Cited by 356Ultrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesMicrobial Inactivation Methods

Clean recovery of antioxidant compounds from plant foods, by-products and algae assisted by ultrasounds processing. Modeling approaches to optimize processing conditions

Roselló-Soto, Elena, Galanakis, Charis M., Brnčić, Mladen, Orlien, Vibeke, Trujillo, Francisco J., Mawson, Raymond, Knoerzer, Kai, Tiwari, Brijesh K. +1 more·2015·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Ultrasound treatment is an alternative affordable, effective and reproducible method for the improved recovery of bioactive compounds from various processing streams. The objective of this review is to discuss the impact of ultrasound-assisted extraction on the recovery of polyphenols, carotenoids and chlorophylls from vegetal and algae matters. Optimization strategies will need to focus on appropriate equipment design and configuration of ultrasonic components, and extrinsic and intrinsic control parameters including ultrasonic power, temperature and extraction time to maximize the yield and biological activity of the extract. Modeling strategies to characterize and optimize ultrasound processes are also be highlighted in the manuscript.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.01.002

Cites

138 of 138 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 139 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roselló-Soto, E., Galanakis, C. M., Brnčić, M., Orlien, V., Trujillo, F. J., Mawson, R., Knoerzer, K., Tiwari, B. K., & Barba, F. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Zagreb (HR)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Barba, Francisco J.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
134-149
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054942951
Cited by
356
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 20 · 2013: 1
FWCI
19.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
ultrasound-assisted extraction, antioxidants, polyphenols, carotenoids, chlorophyll, plant by-products, algae, extraction optimization, process modeling, ultrasonic power, extraction time, temperature effects, bioactive compound recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review