Cited by 123Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorSocial and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Giving peace a chance: oxytocin increases empathy to pain in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G., Abu-Akel, Ahmad, Palgi, Sharon, Sulieman, Ramzi, Fischer-Shofty, Meytal, Levkovitz, Yechiel, Decety, Jean·2013·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Studies have argued that empathy to the pain of out-group members is largely diminished by "in-group empathy bias". Investigating the mechanism underlying the emotional reactions of Jewish Israeli participants toward the pain experienced by Palestinians in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict affords a natural experiment that allows us to examine the role of neurohormones in emotion sensitivity across conflicting social groups. In a double-blind placebo-controlled within-subject crossover design, Israeli Jewish participants were asked to report their empathy to the pain of in-group (Jewish), neutral out-group (European), and adversary out-group (Palestinian) members. Oxytocin remarkably increased empathy to the pain of Palestinians, attenuating the effect of in-group empathy bias observed under the placebo condition. This effect, we argue, is driven by the general role of oxytocin in increasing the salience of social agents which, in turn, may interfere with processes pertaining to derogation of out-group members during intractable conflicts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.015

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies found oxytocin had no main effect on pain ratings but increased ratings depending on perspective or nationality.

    “two studies using subjective ratings of responses to painful stimuli found that OXT did not have a main effect on pain ratings, but did increase ratings as a function of the perspective (self vs. other) participants were asked to take, or the nationality of the person with whom to empathize (Abu-Akel, Palgi, Klein, Decety & Shamay-Tsoory 2015;Shamay-Tsoory et al., 2013).”
  • In some studies oxytocin only increases positive perceptions or social motivations toward others, and in other studies it also amplifies pre-existing social motivations or perceptions, whether positive or negative.

    “Finally, in some studies oxytocin only increases positive perceptions or social motivations toward others (Chang et al., 2012; Shamay-Tsoory et al., 2013) and in other studies it also amplifies pre-existing social motivations or perceptions, whether positive or negative (De Dreu, 2012).”
  • For Israeli Jewish subjects, inhaled oxytocin increased empathy toward potential out-group (Palestinian Arab) members but not to potential in-group members where empathy levels were already high.

    “Furthermore, using an in-group vs. out-group paradigm, Shamay-Tsoory et al. (2013) showed that for Israeli Jewish subjects, inhaled oxytocin increased empathy toward potential out-group (Palestinian Arab) members but not to potential in-group members where empathy levels were already high.”
  • Under some circumstances, administered oxytocin may alter the valence of out-group perception from negative to more positive.

    “A notable exception comes from Shamay-Tsoory et al. (2013) showing that under some circumstances administered oxytocin may alter the valence of out-group perception from negative to more positive.”
  • IN-OT can enhance empathy in Israeli Jewish participants toward the pain of Palestinians, reducing the effect of in-group empathy bias observed in the placebo.

    “IN-OT can also enhance empathy in Israeli Jewish participants toward the pain of Palestinians, reducing the effect of in-group empathy bias observed in the placebo (Shamay-Tsoory et al. 2013).”

    From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Shamay-Tsoory et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Abu-Akel, A., Palgi, S., Sulieman, R., Fischer-Shofty, M., Levkovitz, Y., & Decety, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Shalvata Mental Health Center (IL)
Corresponding author
Abu-Akel, Ahmad
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
38
Issue
12
Pages
3139-3144
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101165690
Cited by
123
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10
FWCI
15.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Binational Science Foundation (BSF)
  • John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
oxytocin, outgroup derogation, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, intergroup conflict, neurohormones, social salience
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Double-Blind Method, Empathy, Female, Humans, Israel, Jews, Male, Middle Aged, Oxytocin, Pain, Pain Measurement, Sex Characteristics, Violence, Warfare, Cross-Over Studies, Arabs, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review