Cited by 468Infant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Nursing our microbiota: molecular linkages between bifidobacteria and milk oligosaccharides

Open access
Sela, David A., Mills, David A.·2010·Trends in Microbiology

Abstract

As the sole nutrition provided to infants, bioactive molecules dissolved in milk influence the development of our gut microbiota. Accordingly, human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) are minimally digested by the infant and persist to negatively and positively regulate gut microbiota. Infant-type bifidobacteria utilize these soluble carbohydrate oligomers by convergent mechanisms. Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis efficiently consumes several small mass HMOs and possesses a large gene cluster and other loci dedicated to HMO metabolism. In contrast, adult-associated bifidobacteria such as the closely related B. longum subsp. longum are deficient for HMO utilization, although they retain the capacity to ferment plant oligosaccharides and constituent pentose sugars. Thus, the ability to subsist on HMO could demark infant-associated ecotypes potentially adapted to colonize the nursing infant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tim.2010.03.008

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 82 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sela, D. A., & Mills, D. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Mills, David A.
Venue
Trends in Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
298-307
ISSN
0966-842X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998628730
Cited by
468
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008799, T32GM08799)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD061923, R01HD059127)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
human milk oligosaccharides, Bifidobacterium, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum, infant gut microbiota, infant nutrition, pentoses
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Milk, Human, Oligosaccharides, Gastrointestinal Tract, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review