other behavioral impairments in these mice (Won et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Won et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Also stated in: § Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the data obtained from these studies support a general conclusion that synaptic function is impaired and social behaviors are abnormal in mice with Shank3 mutations.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“but they were unchanged in the stratum of Δex11−/− mice (Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synaptic Proteins in Shank3-Deficient Mouse Brain
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mRNAs with joining of exons 2-10 and exons 3-10 were stable and were predicted to result in a frame shift in protein sequence shortly after exon 10.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Δex11 mutation (Schmeisser et al., 2012) is predicted to disrupt promoters 1 to 3 for Shank3a-c but not promoters 4 to 6 for Shank3d-f”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schmeisser et al., 2012 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such variation may be due to isoform-specific effects of different mutations.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synaptic Proteins in Shank3-Deficient Mouse Brain
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Different brain regions including hippocampus, striatum, and neocortex were analyzed in different lines of mutant mice.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because all these deletions cause a frame shift for targeted transcripts, they all resulted in either a truncated Shank3 protein or possible disruption of full length RNA or protein isoforms due to the stability of encoded mRNA or protein.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“but not in the hippocampal CA1 synapses in ex4-9J−/− mice (Wang et al., 2011) or Δex11−/− mice (Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synaptic Structure in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“spine density was decreased in the striatum and CA1 hippocampus of Δex13-16−/− and Δex4-9J−/− mice, respectively.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synaptic Structure in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The methods and techniques used in these analyses were similar but not identical.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The mutations in these mice include deletions of exons 4-9 by two groups with slightly different design [(Δex4-9Buxbaum(B)) (Bozdagi et al., 2010) and Δex4-9Jiang (J) (Wang et al., 2011)], deletion of exons 4-7(Δex4-7) (Peca et al., 2011) encoding the ANK repeat domain, deletion of exon 11(Δex11) encoding the SH3 domain (Schmeisser et al., 2012), and deletion of exons 13-16 (Δex13-16) encoding the”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, mutation of Shank3 leads to loss of spines, a reduction in spine volume, and decreased PSD thickness in the adult.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synaptic Structure in Shank3 Mutant Mice
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“synaptic transmission is reduced at hippocampal CA1 synapses of Δex4-9B+/− (Bozdagi et al., 2010) and Δex4-9B−/− (Yang et al., 2012), but not in Δex4-9J−/− (Wang et al., 2011) or Δex13-16−/− mice (Peca et al., 2011)”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synapse Function and Plasticity in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Short-term and long-term memory in a social transmission test were impaired in Δex4-9J−/− mice (Wang et al., 2011).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Behavioral Phenotypes in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wang et al., 2011 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In human patients, ASD is a behavioral diagnosis with considerable clinical heterogeneity.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Translation of Shank Mutant Mice to Human ASD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression (LTD) induced by low frequency stimulus and mGluR-dependent LTD induced by PP-LFS were not affected in CA1 hippocampus of ex4-9B mice”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synapse Function and Plasticity in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In striatum, the frequency of mEPSCs and amplitude of population spikes were significantly decreased in Δex13-16−/− mice, but only mildly affected in Δex4-7−/− mice (Peca et al., 2011).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synapse Function and Plasticity in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peca et al., 2011 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A naturally occurring Disc1 (Disrupted in schizophrenia) mutation in the 129 strain of ES cells (Clapcote et al., 2007; Clapcote and Roder, 2006) was segregated from the Δex4-9J−/− deletion (Wang et al., 2011) but was not reported in other Shank3 mutant mice using mouse 129 ES cells (Peca et al., 2011; Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Behavioral Phenotypes in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, mouse genetic background, animal age, and specific protocols used for the studies may contribute to the variability.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synapse Function and Plasticity in Shank3 Mutant Mice
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“perhaps due to differential spatial and temporal expression of other Shank family members or to compositional variation across different populations of glutamatergic synapses.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synaptic Structure in Shank3 Mutant Mice
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, synapse structure phenotypes vary with specific Shank3 mutations, are different in different brain regions, and display developmental heterogeneity”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Synaptic Structure in Shank3 Mutant Mice
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Impaired performance in the Morris water maze task was seen in Δex4-9J−/− mice (Wang et al., 2011) but not in Δex13-16−/− (Peca et al., 2011) and Δex4-9B−/− animals (Yang et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Behavioral Phenotypes in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, analysis of heterozygotes versus homozygotes, different measurements in different brain regions, as well as different genetic backgrounds could all contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Behavioral Phenotypes in Shank3 Mutant Mice
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Mutations in the SH3 and PDZ domains are missense mutations in humans (Boccuto et al., 2012; Waga et al., 2011), but mouse mutation of Δex11 and Δex13-16 are exon deletion and frame shift mutations (Peca et al., 2011; Schmeisser et al., 2012).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Behavioral Phenotypes in Shank3 Mutant Mice
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the consistent intellectual disability reported in patients with multiple types of SHANK3 mutations, Shank3 mutant mice differed significantly in performance of learning and memory tasks.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Behavioral Phenotypes in Shank3 Mutant Mice
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several competing hypotheses have been proposed to account for core deficits and ancillary symptomatic domains in ASD, but none have been widely accepted (Belmonte et al., 2004; Courchesne et al., 2007; Geschwind and Levitt, 2007; Rubenstein, 2010; Zoghbi, 2003).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Translation of Shank Mutant Mice to Human ASD
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the triad of impaired social interaction, communication, and stereotypical behaviors is recognized as core to ASD, the clinical presentation of these impairments is highly varied in humans.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Translation of Shank Mutant Mice to Human ASD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Remarkably little is known about the neurological basis of ASD, and many brain regions and circuits have been implicated in ASD (Amaral et al., 2008; Anagnostou and Taylor, 2011; Bauman and Kemper, 2005; Courchesne et al., 2007).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Translation of Shank Mutant Mice to Human ASD
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Functional studies are thus a critical component to determine the pathogenicity of specific genetic variants.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Future Directions
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because of the rarity of sequence variants across the population, it has been challenge to establish a causal role for specific variants in human disease.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Future Directions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specific mutations are likely to produce specific phenotypes in patients and hence must be modeled accordingly in mice for the mutant mice to have full translational potential.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Future Directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In mouse behavioral studies, testing paradigms for learning and memory have been widely accepted (Crawley, 2008; Crawley and Paylor, 1997; Morris, 1981).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Translation of Shank Mutant Mice to Human ASD
What the sources say
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ultimately, the value of Shank mutant mice will depend critically on the ability to use human patients to validate their predictive utility.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Future Directions
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lesson learned from modeling SHANK mutations in mice will almost certainly be valuable to modeling other ASD candidate genes in the future.”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Future Directions
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Animal models can bridge human ASD genetics to circuit-based deficits and to therapeutic strategies.
“The development of animal models is an important step in bridging the human genetics of ASD to circuit-based deficits underlying the clinical presentation, and ultimately to discovering, designing, and deploying effective therapeutic strategies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The rat Shank2 cDNA reference accurately predicts the exon numbering of full-length mouse Shank2.
“Using the longest rat cDNA of Shank2 deposited in GenBank (NM_201350) as a reference, one can deduce that exons 6 and 7 in mouse Shank2a isoform correspond to exons 16 and 17 of predicted full length mouse Shank2 deduced from rat cDNA (NM_201350)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Exons 6-7 of Shank2 encode the PDZ domain.
“Exons 6-7 encode the PDZ domain of Shank2.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Shank proteins regulate the abundance and signaling of ionotropic glutamate receptors at excitatory synapses.
“Shank proteins regulate the abundance and signaling of ionotropic glutamate receptors at excitatory synapses.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Translocation and breakpoint mutations in SHANK3 have been consistently implicated in developmental delays and ASD [ 160 ].”
From DNA methylation: a mechanism linking environmental chemical exposures to risk of autism spectrum disorders? (2016) · cites this paper as [160]
In the citing paper
“The two models display behavioral phenotypes with relevance to all core symptoms of ASD in humans [38–40]”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
“three cases with very similar mutations (p.A1227fs, p.E1311fs, and p.R1117X) in exon 21”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Genetic Linkage of SHANK Genes to Autism Spectrum Disorders
“Mutations p.A1227fs and p.E1331fs were found in patients with ASD or PDD-NOS, severe language delay, and significant intellectual disability”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Introduction
“Shank1 mutant mice were first reported in 2008 (Hung et al., 2008).”
§ Modeling Autism by SHANK Gene Mutations in Mice > Modeling SHANKs Mutations in Mice
“Shank1 mutant mice with a deletion of exons 14-15 encoding the PDZ domain were first reported in 2007 (Hung et al., 2008)”
Citations
Cites
Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02172145 · Cited by 9,065
(1943) · The Nervous child · Cited by 8,870
Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., Pickles, A., & Rutter, M. (2000) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1005592401947 · Cited by 7,520
Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues
Morris, R. G. M. (1981) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/0023-9690(81)90020-5 · Cited by 2,699
Autistic disturbances of affective contact.
Kanner, L. (1968) · PubMed · Cited by 2,282
McDonald-McGinn, D. M., Sullivan, K. E., Marino, B., Philip, N., Swillen, A., Vorstman, J. A. S., Zackai, E. H., Emanuel, B. S., Vermeesch, J. R., Morrow, B. E., et al. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.71 · Cited by 2,236
Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations
O’Roak, B. J., Vives, L., Girirajan, S., Karakoc, E., Krumm, N., Coe, B. P., Levy, R., Ko, A., Lee, C., Smith, J. D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10989 · Cited by 2,165
Die „Autistischen Psychopathen” im Kindesalter
Asperger, H. (1944) · Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten · doi:10.1007/bf01837709 · Cited by 2,163
De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism
Sanders, S. J., Murtha, M. T., Gupta, A. R., Murdoch, J. D., Raubeson, M. J., Willsey, A. J., Ercan-Sencicek, A. G., DiLullo, N. M., Parikshak, N. N., Stein, J. L., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10945 · Cited by 2,084
Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders
Pinto, D., Pagnamenta, A. T., Klei, L., Anney, R., Merico, D., Regan, R., Conroy, J., Magalhaes, T. R., Correia, C., Abrahams, B. S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09146 · Cited by 2,013 · cited 2×
“SHANK/ProSAP family proteins (SHANK1, SHANK2, SHANK3) have emerged as promising candidates for modeling ASD in mice due to strong genetic evidence showing molecular defects of SHANK in patients with ASD (Berkel et al., 2010, 2012; Durand et al., 2007; Gauthier et al., 2010; Marshall et al., 2008; Pinto et al., 2010; S…”
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Phelan, K. (2007). 22q13.3 Deletion Syndrome. In GeneReviews. R.A. Pagon, T.C. Bird, C.R. Dolan, and K.S., eds. (Seattle, WA: University of Seattle) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/GeneTests/review?db=genetests.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Excitatory/Inhibitory Balance and Circuit Homeostasis in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Nelson, S. B., & Valakh, V. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.033 · Cited by 1,001
Hippocampal GABAergic Inhibitory Interneurons
Pelkey, K. A., Chittajallu, R., Craig, M. T., Tricoire, L., Wester, J. C., & McBain, C. J. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00007.2017 · Cited by 889
Sgritta, M., Dooling, S. W., Buffington, S. A., Momin, E. N., Francis, M. B., Britton, R. A., & Costa-Mattioli, M. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.018 · Cited by 865
SHANK proteins: roles at the synapse and in autism spectrum disorder
Monteiro, P., & Feng, G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.183 · Cited by 681
Leblond, C. S., Nava, C., Polge, A., Gauthier, J., Huguet, G., Lumbroso, S., Giuliano, F., Stordeur, C., Depienne, C., Mouzat, K., et al. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004580 · Cited by 630
“Mice lacking any of the SHANK proteins display phenotypes relevant to ASD [23].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Y.-H., & Ehlers, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-27
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3659167
- OpenAlex
- W2014756302
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 149
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Autism Speaks
- Pfizer
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH098114)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5K12-HD0043494-08, K12HD043494)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, Shank1, Shank2, SHANK3, synaptic scaffolding proteins, postsynaptic density, glutamatergic synapses, synaptic dysfunction, mouse models of autism, genetic mutations, phenotypic heterogeneity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autistic Disorder, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Mice, Post-Synaptic Density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review